Neuropeptide Signaling: Unravelling the evolutionary history of kisspeptin
Experiments in sea cucumbers reveal how the physiological responses regulated by a neuropeptide called kisspeptin have evolved.
- Department of Biology and Evolution of Marine Organisms, Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Italy
- Centre for Life’s Origins and Evolution, University College London, United Kingdom
- Research Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, United Kingdom
The world around us is constantly changing. As seasons shift, or as night turns to day, and food becomes more or less available, every organism must adapt their behavior and physiology to cope with its changing environment. The neuroendocrine systems play a central role in converting signals from the environment into biomolecules that can generate a response. Cells in these systems communicate by releasing various signals, including small proteins called neuropeptides. These molecules then travel towards their target cells where they bind to specific receptors and trigger a reaction that adjusts the physiology of cells and the tissues or organs they belong to (Tessmar-Raible, 2007).
A neuropeptide called kisspeptin is known to regulate fertility and reproduction in mammals (Hameed et al., 2011). The gene for kisspeptin is primarily expressed in the central nervous system, but is also active in other tissues such as the liver and heart. The gene that codes for its matching receptor shows a distinct but often overlapping pattern of expression (Bhattacharya and Babwah, 2015; Figure 1). Recent studies in adult mammals have revealed new physiological roles for this neuropeptide signaling system. For example, it has been shown that kisspeptin and its receptor regulate glucose homeostasis, feeding behavior and body mass composition by sending signals between the liver and pancreas (Wolfe and Hussain, 2018).
Figure 1
The role of kisspeptin in sea cucumbers and mammals.
Schematic showing the main organs that express kisspeptin (magenta) and/or its receptor (blue) in mammals (left panel) and sea cucumbers (right panel). The binding of kisspeptin (Kiss) to its receptor (KissR) triggers an intracellular pathway which sequentially activates the signaling molecules Ca2+/Gq/PLC/PKC/MAPK. This stimulates a molecule called ERK1/2 which regulates a number of cellular processes, including gene expression (center panel). Wang et al. showed that the signaling cascade triggered by kisspeptin regulates similar biological processes in mammals and sea cucumbers, such as reproduction, glucose metabolism and body mass.
Image credit: Maria I Arnone.
The genes for the neuropeptide kisspeptin and its receptor have also been identified in several marine invertebrates, including members of the echinoderm family, such as sea stars, sea urchins and sea cucumbers (Elphick et al., 2018). In sea urchins, it has been reported that the gene for kisspeptin is expressed in the gut of their larvae (Wood et al., 2018). However, we know relatively little about when and where this gene is expressed in other echinoderms or about its physiological role.
Now, in eLife, Naiming Zhou from Zhejiang University and co-workers – including Tianming Wang, Zheng Cao and Zhangfei Shen as joint first authors – report experiments identifying the location and role of the kisspeptin signaling system in the sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus (Wang et al., 2020). This allowed the team (who are based in China and the US) to unravel the evolutionary history of this neuropeptide signaling system, which spans over more than 540 million years.
When studying the genome of A. japonicus, Wang et al. identified one gene which codes for two mature neuropeptides (AjKiss1a and AjKiss1b) and two genes which encode two receptor proteins (AjKissR1 and AjKissR2). In vitro experiments in cultured human cells showed that both neuropeptides are able to bind and specifically activate either receptor. Furthermore, the receptor proteins from sea cucumbers could also be activated by kisspeptin neuropeptides from other vertebrates, including humans.
Further experiments showed that when kisspeptin binds to either of the receptor proteins in human cells, this triggers an intracellular signaling pathway that eventually activates a molecule called MAPK (Castaño et al., 2009; Figure 1). These findings were further supported by in vivo experiments in the oocytes of sea cucumbers, in which the activation of MAPK was also detected following exposure to the neuropeptide AjKiss1b. This suggests that the molecular mechanisms activated by the kisspeptin signaling system are evolutionary conserved.
Next, Wang et al. studied the expression and physiological role of kisspeptin in adult sea cucumbers. This revealed that the precursor peptide for AjKiss1 is primarily expressed in the central nervous system (nerve ring) and gonads of A. japonicus, and its expression levels changed significantly during the reproductive season (Figure 1). The gene for the AjKiss1R1 receptor was also active in the nerve ring and gonads, in addition to other organs, including the muscles of the body-wall and respiratory tree that are only present in sea cucumbers (Spirina and Dolmatov, 2001).
