Abstract

In utero exposure to maternal immune activation (MIA) is an environmental risk factor for neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric disorders. Animal models provide an opportunity to identify mechanisms driving neuropathology associated with MIA. We performed time course transcriptional profiling of mouse cortical development following induced MIA via poly(I:C) injection at E12.5. MIA-driven transcriptional changes were validated via protein analysis, and parallel perturbations to cortical neuroanatomy were identified via imaging. MIA-induced acute upregulation of genes associated with hypoxia, immune signaling, and angiogenesis, by six hours following exposure. This acute response was followed by changes in proliferation, neuronal and glial specification, and cortical lamination that emerged at E14.5 and peaked at E17.5. Decreased numbers of proliferative cells in germinal zones and alterations in neuronal and glial populations were identified in the MIA-exposed cortex. Overall, paired transcriptomic and neuroanatomical characterization revealed a sequence of perturbations to corticogenesis driven by mid-gestational MIA.

Data availability

Sequencing data (raw and gene-count data for RNA-seq) have been deposited in GEO under accession number GSE166376. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE166376Data analysis code is available at: https://github.com/NordNeurogenomicsLab/Publications/tree/master/Canales_eLife_2021Detailed DE analysis are included in the manuscript and supporting files (Supplementary files 1-15) and can be visualized using our interactive online browser at: https://nordlab.shinyapps.io/mia_browser/.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Cesar P Canales

    Center for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2505-8367
  2. Myka L Estes

    Center for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Karol Cichewicz

    Center for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Kartik Angara

    Department of Pediatrics & Human Development, Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. John Paul Aboubechara

    Center for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Scott Cameron

    Center for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Kathryn Prendergast

    Center for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Linda Su-Feher

    Center for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Iva Zdilar

    Center for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Ellie J Kreun

    Center for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Emma C Connolly

    Center for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Jin Myeong Seo

    Center for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Jack B Goon

    Center for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Kathleen Farrelly

    Center for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Tyler W Stradleigh

    Center for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Deborah van der List

    Department of Physiology and Membrane Biology, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Lory Haapanen

    Div. of Rheumatology/Allergy and Clin. Immunol, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Judy Van de Water

    Div. of Rheumatology/Allergy and Clin. Immunol, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. Daniel Vogt

    Department of Pediatrics & Human Development, Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  20. Kim McAllister

    Center for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
    For correspondence
    kmcallister@ucdavis.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  21. Alex S Nord

    Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
    For correspondence
    asnord@ucdavis.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4259-7514

Funding

National Institute of Mental Health (2T32MH073124-16)

  • Cesar P Canales

National Institute of Mental Health (5R21MH116681-02)

  • Kim McAllister
  • Alex S Nord

Brain Research Foundation

  • Alex S Nord

The UCD Clinical Translational Science Center

  • Kim McAllister
  • Alex S Nord

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM119831)

  • Alex S Nord

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Anita Bhattacharyya, University of Wisconsin, Madison, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was conducted in compliance with NIH guidelines and approved protocols from the University of California Davis Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) protocol #20229

Version history

  1. Received: June 16, 2020
  2. Accepted: March 2, 2021
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: March 5, 2021 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: March 19, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2021, Canales et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,478
    views
  • 324
    downloads
  • 17
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Cesar P Canales
  2. Myka L Estes
  3. Karol Cichewicz
  4. Kartik Angara
  5. John Paul Aboubechara
  6. Scott Cameron
  7. Kathryn Prendergast
  8. Linda Su-Feher
  9. Iva Zdilar
  10. Ellie J Kreun
  11. Emma C Connolly
  12. Jin Myeong Seo
  13. Jack B Goon
  14. Kathleen Farrelly
  15. Tyler W Stradleigh
  16. Deborah van der List
  17. Lory Haapanen
  18. Judy Van de Water
  19. Daniel Vogt
  20. Kim McAllister
  21. Alex S Nord
(2021)
Sequential perturbations to mouse corticogenesis following in utero maternal immune activation
eLife 10:e60100.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60100

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.60100

Further reading

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Neuroscience
    Bohan Zhu, Richard I Ainsworth ... Javier González-Maeso
    Research Article

    Genome-wide association studies have revealed >270 loci associated with schizophrenia risk, yet these genetic factors do not seem to be sufficient to fully explain the molecular determinants behind this psychiatric condition. Epigenetic marks such as post-translational histone modifications remain largely plastic during development and adulthood, allowing a dynamic impact of environmental factors, including antipsychotic medications, on access to genes and regulatory elements. However, few studies so far have profiled cell-specific genome-wide histone modifications in postmortem brain samples from schizophrenia subjects, or the effect of antipsychotic treatment on such epigenetic marks. Here, we conducted ChIP-seq analyses focusing on histone marks indicative of active enhancers (H3K27ac) and active promoters (H3K4me3), alongside RNA-seq, using frontal cortex samples from antipsychotic-free (AF) and antipsychotic-treated (AT) individuals with schizophrenia, as well as individually matched controls (n=58). Schizophrenia subjects exhibited thousands of neuronal and non-neuronal epigenetic differences at regions that included several susceptibility genetic loci, such as NRG1, DISC1, and DRD3. By analyzing the AF and AT cohorts separately, we identified schizophrenia-associated alterations in specific transcription factors, their regulatees, and epigenomic and transcriptomic features that were reversed by antipsychotic treatment; as well as those that represented a consequence of antipsychotic medication rather than a hallmark of schizophrenia in postmortem human brain samples. Notably, we also found that the effect of age on epigenomic landscapes was more pronounced in frontal cortex of AT-schizophrenics, as compared to AF-schizophrenics and controls. Together, these data provide important evidence of epigenetic alterations in the frontal cortex of individuals with schizophrenia, and remark for the first time on the impact of age and antipsychotic treatment on chromatin organization.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Kevin Nuno, Armon Azizi ... Ravindra Majeti
    Research Article

    Relapse of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is highly aggressive and often treatment refractory. We analyzed previously published AML relapse cohorts and found that 40% of relapses occur without changes in driver mutations, suggesting that non-genetic mechanisms drive relapse in a large proportion of cases. We therefore characterized epigenetic patterns of AML relapse using 26 matched diagnosis-relapse samples with ATAC-seq. This analysis identified a relapse-specific chromatin accessibility signature for mutationally stable AML, suggesting that AML undergoes epigenetic evolution at relapse independent of mutational changes. Analysis of leukemia stem cell (LSC) chromatin changes at relapse indicated that this leukemic compartment underwent significantly less epigenetic evolution than non-LSCs, while epigenetic changes in non-LSCs reflected overall evolution of the bulk leukemia. Finally, we used single-cell ATAC-seq paired with mitochondrial sequencing (mtscATAC) to map clones from diagnosis into relapse along with their epigenetic features. We found that distinct mitochondrially-defined clones exhibit more similar chromatin accessibility at relapse relative to diagnosis, demonstrating convergent epigenetic evolution in relapsed AML. These results demonstrate that epigenetic evolution is a feature of relapsed AML and that convergent epigenetic evolution can occur following treatment with induction chemotherapy.