A mechanism for the extension and unfolding of parallel G-quadruplexes by human telomerase at single-molecule resolution

  1. Bishnu P Paudel
  2. Aaron Lavel Moye
  3. Hala Abou Assi
  4. Roberto El-Khoury
  5. Scott Cohen
  6. Jessica K Holien
  7. Monica L Birrento
  8. Siritron Samosorn
  9. Kamthorn Intharapichai
  10. Christopher G Tomlinson
  11. Marie-Paule Teulade-Fichou
  12. Carlos González
  13. Jennifer L Beck
  14. Masad J Damha
  15. Antoine M van Oijen
  16. Tracy M Bryan  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Wollongong, Australia
  2. Children's Medical Research Institute, Australia
  3. McGill University, Canada
  4. RMIT University, Australia
  5. Srinakharinwirot University, Thailand
  6. Kyoto Institute of Technology, Japan
  7. PSL Research University, France
  8. Instituto de Química Física 'Rocasolano', Spain

Abstract

Telomeric G-quadruplexes (G4) were long believed to form a protective structure at telomeres, preventing their extension by the ribonucleoprotein telomerase. Contrary to this belief, we have previously demonstrated that parallel-stranded conformations of telomeric G4 can be extended by human and ciliate telomerase. However, a mechanistic understanding of the interaction of telomerase with structured DNA remained elusive. Here, we use single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer (smFRET) microscopy and bulk-phase enzymology to propose a mechanism for the resolution and extension of parallel G4 by telomerase. Binding is initiated by the RNA template of telomerase interacting with the G-quadruplex; nucleotide addition then proceeds to the end of the RNA template. It is only through the large conformational change of translocation following synthesis that the G-quadruplex structure is completely unfolded to a linear product. Surprisingly, parallel G4 stabilization with either small molecule ligands or by chemical modification does not always inhibit G4 unfolding and extension by telomerase. These data reveal that telomerase is a parallel G-quadruplex resolvase.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for all summary graphs.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Bishnu P Paudel

    School of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3518-3882
  2. Aaron Lavel Moye

    Cell Biology Unit, Children's Medical Research Institute, Westmead, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Hala Abou Assi

    Department of Chemistry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1087-8805
  4. Roberto El-Khoury

    Department of Chemistry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Scott Cohen

    Cell Biology Unit, Children's Medical Research Institute, Westmead, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Jessica K Holien

    School of Science, College of Science, Engineering and Health, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Monica L Birrento

    School of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Siritron Samosorn

    Department of Chemistry, Srinakharinwirot University, Bangkok, Thailand
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Kamthorn Intharapichai

    Department of Biobased Materials Science, Kyoto Institute of Technology, Kyoto, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Christopher G Tomlinson

    Cell Biology Unit, Children's Medical Research Institute, Westmead, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Marie-Paule Teulade-Fichou

    Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Carlos González

    Instituto de Química Física 'Rocasolano', Madrid, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Jennifer L Beck

    School of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Masad J Damha

    Department of Chemistry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Antoine M van Oijen

    School of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1794-5161
  16. Tracy M Bryan

    Cell Biology Unit, Children's Medical Research Institute, Westmead, Australia
    For correspondence
    tbryan@cmri.org.au
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7990-5501

Funding

Cancer Council NSW (RG 11-07,RG 16-10)

  • Tracy M Bryan

Cancer Institute NSW

  • Aaron Lavel Moye

Australian Research Council

  • Antoine M van Oijen

Ernest and Piroska Major Foundation

  • Scott Cohen

National Science and Engineering Council

  • Masad J Damha

Centre of Excellence for Innovation in Chemistry (PERCH-CIC)

  • Siritron Samosorn

Research Unit of Natural Products and Organic Synthesis for Drug Discovery (NPOS 405/2560)

  • Siritron Samosorn

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2020, Paudel et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,387
    views
  • 514
    downloads
  • 44
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Bishnu P Paudel
  2. Aaron Lavel Moye
  3. Hala Abou Assi
  4. Roberto El-Khoury
  5. Scott Cohen
  6. Jessica K Holien
  7. Monica L Birrento
  8. Siritron Samosorn
  9. Kamthorn Intharapichai
  10. Christopher G Tomlinson
  11. Marie-Paule Teulade-Fichou
  12. Carlos González
  13. Jennifer L Beck
  14. Masad J Damha
  15. Antoine M van Oijen
  16. Tracy M Bryan
(2020)
A mechanism for the extension and unfolding of parallel G-quadruplexes by human telomerase at single-molecule resolution
eLife 9:e56428.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.56428

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.56428

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Angel D'Oliviera, Xuhang Dai ... Jeffrey S Mugridge
    Research Article

    The SARS-CoV-2 main protease (Mpro or Nsp5) is critical for production of viral proteins during infection and, like many viral proteases, also targets host proteins to subvert their cellular functions. Here, we show that the human tRNA methyltransferase TRMT1 is recognized and cleaved by SARS-CoV-2 Mpro. TRMT1 installs the N2,N2-dimethylguanosine (m2,2G) modification on mammalian tRNAs, which promotes cellular protein synthesis and redox homeostasis. We find that Mpro can cleave endogenous TRMT1 in human cell lysate, resulting in removal of the TRMT1 zinc finger domain. Evolutionary analysis shows the TRMT1 cleavage site is highly conserved in mammals, except in Muroidea, where TRMT1 is likely resistant to cleavage. TRMT1 proteolysis results in reduced tRNA binding and elimination of tRNA methyltransferase activity. We also determined the structure of an Mpro-TRMT1 peptide complex that shows how TRMT1 engages the Mpro active site in an uncommon substrate binding conformation. Finally, enzymology and molecular dynamics simulations indicate that kinetic discrimination occurs during a later step of Mpro-mediated proteolysis following substrate binding. Together, these data provide new insights into substrate recognition by SARS-CoV-2 Mpro that could help guide future antiviral therapeutic development and show how proteolysis of TRMT1 during SARS-CoV-2 infection impairs both TRMT1 tRNA binding and tRNA modification activity to disrupt host translation and potentially impact COVID-19 pathogenesis or phenotypes.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Qian Wang, Jinxin Liu ... Qian Liu
    Research Article

    Paramyxovirus membrane fusion requires an attachment protein for receptor binding and a fusion protein for membrane fusion triggering. Nipah virus (NiV) attachment protein (G) binds to ephrinB2 or -B3 receptors, and fusion protein (F) mediates membrane fusion. NiV-F is a class I fusion protein and is activated by endosomal cleavage. The crystal structure of a soluble GCN4-decorated NiV-F shows a hexamer-of-trimer assembly. Here, we used single-molecule localization microscopy to quantify the NiV-F distribution and organization on cell and virus-like particle membranes at a nanometer precision. We found that NiV-F on biological membranes forms distinctive clusters that are independent of endosomal cleavage or expression levels. The sequestration of NiV-F into dense clusters favors membrane fusion triggering. The nano-distribution and organization of NiV-F are susceptible to mutations at the hexamer-of-trimer interface, and the putative oligomerization motif on the transmembrane domain. We also show that NiV-F nanoclusters are maintained by NiV-F–AP-2 interactions and the clathrin coat assembly. We propose that the organization of NiV-F into nanoclusters facilitates membrane fusion triggering by a mixed population of NiV-F molecules with varied degrees of cleavage and opportunities for interacting with the NiV-G/receptor complex. These observations provide insights into the in situ organization and activation mechanisms of the NiV fusion machinery.