Genetic and environmental determinants of variation in the plasma lipidome of older Australian twins

  1. Matthew WK Wong
  2. Anbupalam Thalamuthu
  3. Nady Braidy
  4. Karen A Mather
  5. Yue Liu
  6. Liliana Ciobanu
  7. Bernhardt T Baune
  8. Nicola J Armstrong
  9. John Kwok
  10. Peter Schofield
  11. Margaret J Wright
  12. David Ames
  13. Russell Pickford
  14. Teresa Lee
  15. Anne Poljak
  16. Perminder S Sachdev  Is a corresponding author
  1. Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing, University of New South Wales, Australia
  2. The University of Adelaide, Adelaide Medical School, Discipline of Psychiatry, Australia
  3. Department of Psychiatry, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Australia
  4. Mathematics and Statistics, Murdoch University, Australia
  5. Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Australia
  6. Neuroscience Research Australia, Australia
  7. Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, Australia
  8. University of Melbourne Academic Unit for Psychiatry of Old Age, St George's Hospital, Australia
  9. University of New South Wales, Australia

Abstract

The critical role of blood lipids in a broad range of health and disease states is well recognised but less explored is the interplay of genetics and environment within the broader blood lipidome. We examined heritability of the plasma lipidome among healthy older-aged twins (75 monozygotic/55 dizygotic pairs) enrolled in the Older Australian Twins Study (OATS) and explored corresponding gene expression and DNA methylation associations. 27/209 lipids (13.3%) detected by liquid chromatography-coupled mass spectrometry (LC-MS) were significantly heritable under the classical ACE twin model (h2=0.28-0.59), which included ceramides (Cer) and triglycerides (TG). Relative to non-significantly heritable TGs, heritable TGs had a greater number of associations with gene transcripts, not directly associated with lipid metabolism, but with immune function, signalling and transcriptional regulation. Genome-wide average DNA methylation (GWAM) levels accounted for variability in some non-heritable lipids. We reveal a complex interplay of genetic and environmental influences on the ageing plasma lipidome.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Matthew WK Wong

    School of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Anbupalam Thalamuthu

    School of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Nady Braidy

    School of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Karen A Mather

    School of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Yue Liu

    School of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Liliana Ciobanu

    Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide Medical School, Discipline of Psychiatry, Adelaide, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Bernhardt T Baune

    Department of Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Nicola J Armstrong

    Mathematics and Statistics, Mathematics and Statistics, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4477-293X
  9. John Kwok

    Brain and Mind Centre, Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Peter Schofield

    Faculty of Medicine, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Margaret J Wright

    Queensland Brain Institute, Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7133-4970
  12. David Ames

    Academic Unit for Psychiatry of Old Age, University of Melbourne Academic Unit for Psychiatry of Old Age, St George's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Russell Pickford

    Bioanalytical Mass Spectrometry Facility, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Teresa Lee

    School of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Anne Poljak

    School of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Perminder S Sachdev

    School of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
    For correspondence
    p.sachdev@unsw.edu.au
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9595-3220

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council

  • Nady Braidy
  • Perminder S Sachdev

Australian Research Council

  • Nady Braidy

Rebecca L. Cooper Medical Research Foundation

  • Nady Braidy
  • Anne Poljak
  • Perminder S Sachdev

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Mone Zaidi, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, United States

Ethics

Human subjects: OATS was approved by the Ethics Committees of the University of New South Wales and the South Eastern Sydney Local Health District (ethics approval HC17414). All work involving human participants was performed in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki of the World Medical Association. Informed consent was obtained from all participants and/or guardians.

Version history

  1. Received: May 18, 2020
  2. Accepted: July 20, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: July 22, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: July 31, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, Wong et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,018
    views
  • 108
    downloads
  • 9
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Matthew WK Wong
  2. Anbupalam Thalamuthu
  3. Nady Braidy
  4. Karen A Mather
  5. Yue Liu
  6. Liliana Ciobanu
  7. Bernhardt T Baune
  8. Nicola J Armstrong
  9. John Kwok
  10. Peter Schofield
  11. Margaret J Wright
  12. David Ames
  13. Russell Pickford
  14. Teresa Lee
  15. Anne Poljak
  16. Perminder S Sachdev
(2020)
Genetic and environmental determinants of variation in the plasma lipidome of older Australian twins
eLife 9:e58954.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58954

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58954

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Erik Toraason, Alina Salagean ... Diana E Libuda
    Research Article

    The preservation of genome integrity during sperm and egg development is vital for reproductive success. During meiosis, the tumor suppressor BRCA1/BRC-1 and structural maintenance of chromosomes 5/6 (SMC-5/6) complex genetically interact to promote high fidelity DNA double strand break (DSB) repair, but the specific DSB repair outcomes these proteins regulate remain unknown. Using genetic and cytological methods to monitor resolution of DSBs with different repair partners in Caenorhabditis elegans, we demonstrate that both BRC-1 and SMC-5 repress intersister crossover recombination events. Sequencing analysis of conversion tracts from homolog-independent DSB repair events further indicates that BRC-1 regulates intersister/intrachromatid noncrossover conversion tract length. Moreover, we find that BRC-1 specifically inhibits error prone repair of DSBs induced at mid-pachytene. Finally, we reveal functional interactions of BRC-1 and SMC-5/6 in regulating repair pathway engagement: BRC-1 is required for localization of recombinase proteins to DSBs in smc-5 mutants and enhances DSB repair defects in smc-5 mutants by repressing theta-mediated end joining (TMEJ). These results are consistent with a model in which some functions of BRC-1 act upstream of SMC-5/6 to promote recombination and inhibit error-prone DSB repair, while SMC-5/6 acts downstream of BRC-1 to regulate the formation or resolution of recombination intermediates. Taken together, our study illuminates the coordinate interplay of BRC-1 and SMC-5/6 to regulate DSB repair outcomes in the germline.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Xinyang Bing, Wenfan Ke ... James B Jaynes
    Research Article

    Two different models have been proposed to explain how the endpoints of chromatin looped domains (‘TADs’) in eukaryotic chromosomes are determined. In the first, a cohesin complex extrudes a loop until it encounters a boundary element roadblock, generating a stem-loop. In this model, boundaries are functionally autonomous: they have an intrinsic ability to halt the movement of incoming cohesin complexes that is independent of the properties of neighboring boundaries. In the second, loops are generated by boundary:boundary pairing. In this model, boundaries are functionally non-autonomous, and their ability to form a loop depends upon how well they match with their neighbors. Moreover, unlike the loop-extrusion model, pairing interactions can generate both stem-loops and circle-loops. We have used a combination of MicroC to analyze how TADs are organized, and experimental manipulations of the even skipped TAD boundary, homie, to test the predictions of the ‘loop-extrusion’ and the ‘boundary-pairing’ models. Our findings are incompatible with the loop-extrusion model, and instead suggest that the endpoints of TADs in flies are determined by a mechanism in which boundary elements physically pair with their partners, either head-to-head or head-to-tail, with varying degrees of specificity. Although our experiments do not address how partners find each other, the mechanism is unlikely to require loop extrusion.