1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology

Structural and functional characterization of G protein-coupled receptors with deep mutational scanning

  1. Eric M Jones
  2. Nathan B Lubock
  3. A J Venkatakrishnan
  4. Jeffrey Wang
  5. Alex M Tseng
  6. Joseph M Paggi
  7. Naomi R Latorraca
  8. Daniel Cancilla
  9. Megan Satyadi
  10. Jessica E Davis
  11. M Madan Babu
  12. Ron O Dror  Is a corresponding author
  13. Sriram Kosuri  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of California, Los Angeles, United States
  2. Stanford University, United States
  3. MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, United Kingdom
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54895
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Eric M Jones
  2. Nathan B Lubock
  3. A J Venkatakrishnan
  4. Jeffrey Wang
  5. Alex M Tseng
  6. Joseph M Paggi
  7. Naomi R Latorraca
  8. Daniel Cancilla
  9. Megan Satyadi
  10. Jessica E Davis
  11. M Madan Babu
  12. Ron O Dror
  13. Sriram Kosuri
(2020)
Structural and functional characterization of G protein-coupled receptors with deep mutational scanning
eLife 9:e54895.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54895
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

Abstract

In humans, the >800 G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are responsible for transducing diverse chemical stimuli to alter cell state, and are the largest class of drug targets. Their myriad structural conformations and various modes of signaling make it challenging to understand their structure and function. Here we developed a platform to characterize large libraries of GPCR variants in human cell lines with a barcoded transcriptional reporter of G-protein signal transduction. We tested 7,800 of 7,828 possible single amino acid substitutions to the beta-2 adrenergic receptor (β2AR) at four concentrations of the agonist isoproterenol. We identified residues specifically important for β2AR signaling, mutations in the human population that are potentially loss of function, and residues that modulate basal activity. Using unsupervised learning, we resolve residues critical for signaling, including all major structural motifs and molecular interfaces. We also find a previously uncharacterized structural latch spanning the first two extracellular loops that is highly conserved across Class A GPCRs and is conformationally rigid in both the inactive and active states of the receptor. More broadly, by linking deep mutational scanning with engineered transcriptional reporters, we establish a generalizable method for exploring pharmacogenomics, structure and function across broad classes of drug receptors.

Data availability

Sequencing data have been submitted to GEO and the accession code is GSE144819.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Eric M Jones

    Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, UCLA-DOE Institute for Genomics and Proteomics, Molecular Biology Institute, Quantitative and Computational Biology Institute, Eli and Edythe Broad Center o, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    Eric M Jones, holds equity and is employed by Octant, Inc., a company to which patent rights based on this work have been licensed (Application No. 62/528,833).

  2. Nathan B Lubock

    Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    Nathan B Lubock, Employed by and holds equity in Octant Inc. to which patent rights based on this work have been licensed (Application No. 62/528,833).

  3. A J Venkatakrishnan

    Department of Computer Science, Institute for Computational and Mathematical Engineering, Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2819-3214

  4. Jeffrey Wang

    Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, UCLA-DOE Institute for Genomics and Proteomics, Molecular Biology Institute, Quantitative and Computational Biology Institute, Eli and Edythe Broad Center o, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  5. Alex M Tseng

    Department of Computer Science, Institute for Computational and Mathematical Engineering, Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  6. Joseph M Paggi

    Department of Computer Science, Institute for Computational and Mathematical Engineering, Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  7. Naomi R Latorraca

    Biophysics Program, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  8. Daniel Cancilla

    Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, UCLA-DOE Institute for Genomics and Proteomics, Molecular Biology Institute, Quantitative and Computational Biology Institute, Eli and Edythe Broad Center o, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  9. Megan Satyadi

    Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, UCLA-DOE Institute for Genomics and Proteomics, Molecular Biology Institute, Quantitative and Computational Biology Institute, Eli and Edythe Broad Center o, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  10. Jessica E Davis

    Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  11. M Madan Babu

    MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  12. Ron O Dror

    Biophysics Program, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    For correspondence
    ron.dror@stanford.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  13. Sriram Kosuri

    Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    For correspondence
    sri@ucla.edu
    Competing interests
    Sriram Kosuri, holds equity and is employed by Octant, Inc., a company to which patent rights based on this work have been licensed to (Application No. 62/528,833).
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4661-0600

Funding

National Science Foundation (1556207)

  • Sriram Kosuri

National Institutes of Health (GM007185)

  • Sriram Kosuri

National Institutes of Health (5T32GM008496)

  • Sriram Kosuri

National Institutes of Health (DP2GM114829)

  • Sriram Kosuri

Medical Research Council (MC_U105185859)

