Synergy between SIRT1 and SIRT6 helps recognize DNA breaks and potentiates the DNA damage response and repair in humans and mice

  1. Fanbiao Meng
  2. Minxian Qian
  3. Bin Peng
  4. Linyuan Peng
  5. Xiaohui Wang
  6. Kang Zheng
  7. Zuojun Liu
  8. Xiaolong Tang
  9. Shuju Zhang
  10. Shimin Sun
  11. Xinyue Cao
  12. Qiuxiang Pang
  13. Bosheng Zhao
  14. Wenbin Ma
  15. Zhou Songyang
  16. Bo Xu
  17. Wei-Guo Zhu
  18. Xingzhi Xu  Is a corresponding author
  19. Baohua Liu  Is a corresponding author
  1. Shenzhen University Health Science Center, China
  2. Shandong University of Technology, China
  3. Sun Yat-sen University, China
  4. Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, China

Abstract

The DNA damage response (DDR) is a highly orchestrated process but how double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs) are initially recognized is unclear. Here, we show that polymerized SIRT6 deacetylase recognizes DSBs and potentiates the DDR in human and mouse cells. First, SIRT1 deacetylates SIRT6 at residue K33, which is important for SIRT6 polymerization and mobilization toward DSBs. Then, K33-deacetylated SIRT6 anchors to γH2AX, allowing its retention on and subsequent remodeling of local chromatin. We show that a K33R mutation that mimics hypoacetylated SIRT6 can rescue defective DNA repair as a result of SIRT1 deficiency in cultured cells. These data highlight the synergistic action between SIRTs in the spatiotemporal regulation of the DDR and DNA repair in humans and mice.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Fanbiao Meng

    Guangdong Key Laboratory of Genome Stability and Human Disease Prevention, Shenzhen University Health Science Center, Shenzhen, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Minxian Qian

    Guangdong Key Laboratory of Genome Stability and Human Disease Prevention, Shenzhen University Health Science Center, Shenzhen, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1763-2325
  3. Bin Peng

    Guangdong Key Laboratory of Genome Stability and Human Disease Prevention, Shenzhen University Health Science Center, Shenzhen, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Linyuan Peng

    Guangdong Key Laboratory of Genome Stability and Human Disease Prevention, Shenzhen University Health Science Center, Shenzhen, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Xiaohui Wang

    Guangdong Key Laboratory of Genome Stability and Human Disease Prevention, Shenzhen University Health Science Center, Shenzhen, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Kang Zheng

    Anti-aging & Regenerative Medicine Research Institution, School of Life Sciences, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6347-4241
  7. Zuojun Liu

    Guangdong Key Laboratory of Genome Stability and Human Disease Prevention, Shenzhen University Health Science Center, Shenzhen, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Xiaolong Tang

    Guangdong Key Laboratory of Genome Stability and Human Disease Prevention, Shenzhen University Health Science Center, Shenzhen, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4744-5846
  9. Shuju Zhang

    Guangdong Key Laboratory of Genome Stability and Human Disease Prevention, Shenzhen University Health Science Center, Shenzhen, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Shimin Sun

    Anti-aging & Regenerative Medicine Research Institution, School of Life Sciences, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Xinyue Cao

    Guangdong Key Laboratory of Genome Stability and Human Disease Prevention, Shenzhen University Health Science Center, Shenzhen, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Qiuxiang Pang

    Anti-aging & Regenerative Medicine Research Institution, School of Life Sciences, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Bosheng Zhao

    Anti-aging & Regenerative Medicine Research Institution, School of Life Sciences, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Wenbin Ma

    Key Laboratory of Gene Engineering of the Ministry of Education and State Key Laboratory for Biocontrol, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Zhou Songyang

    Key Laboratory of Gene Engineering of the Ministry of Education and State Key Laboratory for Biocontrol, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Bo Xu

    Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Wei-Guo Zhu

    Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shenzhen University Health Science Center, Shenzhen, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8385-6581
  18. Xingzhi Xu

