Structural and functional characterization of G protein-coupled receptors with deep mutational scanning

  1. Eric M Jones
  2. Nathan B Lubock
  3. A J Venkatakrishnan
  4. Jeffrey Wang
  5. Alex M Tseng
  6. Joseph M Paggi
  7. Naomi R Latorraca
  8. Daniel Cancilla
  9. Megan Satyadi
  10. Jessica E Davis
  11. M Madan Babu
  12. Ron O Dror  Is a corresponding author
  13. Sriram Kosuri  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of California, Los Angeles, United States
  2. Stanford University, United States
  3. MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, United Kingdom

Abstract

In humans, the >800 G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are responsible for transducing diverse chemical stimuli to alter cell state, and are the largest class of drug targets. Their myriad structural conformations and various modes of signaling make it challenging to understand their structure and function. Here we developed a platform to characterize large libraries of GPCR variants in human cell lines with a barcoded transcriptional reporter of G-protein signal transduction. We tested 7,800 of 7,828 possible single amino acid substitutions to the beta-2 adrenergic receptor (β2AR) at four concentrations of the agonist isoproterenol. We identified residues specifically important for β2AR signaling, mutations in the human population that are potentially loss of function, and residues that modulate basal activity. Using unsupervised learning, we resolve residues critical for signaling, including all major structural motifs and molecular interfaces. We also find a previously uncharacterized structural latch spanning the first two extracellular loops that is highly conserved across Class A GPCRs and is conformationally rigid in both the inactive and active states of the receptor. More broadly, by linking deep mutational scanning with engineered transcriptional reporters, we establish a generalizable method for exploring pharmacogenomics, structure and function across broad classes of drug receptors.

Data availability

Sequencing data have been submitted to GEO and the accession code is GSE144819.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Eric M Jones

    Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, UCLA-DOE Institute for Genomics and Proteomics, Molecular Biology Institute, Quantitative and Computational Biology Institute, Eli and Edythe Broad Center o, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    Eric M Jones, holds equity and is employed by Octant, Inc., a company to which patent rights based on this work have been licensed (Application No. 62/528,833).
  2. Nathan B Lubock

    Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    Nathan B Lubock, Employed by and holds equity in Octant Inc. to which patent rights based on this work have been licensed (Application No. 62/528,833).
  3. A J Venkatakrishnan

    Department of Computer Science, Institute for Computational and Mathematical Engineering, Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2819-3214
  4. Jeffrey Wang

    Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, UCLA-DOE Institute for Genomics and Proteomics, Molecular Biology Institute, Quantitative and Computational Biology Institute, Eli and Edythe Broad Center o, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Alex M Tseng

    Department of Computer Science, Institute for Computational and Mathematical Engineering, Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Joseph M Paggi

    Department of Computer Science, Institute for Computational and Mathematical Engineering, Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Naomi R Latorraca

    Biophysics Program, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Daniel Cancilla

    Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, UCLA-DOE Institute for Genomics and Proteomics, Molecular Biology Institute, Quantitative and Computational Biology Institute, Eli and Edythe Broad Center o, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Megan Satyadi

    Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, UCLA-DOE Institute for Genomics and Proteomics, Molecular Biology Institute, Quantitative and Computational Biology Institute, Eli and Edythe Broad Center o, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Jessica E Davis

    Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. M Madan Babu

    MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Ron O Dror

    Biophysics Program, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    For correspondence
    ron.dror@stanford.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Sriram Kosuri

    Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    For correspondence
    sri@ucla.edu
    Competing interests
    Sriram Kosuri, holds equity and is employed by Octant, Inc., a company to which patent rights based on this work have been licensed to (Application No. 62/528,833).
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4661-0600

Funding

National Science Foundation (1556207)

  • Sriram Kosuri

National Institutes of Health (GM007185)

  • Sriram Kosuri

National Institutes of Health (5T32GM008496)

  • Sriram Kosuri

National Institutes of Health (DP2GM114829)

  • Sriram Kosuri

Medical Research Council (MC_U105185859)

  • Sriram Kosuri

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2020, Jones et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 11,998
    views
  • 1,447
    downloads
  • 127
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Eric M Jones
  2. Nathan B Lubock
  3. A J Venkatakrishnan
  4. Jeffrey Wang
  5. Alex M Tseng
  6. Joseph M Paggi
  7. Naomi R Latorraca
  8. Daniel Cancilla
  9. Megan Satyadi
  10. Jessica E Davis
  11. M Madan Babu
  12. Ron O Dror
  13. Sriram Kosuri
(2020)
Structural and functional characterization of G protein-coupled receptors with deep mutational scanning
eLife 9:e54895.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54895

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54895

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Mai Nguyen, Elda Bauda ... Cecile Morlot
    Research Article

    Teichoic acids (TA) are linear phospho-saccharidic polymers and important constituents of the cell envelope of Gram-positive bacteria, either bound to the peptidoglycan as wall teichoic acids (WTA) or to the membrane as lipoteichoic acids (LTA). The composition of TA varies greatly but the presence of both WTA and LTA is highly conserved, hinting at an underlying fundamental function that is distinct from their specific roles in diverse organisms. We report the observation of a periplasmic space in Streptococcus pneumoniae by cryo-electron microscopy of vitreous sections. The thickness and appearance of this region change upon deletion of genes involved in the attachment of TA, supporting their role in the maintenance of a periplasmic space in Gram-positive bacteria as a possible universal function. Consequences of these mutations were further examined by super-resolved microscopy, following metabolic labeling and fluorophore coupling by click chemistry. This novel labeling method also enabled in-gel analysis of cell fractions. With this approach, we were able to titrate the actual amount of TA per cell and to determine the ratio of WTA to LTA. In addition, we followed the change of TA length during growth phases, and discovered that a mutant devoid of LTA accumulates the membrane-bound polymerized TA precursor.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Computational and Systems Biology
    Shinichi Kawaguchi, Xin Xu ... Toshie Kai
    Research Article

    Protein–protein interactions are fundamental to understanding the molecular functions and regulation of proteins. Despite the availability of extensive databases, many interactions remain uncharacterized due to the labor-intensive nature of experimental validation. In this study, we utilized the AlphaFold2 program to predict interactions among proteins localized in the nuage, a germline-specific non-membrane organelle essential for piRNA biogenesis in Drosophila. We screened 20 nuage proteins for 1:1 interactions and predicted dimer structures. Among these, five represented novel interaction candidates. Three pairs, including Spn-E_Squ, were verified by co-immunoprecipitation. Disruption of the salt bridges at the Spn-E_Squ interface confirmed their functional importance, underscoring the predictive model’s accuracy. We extended our analysis to include interactions between three representative nuage components—Vas, Squ, and Tej—and approximately 430 oogenesis-related proteins. Co-immunoprecipitation verified interactions for three pairs: Mei-W68_Squ, CSN3_Squ, and Pka-C1_Tej. Furthermore, we screened the majority of Drosophila proteins (~12,000) for potential interaction with the Piwi protein, a central player in the piRNA pathway, identifying 164 pairs as potential binding partners. This in silico approach not only efficiently identifies potential interaction partners but also significantly bridges the gap by facilitating the integration of bioinformatics and experimental biology.