Animal Behavior: Whale breaching says it loud and clear
A whale leaping above the surface expends an enormous amount of energy, displaying its health and strength to peers and potential mates.
- Department of Biology, Hampden-Sydney College, United States
From marine biologists on their first field trip to the most jaded sailors, witnessing whales leaping above the sea surface – a behavior called breaching – rarely fails to elicit child-like wonder (Würsig and Whitehead, 2018). But why do whales breach? Is it, for instance, to dislodge external parasites, or could it simply be for play? Since these cetaceans often jump near each other, scientists have long thought that breaching might be a form of communication, a way for a whale to say: “Look how strong I am, I can propel my huge body right out of the water!” Beyond physical strength, this would also convey information about the animal’s genetic fitness – in other words: “You really should consider me as a potential mate!”
Gazelles that conspicuously leap directly in front of predators, peacocks which sport ridiculously huge tails, and even humans who smoke cigarettes or cover their bodies with tattoos are all prime examples of so-called ‘handicap signals’. These traits or behaviors are energy consuming or risky, but they demonstrate that the individual can bear these costs and still thrive (Zahavi, 1977). For a signal to be ‘honest’, however, it must entail a genuine expense to the animal. Until recently, it was not clear how much energy a breach would truly require from a whale, and how this was limited by the length of the animal, its swimming speed and other factors (Figure 1).
Figure 1
The ability of a whale to breach is influenced by many factors.
Breaching is an energetically expensive behavior which depends on a number of interconnected elements. The length of the animal is one of the most limiting factors, affecting, for instance, body maneuverability. Shorter whales require lower swimming speeds to breach, and therefore lower muscle power. The surface area of flukes and flippers also influences how fast a whale can swim and turn. These and other features determine whether the animal has the capacity to expend a large amount of energy in a very short time (high energetic performance), and is therefore able to breach.
Now, in eLife, Paolo Segre from Stanford University and colleagues based in Italy, Portugal, the United States and Denmark report the results of a study on the energetic limits of breaching (Segre et al., 2020). The 18-member team used long poles and suction cups to temporarily attach sensors onto the bodies of five species of whales. The instruments recorded 187 breaches, tracking water depth and temperature as well as capturing the position of the whales over time and video clips before and during the jumps (Goldbogen et al., 2017; Cade et al., 2018).
Using these data to reconstruct the trajectory of breaching whales showed, for example, that young humpback whales often roll on their sides as they exit the water, while the adults usually emerge right-side up or upside-down. Swimming speeds reached a brisk 8–9 meters per second, but the large amounts of energy required for each breach did not stop some of the whales from leaping repeatedly: indeed, one juvenile humpback breached 52 times in just over four hours.
To calculate how much energy a whale spends on a breach, Segre et al. considered a series of factors that included metabolic rates, the energy needed for muscular contractions (Fish, 1998), the frequency of the tail stroke, and variables that influence water resistance (such as viscosity). Calculations showed that the energy costs of breaching depended on muscle power, which in turn is related to the length of the whale (Kahane-Rapport and Goldbogen, 2018; Gough et al., 2019). Large specimens must swim faster to clear the surface, requiring their muscles to generate tremendous power: a 15-meter-long humpback whale needs nearly ten times more energy per breach than a whale that is 8 meters long. In fact, in the few seconds that it takes to breach, the 15-meter whale can expend as much energy as a 60-kilogram human would during a marathon. Segre et al. therefore contend that a breach may represent the “most expensive burst maneuver” in all of nature, pushing the boundaries of muscular performance and providing an honest signal of a whale’s general health.
Overall, it is the length of a whale (rather than its mass) that appears to be the biggest obstacle to breaching: this may explain differences in breaching behavior between species of similar mass, but distinct builds. Blue whales, the longest species, are limited by how much power their muscles can deliver in short bursts and by the hydrodynamics of their tails. On the other hand, right whales, another large species, have short and chunky bodies, wider tails, and a thick, buoyant fat layer, all of which could help with breaching. In the end, species like humpbacks – famous for their agility as much as their complex social structure (Segre et al., 2019) – might be best suited to breaching. Regardless, there is no doubt that breaching comes at great expense for all types of whales: so next time you marvel at a leaping cetacean, consider the breach’s dazzling metabolic cost as well as its eye-widening beauty.
