Genomic and phenotypic evolution of Escherichia coli in a novel citrate-only resource environment

  1. Zachary David Blount  Is a corresponding author
  2. Rohan Maddamsetti  Is a corresponding author
  3. Nkrumah A Grant  Is a corresponding author
  4. Sumaya T Ahmed
  5. Tanush Jagdish
  6. Jessica A Baxter
  7. Brooke A Sommerfeld
  8. Alice Tillman
  9. Jeremy Moore
  10. Joan L Slonczewski
  11. Jeffrey E Barrick
  12. Richard E Lenski
  1. Michigan State University, United States
  2. Harvard Medical School, United States
  3. Kenyon College, United States
  4. University of Texas at Austin, United States

Abstract

Evolutionary innovations allow populations to colonize new ecological niches. We previously reported that aerobic growth on citrate (Cit+) evolved in an Escherichia coli population during adaptation to a minimal glucose medium containing citrate (DM25). Cit+ variants can also grow in citrate-only medium (DM0), a novel environment for E. coli. To study adaptation to this new niche, we founded two sets of Cit+ populations and evolved them for 2,500 generations in DM0 or DM25. The evolved lineages acquired numerous parallel mutations, many mediated by transposable elements. Several also evolved amplifications of regions containing the maeA gene. Unexpectedly, some evolved populations and clones show apparent declines in fitness. We also found evidence of substantial cell death in Cit+ clones. Our results thus demonstrate rapid novel trait refinement and adaptation to the novel citrate niche, while also suggesting a recalcitrant mismatch between E. coli physiology and growth on citrate.

Data availability

All analysis and statistical scripts have been deposited at www.datadryad.org (https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.7wm37pvpp). RNA-Seq data have been deposited in the NCBI SRA under accession PRJNA553503. Genome sequencing data have been deposited in the NCBI SRA under accession PRJNA595472. Analysis code is also available at: https://github.com/rohanmaddamsetti/DM0-evolution.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Zachary David Blount

    Microbiology and Molecular Genetics; BEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States
    For correspondence
    zachary.david.blount@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5153-0034
  2. Rohan Maddamsetti

    Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    rohan.maddamsetti@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3370-092X
  3. Nkrumah A Grant

    Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States
    For correspondence
    grantnkr@msu.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4555-5283
  4. Sumaya T Ahmed

    Biology, Kenyon College, Gambier, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Tanush Jagdish

    Systems Biology; BEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Jessica A Baxter

    Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Brooke A Sommerfeld

    Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Alice Tillman

    Biology, Kenyon College, Gambier, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Jeremy Moore

    Biology, Kenyon College, Gambier, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Joan L Slonczewski

    Biology, Kenyon College, Gambier, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3484-1564
  11. Jeffrey E Barrick

    Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States
    Competing interests
    Jeffrey E Barrick, Jeffrey E. Barrick is the owner of Evolvomics LLC..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0888-7358
  12. Richard E Lenski

    Microbiology and Molecular Genetics; BEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

Funding

Michigan State University (Ralph Evans Award)

  • Zachary David Blount

Kenyon College (Individual Faculty Development Award)

  • Zachary David Blount

Michigan State University (Rufolph Hugh Award)

  • Nkrumah A Grant

National Science Foundation (DEB-1451740)

  • Richard E Lenski

National Science Foundation (DBI-0939454)

  • Richard E Lenski

USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture (MICL02253)

  • Richard E Lenski

National Science Foundation (MCB-1923077)

  • Joan L Slonczewski

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2020, Blount et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 7,441
    views
  • 614
    downloads
  • 28
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Zachary David Blount
  2. Rohan Maddamsetti
  3. Nkrumah A Grant
  4. Sumaya T Ahmed
  5. Tanush Jagdish
  6. Jessica A Baxter
  7. Brooke A Sommerfeld
  8. Alice Tillman
  9. Jeremy Moore
  10. Joan L Slonczewski
  11. Jeffrey E Barrick
  12. Richard E Lenski
(2020)
Genomic and phenotypic evolution of Escherichia coli in a novel citrate-only resource environment
eLife 9:e55414.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.55414

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.55414

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Pierre Barrat-Charlaix, Richard A Neher
    Research Article

    As pathogens spread in a population of hosts, immunity is built up, and the pool of susceptible individuals are depleted. This generates selective pressure, to which many human RNA viruses, such as influenza virus or SARS-CoV-2, respond with rapid antigenic evolution and frequent emergence of immune evasive variants. However, the host’s immune systems adapt, and older immune responses wane, such that escape variants only enjoy a growth advantage for a limited time. If variant growth dynamics and reshaping of host-immunity operate on comparable time scales, viral adaptation is determined by eco-evolutionary interactions that are not captured by models of rapid evolution in a fixed environment. Here, we use a Susceptible/Infected model to describe the interaction between an evolving viral population in a dynamic but immunologically diverse host population. We show that depending on strain cross-immunity, heterogeneity of the host population, and durability of immune responses, escape variants initially grow exponentially, but lose their growth advantage before reaching high frequencies. Their subsequent dynamics follows an anomalous random walk determined by future escape variants and results in variant trajectories that are unpredictable. This model can explain the apparent contradiction between the clearly adaptive nature of antigenic evolution and the quasi-neutral dynamics of high-frequency variants observed for influenza viruses.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Timothy Fuqua, Yiqiao Sun, Andreas Wagner
    Research Article

    Gene regulation is essential for life and controlled by regulatory DNA. Mutations can modify the activity of regulatory DNA, and also create new regulatory DNA, a process called regulatory emergence. Non-regulatory and regulatory DNA contain motifs to which transcription factors may bind. In prokaryotes, gene expression requires a stretch of DNA called a promoter, which contains two motifs called –10 and –35 boxes. However, these motifs may occur in both promoters and non-promoter DNA in multiple copies. They have been implicated in some studies to improve promoter activity, and in others to repress it. Here, we ask whether the presence of such motifs in different genetic sequences influences promoter evolution and emergence. To understand whether and how promoter motifs influence promoter emergence and evolution, we start from 50 ‘promoter islands’, DNA sequences enriched with –10 and –35 boxes. We mutagenize these starting ‘parent’ sequences, and measure gene expression driven by 240,000 of the resulting mutants. We find that the probability that mutations create an active promoter varies more than 200-fold, and is not correlated with the number of promoter motifs. For parent sequences without promoter activity, mutations created over 1500 new –10 and –35 boxes at unique positions in the library, but only ~0.3% of these resulted in de-novo promoter activity. Only ~13% of all –10 and –35 boxes contribute to de-novo promoter activity. For parent sequences with promoter activity, mutations created new –10 and –35 boxes in 11 specific positions that partially overlap with preexisting ones to modulate expression. We also find that –10 and –35 boxes do not repress promoter activity. Overall, our work demonstrates how promoter motifs influence promoter emergence and evolution. It has implications for predicting and understanding regulatory evolution, de novo genes, and phenotypic evolution.