When sea cucumbers were exposed to sustained high levels of the neuropeptide AjKiss1b, this upregulated the expression of proteins involved in the metabolism of glucose and induced a dormancy-like state known as aestivation: this is characterized by extensive weight loss and degeneration of the digestive tract. This suggests that, similar to vertebrates, the kisspeptin signaling system in sea cucumbers is also involved in regulating glucose metabolism, reproduction and body mass (Figure 1). The shared role of kisspeptin in vertebrates and sea cucumbers reveals important insights into how this neuropeptide signaling system evolved.
The findings of Wang et al. demonstrate how comparing the genomes and gene roles of different organisms can unravel new aspects of animal biology that may be useful for biomedical studies. Future studies on unexplored animals will shed further light on the complex interactions that allow organisms to adapt in response to their changing environment.
References
-
Evolution of neuropeptide signalling systemsThe Journal of Experimental Biology 221:jeb151092.https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.151092
-
Morphology of the respiratory trees in the holothurians Apostichopus japonicus and Cucumaria japonicaRussian Journal of Marine Biology 27:367–375.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013753420806
-
The evolution of neurosecretory centers in bilaterian forebrains: insights from protostomesSeminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 18:492–501.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2007.04.007
-
The emerging role(s) for kisspeptin in metabolism in mammalsFrontiers in Endocrinology 9:184.https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2018.00184
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2020, Arnone and Oliveri
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 995
- views
-
- 95
- downloads
-
- 0
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Neuropeptide Signaling: Unravelling the evolutionary history of kisspeptin
eLife 9:e58599.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58599
Further reading
-
- Evolutionary Biology
Gene duplication drives evolution by providing raw material for proteins with novel functions. An influential hypothesis by Ohno (1970) posits that gene duplication helps genes tolerate new mutations and thus facilitates the evolution of new phenotypes. Competing hypotheses argue that deleterious mutations will usually inactivate gene duplicates too rapidly for Ohno’s hypothesis to work. We experimentally tested Ohno’s hypothesis by evolving one or exactly two copies of a gene encoding a fluorescent protein in Escherichia coli through several rounds of mutation and selection. We analyzed the genotypic and phenotypic evolutionary dynamics of the evolving populations through high-throughput DNA sequencing, biochemical assays, and engineering of selected variants. In support of Ohno’s hypothesis, populations carrying two gene copies displayed higher mutational robustness than those carrying a single gene copy. Consequently, the double-copy populations experienced relaxed purifying selection, evolved higher phenotypic and genetic diversity, carried more mutations and accumulated combinations of key beneficial mutations earlier. However, their phenotypic evolution was not accelerated, possibly because one gene copy rapidly became inactivated by deleterious mutations. Our work provides an experimental platform to test models of evolution by gene duplication, and it supports alternatives to Ohno’s hypothesis that point to the importance of gene dosage.
-
- Evolutionary Biology
Life-history theory, central to our understanding of diversity in morphology, behaviour, and senescence, describes how traits evolve through the optimisation of trade-offs in investment. Despite considerable study, there is only minimal support for trade-offs within species between the two traits most closely linked to fitness – reproductive effort and survival – questioning the theory’s general validity. We used a meta-analysis to separate the effects of individual quality (positive survival/reproduction correlation) from the costs of reproduction (negative survival/reproduction correlation) using studies of reproductive effort and parental survival in birds. Experimental enlargement of brood size caused reduced parental survival. However, the effect size of brood size manipulation was small and opposite to the effect of phenotypic quality, as we found that individuals that naturally produced larger clutches also survived better. The opposite effects on parental survival in experimental and observational studies of reproductive effort provide the first meta-analytic evidence for theory suggesting that quality differences mask trade-offs. Fitness projections using the overall effect size revealed that reproduction presented negligible costs, except when reproductive effort was forced beyond the maximum level observed within species, to that seen between species. We conclude that there is little support for the most fundamental life-history trade-off, between reproductive effort and survival, operating within a population. We suggest that within species the fitness landscape of the reproduction–survival trade-off is flat until it reaches the boundaries of the between-species fast–slow life-history continuum. Our results provide a quantitative explanation as to why the costs of reproduction are not apparent and why variation in reproductive effort persists within species.