References
-
Determining forward speed from accelerometer jiggle in aquatic environmentsThe Journal of Experimental Biology 221:jeb170449.https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.170449
-
Comparative kinematics and hydrodynamics of odontocete cetaceans: morphological and ecological correlates with swimming performanceThe Journal of Experimental Biology 201:2867–2877.
-
Scaling of swimming performance in baleen whalesThe Journal of Experimental Biology 222:jeb204172.https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.204172
-
Allometric scaling of morphology and engulfment capacity in rorqual whalesJournal of Morphology 279:1256–1268.https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.20846
-
Body flexibility enhances maneuverability in the world's largest predatorIntegrative and Comparative Biology 59:48–60.https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icy121
-
Encyclopedia of Marine Mammals6–10, Aerial behavior, Encyclopedia of Marine Mammals, San Diego, Academic Press, 10.1016/b978-0-12-804327-1.00040-6.
-
The cost of honesty (further remarks on the handicap principle)Journal of Theoretical Biology 67:603–605.https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(77)90061-3
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2020, Werth and Lemon
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 2,370
- views
-
- 129
- downloads
-
- 1
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Animal Behavior: Whale breaching says it loud and clear
eLife 9:e55722.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.55722
Further reading
-
- Cell Biology
- Physics of Living Systems
The endoplasmic reticulum (ER), the largest cellular compartment, harbours the machinery for the biogenesis of secretory proteins and lipids, calcium storage/mobilisation, and detoxification. It is shaped as layered membranous sheets interconnected with a network of tubules extending throughout the cell. Understanding the influence of the ER morphology dynamics on molecular transport may offer clues to rationalising neuro-pathologies caused by ER morphogen mutations. It remains unclear, however, how the ER facilitates its intra-luminal mobility and homogenises its content. It has been recently proposed that intra-luminal transport may be enabled by active contractions of ER tubules. To surmount the barriers to empirical studies of the minuscule spatial and temporal scales relevant to ER nanofluidics, here we exploit the principles of viscous fluid dynamics to generate a theoretical physical model emulating in silico the content motion in actively contracting nanoscopic tubular networks. The computational model reveals the luminal particle speeds, and their impact in facilitating active transport, of the active contractile behaviour of the different ER components along various time–space parameters. The results of the model indicate that reproducing transport with velocities similar to those reported experimentally in single-particle tracking would require unrealistically high values of tubule contraction site length and rate. Considering further nanofluidic scenarios, we show that width contractions of the ER’s flat domains (perinuclear sheets) generate local flows with only a short-range effect on luminal transport. Only contractions of peripheral sheets can reproduce experimental measurements, provided they are able to contract fast enough.
-
- Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
- Physics of Living Systems
For drugs to be active they have to reach their targets. Within cells this requires crossing the cell membrane, and then free diffusion, distribution, and availability. Here, we explored the in-cell diffusion rates and distribution of a series of small molecular fluorescent drugs, in comparison to proteins, by microscopy and fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP). While all proteins diffused freely, we found a strong correlation between pKa and the intracellular diffusion and distribution of small molecule drugs. Weakly basic, small-molecule drugs displayed lower fractional recovery after photobleaching and 10- to-20-fold slower diffusion rates in cells than in aqueous solutions. As, more than half of pharmaceutical drugs are weakly basic, they, are protonated in the cell cytoplasm. Protonation, facilitates the formation of membrane impermeable ionic form of the weak base small molecules. This results in ion trapping, further reducing diffusion rates of weakly basic small molecule drugs under macromolecular crowding conditions where other nonspecific interactions become more relevant and dominant. Our imaging studies showed that acidic organelles, particularly the lysosome, captured these molecules. Surprisingly, blocking lysosomal import only slightly increased diffusion rates and fractional recovery. Conversely, blocking protonation by N-acetylated analogues, greatly enhanced their diffusion and fractional recovery after FRAP. Based on these results, N-acetylation of small molecule drugs may improve the intracellular availability and distribution of weakly basic, small molecule drugs within cells.
