Limited inhibition of multiple nodes in a driver network blocks metastasis

  1. Ali Ekrem Yesilkanal
  2. Dongbo Yang
  3. Andrea Valdespino
  4. Payal Tiwari
  5. Alan U Sabino
  6. Long Chi Nguyen
  7. Jiyoung Lee
  8. Xiao-He Xie
  9. Siqi Sun
  10. Christopher Dann
  11. Lydia Robinson-Mailman
  12. Ethan Steinberg
  13. Timothy Stuhlmiller
  14. Casey Frankenberger
  15. Elizabeth Goldsmith
  16. Gary L Johnson
  17. Alexandre F Ramos  Is a corresponding author
  18. Marsha R Rosner  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Chicago, United States
  2. University of São Paulo, Brazil
  3. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States
  4. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, United States

Abstract

Metastasis suppression by high-dose, multi-drug targeting is unsuccessful due to network heterogeneity and compensatory network activation. Here we show that targeting driver network signaling capacity by limited inhibition of core pathways is a more effective anti-metastatic strategy. This principle underlies the action of a physiological metastasis suppressor, Raf Kinase Inhibitory Protein (RKIP), that moderately decreases stress-regulated MAP kinase network activity, reducing output to transcription factors such as pro-metastastic BACH1 and motility-related target genes. We developed a low-dose four-drug mimic that blocks metastatic colonization in mouse breast cancer models and increases survival. Experiments and network flow modeling show limited inhibition of multiple pathways is required to overcome variation in MAPK network topology and suppress signaling output across heterogeneous tumor cells. Restricting inhibition of individual kinases dissipates surplus signal, preventing threshold activation of compensatory kinase networks. This low-dose multi-drug approach to decrease signaling capacity of driver networks represents a transformative, clinically-relevant strategy for anti-metastatic treatment.

Data availability

RNA sequencing data have been deposited in GEO under the accession code GSE128983.

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ali Ekrem Yesilkanal

    Ben May Department for Cancer Research, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Dongbo Yang

    Ben May Department for Cancer Research, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Andrea Valdespino

    Ben May Department for Cancer Research, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Payal Tiwari

    Ben May Department for Cancer Research, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Alan U Sabino

    Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1094-5078
  6. Long Chi Nguyen

    Ben May Department for Cancer Research, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Jiyoung Lee

    Ben May Department for Cancer Research, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8503-4805
  8. Xiao-He Xie

    Ben May Department for Cancer Research, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Siqi Sun

    Ben May Department for Cancer Research, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Christopher Dann

    Ben May Department for Cancer Research, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Lydia Robinson-Mailman

    Ben May Department for Cancer Research, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Ethan Steinberg

    Ben May Department for Cancer Research, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Timothy Stuhlmiller

    Department of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Casey Frankenberger

    Ben May Department for Cancer Research, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. Elizabeth Goldsmith

    Department of Biophysics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  16. Gary L Johnson

    Pharmacology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2867-0551
  17. Alexandre F Ramos

    Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
    For correspondence
    alex.ramos@usp.br
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  18. Marsha R Rosner

    Ben May Department for Cancer Research, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    For correspondence
    m-rosner@uchicago.edu
    Competing interests
    Marsha R Rosner, This research is also the subject of a pending US patent application # 17/048,282..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6586-8335

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R01 GM121735-01)

  • Marsha R Rosner

National Institutes of Health (CA058223)

  • Gary L Johnson

Rustandy Fund for Innovative Cancer Research

  • Marsha R Rosner

University of Chicago Women's Board Grants Fund

  • Ali Ekrem Yesilkanal

University of Sao Paulo (Use of Intelligent Systems,18.5.245.86.7)

  • Alexandre F Ramos

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (88881.062174/2014-01)

  • Alexandre F Ramos

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior

  • Alan U Sabino

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal protocols related to mouse experiments were approved by the University of Chicago Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC #72228).

Copyright

© 2021, Yesilkanal et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,799
    views
  • 357
    downloads
  • 21
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ali Ekrem Yesilkanal
  2. Dongbo Yang
  3. Andrea Valdespino
  4. Payal Tiwari
  5. Alan U Sabino
  6. Long Chi Nguyen
  7. Jiyoung Lee
  8. Xiao-He Xie
  9. Siqi Sun
  10. Christopher Dann
  11. Lydia Robinson-Mailman
  12. Ethan Steinberg
  13. Timothy Stuhlmiller
  14. Casey Frankenberger
  15. Elizabeth Goldsmith
  16. Gary L Johnson
  17. Alexandre F Ramos
  18. Marsha R Rosner
(2021)
Limited inhibition of multiple nodes in a driver network blocks metastasis
eLife 10:e59696.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.59696

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.59696

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Susanne Tilk, Judith Frydman ... Dmitri A Petrov
    Research Article

    In asexual populations that don’t undergo recombination, such as cancer, deleterious mutations are expected to accrue readily due to genome-wide linkage between mutations. Despite this mutational load of often thousands of deleterious mutations, many tumors thrive. How tumors survive the damaging consequences of this mutational load is not well understood. Here, we investigate the functional consequences of mutational load in 10,295 human tumors by quantifying their phenotypic response through changes in gene expression. Using a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM), we find that high mutational load tumors up-regulate proteostasis machinery related to the mitigation and prevention of protein misfolding. We replicate these expression responses in cancer cell lines and show that the viability in high mutational load cancer cells is strongly dependent on complexes that degrade and refold proteins. This indicates that the upregulation of proteostasis machinery is causally important for high mutational burden tumors and uncovers new therapeutic vulnerabilities.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Kourosh Hayatigolkhatmi, Chiara Soriani ... Simona Rodighiero
    Tools and Resources

    Understanding the cell cycle at the single-cell level is crucial for cellular biology and cancer research. While current methods using fluorescent markers have improved the study of adherent cells, non-adherent cells remain challenging. In this study, we addressed this gap by combining a specialized surface to enhance cell attachment, the FUCCI(CA)2 sensor, an automated image analysis pipeline, and a custom machine learning algorithm. This approach enabled precise measurement of cell cycle phase durations in non-adherent cells. This method was validated in acute myeloid leukemia cell lines NB4 and Kasumi-1, which have unique cell cycle characteristics, and we tested the impact of cell cycle-modulating drugs on NB4 cells. Our cell cycle analysis system, which is also compatible with adherent cells, is fully automated and freely available, providing detailed insights from hundreds of cells under various conditions. This report presents a valuable tool for advancing cancer research and drug development by enabling comprehensive, automated cell cycle analysis in both adherent and non-adherent cells.