POMK regulates dystroglycan function via LARGE1-mediated elongation of matriglycan

  1. Ameya S Walimbe
  2. Hidehiko Okuma
  3. Soumya Joseph
  4. Tiandi Yang
  5. Takahiro Yonekawa
  6. Jeffrey M Hord
  7. David Venzke
  8. Mary E Anderson
  9. Silvia Torelli
  10. Adnan Manzur
  11. Megan Devereaux
  12. Marco Cuellar
  13. