A new protocol for single-cell RNA-seq reveals stochastic gene expression during lag phase in budding yeast

  1. Abbas Jariani
  2. Lieselotte Vermeersch
  3. Bram Cerulus
  4. Gemma Perez-Samper
  5. Karin Voordeckers
  6. Thomas Van Brussel
  7. Bernard Thienpont
  8. Diether Lambrechts
  9. Kevin J Verstrepen  Is a corresponding author
  1. VIB-KU Leuven Center for Microbiology, Belgium
  2. VIB-KU Leuven Center for Cancer Biology, Belgium

Abstract

Current methods for single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) of yeast cells do not match the throughput and relative simplicity of the state-of-the-art techniques that are available for mammalian cells. In this study, we report how 10x Genomics' droplet-based single-cell RNA sequencing technology can be modified to allow analysis of yeast cells. The protocol, which is based on in-droplet spheroplasting of the cells, yields an order-of-magnitude higher throughput in comparison to existing methods. After extensive validation of the method, we demonstrate its use by studying the dynamics of the response of isogenic yeast populations to a shift in carbon source, revealing the heterogeneity and underlying molecular processes during this shift. The method we describe opens new avenues for studies focusing on yeast cells, as well as other cells with a degradable cell wall.

Data availability

Sequencing data have been deposited in GEO under accession code GSE144820

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Abbas Jariani

    VIB Laboratory for Systems Biology, VIB-KU Leuven Center for Microbiology, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2715-933X
  2. Lieselotte Vermeersch

    VIB Laboratory for Systems Biology, VIB-KU Leuven Center for Microbiology, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5789-2220
  3. Bram Cerulus

    VIB Laboratory for Systems Biology, VIB-KU Leuven Center for Microbiology, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Gemma Perez-Samper

    VIB Laboratory for Systems Biology, VIB-KU Leuven Center for Microbiology, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Karin Voordeckers

    VIB Laboratory for Systems Biology, VIB-KU Leuven Center for Microbiology, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Thomas Van Brussel

    VIB-KU Leuven Laboratory for Translational Genetics, VIB-KU Leuven Center for Cancer Biology, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Bernard Thienpont

    VIB-KU Leuven Laboratory for Translational Genetics, VIB-KU Leuven Center for Cancer Biology, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8772-6845
  8. Diether Lambrechts

    VIB-KU Leuven Laboratory for Translational Genetics, VIB-KU Leuven Center for Cancer Biology, Leuven, Belgium
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Kevin J Verstrepen

    VIB Laboratory for Systems Biology, VIB-KU Leuven Center for Microbiology, Leuven, Belgium
    For correspondence
    kevin.verstrepen@kuleuven.vib.be
    Competing interests
    Kevin J Verstrepen, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3077-6219

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek

  • Lieselotte Vermeersch
  • Bram Cerulus

Vlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie

  • Kevin J Verstrepen

European Research Council (Council CoG682009)

  • Kevin J Verstrepen

AB-InBev-Baillet Latour Fund

  • Kevin J Verstrepen

Human Frontier Science Program (246 RGP0050/2013)

  • Kevin J Verstrepen

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Antonis Rokas, Vanderbilt University, United States

Publication history

  1. Received: January 20, 2020
  2. Accepted: May 15, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: May 18, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: May 29, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, Jariani et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 9,030
    Page views
  • 854
    Downloads
  • 25
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Abbas Jariani
  2. Lieselotte Vermeersch
  3. Bram Cerulus
  4. Gemma Perez-Samper
  5. Karin Voordeckers
  6. Thomas Van Brussel
  7. Bernard Thienpont
  8. Diether Lambrechts
  9. Kevin J Verstrepen
(2020)
A new protocol for single-cell RNA-seq reveals stochastic gene expression during lag phase in budding yeast
eLife 9:e55320.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.55320

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Qiming Yang, Te-Wen Lo ... Barbara J Meyer
    Research Article

    An evolutionary perspective enhances our understanding of biological mechanisms. Comparison of sex determination and X-chromosome dosage compensation mechanisms between the closely related nematode species C. briggsae (Cbr) and C. elegans (Cel) revealed that the genetic regulatory hierarchy controlling both processes is conserved, but the X-chromosome target specificity and mode of binding for the specialized condensin dosage compensation complex (DCC) controlling X expression have diverged. We identified two motifs within Cbr DCC recruitment sites that are highly enriched on X: 13-bp MEX and 30-bp MEX II. Mutating either MEX or MEX II in an endogenous recruitment site with multiple copies of one or both motifs reduced binding, but only removing all motifs eliminated binding in vivo. Hence, DCC binding to Cbr recruitment sites appears additive. In contrast, DCC binding to Cel recruitment sites is synergistic: mutating even one motif in vivo eliminated binding. Although all X-chromosome motifs share the sequence CAGGG, they have otherwise diverged so that a motif from one species cannot function in the other. Functional divergence was demonstrated in vivo and in vitro. A single nucleotide position in Cbr MEX can determine whether Cel DCC binds. This rapid divergence of DCC target specificity could have been an important factor in establishing reproductive isolation between nematode species and contrasts dramatically with conservation of target specificity for X-chromosome dosage compensation across Drosophila species and for transcription factors controlling developmental processes such as body-plan specification from fruit flies to mice.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Plant Biology
    Vy Nguyen, Iain Searle
    Insight

    A well-established model for how plants start the process of flowering in periods of cold weather may need revisiting.