1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
  2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression

Hfq CLASH uncovers sRNA-target interaction networks linked to nutrient availability adaptation

  1. Ira Alexandra Iosub
  2. Rob Willem van Nues
  3. Stuart William McKellar
  4. Karen Jule Nieken
  5. Marta Marchioretto
  6. Brandon Sy
  7. Jai J Tree
  8. Gabriella Viero
  9. Sander Granneman  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  2. CNR, Italy
  3. University of New South Wales, Australia
  4. CNR Unit, Italy
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54655
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Ira Alexandra Iosub
  2. Rob Willem van Nues
  3. Stuart William McKellar
  4. Karen Jule Nieken
  5. Marta Marchioretto
  6. Brandon Sy
  7. Jai J Tree
  8. Gabriella Viero
  9. Sander Granneman
(2020)
Hfq CLASH uncovers sRNA-target interaction networks linked to nutrient availability adaptation
eLife 9:e54655.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54655
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

Abstract

By shaping gene expression profiles, small RNAs (sRNAs) enable bacteria to efficiently adapt to changes in their environment. To better understand how Escherichia coli acclimatizes to nutrient availability, we performed UV cross-linking, ligation and sequencing of hybrids (CLASH) to uncover Hfq-associated RNA-RNA interactions at specific growth stages. We demonstrate that Hfq CLASH robustly captures bona fide RNA-RNA interactions identified hundreds of novel sRNA base-pairing interactions, including many sRNA-sRNA interactions and involving 3'UTR-derived sRNAs. We rediscovered known and identified novel sRNA seed sequences. The sRNA-mRNA interactions identified by CLASH have strong base-pairing potential and are highly enriched for complementary sequence motifs, even those supported by only a few reads. Yet, steady state levels of most mRNA targets were not significantly affected upon over-expression of the sRNA regulator. Our results reinforce the idea that the reproducibility of the interaction, not base-pairing potential, is a stronger predictor for a regulatory outcome.

Data availability

The next generation sequencing data have been deposited on the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) with accession number GSE123050. The python pyCRAC (Webb et al., 2014), kinetic-CRAC and GenomeBrowser software packages used for analysing the data are available from https://bitbucket.org/sgrann (pyCRAC up to version 1.4.3), https://git.ecdf.ed.ac.uk/sgrannem/ and pypi (https://pypi.org/user/g_ronimo/). The hyb pipeline for identifying chimeric reads is available from https://github.com/gkudla/hyb. The scripts for statistical analysis of hyb data is available from https://bitbucket.org/jaitree/hyb_stats/. The FLASH algorithm for merging paired reads is available from https://github.com/dstreett/FLASH2. Bedgraph and Gene Transfer Format (GTF) generated from the analysis of the Hfq CLASH, RNA-seq and TEX RNA-seq data (Thomason et al., 2015) are available from the Granneman lab DataShare repository (https://datashare.is.ed.ac.uk/handle/10283/2915).

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ira Alexandra Iosub

    SynthSys, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2924-2471

  2. Rob Willem van Nues

    ICB, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  3. Stuart William McKellar

    IQB3, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0792-9878

  4. Karen Jule Nieken

    Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  5. Marta Marchioretto

    Institute of Biophysics, CNR, Trento, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  6. Brandon Sy

    School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  7. Jai J Tree

    School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  8. Gabriella Viero

    Institute of Biophysics, CNR Unit, Trento, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6755-285X

  9. Sander Granneman

    SynthSys, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    sgrannem@ed.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4387-1271

Funding

Wellcome (102334)

  • Ira Alexandra Iosub

Wellcome (091549)

  • Sander Granneman

Medical Research Council (MR/R008205/1)

  • Sander Granneman

Australian National Health (GNT1067241)

  • Jai J Tree

Australian Medical Research Council (GNT1139313)

  • Jai J Tree

Axonomix (N/A)

