1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
  2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
Download icon

Positively selected modifications in the pore of TbAQP2 allow pentamidine to enter Trypanosoma brucei

  1. Ali Alghamdi
  2. Jane C Munday
  3. Gustavo Daniel Campagnaro
  4. Dominik Gurvic
  5. Fredrik Svensson
  6. Chinyere E Okpara
  7. Arvind Kumar
  8. Juan Quintana
  9. Maria Esther Martin Abril
  10. Patrik Milić
  11. Laura Watson
  12. Daniel Paape
  13. Luca Settimo
  14. Anna Dimitriou
  15. Joanna Wielinska
  16. Graeme Smart
  17. Laura F Anderson
  18. Christopher M Woodley
  19. Siu Pui Ying Kelly
  20. Hasan MS Ibrahim
  21. Fabian Hulpia
  22. Mohammed I Al-Salabi
  23. Anthonius A Eze
  24. Ibrahim A Teka
  25. Simon Gudin
  26. Mark Field
  27. Christophe Dardonville
  28. Richard R Tidwell
  29. Mark Carrington
  30. Paul O'Neill
  31. David W Boykin
  32. Ulrich Zachariae
  33. Harry P De Koning  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Glasgow, United Kingdom
  2. University of Dundee, United Kingdom
  3. IOTA Pharmaceuticals Ltd, United Kingdom
  4. University of Liverpool, United Kingdom
  5. Georgia State University, United States
  6. University of Ghent, Belgium
  7. CSIC, Spain
  8. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States
  9. University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
Research Article
  • Cited 4
  • Views 922
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2020;9:e56416 doi: 10.7554/eLife.56416

Abstract

Mutations in the Trypanosoma brucei aquaporin AQP2 are associated with resistance to pentamidine and melarsoprol. We show that TbAQP2 but not TbAQP3 was positively selected for increased pore size from a common ancestor aquaporin. We demonstrate that TbAQP2's unique architecture permits pentamidine permeation through its central pore and show how specific mutations in highly conserved motifs affect drug permeation. Introduction of key TbAQP2 amino acids into TbAQP3 renders the latter permeable to pentamidine. Molecular dynamics demonstrates that permeation by dicationic pentamidine is energetically favourable in TbAQP2, driven by the membrane potential, although aquaporins are normally strictly impermeable for ionic species. We also identify the structural determinants that make pentamidine a permeant although most other diamidine drugs are excluded. Our results have wide-ranging implications for optimising antitrypanosomal drugs and averting cross-resistance. Moreover, these new insights in aquaporin permeation may allow the pharmacological exploitation of other members of this ubiquitous gene family.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ali Alghamdi

    Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Jane C Munday

    Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Gustavo Daniel Campagnaro

    Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6542-0485
  4. Dominik Gurvic

    2.Computational Biology Centre for Translational and Interdisciplinary Research, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Fredrik Svensson

    Chemoinformatics, IOTA Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Chinyere E Okpara

    Department of Chemistry, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Arvind Kumar

    Chemistry Department, Georgia State University, Atalanta, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Juan Quintana

    School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Maria Esther Martin Abril

    Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Patrik Milić

    Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Laura Watson

    Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Daniel Paape

    The Wellcome Trust Centre for Molecular Parasitology, Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation,, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Luca Settimo

    Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Anna Dimitriou

    Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Joanna Wielinska

    Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Graeme Smart

    Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Laura F Anderson

    Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Christopher M Woodley

    Department of Chemistry, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. Siu Pui Ying Kelly

    Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  20. Hasan MS Ibrahim

    Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  21. Fabian Hulpia

    Laboratory for Medicinal Chemistry, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7470-3484
  22. Mohammed I Al-Salabi

    Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  23. Anthonius A Eze

    Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4821-1689
  24. Ibrahim A Teka

    Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  25. Simon Gudin

    Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  26. Mark Field

    School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  27. Christophe Dardonville

    Instituto de Química Médica, CSIC, Madrid, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  28. Richard R Tidwell

    Department of Pathology and Lab Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  29. Mark Carrington

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6435-7266
  30. Paul O'Neill

    Department of Chemistry, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  31. David W Boykin

    Chemistry Department, Georgia State University, Atalanta, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  32. Ulrich Zachariae

    School of Life Sciences / School of Science and Engineering, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  33. Harry P De Koning

    Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    Harry.De-Koning@glasgow.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9963-1827

Funding

Medical Research Council (84733)

  • Harry P De Koning

National Institutes of Health (GM111749)

  • David W Boykin

Medical Research Council (MR/R015791/1)

  • Harry P De Koning

Scottish Universities Physics Alliance

  • Ulrich Zachariae

Albaha University, Saudi Arabia

  • Ali Alghamdi

Science Without Borders, Brazil (206385/2014-5)

  • Gustavo Daniel Campagnaro

Wellcome (204697/Z/16/Z)

  • Mark Field

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Christine Clayton, DKFZ-ZMBH Alliance, Germany

Publication history

  1. Received: February 26, 2020
  2. Accepted: August 6, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: August 7, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Accepted Manuscript updated: August 11, 2020 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record published: September 4, 2020 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2020, Alghamdi et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 922
    Page views
  • 144
    Downloads
  • 4
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Mikel Garcia-Marcos
    Research Article Updated

    It has become evident that activation of heterotrimeric G-proteins by cytoplasmic proteins that are not G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) plays a role in physiology and disease. Despite sharing the same biochemical guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) activity as GPCRs in vitro, the mechanisms by which these cytoplasmic proteins trigger G-protein-dependent signaling in cells have not been elucidated. Heterotrimeric G-proteins can give rise to two active signaling species, Gα-GTP and dissociated Gβγ, with different downstream effectors, but how non-receptor GEFs affect the levels of these two species in cells is not known. Here, a systematic comparison of GPCRs and three unrelated non-receptor proteins with GEF activity in vitro (GIV/Girdin, AGS1/Dexras1, and Ric-8A) revealed high divergence in their contribution to generating Gα-GTP and free Gβγ in cells directly measured with live-cell biosensors. These findings demonstrate fundamental differences in how receptor and non-receptor G-protein activators promote signaling in cells despite sharing similar biochemical activities in vitro.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Zachary F Mandell et al.
    Research Article

    NusA and NusG are transcription factors that stimulate RNA polymerase pausing in Bacillus subtilis. While NusA was known to function as an intrinsic termination factor in B. subtilis, the role of NusG in this process was unknown. To examine the individual and combinatorial roles that NusA and NusG play in intrinsic termination, Term-seq was conducted in wild type, NusA depletion, DnusG, and NusA depletion DnusG strains. We determined that NusG functions as an intrinsic termination factor that works alone and cooperatively with NusA to facilitate termination at 88% of the 1400 identified intrinsic terminators. Our results indicate that NusG stimulates a sequence-specific pause that assists in the completion of suboptimal terminator hairpins with weak terminal A-U and G-U base pairs at the bottom of the stem. Loss of NusA and NusG leads to global misregulation of gene expression and loss of NusG results in flagella and swimming motility defects.