The Structural Determinants of PH Domain-Mediated Regulation of Akt Revealed by Segmental Labeling

  1. Nam Chu
  2. Thibault Viennet
  3. Hwan Bae
  4. Antonieta Salguero
  5. Andras Boeszoermenyi
  6. Haribabu Arthanari  Is a corresponding author
  7. Philip A Cole  Is a corresponding author
  1. Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, United States
  2. Harvard Medical School, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, United States
  3. Harvard Medical School, United States

Abstract

Akt is a critical protein kinase that governs cancer cell growth and metabolism. Akt appears to be autoinhibited by an intramolecular interaction between its N-terminal pleckstrin homology (PH) domain and kinase domain, which is relieved by C-tail phosphorylation, but the precise molecular mechanisms remain elusive. Here we use a combination of protein semisynthesis, NMR, and enzymological analysis to characterize structural features of the PH domain in its autoinhibited and activated states. We find that Akt autoinhibition depends on the length/flexibility of the PH-kinase linker. We identify a role for a dynamic short segment in the PH domain that appears to regulate autoinhibition and PDK1-catalyzed phosphorylation of Thr308 in the activation loop. We determine that Akt allosteric inhibitor MK2206 drives distinct PH domain structural changes compared to baseline autoinhibited Akt. These results highlight how the conformational plasticity of Akt governs the delicate control of its catalytic properties.

Data availability

Source data: Enzyme kinetics, fluorescence binding data, western blots, SDSPAGE gels have been deposited in Dryad: http://dx.doi:10.5061/dryad.0p2ngf1xg

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Nam Chu

    Medicine/BCMP, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9717-5007
  2. Thibault Viennet

    BCMP, Harvard Medical School, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Hwan Bae

    Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5252-252X
  4. Antonieta Salguero

    Medicine/BCMP, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Andras Boeszoermenyi

    BCMP, Harvard Medical School, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Haribabu Arthanari

    BCMP, Harvard Medical School, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    hari_arthanari@hms.harvard.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Philip A Cole

    Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    pacole@bwh.harvard.edu
    Competing interests
    Philip A Cole, Senior editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6873-7824

Funding

National Cancer Institute (CA74305)

  • Philip A Cole

Claudia Adams Barr Program in Innovative Cancer Research

  • Haribabu Arthanari

Austrian Science Fund (Schroedinger Fellowship)

  • Andras Boeszoermenyi

American Heart Association (19POST34380800)

  • Andras Boeszoermenyi

National Institutes of Health (EB002026)

  • Haribabu Arthanari

Kwanjeong Educational Foundation (pre-doctoral fellowship)

  • Hwan Bae

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. John Kuriyan, University of California, Berkeley, United States

Version history

  1. Received: May 20, 2020
  2. Accepted: August 3, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: August 3, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: August 19, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, Chu et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 6,019
    views
  • 628
    downloads
  • 45
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Nam Chu
  2. Thibault Viennet
  3. Hwan Bae
  4. Antonieta Salguero
  5. Andras Boeszoermenyi
  6. Haribabu Arthanari
  7. Philip A Cole
(2020)
The Structural Determinants of PH Domain-Mediated Regulation of Akt Revealed by Segmental Labeling
eLife 9:e59151.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.59151

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.59151

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Plant Biology
    Henning Mühlenbeck, Yuko Tsutsui ... Cyril Zipfel
    Research Article

    Transmembrane signaling by plant receptor kinases (RKs) has long been thought to involve reciprocal trans-phosphorylation of their intracellular kinase domains. The fact that many of these are pseudokinase domains, however, suggests that additional mechanisms must govern RK signaling activation. Non-catalytic signaling mechanisms of protein kinase domains have been described in metazoans, but information is scarce for plants. Recently, a non-catalytic function was reported for the leucine-rich repeat (LRR)-RK subfamily XIIa member EFR (elongation factor Tu receptor) and phosphorylation-dependent conformational changes were proposed to regulate signaling of RKs with non-RD kinase domains. Here, using EFR as a model, we describe a non-catalytic activation mechanism for LRR-RKs with non-RD kinase domains. EFR is an active kinase, but a kinase-dead variant retains the ability to enhance catalytic activity of its co-receptor kinase BAK1/SERK3 (brassinosteroid insensitive 1-associated kinase 1/somatic embryogenesis receptor kinase 3). Applying hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) analysis and designing homology-based intragenic suppressor mutations, we provide evidence that the EFR kinase domain must adopt its active conformation in order to activate BAK1 allosterically, likely by supporting αC-helix positioning in BAK1. Our results suggest a conformational toggle model for signaling, in which BAK1 first phosphorylates EFR in the activation loop to stabilize its active conformation, allowing EFR in turn to allosterically activate BAK1.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Katarzyna Marta Zoltowska, Utpal Das ... Lucía Chávez-Gutiérrez
    Research Article

    Amyloid β (Aβ) peptides accumulating in the brain are proposed to trigger Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, molecular cascades underlying their toxicity are poorly defined. Here, we explored a novel hypothesis for Aβ42 toxicity that arises from its proven affinity for γ-secretases. We hypothesized that the reported increases in Aβ42, particularly in the endolysosomal compartment, promote the establishment of a product feedback inhibitory mechanism on γ-secretases, and thereby impair downstream signaling events. We conducted kinetic analyses of γ-secretase activity in cell-free systems in the presence of Aβ, as well as cell-based and ex vivo assays in neuronal cell lines, neurons, and brain synaptosomes to assess the impact of Aβ on γ-secretases. We show that human Aβ42 peptides, but neither murine Aβ42 nor human Aβ17–42 (p3), inhibit γ-secretases and trigger accumulation of unprocessed substrates in neurons, including C-terminal fragments (CTFs) of APP, p75, and pan-cadherin. Moreover, Aβ42 treatment dysregulated cellular homeostasis, as shown by the induction of p75-dependent neuronal death in two distinct cellular systems. Our findings raise the possibility that pathological elevations in Aβ42 contribute to cellular toxicity via the γ-secretase inhibition, and provide a novel conceptual framework to address Aβ toxicity in the context of γ-secretase-dependent homeostatic signaling.