Abstract

Plants produce phylogenetically and spatially restricted, as well as structurally diverse specialized metabolites via multistep metabolic pathways. Hallmarks of specialized metabolic evolution include enzymatic promiscuity and recruitment of primary metabolic enzymes and examples of genomic clustering of pathway genes. Solanaceae glandular trichomes produce defensive acylsugars, with sidechains that vary in length across the family. We describe a tomato gene cluster on chromosome 7 involved in medium chain acylsugar accumulation due to trichome specific acyl-CoA synthetase and enoyl-CoA hydratase genes. This cluster co-localizes with a tomato steroidal alkaloid gene cluster and is syntenic to a chromosome 12 region containing another acylsugar pathway gene. We reconstructed the evolutionary events leading to this gene cluster and found that its phylogenetic distribution correlates with medium chain acylsugar accumulation across the Solanaceae. This work reveals insights into the dynamics behind gene cluster evolution and cell-type specific metabolite diversity.

Data availability

The RNA-seq reads were deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information Sequence Read Archive under the accession number PRJNA605501. Sequence data used in this study are in the GenBank/EMBL data libraries under these accession numbers: Sl-AACS1(MT078737), Sl-AECH1(MT078736), Sp-AACS1(MT078735), Sp-AECH1(MT078734), Sq-AACS1(MT078732), Sq-AECH1(MT078731), Sq_c35719 (MT078733). The following materials require a material transfer agreement: pEAQ-HT, pK7WG, pKGWFS7, pEarleyGate102, pEarleyGate104, pTRV2-LIC, pICH47742::2x35S-5'UTR-hCas9(STOP)-NOST, pICH41780, pAGM4723, and pICSL11024.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Pengxiang Fan

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Peipei Wang

    Plant BIology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Yann-Ru Lou

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Bryan J Leong

    Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4042-1160
  5. Bethany M Moore

    Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Craig A Schenck

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5711-7213
  7. Rachel Combs

    Translational Plant Sciences, Ohio State University, Columbus, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6626-0903
  8. Pengfei Cao

    MSU-DOE Plant Research Lab, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6998-9302
  9. Federica Brandizzi

    MSU-DOE Plant Research Lab, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0580-8888
  10. Shin-Han Shiu

    Plant BIology, Computational Mathematics Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Robert L Last

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States
    For correspondence
    lastr@msu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6974-9587

Funding

National Science Foundation (1546617)

  • Shin-Han Shiu
  • Robert L Last

National Science Foundation (1655386)

  • Shin-Han Shiu

U.S. Department of Energy (BER DE-SC0018409)

  • Shin-Han Shiu

National Science Foundation (1727362)

  • Federica Brandizzi

National Institutes of Health (GM110523)

  • Bryan J Leong
  • Robert L Last

National Science Foundation (1757043)

  • Rachel Combs
  • Robert L Last

National Science Foundation (1811055)

  • Craig A Schenck

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Daniel J Kliebenstein, University of California, Davis, United States

Version history

  1. Received: March 7, 2020
  2. Accepted: July 1, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: July 2, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: July 28, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, Fan et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,388
    views
  • 759
    downloads
  • 47
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Pengxiang Fan
  2. Peipei Wang
  3. Yann-Ru Lou
  4. Bryan J Leong
  5. Bethany M Moore
  6. Craig A Schenck
  7. Rachel Combs
  8. Pengfei Cao
  9. Federica Brandizzi
  10. Shin-Han Shiu
  11. Robert L Last
(2020)
Evolution of a plant gene cluster in Solanaceae and emergence of metabolic diversity
eLife 9:e56717.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.56717

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.56717

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Natalia E Ketaren, Fred D Mast ... John D Aitchison
    Research Advance

    To date, all major modes of monoclonal antibody therapy targeting SARS-CoV-2 have lost significant efficacy against the latest circulating variants. As SARS-CoV-2 omicron sublineages account for over 90% of COVID-19 infections, evasion of immune responses generated by vaccination or exposure to previous variants poses a significant challenge. A compelling new therapeutic strategy against SARS-CoV-2 is that of single-domain antibodies, termed nanobodies, which address certain limitations of monoclonal antibodies. Here, we demonstrate that our high-affinity nanobody repertoire, generated against wild-type SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (Mast et al., 2021), remains effective against variants of concern, including omicron BA.4/BA.5; a subset is predicted to counter resistance in emerging XBB and BQ.1.1 sublineages. Furthermore, we reveal the synergistic potential of nanobody cocktails in neutralizing emerging variants. Our study highlights the power of nanobody technology as a versatile therapeutic and diagnostic tool to combat rapidly evolving infectious diseases such as SARS-CoV-2.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Benjamin R Duewell, Naomi E Wilson ... Scott D Hansen
    Research Article

    Phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) beta (PI3Kβ) is functionally unique in the ability to integrate signals derived from receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), G-protein coupled receptors, and Rho-family GTPases. The mechanism by which PI3Kβ prioritizes interactions with various membrane-tethered signaling inputs, however, remains unclear. Previous experiments did not determine whether interactions with membrane-tethered proteins primarily control PI3Kβ localization versus directly modulate lipid kinase activity. To address this gap in our knowledge, we established an assay to directly visualize how three distinct protein interactions regulate PI3Kβ when presented to the kinase in a biologically relevant configuration on supported lipid bilayers. Using single molecule Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence (TIRF) Microscopy, we determined the mechanism controlling PI3Kβ membrane localization, prioritization of signaling inputs, and lipid kinase activation. We find that auto-inhibited PI3Kβ prioritizes interactions with RTK-derived tyrosine phosphorylated (pY) peptides before engaging either GβGγ or Rac1(GTP). Although pY peptides strongly localize PI3Kβ to membranes, stimulation of lipid kinase activity is modest. In the presence of either pY/GβGγ or pY/Rac1(GTP), PI3Kβ activity is dramatically enhanced beyond what can be explained by simply increasing membrane localization. Instead, PI3Kβ is synergistically activated by pY/GβGγ and pY/Rac1 (GTP) through a mechanism consistent with allosteric regulation.