    Guangdong Key Laboratory of Genome Stability and Human Disease Prevention, Shenzhen University Health Science Center, Shenzhen, China
    For correspondence
    xingzhi.xu@szu.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. Baohua Liu

    Guangdong Key Laboratory of Genome Stability and Human Disease Prevention, Shenzhen University Health Science Center, Shenzhen, China
    For correspondence
    ppliew@szu.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1599-8059

Funding

National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFA0503900)

  • Wei-Guo Zhu
  • Baohua Liu

National Natural Science Foundation of China (91849208,81972602,81702909,81871114,81601215)

  • Minxian Qian
  • Zuojun Liu
  • Xiaolong Tang
  • Xingzhi Xu
  • Baohua Liu

National Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2015A030308007,2017B030301016)

  • Minxian Qian
  • Wei-Guo Zhu
  • Xingzhi Xu
  • Baohua Liu

Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Commission (ZDSYS20190902093401689,KQJSCX20180328093403969,JCYJ20180507182044945)

  • Baohua Liu

Tianjin Municipal Science Foundation for Youths (18JCQNJC79800)

  • Fanbiao Meng

Youth Foundation of Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital (B1714)

  • Fanbiao Meng

National Natural Science Foundation of China (91949124)

  • Minxian Qian

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2020, Meng et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,224
    views
  • 519
    downloads
  • 61
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.55828

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Conor J Howard, Nathan S Abell ... Nathan B Lubock
    Research Article

    Deep Mutational Scanning (DMS) is an emerging method to systematically test the functional consequences of thousands of sequence changes to a protein target in a single experiment. Because of its utility in interpreting both human variant effects and protein structure-function relationships, it holds substantial promise to improve drug discovery and clinical development. However, applications in this domain require improved experimental and analytical methods. To address this need, we report novel DMS methods to precisely and quantitatively interrogate disease-relevant mechanisms, protein-ligand interactions, and assess predicted response to drug treatment. Using these methods, we performed a DMS of the melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R), a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) implicated in obesity and an active target of drug development efforts. We assessed the effects of >6600 single amino acid substitutions on MC4R’s function across 18 distinct experimental conditions, resulting in >20 million unique measurements. From this, we identified variants that have unique effects on MC4R-mediated Gαs- and Gαq-signaling pathways, which could be used to design drugs that selectively bias MC4R’s activity. We also identified pathogenic variants that are likely amenable to a corrector therapy. Finally, we functionally characterized structural relationships that distinguish the binding of peptide versus small molecule ligands, which could guide compound optimization. Collectively, these results demonstrate that DMS is a powerful method to empower drug discovery and development.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Meina He, Yongxin Tao ... Wenli Chen
    Research Article

    Copper is an essential enzyme cofactor in bacteria, but excess copper is highly toxic. Bacteria can cope with copper stress by increasing copper resistance and initiating chemorepellent response. However, it remains unclear how bacteria coordinate chemotaxis and resistance to copper. By screening proteins that interacted with the chemotaxis kinase CheA, we identified a copper-binding repressor CsoR that interacted with CheA in Pseudomonas putida. CsoR interacted with the HPT (P1), Dimer (P3), and HATPase_c (P4) domains of CheA and inhibited CheA autophosphorylation, resulting in decreased chemotaxis. The copper-binding of CsoR weakened its interaction with CheA, which relieved the inhibition of chemotaxis by CsoR. In addition, CsoR bound to the promoter of copper-resistance genes to inhibit gene expression, and copper-binding released CsoR from the promoter, leading to increased gene expression and copper resistance. P. putida cells exhibited a chemorepellent response to copper in a CheA-dependent manner, and CsoR inhibited the chemorepellent response to copper. Besides, the CheA-CsoR interaction also existed in proteins from several other bacterial species. Our results revealed a mechanism by which bacteria coordinately regulated chemotaxis and resistance to copper by CsoR.