The development of active binocular vision under normal and alternate rearing conditions

  1. Lukas Klimmasch  Is a corresponding author
  2. Johann Schneider
  3. Alexander Lelais
  4. Maria Fronius
  5. Bertram Emil Shi
  6. Jochen Triesch  Is a corresponding author
  1. Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies (FIAS), Germany
  2. Goethe University, Germany
  3. Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, China

Abstract

The development of binocular vision is an active learning process comprising the development of disparity tuned neurons in visual cortex and the establishment of precise vergence control of the eyes. We present a computational model for the learning and self-calibration of active binocular vision based on the Active Efficient Coding framework, an extension of classic efficient coding ideas to active perception. Under normal rearing conditions with naturalistic input, the model develops disparity tuned neurons and precise vergence control, allowing it to correctly interpret random dot stereograms. Under altered rearing conditions modeled after neurophysiological experiments, the model qualitatively reproduces key experimental findings on changes in binocularity and disparity tuning. Furthermore, the model makes testable predictions regarding how altered rearing conditions impede the learning of precise vergence control. Finally, the model predicts a surprising new effect that impaired vergence control affects the statistics of orientation tuning in visual cortical neurons.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for all Figures displaying our own generated data.

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Lukas Klimmasch

    Theoretical Neuroscience, Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies (FIAS), Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    For correspondence
    klimmasch@fias.uni-frankfurt.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9923-3052
  2. Johann Schneider

    Theoretical Neuroscience, Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies (FIAS), Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Alexander Lelais

    Theoretical Neuroscience, Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies (FIAS), Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Maria Fronius

    Department of Ophthalmology, Child Vision Research Unit, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Bertram Emil Shi

    Dept of Electronic and Computer Engineering, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Jochen Triesch

    Theoretical Neuroscience, Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies (FIAS), Frankfurt am Main, Germany
    For correspondence
    triesch@fias.uni-frankfurt.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8166-2441

Funding

German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (01GQ1414)

  • Lukas Klimmasch
  • Alexander Lelais

Gernan Federal Ministry of Education and Research (01EW1603A)

  • Lukas Klimmasch
  • Johann Schneider
  • Maria Fronius
  • Jochen Triesch

European Union's Horizon 2020 (713010)

  • Alexander Lelais

Hong Kong Research Grants Council (16244416)

  • Bertram Emil Shi

Quandt Foundation

  • Jochen Triesch

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2021, Klimmasch et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,476
    views
  • 116
    downloads
  • 3
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.56212

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    Thomas A Bos, Elizaveta Polyakova ... Monique RM Jongbloed
    Research Article Updated

    Human autonomic neuronal cell models are emerging as tools for modeling diseases such as cardiac arrhythmias. In this systematic review, we compared 33 articles applying 14 different protocols to generate sympathetic neurons and 3 different procedures to produce parasympathetic neurons. All methods involved the differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells, and none employed permanent or reversible cell immortalization. Almost all protocols were reproduced in multiple pluripotent stem cell lines, and over half showed evidence of neural firing capacity. Common limitations in the field are a lack of three-dimensional models and models that include multiple cell types. Sympathetic neuron differentiation protocols largely mirrored embryonic development, with the notable absence of migration, axon extension, and target-specificity cues. Parasympathetic neuron differentiation protocols may be improved by including several embryonic cues promoting cell survival, cell maturation, or ion channel expression. Moreover, additional markers to define parasympathetic neurons in vitro may support the validity of these protocols. Nonetheless, four sympathetic neuron differentiation protocols and one parasympathetic neuron differentiation protocol reported more than two-thirds of cells expressing autonomic neuron markers. Altogether, these protocols promise to open new research avenues of human autonomic neuron development and disease modeling.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Sarah Y Coomson, Salil A Lachke
    Insight

    A study in mice reveals key interactions between proteins involved in fibroblast growth factor signaling and how they contribute to distinct stages of eye lens development.