Health benefits attributed to 17α-estradiol, a lifespan-extending compound, are mediated through estrogen receptor α

  1. Shivani N Mann
  2. Niran Hadad
  3. Molly Nelson Holte
  4. Alicia R Rothman
  5. Roshini Sathiaseelan
  6. Samim Ali Mondal
  7. Martin-Paul Agbaga
  8. Archana Unnikrishnan
  9. Malayannan Subramaniam
  10. John Hawse
  11. Derek M Huffman
  12. Willard M Freeman
  13. Michael B Stout  Is a corresponding author
  1. OUHSC, United States
  2. The Jackson Laboratory, United States
  3. Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, United States
  4. Mayo Clinic, United States
  5. Albert Einstein College of Medicine, United States
  6. Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, United States

Abstract

Metabolic dysfunction underlies several chronic diseases, many of which are exacerbated by obesity. Dietary interventions can reverse metabolic declines and slow aging, although compliance issues remain paramount. 17α-estradiol treatment improves metabolic parameters and slows aging in male mice. The mechanisms by which 17α-estradiol elicits these benefits remain unresolved. Herein, we show that 17α-estradiol elicits similar genomic binding and transcriptional activation through estrogen receptor α (ERα) to that of 17β-estradiol. In addition, we show that the ablation of ERα completely attenuates the beneficial metabolic effects of 17α-E2 in male mice. Our findings suggest that 17α-E2 may act through the liver and hypothalamus to improve metabolic parameters in male mice. Lastly, we also determined that 17α-E2 improves metabolic parameters in male rats, thereby proving that the beneficial effects of 17α-E2 are not limited to mice. Collectively, these studies suggest ERα may be a drug target for mitigating chronic diseases in male mammals.

Data availability

Sequencing data has been deposited in GEO under accession code GSE151039

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Shivani N Mann

    Nutritional Sciences, OUHSC, Oklahoma City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Niran Hadad

    Genomics, The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Molly Nelson Holte

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Alicia R Rothman

    Nutritional Sciences, OUHSC, Oklahoma City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Roshini Sathiaseelan

    Nutritional Sciences, OUHSC, Oklahoma City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Samim Ali Mondal

    Nutritional Sciences, OUHSC, Oklahoma City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Martin-Paul Agbaga

    Cell Biology, OUHSC, Oklahoma City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Archana Unnikrishnan

    Biochemistry, OUHSC, Oklahoma City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Malayannan Subramaniam

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. John Hawse

    Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Derek M Huffman

    Department of Molecular Pharmacology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Willard M Freeman

    Genes & Human Disease, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7027-999X
  13. Michael B Stout

    Nutritional Sciences, OUHSC, Oklahoma City, United States
    For correspondence
    michael-stout@ouhsc.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9996-9123

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R00 AG51661,R01 EY030513,T32 AG052363,P30 EY012190,P30 AG038072)

  • Shivani N Mann
  • Martin-Paul Agbaga
  • Derek M Huffman
  • Michael B Stout

Harold Hamm Diabetes Center (Pilot Research Funding)

  • Shivani N Mann
  • Michael B Stout

National Institutes of Health (R01 AG069742)

  • Michael B Stout

National Institutes of Health (R01 AG059430)

  • Willard M Freeman

Veterans Affairs Oklahoma City (I01BX003906)

  • Willard M Freeman

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (#19-063-SEAHI) of the University of Oklahoma Health Science Center.

Copyright

© 2020, Mann et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 6,537
    views
  • 358
    downloads
  • 36
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Shivani N Mann
  2. Niran Hadad
  3. Molly Nelson Holte
  4. Alicia R Rothman
  5. Roshini Sathiaseelan
  6. Samim Ali Mondal
  7. Martin-Paul Agbaga
  8. Archana Unnikrishnan
  9. Malayannan Subramaniam
  10. John Hawse
  11. Derek M Huffman
  12. Willard M Freeman
  13. Michael B Stout
(2020)
Health benefits attributed to 17α-estradiol, a lifespan-extending compound, are mediated through estrogen receptor α
eLife 9:e59616.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.59616

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.59616

Further reading

    1. Medicine
    Jiang Li, Yuefeng Yu ... Bin Wang
    Research Article

    Background:

    Identification of individuals with prediabetes who are at high risk of developing diabetes allows for precise interventions. We aimed to determine the role of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)-based metabolomic signature in predicting the progression from prediabetes to diabetes.

    Methods:

    This prospective study included 13,489 participants with prediabetes who had metabolomic data from the UK Biobank. Circulating metabolites were quantified via NMR spectroscopy. Cox proportional hazard (CPH) models were performed to estimate the associations between metabolites and diabetes risk. Supporting vector machine, random forest, and extreme gradient boosting were used to select the optimal metabolite panel for prediction. CPH and random survival forest (RSF) models were utilized to validate the predictive ability of the metabolites.

    Results:

    During a median follow-up of 13.6 years, 2525 participants developed diabetes. After adjusting for covariates, 94 of 168 metabolites were associated with risk of progression to diabetes. A panel of nine metabolites, selected by all three machine-learning algorithms, was found to significantly improve diabetes risk prediction beyond conventional risk factors in the CPH model (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, 1 year: 0.823 for risk factors + metabolites vs 0.759 for risk factors, 5 years: 0.830 vs 0.798, 10 years: 0.801 vs 0.776, all p < 0.05). Similar results were observed from the RSF model. Categorization of participants according to the predicted value thresholds revealed distinct cumulative risk of diabetes.

    Conclusions:

    Our study lends support for use of the metabolite markers to help determine individuals with prediabetes who are at high risk of progressing to diabetes and inform targeted and efficient interventions.

    Funding:

    Shanghai Municipal Health Commission (2022XD017). Innovative Research Team of High-level Local Universities in Shanghai (SHSMU-ZDCX20212501). Shanghai Municipal Human Resources and Social Security Bureau (2020074). Clinical Research Plan of Shanghai Hospital Development Center (SHDC2020CR4006). Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (22015810500).

    1. Medicine
    Jon R Lorsch, Lawrence A Tabak, Monica M Bertagnolli
    Feature Article

    Three senior figures at the US National Institutes of Health explain why the agency remains committed to supporting basic science and research.