Self-restoration of cardiac excitation rhythm by anti-arrhythmic ion channel gating

  1. Rupamanjari Majumder
  2. Tim De Coster
  3. Nina Kudryashova
  4. Arie O Verkerk
  5. Ivan V Kazbanov
  6. Balázs Ördög
  7. Niels Harlaar
  8. Ronald Wilders
  9. Antoine A F de Vries
  10. Dirk L Ypey
  11. Alexander V Panfilov
  12. Daniel A Pijnappels  Is a corresponding author
  1. Leiden University Medical Center, Netherlands
  2. School of Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  3. Amsterdam UMC, Netherlands
  4. Ghent University, Belgium

Abstract

Homeostatic regulation protects organisms against hazardous physiological changes. However, such regulation is limited in certain organs and associated biological processes. For example, the heart fails to self-restore its normal electrical activity once disturbed, as with sustained arrhythmias. Here we present proof-of-concept of a biological self-restoring system that allows automatic detection and correction of such abnormal excitation rhythms. For the heart, its realization involves the integration of ion channels with newly designed gating properties into cardiomyocytes. This allows cardiac tissue to i) discriminate between normal rhythm and arrhythmia based on frequency-dependent gating and ii) generate an ionic current for termination of the detected arrhythmia. We show in silico, that for both human atrial and ventricular arrhythmias, activation of these channels leads to rapid and repeated restoration of normal excitation rhythm. Experimental validation is provided by injecting the designed channel current for arrhythmia termination in human atrial myocytes using dynamic clamp.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for Figure 5.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Rupamanjari Majumder

    Laboratory of Experimental Cardiology, Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3851-9225
  2. Tim De Coster

    Laboratory of Experimental Cardiology, Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4942-9866
  3. Nina Kudryashova

    Institute for Adaptive and Neural Computation, School of Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Arie O Verkerk

    Department of Medical Biology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2140-834X
  5. Ivan V Kazbanov

    Deaprtment of Physics and Astronomy, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Balázs Ördög

    Laboratory of Experimental Cardiology, Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Niels Harlaar

    Laboratory of Experimental Cardiology, Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Ronald Wilders

    Department of Medical Biology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1340-0869
  9. Antoine A F de Vries

    Laboratory of Experimental Cardiology, Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Dirk L Ypey

    Laboratory of Experimental Cardiology, Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Alexander V Panfilov

    Department of Physics and Astronomy, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Daniel A Pijnappels

    Laboratory of Experimental Cardiology, Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
    For correspondence
    D.A.Pijnappels@lumc.nl
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6731-4125

Funding

European Research Council (ERC starting grant 716509)

  • Daniel A Pijnappels

Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO Vidi grant 91714336)

  • Daniel A Pijnappels

Ammodo grant

  • Daniel A Pijnappels

Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (project 114022503)

  • Antoine A F de Vries

Leiden Regenerative Medicine Platform Holding (LRMPH project 8212/41235)

  • Antoine A F de Vries

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: Conditional immortalization of human atrial myocytes was done with cells isolated from elective abortion material. Human tissue was obtained after individual permission using standard informed consent procedures. Experiments with these cells were performed in accordance with the national guidelines, approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of the Leiden University Medical Center (protocol P08.087), and conformed to the Declaration of Helsinki.

Copyright

© 2020, Majumder et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,373
    views
  • 277
    downloads
  • 17
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Rupamanjari Majumder
  2. Tim De Coster
  3. Nina Kudryashova
  4. Arie O Verkerk
  5. Ivan V Kazbanov
  6. Balázs Ördög
  7. Niels Harlaar
  8. Ronald Wilders
  9. Antoine A F de Vries
  10. Dirk L Ypey
  11. Alexander V Panfilov
  12. Daniel A Pijnappels
(2020)
Self-restoration of cardiac excitation rhythm by anti-arrhythmic ion channel gating
eLife 9:e55921.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.55921

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.55921

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Computational and Systems Biology
    Rosalyn W Sayaman, Masaru Miyano ... Mark A LaBarge
    Research Article Updated

    Effects from aging in single cells are heterogenous, whereas at the organ- and tissue-levels aging phenotypes tend to appear as stereotypical changes. The mammary epithelium is a bilayer of two major phenotypically and functionally distinct cell lineages: luminal epithelial and myoepithelial cells. Mammary luminal epithelia exhibit substantial stereotypical changes with age that merit attention because these cells are the putative cells-of-origin for breast cancers. We hypothesize that effects from aging that impinge upon maintenance of lineage fidelity increase susceptibility to cancer initiation. We generated and analyzed transcriptomes from primary luminal epithelial and myoepithelial cells from younger <30 (y)ears old and older >55 y women. In addition to age-dependent directional changes in gene expression, we observed increased transcriptional variance with age that contributed to genome-wide loss of lineage fidelity. Age-dependent variant responses were common to both lineages, whereas directional changes were almost exclusively detected in luminal epithelia and involved altered regulation of chromatin and genome organizers such as SATB1. Epithelial expression variance of gap junction protein GJB6 increased with age, and modulation of GJB6 expression in heterochronous co-cultures revealed that it provided a communication conduit from myoepithelial cells that drove directional change in luminal cells. Age-dependent luminal transcriptomes comprised a prominent signal that could be detected in bulk tissue during aging and transition into cancers. A machine learning classifier based on luminal-specific aging distinguished normal from cancer tissue and was highly predictive of breast cancer subtype. We speculate that luminal epithelia are the ultimate site of integration of the variant responses to aging in their surrounding tissue, and that their emergent phenotype both endows cells with the ability to become cancer-cells-of-origin and represents a biosensor that presages cancer susceptibility.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    David B Blumenthal, Marta Lucchetta ... Martin H Schaefer
    Research Article Updated

    Degree distributions in protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks are believed to follow a power law (PL). However, technical and study biases affect the experimental procedures for detecting PPIs. For instance, cancer-associated proteins have received disproportional attention. Moreover, bait proteins in large-scale experiments tend to have many false-positive interaction partners. Studying the degree distributions of thousands of PPI networks of controlled provenance, we address the question if PL distributions in observed PPI networks could be explained by these biases alone. Our findings are supported by mathematical models and extensive simulations, and indicate that study bias and technical bias suffice to produce the observed PL distribution. It is, hence, problematic to derive hypotheses about the topology of the true biological interactome from the PL distributions in observed PPI networks. Our study casts doubt on the use of the PL property of biological networks as a modeling assumption or quality criterion in network biology.