The LINC complex transmits integrin-dependent tension to the nuclear lamina and represses epidermal differentiation

Abstract

While the mechanisms by which chemical signals control cell fate have been well studied, how mechanical inputs impact cell fate decisions are not well understood. Here, using the well-defined system of keratinocyte differentiation in the skin, we examine whether and how direct force transmission to the nucleus regulates epidermal cell fate. Using a molecular biosensor, we find that tension on the nucleus through Linker of Nucleoskeleton and Cytoskeleton (LINC) complexes requires integrin engagement in undifferentiated epidermal stem cells, and is released during differentiation concomitant with decreased tension on A-type lamins. LINC complex ablation in mice reveals that LINC complexes are required to repress epidermal differentiation in vivo and in vitro and influence accessibility of epidermal differentiation genes, suggesting that force transduction from engaged integrins to the nucleus plays a role in maintaining keratinocyte progenitors. This work reveals a direct mechanotransduction pathway capable of relaying adhesion-specific signals to regulate cell fate.

Data availability

Sequencing data have been deposited as a single BioProject at NCBI with accession number PRJNA636991

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Emma Carley

    Cell Biology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Rachel Stewart

    Department of Cell Biology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Abigail G Zieman

    Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8236-207X
  4. Iman Jalilian

    Cell Biology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Diane E King

    Cell Biology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Amanda E Zubek

    Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Samantha Lin

    Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Valerie Horsley

    Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    For correspondence
    valerie.horsley@yale.edu
    Competing interests
    Valerie Horsley, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1254-5839
  9. Megan C King

    Department of Cell Biology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, United States
    For correspondence
    megan.king@yale.edu
    Competing interests
    Megan C King, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1688-2226

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R01 GM129308)

  • Emma Carley
  • Iman Jalilian
  • Megan C King

American Heart Association (16PRE27460000)

  • Rachel Stewart

Ludwig Family Foundation

  • Rachel Stewart
  • Megan C King

National Institutes of Health (R01 AR060295)

  • Valerie Horsley

National Institutes of Health (R01 AR069550)

  • Valerie Horsley

National Institutes of Health (T32 AR007016)

  • Abigail G Zieman

National Institutes of Health (T32 GM007223)

  • Emma Carley

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All animal care and experimental procedures were conducted in accord with requirements approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Yale University. IACUC Approval 2018-11248.

Copyright

© 2021, Carley et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,085
    views
  • 728
    downloads
  • 56
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Emma Carley
  2. Rachel Stewart
  3. Abigail G Zieman
  4. Iman Jalilian
  5. Diane E King
  6. Amanda E Zubek
  7. Samantha Lin
  8. Valerie Horsley
  9. Megan C King
(2021)
The LINC complex transmits integrin-dependent tension to the nuclear lamina and represses epidermal differentiation
eLife 10:e58541.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58541

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58541

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Mitsuhiro Abe, Masataka Yanagawa ... Yasushi Sako
    Research Article

    Anionic lipid molecules, including phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PI(4,5)P2), are implicated in the regulation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). However, the role of the spatiotemporal dynamics of PI(4,5)P2 in the regulation of EGFR activity in living cells is not fully understood, as it is difficult to visualize the local lipid domains around EGFR. Here, we visualized both EGFR and PI(4,5)P2 nanodomains in the plasma membrane of HeLa cells using super-resolution single-molecule microscopy. The EGFR and PI(4,5)P2 nanodomains aggregated before stimulation with epidermal growth factor (EGF) through transient visits of EGFR to the PI(4,5)P2 nanodomains. The degree of coaggregation decreased after EGF stimulation and depended on phospholipase Cγ, the EGFR effector hydrolyzing PI(4,5)P2. Artificial reduction in the PI(4,5)P2 content of the plasma membrane reduced both the dimerization and autophosphorylation of EGFR after stimulation with EGF. Inhibition of PI(4,5)P2 hydrolysis after EGF stimulation decreased phosphorylation of EGFR-Thr654. Thus, EGFR kinase activity and the density of PI(4,5)P2 around EGFR molecules were found to be mutually regulated.

    1. Cell Biology
    Wonjo Jang, Kanishka Senarath ... Nevin A Lambert
    Tools and Resources

    Classical G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling takes place in response to extracellular stimuli and involves receptors and heterotrimeric G proteins located at the plasma membrane. It has recently been established that GPCR signaling can also take place from intracellular membrane compartments, including endosomes that contain internalized receptors and ligands. While the mechanisms of GPCR endocytosis are well understood, it is not clear how well internalized receptors are supplied with G proteins. To address this gap, we use gene editing, confocal microscopy, and bioluminescence resonance energy transfer to study the distribution and trafficking of endogenous G proteins. We show here that constitutive endocytosis is sufficient to supply newly internalized endocytic vesicles with 20–30% of the G protein density found at the plasma membrane. We find that G proteins are present on early, late, and recycling endosomes, are abundant on lysosomes, but are virtually undetectable on the endoplasmic reticulum, mitochondria, and the medial-trans Golgi apparatus. Receptor activation does not change heterotrimer abundance on endosomes. Our findings provide a subcellular map of endogenous G protein distribution, suggest that G proteins may be partially excluded from nascent endocytic vesicles, and are likely to have implications for GPCR signaling from endosomes and other intracellular compartments.