Self-organized patterning of cell morphology via mechanosensitive feedback

  1. Natalie A Dye  Is a corresponding author
  2. Marko Popovic
  3. K. Venkatesan Iyer
  4. Jana Fuhrmann
  5. Romina Piscitello-Gómez
  6. Suzanne Eaton
  7. Frank Jülicher  Is a corresponding author
  1. Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Germany
  2. École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland
  3. Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, Germany

Abstract

Tissue organization is often characterized by specific patterns of cell morphology. How such patterns emerge in developing tissues is a fundamental open question. Here, we investigate the emergence of tissue-scale patterns of cell shape and mechanical tissue stress in the Drosophila wing imaginal disc during larval development. Using quantitative analysis of the cellular dynamics, we reveal a pattern of radially oriented cell rearrangements that is coupled to the buildup of tangential cell elongation. Developing a laser ablation method, we map tissue stresses and extract key parameters of tissue mechanics. We present a continuum theory showing that this pattern of cell morphology and tissue stress can arise via self-organization of a mechanical feedback that couples cell polarity to active cell rearrangements. The predictions of this model are supported by knockdown of MyoVI, a component of mechanosensitive feedback. Our work reveals a mechanism for the emergence of cellular patterns in morphogenesis.

Data availability

We have made all data analyzed during this study available. Data for Figs 1H-M, 2,4,5, and 7 are provided as source data files. The data on cell area and elongation in Figure 1A-F, 3F,G, and 6C are too large to be submitted here and are available on Dryad (doi:10.5061/dryad.jsxksn06b).

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Natalie A Dye

    Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany
    For correspondence
    dye@mpi-cbg.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4859-6670
  2. Marko Popovic

    Institute of Physics, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. K. Venkatesan Iyer

    Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Jana Fuhrmann

    Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Romina Piscitello-Gómez

    Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Suzanne Eaton

    Developmental cell biology, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Frank Jülicher

    Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, Dresden, Germany
    For correspondence
    julicher@pks.mpg.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4731-9185

Funding

Max-Planck-Gesellschaft

  • Natalie A Dye
  • Marko Popovic
  • K. Venkatesan Iyer
  • Jana Fuhrmann
  • Romina Piscitello-Gómez
  • Suzanne Eaton
  • Frank Jülicher

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (EA4/10-1,EA4/10-2)

  • Natalie A Dye
  • K. Venkatesan Iyer
  • Suzanne Eaton

Swiss National Science Foundation (200021-165509)

  • Marko Popovic

Simons Foundation (454953)

  • Marko Popovic

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2021, Dye et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,269
    views
  • 840
    downloads
  • 46
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Natalie A Dye
  2. Marko Popovic
  3. K. Venkatesan Iyer
  4. Jana Fuhrmann
  5. Romina Piscitello-Gómez
  6. Suzanne Eaton
  7. Frank Jülicher
(2021)
Self-organized patterning of cell morphology via mechanosensitive feedback
eLife 10:e57964.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.57964

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.57964

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Simon Rethemeier, Sonja Fritzsche ... Vera S Hunnekuhl
    Research Article

    The insect brain and the timing of its development underwent evolutionary adaptations. However, little is known about the underlying developmental processes. The central complex of the brain is an excellent model to understand neural development and divergence. It is produced in large parts by type II neuroblasts, which produce intermediate progenitors, another type of cycling precursor, to increase their neural progeny. Type II neuroblasts lineages are believed to be conserved among insects, but little is known on their molecular characteristics in insects other than flies. Tribolium castaneum has emerged as a model for brain development and evolution. However, type II neuroblasts have so far not been studied in this beetle. We created a fluorescent enhancer trap marking expression of Tc-fez/earmuff, a key marker for intermediate progenitors. Using combinatorial labeling of further markers, including Tc-pointed, we characterized embryonic type II neuroblast lineages. Intriguingly, we found nine lineages per hemisphere in the Tribolium embryo while Drosophila produces only eight per brain hemisphere. These embryonic lineages are significantly larger in Tribolium than they are in Drosophila and contain more intermediate progenitors. Finally, we mapped these lineages to the domains of head patterning genes. Notably, Tc-otd is absent from all type II neuroblasts and intermediate progenitors, whereas Tc-six3 marks an anterior subset of the type II lineages. Tc-six4 specifically marks the territory where anterior-medial type II neuroblasts differentiate. In conclusion, we identified a conserved pattern of gene expression in holometabolan central complex forming type II neuroblast lineages, and conserved head patterning genes emerged as new candidates for conferring spatial identity to individual lineages. The higher number and greater lineage size of the embryonic type II neuroblasts in the beetle correlate with a previously described embryonic phase of central complex formation. These findings stipulate further research on the link between stem cell activity and temporal and structural differences in central complex development.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Jeet H Patel, Mary C Mullins
    Insight

    Disease-causing mutations in the signaling protein BMP4 impair its secretion, but only when it is made as a homodimer.