Genetic analysis of the Arabidopsis TIR1/AFB auxin receptors reveals both overlapping and specialized functions

  1. Michael J Prigge
  2. Matthieu Platre
  3. Nikita Kadakia
  4. Yi Zhang
  5. Kathleen Greenham
  6. Whitnie Szutu
  7. Bipin Kumar Pandey
  8. Rahul Arvind Bhosale
  9. Malcolm J Bennett
  10. Wolfgang Busch
  11. Mark Estelle  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of California, San Diego, United States
  2. Salk Institute for Biological Sciences, United States
  3. University of Nottingham, United Kingdom
  4. Salk Institute for Biological Studies, United States

Abstract

The TIR1/AFB auxin co-receptors mediate diverse responses to the plant hormone auxin. The Arabidopsis genome encodes six TIR1/AFB proteins representing three of the four clades that were established prior to angiosperm radiation. To determine the role of these proteins in plant development we performed an extensive genetic analysis involving the generation and characterization of all possible multiply-mutant lines. We find that loss of all six TIR1/AFB proteins results in early embryo defects and eventually seed abortion, and yet a single wild-type allele of TIR1 or AFB2 is sufficient to support growth throughout development. Our analysis reveals extensive functional overlap between even the most distantly related TIR1/AFB genes except for AFB1. Surprisingly, AFB1 has a specialized function in rapid auxin-dependent inhibition of root growth and early phase of root gravitropism. This activity may be related to a difference in subcellular localization compared to the other members of the family.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for Figure 1-figure supplement 2B, Figure 1-figure supplement 4, Figure 1-figure supplement 5. Figure 5-figure supplement 1, Figure 6, Figure 6-figure supplement 2 , Figure 7, Figure 7-figure supplement 1

The following previously published data sets were used
    1. Eric J Carpenter et al
    (2019) One 1000 plant transciptomics
    https://datacommons.cyverse.org/browse/iplant/home/shared/commons_repo/curated/oneKP_capstone_2019.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Michael J Prigge

    Section of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0671-2538
  2. Matthieu Platre

    Plant Molecular and Cellular Biology Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Sciences, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Nikita Kadakia

    Section of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Yi Zhang

    Section of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Kathleen Greenham

    Section of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7681-5263
  6. Whitnie Szutu

    Section of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Bipin Kumar Pandey

    School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Loughborough, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9614-1347
  8. Rahul Arvind Bhosale

    School of Biosciences, Plant Sciences, University of Nottingham, Loughborough, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6515-4922
  9. Malcolm J Bennett

    Plant Sciences Division, University of Nottingham, Loughborough, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Wolfgang Busch

    Plant Molecular and Cellular Biology Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Mark Estelle

    Section of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, United States
    For correspondence
    mestelle@ucsd.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2613-8652

Funding

National Institutes of Health (GM43644)

  • Mark Estelle

Human Frontier Science Program (LT000340/2019-L)

  • Matthieu Platre

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (research fellowship)

  • Rahul Arvind Bhosale

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2020, Prigge et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 8,928
    views
  • 1,194
    downloads
  • 118
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Michael J Prigge
  2. Matthieu Platre
  3. Nikita Kadakia
  4. Yi Zhang
  5. Kathleen Greenham
  6. Whitnie Szutu
  7. Bipin Kumar Pandey
  8. Rahul Arvind Bhosale
  9. Malcolm J Bennett
  10. Wolfgang Busch
  11. Mark Estelle
(2020)
Genetic analysis of the Arabidopsis TIR1/AFB auxin receptors reveals both overlapping and specialized functions
eLife 9:e54740.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54740

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54740

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Rachael Kuintzle, Leah A Santat, Michael B Elowitz
    Research Article

    The Notch signaling pathway uses families of ligands and receptors to transmit signals to nearby cells. These components are expressed in diverse combinations in different cell types, interact in a many-to-many fashion, both within the same cell (in cis) and between cells (in trans), and their interactions are modulated by Fringe glycosyltransferases. A fundamental question is how the strength of Notch signaling depends on which pathway components are expressed, at what levels, and in which cells. Here, we used a quantitative, bottom-up, cell-based approach to systematically characterize trans-activation, cis-inhibition, and cis-activation signaling efficiencies across a range of ligand and Fringe expression levels in Chinese hamster and mouse cell lines. Each ligand (Dll1, Dll4, Jag1, and Jag2) and receptor variant (Notch1 and Notch2) analyzed here exhibited a unique profile of interactions, Fringe dependence, and signaling outcomes. All four ligands were able to bind receptors in cis and in trans, and all ligands trans-activated both receptors, although Jag1-Notch1 signaling was substantially weaker than other ligand-receptor combinations. Cis-interactions were predominantly inhibitory, with the exception of the Dll1- and Dll4-Notch2 pairs, which exhibited cis-activation stronger than trans-activation. Lfng strengthened Delta-mediated trans-activation and weakened Jagged-mediated trans-activation for both receptors. Finally, cis-ligands showed diverse cis-inhibition strengths, which depended on the identity of the trans-ligand as well as the receptor. The map of receptor-ligand-Fringe interaction outcomes revealed here should help guide rational perturbation and control of the Notch pathway.

    1. Developmental Biology
    Alexander S Campbell, Martin Minařík ... Clare VH Baker
    Research Article

    The lateral line system enables fishes and aquatic-stage amphibians to detect local water movement via mechanosensory hair cells in neuromasts, and many species to detect weak electric fields via electroreceptors (modified hair cells) in ampullary organs. Both neuromasts and ampullary organs develop from lateral line placodes, but the molecular mechanisms underpinning ampullary organ formation are understudied relative to neuromasts. This is because the ancestral lineages of zebrafish (teleosts) and Xenopus (frogs) independently lost electroreception. We identified Bmp5 as a promising candidate via differential RNA-seq in an electroreceptive ray-finned fish, the Mississippi paddlefish (Polyodon spathula; Modrell et al., 2017, eLife 6: e24197). In an experimentally tractable relative, the sterlet sturgeon (Acipenser ruthenus), we found that Bmp5 and four other Bmp pathway genes are expressed in the developing lateral line, and that Bmp signalling is active. Furthermore, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis targeting Bmp5 in G0-injected sterlet embryos resulted in fewer ampullary organs. Conversely, when Bmp signalling was inhibited by DMH1 treatment shortly before the formation of ampullary organ primordia, supernumerary ampullary organs developed. These data suggest that Bmp5 promotes ampullary organ development, whereas Bmp signalling via another ligand(s) prevents their overproduction. Taken together, this demonstrates opposing roles for Bmp signalling during ampullary organ formation.