Genomic and phenotypic evolution of Escherichia coli in a novel citrate-only resource environment

  1. Zachary David Blount  Is a corresponding author
  2. Rohan Maddamsetti  Is a corresponding author
  3. Nkrumah A Grant  Is a corresponding author
  4. Sumaya T Ahmed
  5. Tanush Jagdish
  6. Jessica A Baxter
  7. Brooke A Sommerfeld
  8. Alice Tillman
  9. Jeremy Moore
  10. Joan L Slonczewski
  11. Jeffrey E Barrick
  12. Richard E Lenski
  1. Michigan State University, United States
  2. Harvard Medical School, United States
  3. Kenyon College, United States
  4. University of Texas at Austin, United States

Abstract

Evolutionary innovations allow populations to colonize new ecological niches. We previously reported that aerobic growth on citrate (Cit+) evolved in an Escherichia coli population during adaptation to a minimal glucose medium containing citrate (DM25). Cit+ variants can also grow in citrate-only medium (DM0), a novel environment for E. coli. To study adaptation to this new niche, we founded two sets of Cit+ populations and evolved them for 2,500 generations in DM0 or DM25. The evolved lineages acquired numerous parallel mutations, many mediated by transposable elements. Several also evolved amplifications of regions containing the maeA gene. Unexpectedly, some evolved populations and clones show apparent declines in fitness. We also found evidence of substantial cell death in Cit+ clones. Our results thus demonstrate rapid novel trait refinement and adaptation to the novel citrate niche, while also suggesting a recalcitrant mismatch between E. coli physiology and growth on citrate.

Data availability

All analysis and statistical scripts have been deposited at www.datadryad.org (https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.7wm37pvpp). RNA-Seq data have been deposited in the NCBI SRA under accession PRJNA553503. Genome sequencing data have been deposited in the NCBI SRA under accession PRJNA595472. Analysis code is also available at: https://github.com/rohanmaddamsetti/DM0-evolution.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Zachary David Blount

    Microbiology and Molecular Genetics; BEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States
    For correspondence
    zachary.david.blount@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5153-0034
  2. Rohan Maddamsetti

    Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    rohan.maddamsetti@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3370-092X
  3. Nkrumah A Grant

    Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States
    For correspondence
    grantnkr@msu.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4555-5283
  4. Sumaya T Ahmed

    Biology, Kenyon College, Gambier, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Tanush Jagdish

    Systems Biology; BEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Jessica A Baxter

    Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Brooke A Sommerfeld

    Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Alice Tillman

    Biology, Kenyon College, Gambier, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Jeremy Moore

    Biology, Kenyon College, Gambier, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Joan L Slonczewski

    Biology, Kenyon College, Gambier, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3484-1564
  11. Jeffrey E Barrick

    Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States
    Competing interests
    Jeffrey E Barrick, Jeffrey E. Barrick is the owner of Evolvomics LLC..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0888-7358
  12. Richard E Lenski

    Microbiology and Molecular Genetics; BEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

Funding

Michigan State University (Ralph Evans Award)

  • Zachary David Blount

Kenyon College (Individual Faculty Development Award)

  • Zachary David Blount

Michigan State University (Rufolph Hugh Award)

  • Nkrumah A Grant

National Science Foundation (DEB-1451740)

  • Richard E Lenski

National Science Foundation (DBI-0939454)

  • Richard E Lenski

USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture (MICL02253)

  • Richard E Lenski

National Science Foundation (MCB-1923077)

  • Joan L Slonczewski

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2020, Blount et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 7,572
    views
  • 629
    downloads
  • 31
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Zachary David Blount
  2. Rohan Maddamsetti
  3. Nkrumah A Grant
  4. Sumaya T Ahmed
  5. Tanush Jagdish
  6. Jessica A Baxter
  7. Brooke A Sommerfeld
  8. Alice Tillman
  9. Jeremy Moore
  10. Joan L Slonczewski
  11. Jeffrey E Barrick
  12. Richard E Lenski
(2020)
Genomic and phenotypic evolution of Escherichia coli in a novel citrate-only resource environment
eLife 9:e55414.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.55414

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.55414

Further reading

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    Mauna R Dasari, Kimberly E Roche ... Elizabeth A Archie
    Research Article

    Mammalian gut microbiomes are highly dynamic communities that shape and are shaped by host aging, including age-related changes to host immunity, metabolism, and behavior. As such, gut microbial composition may provide valuable information on host biological age. Here, we test this idea by creating a microbiome-based age predictor using 13,563 gut microbial profiles from 479 wild baboons collected over 14 years. The resulting ‘microbiome clock’ predicts host chronological age. Deviations from the clock’s predictions are linked to some demographic and socio-environmental factors that predict baboon health and survival: animals who appear old-for-age tend to be male, sampled in the dry season (for females), and have high social status (both sexes). However, an individual’s ‘microbiome age’ does not predict the attainment of developmental milestones or lifespan. Hence, in our host population, gut microbiome age largely reflects current, as opposed to past, social and environmental conditions, and does not predict the pace of host development or host mortality risk. We add to a growing understanding of how age is reflected in different host phenotypes and what forces modify biological age in primates.

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Christopher S McAllester, John E Pool
    Research Article

    Chromosomal inversion polymorphisms can be common, but the causes of their persistence are often unclear. We propose a model for the maintenance of inversion polymorphism, which requires that some variants contribute antagonistically to two phenotypes, one of which has negative frequency-dependent fitness. These conditions yield a form of frequency-dependent disruptive selection, favoring two predominant haplotypes segregating alleles that favor opposing antagonistic phenotypes. An inversion associated with one haplotype can reduce the fitness load incurred by generating recombinant offspring, reinforcing its linkage to the haplotype and enabling both haplotypes to accumulate more antagonistic variants than expected otherwise. We develop and apply a forward simulator to examine these dynamics under a tradeoff between survival and male display. These simulations indeed generate inversion-associated haplotypes with opposing sex-specific fitness effects. Antagonism strengthens with time, and can ultimately yield karyotypes at surprisingly predictable frequencies, with striking genotype frequency differences between sexes and between developmental stages. To test whether this model may contribute to well-studied yet enigmatic inversion polymorphisms in Drosophila melanogaster, we track inversion frequencies in laboratory crosses to test whether they influence male reproductive success or survival. We find that two of the four tested inversions show significant evidence for the tradeoff examined, with In(3 R)K favoring survival and In(3 L)Ok favoring male reproduction. In line with the apparent sex-specific fitness effects implied for both of those inversions, In(3 L)Ok was also found to be less costly to the viability and/or longevity of males than females, whereas In(3 R)K was more beneficial to female survival. Based on this work, we expect that balancing selection on antagonistically pleiotropic traits may provide a significant and underappreciated contribution to the maintenance of natural inversion polymorphism.