1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
  2. Computational and Systems Biology

Gene regulation gravitates towards either addition or multiplication when combining the effects of two signals

  1. Eric M Sanford
  2. Benjamin L Emert
  3. Allison Coté
  4. Arjun Raj  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Pennsylvania, United States
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.59388
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Eric M Sanford
  2. Benjamin L Emert
  3. Allison Coté
  4. Arjun Raj
(2020)
Gene regulation gravitates towards either addition or multiplication when combining the effects of two signals
eLife 9:e59388.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.59388
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

Abstract

Two different cell signals often affect transcription of the same gene. In such cases, it is natural to ask how the combined transcriptional response compares to the individual responses. The most commonly used mechanistic models predict additive or multiplicative combined responses, but a systematic genome-wide evaluation of these predictions is not available. Here, we analyzed the transcriptional response of human MCF-7 cells to retinoic acid and TGF-β, applied individually and in combination. The combined transcriptional responses of induced genes exhibited a range of behaviors, but clearly favored both additive and multiplicative outcomes. We performed paired chromatin accessibility measurements and found that increases in accessibility were largely additive. There was some association between super-additivity of accessibility and multiplicative or super-multiplicative combined transcriptional responses, while sub-additivity of accessibility associated with additive transcriptional responses. Our findings suggest that mechanistic models of combined transcriptional regulation must be able to reproduce a range of behaviors.

Data availability

We have uploading our data to NIH GEO. We are committed to sharing this manuscript's data openly and will happily upload it to any additional databases if requested.All of our raw and processed data (RNA-seq and ATAC-seq data sets) are also available on Dropbox and Github:Data:https://www.dropbox.com/sh/fhx7huyhhtf8fux/AACKW5Bd7k34uy6Rrk3k0WZ4a?dl=0&lst=Analysis Code:https://github.com/emsanford/combined_responses_paperhttps://github.com/arjunrajlaboratory/atac-seq_pipeline_paired-endhttps://github.com/arjunrajlaboratory/RajLabSeqTools

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Eric M Sanford

    Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9232-9334

  2. Benjamin L Emert

    Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  3. Allison Coté

    Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  4. Arjun Raj

    Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
    For correspondence
    arjunraj@seas.upenn.edu
    Competing interests
    Arjun Raj, Receives consulting income and royalties related to Stellaris{trade mark, serif} RNA FISH probes..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2915-6960

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R01 CA238237)

  • Arjun Raj

National Institutes of Health (T32 GM007170)

  • Benjamin L Emert

National Institutes of Health (T32 HG000046)

  • Benjamin L Emert

National Institutes of Health (T32 GM- 07229)

  • Allison Coté

Tara Miller Foundation

  • Arjun Raj

National Institutes of Health (SPORE P50 CA174523)

  • Arjun Raj

National Institutes of Health (F30 HG010986)

  • Eric M Sanford

National Institutes of Health (Transformative Research Award R01 GM137425)

  • Arjun Raj

National Institutes of Health (R01 CA232256)

  • Arjun Raj

National Science Foundation (CAREER 1350601)

  • Arjun Raj

National Institutes of Health (U01 CA227550)

  • Arjun Raj

National Institutes of Health (U01 HL129998)

  • Arjun Raj

National Institutes of Health (RM1 HG007743)

  • Arjun Raj

National Institutes of Health (P30 CA016520)

  • Arjun Raj

National Institutes of Health (F30 CA236129)

  • Benjamin L Emert

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Jie Xiao, Johns Hopkins University, United States

Publication history

  1. Received: May 28, 2020
  2. Accepted: December 4, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: December 7, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: December 29, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, Sanford et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,531
    Page views
  • 320
    Downloads
  • 4
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Eric M Sanford
  2. Benjamin L Emert
  3. Allison Coté
  4. Arjun Raj
(2020)
Gene regulation gravitates towards either addition or multiplication when combining the effects of two signals
eLife 9:e59388.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.59388

Categories and tags

Research organism

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Plant Biology

    Vernalization-triggered expression of the antisense transcript COOLAIR is mediated by CBF genes

    Myeongjune Jeon, Goowon Jeong ... Ilha Lee
    Research Article Updated

    To synchronize flowering time with spring, many plants undergo vernalization, a floral-promotion process triggered by exposure to long-term winter cold. In Arabidopsis thaliana, this is achieved through cold-mediated epigenetic silencing of the floral repressor, FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC). COOLAIR, a cold-induced antisense RNA transcribed from the FLC locus, has been proposed to facilitate FLC silencing. Here, we show that C-repeat (CRT)/dehydration-responsive elements (DREs) at the 3′-end of FLC and CRT/DRE-binding factors (CBFs) are required for cold-mediated expression of COOLAIR. CBFs bind to CRT/DREs at the 3′-end of FLC, both in vitro and in vivo, and CBF levels increase gradually during vernalization. Cold-induced COOLAIR expression is severely impaired in cbfs mutants in which all CBF genes are knocked-out. Conversely, CBF-overexpressing plants show increased COOLAIR levels even at warm temperatures. We show that COOLAIR is induced by CBFs during early stages of vernalization but COOLAIR levels decrease in later phases as FLC chromatin transitions to an inactive state to which CBFs can no longer bind. We also demonstrate that cbfs and FLCΔCOOLAIR mutants exhibit a normal vernalization response despite their inability to activate COOLAIR expression during cold, revealing that COOLAIR is not required for the vernalization process.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression

    X-chromosome target specificity diverged between dosage compensation mechanisms of two closely related Caenorhabditis species

    Qiming Yang, Te-Wen Lo ... Barbara J Meyer
    Research Article

    An evolutionary perspective enhances our understanding of biological mechanisms. Comparison of sex determination and X-chromosome dosage compensation mechanisms between the closely related nematode species C. briggsae (Cbr) and C. elegans (Cel) revealed that the genetic regulatory hierarchy controlling both processes is conserved, but the X-chromosome target specificity and mode of binding for the specialized condensin dosage compensation complex (DCC) controlling X expression have diverged. We identified two motifs within Cbr DCC recruitment sites that are highly enriched on X: 13-bp MEX and 30-bp MEX II. Mutating either MEX or MEX II in an endogenous recruitment site with multiple copies of one or both motifs reduced binding, but only removing all motifs eliminated binding in vivo. Hence, DCC binding to Cbr recruitment sites appears additive. In contrast, DCC binding to Cel recruitment sites is synergistic: mutating even one motif in vivo eliminated binding. Although all X-chromosome motifs share the sequence CAGGG, they have otherwise diverged so that a motif from one species cannot function in the other. Functional divergence was demonstrated in vivo and in vitro. A single nucleotide position in Cbr MEX can determine whether Cel DCC binds. This rapid divergence of DCC target specificity could have been an important factor in establishing reproductive isolation between nematode species and contrasts dramatically with conservation of target specificity for X-chromosome dosage compensation across Drosophila species and for transcription factors controlling developmental processes such as body-plan specification from fruit flies to mice.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Plant Biology

    Flowering: Keeping it cool

    Vy Nguyen, Iain Searle
    Insight

    A well-established model for how plants start the process of flowering in periods of cold weather may need revisiting.