Structural Insights into Human Acid-sensing Ion Channel 1a Inhibition by Snake Toxin Mambalgin1

  1. Changlin Tian  Is a corresponding author
  2. Demeng Sun
  3. Sanling Liu
  4. Siyu Li
  5. Mengge Zhang
  6. Fan Yang
  7. Ming Wen
  8. Pan Shi
  9. Tao Wang
  10. Man Pan
  11. Shenghai Chang
  12. Xing Zhang
  13. Longhua Zhang
  14. Lei Liu
  1. University of Science and Tehnology of China, China
  2. University of Science and Technology of China, China
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
  4. Tsinghua University, China
  5. Zhejiang University, China

Abstract

Acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs) are proton-gated cation channels that are involved in diverse neuronal processes including pain sensing. Peptide toxin Mambalgin1 (Mamba1) from black mamba snake venom can reversibly inhibit the conductance of ASICs, showing an analgesic effect. However, the detailed inhibitory mechanism of Mamba1 on ASIC1s, especially how Mamba1 binding to extracellular domain affects the conformational changes of the transmembrane domain of ASICs remains elusive. Here, we present single-particle cryo-EM structures of human ASIC1a (hASIC1a) and hASIC1a-Mamba1 complex at resolutions of 3.56 and 3.90 Å, respectively. The structures revealed the inhibited conformation of hASIC1a upon Mamba1 binding. The combination of the structural and physiological data indicates that Mamba1 prefers to bind hASIC1a in a closed state and reduces the proton sensitivity of the channel, representing a closed-state trapping mechanism.

Data availability

The EM maps for hASIC1a and hASIC1a-Mamba1 complex have been deposited in EMDB (www.ebi.ac.uk/pdbe/emdb/) with accession codes EMD-30346 and EMD-30347. The atomic coordinates for hASIC1a and hASIC1a-Mamba1 complex have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank (www.rcsb.org) with accession codes 7CFS and 7CFT respectively

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Changlin Tian

    School of Life Science, University of Science and Tehnology of China, Hefei, China
    For correspondence
    cltian@ustc.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9315-900X
  2. Demeng Sun

    School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Sanling Liu

    School of Life Science, University of Science and Tehnology of China, Hefei, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Siyu Li

    School of Life Science, University of Science and Tehnology of China, Hefei, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Mengge Zhang

    School of Life Science, University of Science and Tehnology of China, Hefei, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Fan Yang

    School of Life Science, University of Science and Tehnology of China, Hefei, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Ming Wen

    School of Life Science, University of Science and Tehnology of China, Hefei, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Pan Shi

    School of Life Science, University of Science and Tehnology of China, Hefei, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Tao Wang

    High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Man Pan

    Department of Chemistry, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Shenghai Chang

    School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Xing Zhang

    School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Longhua Zhang

    School of Life Science, University of Science and Tehnology of China, Hefei, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Lei Liu

    Phosphorus Chemistry & Chemical Biology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (National Key Research and Development Project,2017YFA0505201,2017YFA0505403 and 2016YFA0400903)

  • Changlin Tian

Chinese Academy of Sciences (Queensland-Chinese Academy of Sciences (Q-CAS) Collaborative Science Fund,GJHZ201946)

  • Changlin Tian

Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (National Key Research and Development Project,2017YFA0505200)

  • Lei Liu

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31600601,21778051)

  • Demeng Sun

National Natural Science Foundation of China (91753205,21532004)

  • Lei Liu

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2020, Tian et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,615
    views
  • 658
    downloads
  • 36
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Changlin Tian
  2. Demeng Sun
  3. Sanling Liu
  4. Siyu Li
  5. Mengge Zhang
  6. Fan Yang
  7. Ming Wen
  8. Pan Shi
  9. Tao Wang
  10. Man Pan
  11. Shenghai Chang
  12. Xing Zhang
  13. Longhua Zhang
  14. Lei Liu
(2020)
Structural Insights into Human Acid-sensing Ion Channel 1a Inhibition by Snake Toxin Mambalgin1
eLife 9:e57096.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.57096

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.57096

Further reading

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Julia Belyaeva, Matthias Elgeti
    Review Article

    Under physiological conditions, proteins continuously undergo structural fluctuations on different timescales. Some conformations are only sparsely populated, but still play a key role in protein function. Thus, meaningful structure–function frameworks must include structural ensembles rather than only the most populated protein conformations. To detail protein plasticity, modern structural biology combines complementary experimental and computational approaches. In this review, we survey available computational approaches that integrate sparse experimental data from electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy with molecular modeling techniques to derive all-atom structural models of rare protein conformations. We also propose strategies to increase the reliability and improve efficiency using deep learning approaches, thus advancing the field of integrative structural biology.

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Yao Chi Chen, Karen Sargsyan ... Carmay Lim
    Research Article

    Experimental detection of residues critical for protein–protein interactions (PPI) is a time-consuming, costly, and labor-intensive process. Hence, high-throughput PPI-hot spot prediction methods have been developed, but they have been validated using relatively small datasets, which may compromise their predictive reliability. Here, we introduce PPI-hotspotID, a novel method for identifying PPI-hot spots using the free protein structure, and validated it on the largest collection of experimentally confirmed PPI-hot spots to date. We explored the possibility of detecting PPI-hot spots using (i) FTMap in the PPI mode, which identifies hot spots on protein–protein interfaces from the free protein structure, and (ii) the interface residues predicted by AlphaFold-Multimer. PPI-hotspotID yielded better performance than FTMap and SPOTONE, a webserver for predicting PPI-hot spots given the protein sequence. When combined with the AlphaFold-Multimer-predicted interface residues, PPI-hotspotID yielded better performance than either method alone. Furthermore, we experimentally verified several PPI-hotspotID-predicted PPI-hot spots of eukaryotic elongation factor 2. Notably, PPI-hotspotID can reveal PPI-hot spots not obvious from complex structures, including those in indirect contact with binding partners. PPI-hotspotID serves as a valuable tool for understanding PPI mechanisms and aiding drug design. It is available as a web server (https://ppihotspotid.limlab.dnsalias.org/) and open-source code (https://github.com/wrigjz/ppihotspotid/).