Splicing variation of BMP2K balances abundance of COPII assemblies and autophagic degradation in erythroid cells

  1. Jaroslaw Cendrowski  Is a corresponding author
  2. Marta Kaczmarek
  3. Michał Mazur
  4. Katarzyna Kuzmicz-Kowalska
  5. Kamil Jastrzebski
  6. Marta Brewinska-Olchowik
  7. Agata Kominek
  8. Katarzyna Piwocka
  9. Marta Miaczynska  Is a corresponding author
  1. International Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology in Warsaw, Poland
  2. Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland

Abstract

Intracellular transport undergoes remodeling upon cell differentiation, which involves cell type-specific regulators. Bone morphogenetic protein 2-inducible kinase (BMP2K) has been potentially implicated in endocytosis and cell differentiation but its molecular functions remained unknown. We discovered that its longer (L) and shorter (S) splicing variants regulate erythroid differentiation in a manner unexplainable by their involvement in AP-2 adaptor phosphorylation and endocytosis. However, both variants interact with SEC16A and could localize to the juxtanuclear secretory compartment. Variant-specific depletion approach showed that BMP2K isoforms constitute a BMP2K-L/S regulatory system that controls the distribution of SEC16A and SEC24B as well as SEC31A abundance at COPII assemblies. Finally, we found L to promote and S to restrict autophagic degradation and erythroid differentiation. Hence, we propose that BMP2K-L and BMP2K-S differentially regulate abundance and distribution of COPII assemblies as well as autophagy, possibly thereby fine-tuning erythroid differentiation.

Data availability

The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD013542

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jaroslaw Cendrowski

    Laboratory of Cell Biology, International Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology in Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
    For correspondence
    jcendrowski@iimcb.gov.pl
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8579-7279
  2. Marta Kaczmarek

    Laboratory of Cell Biology, International Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology in Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4939-6299
  3. Michał Mazur

    Laboratory of Cell Biology, International Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology in Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5087-4409
  4. Katarzyna Kuzmicz-Kowalska

    Laboratory of Cell Biology, International Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology in Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Kamil Jastrzebski

    Laboratory of Cell Biology, International Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology in Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Marta Brewinska-Olchowik

    Neurobiology Center, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Agata Kominek

    Neurobiology Center, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Katarzyna Piwocka

    Neurobiology Center, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Marta Miaczynska

    Laboratory of Cell Biology, International Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology in Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
    For correspondence
    miaczynska@iimcb.gov.pl
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0031-5267

Funding

Narodowe Centrum Nauki (UMO-2011/02/A/NZ3/00149)

  • Jaroslaw Cendrowski
  • Katarzyna Kuzmicz-Kowalska
  • Kamil Jastrzebski
  • Marta Miaczynska

Fundacja na rzecz Nauki Polskiej (POIR.04.04.00-00-20CE/16-00)

  • Marta Kaczmarek
  • Kamil Jastrzebski
  • Marta Miaczynska

Fundacja na rzecz Nauki Polskiej (POIR.04.04.00-00-1C54/16-00)

  • Jaroslaw Cendrowski
  • Michał Mazur

Fundacja na rzecz Nauki Polskiej (POIR.04.04.00-00-23C2/17-00)

  • Katarzyna Piwocka

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2020, Cendrowski et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,669
    views
  • 280
    downloads
  • 10
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jaroslaw Cendrowski
  2. Marta Kaczmarek
  3. Michał Mazur
  4. Katarzyna Kuzmicz-Kowalska
  5. Kamil Jastrzebski
  6. Marta Brewinska-Olchowik
  7. Agata Kominek
  8. Katarzyna Piwocka
  9. Marta Miaczynska
(2020)
Splicing variation of BMP2K balances abundance of COPII assemblies and autophagic degradation in erythroid cells
eLife 9:e58504.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58504

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58504

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Adam D Longhurst, Kyle Wang ... David P Toczyski
    Tools and Resources

    Progression through the G1 phase of the cell cycle is the most highly regulated step in cellular division. We employed a chemogenetic approach to discover novel cellular networks that regulate cell cycle progression. This approach uncovered functional clusters of genes that altered sensitivity of cells to inhibitors of the G1/S transition. Mutation of components of the Polycomb Repressor Complex 2 rescued proliferation inhibition caused by the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib, but not to inhibitors of S phase or mitosis. In addition to its core catalytic subunits, mutation of the PRC2.1 accessory protein MTF2, but not the PRC2.2 protein JARID2, rendered cells resistant to palbociclib treatment. We found that PRC2.1 (MTF2), but not PRC2.2 (JARID2), was critical for promoting H3K27me3 deposition at CpG islands genome-wide and in promoters. This included the CpG islands in the promoter of the CDK4/6 cyclins CCND1 and CCND2, and loss of MTF2 lead to upregulation of both CCND1 and CCND2. Our results demonstrate a role for PRC2.1, but not PRC2.2, in antagonizing G1 progression in a diversity of cell linages, including chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), breast cancer, and immortalized cell lines.

    1. Cell Biology
    Tomoharu Kanie, Roy Ng ... Peter K Jackson
    Research Article

    The primary cilium is a microtubule-based organelle that cycles through assembly and disassembly. In many cell types, formation of the cilium is initiated by recruitment of ciliary vesicles to the distal appendage of the mother centriole. However, the distal appendage mechanism that directly captures ciliary vesicles is yet to be identified. In an accompanying paper, we show that the distal appendage protein, CEP89, is important for the ciliary vesicle recruitment, but not for other steps of cilium formation (Tomoharu Kanie, Love, Fisher, Gustavsson, & Jackson, 2023). The lack of a membrane binding motif in CEP89 suggests that it may indirectly recruit ciliary vesicles via another binding partner. Here, we identify Neuronal Calcium Sensor-1 (NCS1) as a stoichiometric interactor of CEP89. NCS1 localizes to the position between CEP89 and a ciliary vesicle marker, RAB34, at the distal appendage. This localization was completely abolished in CEP89 knockouts, suggesting that CEP89 recruits NCS1 to the distal appendage. Similarly to CEP89 knockouts, ciliary vesicle recruitment as well as subsequent cilium formation was perturbed in NCS1 knockout cells. The ability of NCS1 to recruit the ciliary vesicle is dependent on its myristoylation motif and NCS1 knockout cells expressing a myristoylation defective mutant failed to rescue the vesicle recruitment defect despite localizing properly to the centriole. In sum, our analysis reveals the first known mechanism for how the distal appendage recruits the ciliary vesicles.