  • Sriram Kosuri

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2020, Jones et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 11,654
    views
  • 1,406
    downloads
  • 113
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Eric M Jones
  2. Nathan B Lubock
  3. A J Venkatakrishnan
  4. Jeffrey Wang
  5. Alex M Tseng
  6. Joseph M Paggi
  7. Naomi R Latorraca
  8. Daniel Cancilla
  9. Megan Satyadi
  10. Jessica E Davis
  11. M Madan Babu
  12. Ron O Dror
  13. Sriram Kosuri
(2020)
Structural and functional characterization of G protein-coupled receptors with deep mutational scanning
eLife 9:e54895.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54895

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54895

Categories and tags

Research organism

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease

    MftG is crucial for ethanol metabolism of mycobacteria by linking mycofactocin oxidation to respiration

    Ana Patrícia Graça, Vadim Nikitushkin ... Gerald Lackner
    Research Article

    Mycofactocin is a redox cofactor essential for the alcohol metabolism of mycobacteria. While the biosynthesis of mycofactocin is well established, the gene mftG, which encodes an oxidoreductase of the glucose-methanol-choline superfamily, remained functionally uncharacterized. Here, we show that MftG enzymes are almost exclusively found in genomes containing mycofactocin biosynthetic genes and are present in 75% of organisms harboring these genes. Gene deletion experiments in Mycolicibacterium smegmatis demonstrated a growth defect of the ∆mftG mutant on ethanol as a carbon source, accompanied by an arrest of cell division reminiscent of mild starvation. Investigation of carbon and cofactor metabolism implied a defect in mycofactocin reoxidation. Cell-free enzyme assays and respirometry using isolated cell membranes indicated that MftG acts as a mycofactocin dehydrogenase shuttling electrons toward the respiratory chain. Transcriptomics studies also indicated remodeling of redox metabolism to compensate for a shortage of redox equivalents. In conclusion, this work closes an important knowledge gap concerning the mycofactocin system and adds a new pathway to the intricate web of redox reactions governing the metabolism of mycobacteria.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Cell Biology

    eIF3 engages with 3’-UTR termini of highly translated mRNAs

    Santi Mestre-Fos, Lucas Ferguson ... Jamie HD Cate
    Research Article

    Stem cell differentiation involves a global increase in protein synthesis to meet the demands of specialized cell types. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying this translational burst and the involvement of initiation factors remains largely unknown. Here, we investigate the role of eukaryotic initiation factor 3 (eIF3) in early differentiation of human pluripotent stem cell (hPSC)-derived neural progenitor cells (NPCs). Using Quick-irCLIP and alternative polyadenylation (APA) Seq, we show eIF3 crosslinks predominantly with 3’ untranslated region (3’-UTR) termini of multiple mRNA isoforms, adjacent to the poly(A) tail. Furthermore, we find that eIF3 engagement at 3’-UTR ends is dependent on polyadenylation. High eIF3 crosslinking at 3’-UTR termini of mRNAs correlates with high translational activity, as determined by ribosome profiling, but not with translational efficiency. The results presented here show that eIF3 engages with 3’-UTR termini of highly translated mRNAs, likely reflecting a general rather than specific regulatory function of eIF3, and supporting a role of mRNA circularization in the mechanisms governing mRNA translation.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics

    Yerba mate (Ilex paraguariensis) genome provides new insights into convergent evolution of caffeine biosynthesis

    Federico A Vignale, Andrea Hernandez Garcia ... Adrian G Turjanski
    Research Article

    Yerba mate (YM, Ilex paraguariensis) is an economically important crop marketed for the elaboration of mate, the third-most widely consumed caffeine-containing infusion worldwide. Here, we report the first genome assembly of this species, which has a total length of 1.06 Gb and contains 53,390 protein-coding genes. Comparative analyses revealed that the large YM genome size is partly due to a whole-genome duplication (Ip-α) during the early evolutionary history of Ilex, in addition to the hexaploidization event (γ) shared by core eudicots. Characterization of the genome allowed us to clone the genes encoding methyltransferase enzymes that catalyse multiple reactions required for caffeine production. To our surprise, this species has converged upon a different biochemical pathway compared to that of coffee and tea. In order to gain insight into the structural basis for the convergent enzyme activities, we obtained a crystal structure for the terminal enzyme in the pathway that forms caffeine. The structure reveals that convergent solutions have evolved for substrate positioning because different amino acid residues facilitate a different substrate orientation such that efficient methylation occurs in the independently evolved enzymes in YM and coffee. While our results show phylogenomic constraint limits the genes coopted for convergence of caffeine biosynthesis, the X-ray diffraction data suggest structural constraints are minimal for the convergent evolution of individual reactions.