  • Gabriella Viero

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2020, Iosub et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,512
    views
  • 437
    downloads
  • 81
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ira Alexandra Iosub
  2. Rob Willem van Nues
  3. Stuart William McKellar
  4. Karen Jule Nieken
  5. Marta Marchioretto
  6. Brandon Sy
  7. Jai J Tree
  8. Gabriella Viero
  9. Sander Granneman
(2020)
Hfq CLASH uncovers sRNA-target interaction networks linked to nutrient availability adaptation
eLife 9:e54655.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54655

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54655

Categories and tags

Research organism

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology

    The membrane domains of mammalian adenylyl cyclases are lipid receptors

    Marius Landau, Sherif Elsabbagh ... Joachim E Schultz
    Research Article

    The biosynthesis of cyclic 3′,5′-adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) by mammalian membrane-bound adenylyl cyclases (mACs) is predominantly regulated by G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Up to now the two hexahelical transmembrane domains of mACs were considered to fix the enzyme to membranes. Here, we show that the transmembrane domains serve in addition as signal receptors and transmitters of lipid signals that control Gsα-stimulated mAC activities. We identify aliphatic fatty acids and anandamide as receptor ligands of mAC isoforms 1–7 and 9. The ligands enhance (mAC isoforms 2, 3, 7, and 9) or attenuate (isoforms 1, 4, 5, and 6) Gsα-stimulated mAC activities in vitro and in vivo. Substitution of the stimulatory membrane receptor of mAC3 by the inhibitory receptor of mAC5 results in a ligand inhibited mAC5–mAC3 chimera. Thus, we discovered a new class of membrane receptors in which two signaling modalities are at a crossing, direct tonic lipid and indirect phasic GPCR–Gsα signaling regulating the biosynthesis of cAMP.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology

    Disordered proteins interact with the chemical environment to tune their protective function during drying

    Shraddha KC, Kenny H Nguyen ... Thomas C Boothby
    Research Article

    The conformational ensemble and function of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are sensitive to their solution environment. The inherent malleability of disordered proteins, combined with the exposure of their residues, accounts for this sensitivity. One context in which IDPs play important roles that are concomitant with massive changes to the intracellular environment is during desiccation (extreme drying). The ability of organisms to survive desiccation has long been linked to the accumulation of high levels of cosolutes such as trehalose or sucrose as well as the enrichment of IDPs, such as late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins or cytoplasmic abundant heat-soluble (CAHS) proteins. Despite knowing that IDPs play important roles and are co-enriched alongside endogenous, species-specific cosolutes during desiccation, little is known mechanistically about how IDP-cosolute interactions influence desiccation tolerance. Here, we test the notion that the protective function of desiccation-related IDPs is enhanced through conformational changes induced by endogenous cosolutes. We find that desiccation-related IDPs derived from four different organisms spanning two LEA protein families and the CAHS protein family synergize best with endogenous cosolutes during drying to promote desiccation protection. Yet the structural parameters of protective IDPs do not correlate with synergy for either CAHS or LEA proteins. We further demonstrate that for CAHS, but not LEA proteins, synergy is related to self-assembly and the formation of a gel. Our results suggest that functional synergy between IDPs and endogenous cosolutes is a convergent desiccation protection strategy seen among different IDP families and organisms, yet the mechanisms underlying this synergy differ between IDP families.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics

    Isobaric crosslinking mass spectrometry technology for studying conformational and structural changes in proteins and complexes

    Jie Luo, Jeff Ranish
    Tools and Resources

    Dynamic conformational and structural changes in proteins and protein complexes play a central and ubiquitous role in the regulation of protein function, yet it is very challenging to study these changes, especially for large protein complexes, under physiological conditions. Here, we introduce a novel isobaric crosslinker, Qlinker, for studying conformational and structural changes in proteins and protein complexes using quantitative crosslinking mass spectrometry. Qlinkers are small and simple, amine-reactive molecules with an optimal extended distance of ~10 Å, which use MS2 reporter ions for relative quantification of Qlinker-modified peptides derived from different samples. We synthesized the 2-plex Q2linker and showed that the Q2linker can provide quantitative crosslinking data that pinpoints key conformational and structural changes in biosensors, binary and ternary complexes composed of the general transcription factors TBP, TFIIA, and TFIIB, and RNA polymerase II complexes.