The final step of 40S ribosomal subunit maturation is controlled by a dual key lock

  1. Laura Plassart
  2. Ramtin Shayan
  3. Christian Montellese
  4. Dana Rinaldi
  5. Natacha Larburu
  6. Carole Pichereaux
  7. Carine Froment
  8. Simon Lebaron
  9. Marie-Françoise O'Donohue
  10. Ulrike Kutay
  11. Julien Marcoux
  12. Pierre-Emmanuel Gleizes  Is a corresponding author
  13. Celia Plisson-Chastang  Is a corresponding author
  1. Centre de Biologie Integrative, University of Toulouse, France
  2. ETH Zürich, Switzerland
  3. Institut de Pharmacologie et de Biologie Structurale, France
  4. CNRS, France

Abstract

Preventing premature interaction of pre-ribosomes with the translation apparatus is essential for translational accuracy. Hence, the final maturation step releasing functional 40S ribosomal subunits, namely processing of the 18S ribosomal RNA 3' end, is safeguarded by the protein DIM2, which both interacts with the endoribonuclease NOB1 and masks the rRNA cleavage site. To elucidate the control mechanism that unlocks NOB1 activity, we performed cryo-EM analysis of late human pre-40S particles purified using a catalytically-inactive form of the ATPase RIO1. These structures, together with in vivo and in vitro functional analyses, support a model in which ATP-loaded RIO1 cooperates with ribosomal protein RPS26/eS26 to displace DIM2 from the 18S rRNA 3' end, thereby triggering final cleavage by NOB1; release of ADP then leads to RIO1 dissociation from the 40S subunit. This dual key lock mechanism requiring RIO1 and RPS26 guarantees the precise timing of pre-40S particle conversion into translation-competent ribosomal subunits.

Data availability

Mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD019270. Cryo-EM maps have been deposited in the Electron Microscopy Data Bank (EMDB), under the accession codes : EMD-11440 (State A multi-body composite map); EMD-11441 (State B multi-body composite map); EMD-11446 (State A, head); EMD-11445 (State A, body); EMD-11447 (State A, platform); EMD-11443 (State B, head); EMD-11442 (State B, body); EMD-11444 (State B, platform). Atomic coordinate models of State A and State B RIO1(kd)-StHA pre-40S particles have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank (PDB), with respective PDB accession codes 6ZUO and 6ZV6.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Laura Plassart

    Molecular, Cellular and Developmental biology department (MCD), Centre de Biologie Integrative, University of Toulouse, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Ramtin Shayan

    Molecular, Cellular and Developmental biology department (MCD), Centre de Biologie Integrative, University of Toulouse, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Christian Montellese

    Institute of Biochemistry, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Dana Rinaldi

    Molecular, Cellular and Developmental biology department (MCD), Centre de Biologie Integrative, University of Toulouse, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Natacha Larburu

    Molecular, Cellular and Developmental biology department (MCD), Centre de Biologie Integrative, University of Toulouse, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Carole Pichereaux

    Department of Biophysics, Institut de Pharmacologie et de Biologie Structurale, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Carine Froment

    Institute of Pharmacology and Structural Biology, CNRS, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Simon Lebaron

    Molecular, Cellular and Developmental biology department (MCD), Centre de Biologie Integrative, University of Toulouse, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Marie-Françoise O'Donohue

    Molecular, Cellular and Developmental biology department (MCD), Centre de Biologie Integrative, University of Toulouse, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Ulrike Kutay

    Institute of Biochemistry, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8257-7465
  11. Julien Marcoux

    Institute of Pharmacology and Structural Biology, CNRS, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7321-7436
  12. Pierre-Emmanuel Gleizes

    Molecular, Cellular and Developmental biology department (MCD), Centre de Biologie Integrative, University of Toulouse, Toulouse, France
    For correspondence
    pierre-emmanuel.gleizes@univ-tlse3.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Celia Plisson-Chastang

    Molecular, Cellular and Developmental biology department (MCD), Centre de Biologie Integrative, University of Toulouse, Toulouse, France
    For correspondence
    celia.plisson-chastang@univ-tlse3.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8439-8428

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (16-CE11-0029)

  • Laura Plassart
  • Ramtin Shayan
  • Natacha Larburu
  • Simon Lebaron
  • Julien Marcoux
  • Pierre-Emmanuel Gleizes
  • Celia Plisson-Chastang

Swiss National Science Fundation (31003A_166565)

  • Christian Montellese

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2021, Plassart et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,654
    views
  • 295
    downloads
  • 30
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Laura Plassart
  2. Ramtin Shayan
  3. Christian Montellese
  4. Dana Rinaldi
  5. Natacha Larburu
  6. Carole Pichereaux
  7. Carine Froment
  8. Simon Lebaron
  9. Marie-Françoise O'Donohue
  10. Ulrike Kutay
  11. Julien Marcoux
  12. Pierre-Emmanuel Gleizes
  13. Celia Plisson-Chastang
(2021)
The final step of 40S ribosomal subunit maturation is controlled by a dual key lock
eLife 10:e61254.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.61254

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.61254

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Carmina Lichauco, Eric J Foss ... Antonio Bedalov
    Research Article

    The association between late replication timing and low transcription rates in eukaryotic heterochromatin is well known, yet the specific mechanisms underlying this link remain uncertain. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the histone deacetylase Sir2 is required for both transcriptional silencing and late replication at the repetitive ribosomal DNA (rDNA) arrays. We have previously reported that in the absence of SIR2, a de-repressed RNA PolII repositions MCM replicative helicases from their loading site at the ribosomal origin, where they abut well-positioned, high-occupancy nucleosomes, to an adjacent region with lower nucleosome occupancy. By developing a method that can distinguish activation of closely spaced MCM complexes, here we show that the displaced MCMs at rDNA origins have increased firing propensity compared to the nondisplaced MCMs. Furthermore, we found that both activation of the repositioned MCMs and low occupancy of the adjacent nucleosomes critically depend on the chromatin remodeling activity of FUN30. Our study elucidates the mechanism by which Sir2 delays replication timing, and it demonstrates, for the first time, that activation of a specific replication origin in vivo relies on the nucleosome context shaped by a single chromatin remodeler.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Liza Dahal, Thomas GW Graham ... Xavier Darzacq
    Research Article

    Type II nuclear receptors (T2NRs) require heterodimerization with a common partner, the retinoid X receptor (RXR), to bind cognate DNA recognition sites in chromatin. Based on previous biochemical and overexpression studies, binding of T2NRs to chromatin is proposed to be regulated by competition for a limiting pool of the core RXR subunit. However, this mechanism has not yet been tested for endogenous proteins in live cells. Using single-molecule tracking (SMT) and proximity-assisted photoactivation (PAPA), we monitored interactions between endogenously tagged RXR and retinoic acid receptor (RAR) in live cells. Unexpectedly, we find that higher expression of RAR, but not RXR, increases heterodimerization and chromatin binding in U2OS cells. This surprising finding indicates the limiting factor is not RXR but likely its cadre of obligate dimer binding partners. SMT and PAPA thus provide a direct way to probe which components are functionally limiting within a complex TF interaction network providing new insights into mechanisms of gene regulation in vivo with implications for drug development targeting nuclear receptors.