Multi-state recognition pathway of the intrinsically disordered protein kinase inhibitor by protein kinase A

  1. Cristina Olivieri
  2. Yingjie Wang
  3. Geoffrey C Li
  4. Manu Veliparambil Subrahmanian
  5. Jonggul Kim
  6. Benjamin R Stultz
  7. Matthew Neibergall
  8. Fernando Porcelli
  9. Joseph M Muretta
  10. David D T. Thomas
  11. Jiali Gao
  12. Donald K Blumenthal
  13. Susan S Taylor
  14. Gianluigi Veglia  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Minnesota, United States
  2. Shenzhen Bay Laboratory, China
  3. Vanderbilt University, United States
  4. UT Southwestern Medical Center, United States
  5. Medical College of Wisconsin, United States
  6. Bethel University, United States
  7. University of Tuscia, Italy
  8. Beijing University Graduate School, China
  9. University of Utah, United States
  10. University of California, San Diego, United States

Abstract

In the nucleus, the spatiotemporal regulation of the catalytic subunit of cAMP-dependent protein kinase A (PKA-C) is orchestrated by an intrinsically disordered protein kinase inhibitor, PKI, which recruits the CRM1/RanGTP nuclear exporting complex. How the PKA-C/PKI complex assembles and recognizes CRM1/RanGTP is not well understood. Using NMR, SAXS, fluorescence, metadynamics, and Markov model analysis, we determined the multi-state recognition pathway for PKI. After a fast binding step in which PKA-C selects PKI's most competent conformations, PKI folds upon binding through a slow conformational rearrangement within the enzyme's binding pocket. The high-affinity and pseudo-substrate regions of PKI become more structured and the transient interactions with the kinase augment the helical content of the nuclear export sequence, which is then poised to recruit the CRM1/RanGTP complex for nuclear translocation. The multistate binding mechanism featured by PKA-C/PKI complex represents a paradigm on how disordered, ancillary proteins (or protein domains) are able to operate multiple functions such as inhibiting the kinase while recruiting other regulatory proteins for nuclear export.

Data availability

All NMR data will be deposited as NMR-Star File in the BMRB. Fluorescence data from Figures 5 and S5 will be deposited to the University of Minnesota repository site: https://conservancy.umn.edu/

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Cristina Olivieri

    Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6957-6743
  2. Yingjie Wang

    Chemical Biology, Shenzhen Bay Laboratory, Shenzhen, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Geoffrey C Li

    Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5035-5916
  4. Manu Veliparambil Subrahmanian

    Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Jonggul Kim

    Biophysics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4624-7848
  6. Benjamin R Stultz

    Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Matthew Neibergall

    Chemistry, Bethel University, Saint Paul, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Fernando Porcelli

    DIBAF, University of Tuscia, Viterbo, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Joseph M Muretta

    Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. David D T. Thomas

    Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8822-2040
  11. Jiali Gao

    School of Chemical Biology and Technology, Beijing University Graduate School, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Donald K Blumenthal

    Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Susan S Taylor

    Department of Pharmacology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7702-6108
  14. Gianluigi Veglia

    Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States
    For correspondence
    vegli001@umn.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2795-6964

Funding

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM 100310)

  • Gianluigi Veglia

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM 46736)

  • Jiali Gao

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Lewis E Kay, University of Toronto, Canada

Version history

  1. Received: January 30, 2020
  2. Accepted: April 27, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: April 27, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: May 18, 2020 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record updated: May 26, 2020 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2020, Olivieri et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,917
    Page views
  • 290
    Downloads
  • 15
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Cristina Olivieri
  2. Yingjie Wang
  3. Geoffrey C Li
  4. Manu Veliparambil Subrahmanian
  5. Jonggul Kim
  6. Benjamin R Stultz
  7. Matthew Neibergall
  8. Fernando Porcelli
  9. Joseph M Muretta
  10. David D T. Thomas
  11. Jiali Gao
  12. Donald K Blumenthal
  13. Susan S Taylor
  14. Gianluigi Veglia
(2020)
Multi-state recognition pathway of the intrinsically disordered protein kinase inhibitor by protein kinase A
eLife 9:e55607.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.55607

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.55607

Further reading

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Sebastian Jojoa-Cruz, Adrienne E Dubin ... Andrew B Ward
    Research Advance

    The dimeric two-pore OSCA/TMEM63 family has recently been identified as mechanically activated ion channels. Previously, based on the unique features of the structure of OSCA1.2, we postulated the potential involvement of several structural elements in sensing membrane tension (Jojoa-Cruz et al., 2018). Interestingly, while OSCA1, 2, and 3 clades are activated by membrane stretch in cell-attached patches (i.e. they are stretch-activated channels), they differ in their ability to transduce membrane deformation induced by a blunt probe (poking). Here, in an effort to understand the domains contributing to mechanical signal transduction, we used cryo-electron microscopy to solve the structure of Arabidopsis thaliana (At) OSCA3.1, which, unlike AtOSCA1.2, only produced stretch- but not poke-activated currents in our initial characterization (Murthy et al., 2018). Mutagenesis and electrophysiological assessment of conserved and divergent putative mechanosensitive features of OSCA1.2 reveal a selective disruption of the macroscopic currents elicited by poking without considerable effects on stretch-activated currents (SAC). Our results support the involvement of the amphipathic helix and lipid-interacting residues in the membrane fenestration in the response to poking. Our findings position these two structural elements as potential sources of functional diversity within the family.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Tien M Phan, Young C Kim ... Jeetain Mittal
    Research Article

    The heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) family is a crucial component of heterochromatin with diverse functions in gene regulation, cell cycle control, and cell differentiation. In humans, there are three paralogs, HP1α, HP1β, and HP1γ, which exhibit remarkable similarities in their domain architecture and sequence properties. Nevertheless, these paralogs display distinct behaviors in liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS), a process linked to heterochromatin formation. Here, we employ a coarse-grained simulation framework to uncover the sequence features responsible for the observed differences in LLPS. We highlight the significance of the net charge and charge patterning along the sequence in governing paralog LLPS propensities. We also show that both highly conserved folded and less-conserved disordered domains contribute to the observed differences. Furthermore, we explore the potential co-localization of different HP1 paralogs in multicomponent assemblies and the impact of DNA on this process. Importantly, our study reveals that DNA can significantly reshape the stability of a minimal condensate formed by HP1 paralogs due to competitive interactions of HP1α with HP1β and HP1γ versus DNA. In conclusion, our work highlights the physicochemical nature of interactions that govern the distinct phase-separation behaviors of HP1 paralogs and provides a molecular framework for understanding their role in chromatin organization.