EDF1 coordinates cellular responses to ribosome collisions

  1. Niladri K Sinha
  2. Alban Ordureau
  3. Katharina Best
  4. James A Saba
  5. Boris Zinshteyn
  6. Elayanambi Sundaramoorthy
  7. Amit Fulzele
  8. Danielle M Garshott
  9. Timo Denk
  10. Matthias Thoms
  11. Joao A Paulo
  12. Wade Harper
  13. Eric J Bennett
  14. Roland Beckmann  Is a corresponding author
  15. Rachel Green  Is a corresponding author
  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, United States
  2. Harvard Medical School, United States
  3. Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Germany
  4. University of California, San Diego, United States
  5. Gene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Germany

Abstract

Translation of aberrant mRNAs induces ribosomal collisions, thereby triggering pathways for mRNA and nascent peptide degradation and ribosomal rescue. Here we use sucrose gradient fractionation combined with quantitative proteomics to systematically identify proteins associated with collided ribosomes. This approach identified Endothelial differentiation-related factor 1 (EDF1) as a novel protein recruited to collided ribosomes during translational distress. Cryo-electron microscopic analyses of EDF1 and its yeast homolog Mbf1 revealed a conserved 40S ribosomal subunit binding site at the mRNA entry channel near the collision interface. EDF1 recruits the translational repressors GIGYF2 and EIF4E2 to collided ribosomes to initiate a negative-feedback loop that prevents new ribosomes from translating defective mRNAs. Further, EDF1 regulates an immediate-early transcriptional response to ribosomal collisions. Our results uncover mechanisms through which EDF1 coordinates multiple responses of the ribosome-mediated quality control pathway and provide novel insights into the intersection of ribosome-mediated quality control with global transcriptional regulation.

Data availability

Raw mass spectrometry data associated with the following Figures have been deposited in MassIVE repository: Source data for all proteomics-based plots are provided in Source data tables.Figure 1, Figure 1-figure supplement 1: https://doi.org/doi:10.25345/C5T70C(Username: MSV000085423_reviewer | Password: a)Figure 2, Figure 2-figure supplement 1: https://doi.org/doi:10.25345/C5B71D(Username: MSV000085419_reviewer | Password: a)Figure 2-figure supplement 2A: https://doi.org/doi:10.25345/C5Z11X(Username: MSV000085422_reviewer | Password: a)Figure 2H, Figure 2-figure supplement 2F: https://doi.org/doi:10.25345/C5JQ47(Username: MSV000085425_reviewer | Password: a)Figure 5A: https://doi.org/doi:10.25345/C5PH7J(Username: MSV000085424_reviewer | Password: a)Figure 5B, Figure 5-figure supplement 1B-1C: https://doi.org/doi:10.25345/C52Q58(Username: MSV000085421_reviewer | Password: a)Figure 6B-6C, Figure 6-figure supplement 1: https://doi.org/doi:10.25345/C56H6T(Username: MSV000085420_reviewer | Password: a)Raw sequencing data were deposited in the GEO database under the accession number GSE149565. Secure token for reviewers: uzajoeeultgrpsr.The cryo-EM structures reported here have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank under the accession codes 6ZVH (EDF1•ribosome) and 6ZVI (Mbf1•ribosome), and in the Electron Microscopy Data Bank under the accession codes EMD-11456 (EDF1•ribosome) and EMD-11457 (Mbf1•ribosome).

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Niladri K Sinha

    Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9143-495X
  2. Alban Ordureau

    Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4924-8520
  3. Katharina Best

    Gene Center, Department of Biochemistry, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. James A Saba

    Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3453-8151
  5. Boris Zinshteyn

    Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0103-3501
  6. Elayanambi Sundaramoorthy

    Section of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1256-9758
  7. Amit Fulzele

    Section of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Danielle M Garshott

    Section of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4357-1781
  9. Timo Denk

    Department of Biochemistry, Gene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Matthias Thoms

    Department of Biochemistry, Gene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Joao A Paulo

    Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Wade Harper

    Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    Wade Harper, J.W.H. is a reviewing editor, eLife, a founder and advisory board member for Caraway Therapeutics, Inc, and an advisor for X-Chem Inc..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6944-7236
  13. Eric J Bennett

    Section of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    Eric J Bennett, E.J.B is an advisor and scientific advisory board member for Plexium.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1201-3314
  14. Roland Beckmann

    Gene Center, Department of Biochemistry, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany
    For correspondence
    beckmann@genzentrum.lmu.de
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4291-3898
  15. Rachel Green

    Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States
    For correspondence
    ragreen@jhmi.edu
    Competing interests
    Rachel Green, eLife, reviewing editor; advisory board member for Moderna, Inc., FL63, and the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9337-2003

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

  • Rachel Green

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (GRK 1721)

  • Roland Beckmann

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (QBM (Quantitative Biosciences Munich) Graduate School Fellowships)

  • Katharina Best

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (QBM (Quantitative Biosciences Munich) Graduate School Fellowships)

  • Timo Denk

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R37GM059425)

  • Rachel Green

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R37NS083524)

  • Wade Harper

National Institute on Aging (AG011085)

  • Wade Harper

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (DP2GM119132)

  • Eric J Bennett

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (5K99GM135450-02)

  • Boris Zinshteyn

Jane Coffin Childs Memorial Fund for Medical Research

  • Niladri K Sinha

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007240)

  • Danielle M Garshott

National Science Foundation (DGE-1650112)

  • Danielle M Garshott

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Nahum Sonenberg, McGill University, Canada

Version history

  1. Received: May 12, 2020
  2. Accepted: August 2, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: August 3, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: September 11, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, Sinha et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 10,609
    views
  • 1,650
    downloads
  • 108
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Niladri K Sinha
  2. Alban Ordureau
  3. Katharina Best
  4. James A Saba
  5. Boris Zinshteyn
  6. Elayanambi Sundaramoorthy
  7. Amit Fulzele
  8. Danielle M Garshott
  9. Timo Denk
  10. Matthias Thoms
  11. Joao A Paulo
  12. Wade Harper
  13. Eric J Bennett
  14. Roland Beckmann
  15. Rachel Green
(2020)
EDF1 coordinates cellular responses to ribosome collisions
eLife 9:e58828.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58828

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58828

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Katarzyna Marta Zoltowska, Utpal Das ... Lucía Chávez-Gutiérrez
    Research Article

    Amyloid β (Aβ) peptides accumulating in the brain are proposed to trigger Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, molecular cascades underlying their toxicity are poorly defined. Here, we explored a novel hypothesis for Aβ42 toxicity that arises from its proven affinity for γ-secretases. We hypothesized that the reported increases in Aβ42, particularly in the endolysosomal compartment, promote the establishment of a product feedback inhibitory mechanism on γ-secretases, and thereby impair downstream signaling events. We conducted kinetic analyses of γ-secretase activity in cell-free systems in the presence of Aβ, as well as cell-based and ex vivo assays in neuronal cell lines, neurons, and brain synaptosomes to assess the impact of Aβ on γ-secretases. We show that human Aβ42 peptides, but neither murine Aβ42 nor human Aβ17–42 (p3), inhibit γ-secretases and trigger accumulation of unprocessed substrates in neurons, including C-terminal fragments (CTFs) of APP, p75, and pan-cadherin. Moreover, Aβ42 treatment dysregulated cellular homeostasis, as shown by the induction of p75-dependent neuronal death in two distinct cellular systems. Our findings raise the possibility that pathological elevations in Aβ42 contribute to cellular toxicity via the γ-secretase inhibition, and provide a novel conceptual framework to address Aβ toxicity in the context of γ-secretase-dependent homeostatic signaling.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Ya-Juan Wang, Xiao-Jing Di ... Ting-Wei Mu
    Research Article Updated

    Protein homeostasis (proteostasis) deficiency is an important contributing factor to neurological and metabolic diseases. However, how the proteostasis network orchestrates the folding and assembly of multi-subunit membrane proteins is poorly understood. Previous proteomics studies identified Hsp47 (Gene: SERPINH1), a heat shock protein in the endoplasmic reticulum lumen, as the most enriched interacting chaperone for gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptors. Here, we show that Hsp47 enhances the functional surface expression of GABAA receptors in rat neurons and human HEK293T cells. Furthermore, molecular mechanism study demonstrates that Hsp47 acts after BiP (Gene: HSPA5) and preferentially binds the folded conformation of GABAA receptors without inducing the unfolded protein response in HEK293T cells. Therefore, Hsp47 promotes the subunit-subunit interaction, the receptor assembly process, and the anterograde trafficking of GABAA receptors. Overexpressing Hsp47 is sufficient to correct the surface expression and function of epilepsy-associated GABAA receptor variants in HEK293T cells. Hsp47 also promotes the surface trafficking of other Cys-loop receptors, including nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and serotonin type 3 receptors in HEK293T cells. Therefore, in addition to its known function as a collagen chaperone, this work establishes that Hsp47 plays a critical and general role in the maturation of multi-subunit Cys-loop neuroreceptors.