Ecological adaptation in Atlantic herring is associated with large shifts in allele frequencies at hundreds of loci

  1. Fan Han
  2. Minal Jamsandekar
  3. Mats E Pettersson
  4. Leyi Su
  5. Angela Fuentes-Pardo
  6. Brian Davis
  7. Dorte Bekkevold
  8. Florian Berg
  9. Michele Casini
  10. Geir Dahle
  11. Edward D Farrell
  12. Arild Folkvord
  13. Leif Andersson  Is a corresponding author
  1. Uppsala University, Sweden
  2. Texas A&M University, United States
  3. Technical University of Denmark, Denmark
  4. University of Bergen, Norway
  5. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden
  6. Institute of Marine Research, Norway
  7. University College Dublin, Ireland

Abstract

Atlantic herring is widespread in North Atlantic and adjacent waters and is one of the most abundant vertebrates on earth. This species is well suited to explore genetic adaptation due to minute genetic differentiation at selectively neutral loci. Here we report hundreds of loci underlying ecological adaptation to different geographic areas and spawning conditions. Four of these represent megabase inversions confirmed by long read sequencing. The genetic architecture underlying ecological adaptation in herring deviates from expectation under a classical infinitesimal model for complex traits because of large shifts in allele frequencies at hundreds of loci under selection.

Data availability

Data availability statement. The sequence data generated in this study is available in Bioproject PRJNA642736.Code availability statement. The analyses of data have been carried out with publicly available software and all are cited in the Methods section. Custom scripts used are available in Github (https://github.com/Fan-Han/Population-analysis-with-pooled-data)

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Fan Han

    Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Minal Jamsandekar

    Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Mats E Pettersson

    Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7372-9076
  4. Leyi Su

    Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Angela Fuentes-Pardo

    Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Brian Davis

    Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Dorte Bekkevold

    National Institute of Aquatic Resources, Technical University of Denmark, Silkeborg, Denmark
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Florian Berg

    Department of Biology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1543-8112
  9. Michele Casini

    Department of Aquatic Resources, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Lysekil, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Geir Dahle

    Institute of Marine Research, Bergen, Norway
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Edward D Farrell

    School of Biology and Environmental Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Arild Folkvord

    Department of Biological Sciences, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4763-0590
  13. Leif Andersson

    Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
    For correspondence
    leif.andersson@imbim.uu.se
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4085-6968

Funding

Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse (KAW scholar)

  • Leif Andersson

Vetenskapsrådet (Senior professor)

  • Leif Andersson

Research Council of Norway (254774)

  • Arild Folkvord

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2020, Han et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,500
    views
  • 560
    downloads
  • 76
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Fan Han
  2. Minal Jamsandekar
  3. Mats E Pettersson
  4. Leyi Su
  5. Angela Fuentes-Pardo
  6. Brian Davis
  7. Dorte Bekkevold
  8. Florian Berg
  9. Michele Casini
  10. Geir Dahle
  11. Edward D Farrell
  12. Arild Folkvord
  13. Leif Andersson
(2020)
Ecological adaptation in Atlantic herring is associated with large shifts in allele frequencies at hundreds of loci
eLife 9:e61076.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.61076

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.61076

Further reading

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Christopher S McAllester, John E Pool
    Research Article

    Chromosomal inversion polymorphisms can be common, but the causes of their persistence are often unclear. We propose a model for the maintenance of inversion polymorphism, which requires that some variants contribute antagonistically to two phenotypes, one of which has negative frequency-dependent fitness. These conditions yield a form of frequency-dependent disruptive selection, favoring two predominant haplotypes segregating alleles that favor opposing antagonistic phenotypes. An inversion associated with one haplotype can reduce the fitness load incurred by generating recombinant offspring, reinforcing its linkage to the haplotype and enabling both haplotypes to accumulate more antagonistic variants than expected otherwise. We develop and apply a forward simulator to examine these dynamics under a tradeoff between survival and male display. These simulations indeed generate inversion-associated haplotypes with opposing sex-specific fitness effects. Antagonism strengthens with time, and can ultimately yield karyotypes at surprisingly predictable frequencies, with striking genotype frequency differences between sexes and between developmental stages. To test whether this model may contribute to well-studied yet enigmatic inversion polymorphisms in Drosophila melanogaster, we track inversion frequencies in laboratory crosses to test whether they influence male reproductive success or survival. We find that two of the four tested inversions show significant evidence for the tradeoff examined, with In(3 R)K favoring survival and In(3 L)Ok favoring male reproduction. In line with the apparent sex-specific fitness effects implied for both of those inversions, In(3 L)Ok was also found to be less costly to the viability and/or longevity of males than females, whereas In(3 R)K was more beneficial to female survival. Based on this work, we expect that balancing selection on antagonistically pleiotropic traits may provide a significant and underappreciated contribution to the maintenance of natural inversion polymorphism.

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    Hiroshi Arai, Susumu Katsuma ... Daisuke Kageyama
    Research Article

    Wolbachia are maternally transmitted bacterial symbionts that are ubiquitous among arthropods. They can hijack host reproduction in various ways, including male-killing (MK), where the sons of infected mothers are killed during development. The recent discovery of MK-associated Wolbachia genes, i.e., oscar in Ostrinia moths and wmk in Drosophila flies, stimulates our interest in the diversity and commonality of MK mechanisms, which remain largely unclear. We recently discovered that a Wolbachia symbiont of the moth Homona magnanima carries an MK-associated prophage region encoding homologs of oscar (Hm-oscar) and wmk (wmk-1–4). Here, we investigated the effects of these genes in the native host. Upon transient overexpression, Hm-oscar, but not wmk, induced male lethality in H. magnanima, in contrast to our observations in Drosophila, where the wmk homologs, but not Hm-oscar, killed the males. Hm-oscar disrupted sex determination in male embryos by inducing a female-type doublesex splicing and impaired dosage compensation, recapitulating the Wolbachia phenotype. Cell-based transfection assays confirmed that Hm-oscar suppressed the function of masculinizer, the primary male sex determinant involved in lepidopteran dosage compensation. Our study highlights the conserved roles of oscar homologs in Wolbachia-induced lepidopteran MK and argues that Wolbachia have evolved multiple MK mechanisms in insects.