Alcohol drinking alters stress response to predator odor via BNST kappa opioid receptor signaling in male mice

Abstract

Maladaptive responses to stress are a hallmark of alcohol use disorder, but the mechanisms that underlie this are not well characterized. Here we show that kappa opioid receptor signaling in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST) is a critical molecular substrate underlying abnormal stress responses to predator odor following heavy alcohol drinking. Exposure to predator odor during protracted withdrawal from intermittent alcohol drinking resulted in enhanced prefrontal cortex (PFC)-driven excitation of prodynorphin-containing neurons in the BNST. Furthermore, deletion of prodynorphin in the BNST and chemogenetic inhibition of the PFC-BNST pathway restored abnormal responses to predator odor in alcohol-exposed mice. These findings suggest that increased corticolimbic drive may promote abnormal stress behavioral responses to predator odor during protracted withdrawal. Various nodes of this PFC-BNST dynorphin-related circuit may serve as potential targets for potential therapeutic mediation as well as biomarkers of negative responses to stress following heavy alcohol drinking.

Data availability

All data are available in the main text or the supplementary materials.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Lara S Hwa

    Pharmacology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5197-6201
  2. Sofia Neira

    Pharmacology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Meghan E Flanigan

    Pharmacology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3185-7459
  4. Christina M Stanhope

    Pharmacology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Melanie M Pina

    Pharmacology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5638-0474
  6. Dipanwita Pati

    Pharmacology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6303-4871
  7. Olivia J Hon

    Pharmacology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Waylin Yu

    Pharmacology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Emily Kokush

    Pharmacology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Rachel Calloway

    Pharmacology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Kristen Boyt

    Pharmacology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Thomas L Kash

    Pharmacology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
    For correspondence
    tkash@email.unc.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4747-4495

Funding

National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (K99AA027576)

  • Lara S Hwa

National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (T32AA007573)

  • Meghan E Flanigan

National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (F32AA026485)

  • Melanie M Pina

National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (F31AA027129)

  • Waylin Yu

National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA019454)

  • Thomas L Kash

National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (U01AA020911)

  • Thomas L Kash

National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA025582)

  • Thomas L Kash

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Matthew N Hill, University of Calgary, Canada

Ethics

Animal experimentation: The UNC School of Medicine Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approved all experiments (Protocol # 19-078). Procedures were conducted in accordance with the NIH Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

Version history

  1. Received: June 5, 2020
  2. Accepted: July 20, 2020
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: July 21, 2020 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: August 20, 2020 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2020, Hwa et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,182
    views
  • 425
    downloads
  • 11
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Lara S Hwa
  2. Sofia Neira
  3. Meghan E Flanigan
  4. Christina M Stanhope
  5. Melanie M Pina
  6. Dipanwita Pati
  7. Olivia J Hon
  8. Waylin Yu
  9. Emily Kokush
  10. Rachel Calloway
  11. Kristen Boyt
  12. Thomas L Kash
(2020)
Alcohol drinking alters stress response to predator odor via BNST kappa opioid receptor signaling in male mice
eLife 9:e59709.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.59709

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.59709

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Jaebin Kim, Edwin Bustamante ... Scott H Soderling
    Research Article

    One of the most extensively studied members of the Ras superfamily of small GTPases, Rac1 is an intracellular signal transducer that remodels actin and phosphorylation signaling networks. Previous studies have shown that Rac1-mediated signaling is associated with hippocampal-dependent working memory and longer-term forms of learning and memory and that Rac1 can modulate forms of both pre- and postsynaptic plasticity. How these different cognitive functions and forms of plasticity mediated by Rac1 are linked, however, is unclear. Here, we show that spatial working memory in mice is selectively impaired following the expression of a genetically encoded Rac1 inhibitor at presynaptic terminals, while longer-term cognitive processes are affected by Rac1 inhibition at postsynaptic sites. To investigate the regulatory mechanisms of this presynaptic process, we leveraged new advances in mass spectrometry to identify the proteomic and post-translational landscape of presynaptic Rac1 signaling. We identified serine/threonine kinases and phosphorylated cytoskeletal signaling and synaptic vesicle proteins enriched with active Rac1. The phosphorylated sites in these proteins are at positions likely to have regulatory effects on synaptic vesicles. Consistent with this, we also report changes in the distribution and morphology of synaptic vesicles and in postsynaptic ultrastructure following presynaptic Rac1 inhibition. Overall, this study reveals a previously unrecognized presynaptic role of Rac1 signaling in cognitive processes and provides insights into its potential regulatory mechanisms.