External location of touch is constructed post-hoc based on limb choice

  1. Femke Maij
  2. Christian Seegelke
  3. W Pieter Medendorp
  4. Tobias Heed  Is a corresponding author
  1. Radboud University, Netherlands
  2. Bielefeld University, Germany

Abstract

When humans indicate on which hand a tactile stimulus occurred, they often err when their hands are crossed. This finding seemingly supports the view that the automatically determined touch location in external space affects limb assignment: the crossed right hand is localized in left space, and this conflict presumably provokes hand assignment errors. Here, participants judged on which hand the first of two stimuli, presented during a bimanual movement, had occurred, and then indicated its external location by a reach-to-point movement. When participants incorrectly chose the hand stimulated second, they pointed to where that hand had been at the correct, first time point, though no stimulus had occurred at that location. This behavior suggests that stimulus localization depended on hand assignment, not vice versa. It is, thus, incompatible with the notion of automatic computation of external stimulus location upon occurrence. Instead, humans construct external touch location post-hoc and on demand.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data and Matlab/R analysis files have been provided for all data and data figures at the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/ybxn5/).

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Femke Maij

    Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behavior, Centre for Cognition, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Christian Seegelke

    Faculty of Psychology & Sports Science, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9624-6395
  3. W Pieter Medendorp

    Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Centre for Cognition (DCC), Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9615-4220
  4. Tobias Heed

    Faculty of Psychology and Sports Science and Excellence Cluster Cognitive Interaction Technology (Citec), Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
    For correspondence
    tobias.heed@uni-bielefeld.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5632-6091

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (He 6368/1-1)

  • Tobias Heed

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (EU-ERC-283567)

  • W Pieter Medendorp

H2020 European Research Council (NWO-VICI: 453-11-001)

  • W Pieter Medendorp

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: The study was part of a research program approved by the ethics committee of the German Psychological Society (DGPs), advisory opinions TB 10_2011 and TB_10_2011_Add 082013. Experiment 2, which was run at a different university after the move of the last author, was again approved by Bielefeld University's ethics committee, ref.nr. 2017-114. Twelve right-handed participants (aged 19-31 years, 7 female) gave informed consent to take part in the experiment.

Copyright

© 2020, Maij et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,026
    views
  • 133
    downloads
  • 19
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Femke Maij
  2. Christian Seegelke
  3. W Pieter Medendorp
  4. Tobias Heed
(2020)
External location of touch is constructed post-hoc based on limb choice
eLife 9:e57804.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.57804

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.57804

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    2. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Alfonso Aguilera, Marta Nieto
    Insight

    A tailored cocktail of genes can reprogram a subset of progenitors to no longer produce glial cells and instead develop into neurons involved in motor control.

    1. Neuroscience
    Merlin Monzel, Pitshaporn Leelaarporn ... Cornelia McCormick
    Research Article

    Aphantasia refers to reduced or absent visual imagery. While most of us can readily recall decade-old personal experiences (autobiographical memories, AM) with vivid mental images, there is a dearth of information about whether the loss of visual imagery in aphantasics affects their AM retrieval. The hippocampus is thought to be a crucial hub in a brain-wide network underlying AM. One important question is whether this network, especially the connectivity of the hippocampus, is altered in aphantasia. In the current study, we tested 14 congenital aphantasics and 16 demographically matched controls in an AM fMRI task to investigate how key brain regions (i.e. hippocampus and visual-perceptual cortices) interact with each other during AM re-experiencing. All participants were interviewed regarding their autobiographical memory to examine their episodic and semantic recall of specific events. Aphantasics reported more difficulties in recalling AM, were less confident about their memories, and described less internal and emotional details than controls. Neurally, aphantasics displayed decreased hippocampal and increased visual-perceptual cortex activation during AM retrieval compared to controls. In addition, controls showed strong negative functional connectivity between the hippocampus and the visual cortex during AM and resting-state functional connectivity between these two brain structures predicted better visualization skills. Our results indicate that visual mental imagery plays an important role in detail-rich vivid AM, and that this type of cognitive function is supported by the functional connection between the hippocampus and the visual-perceptual cortex.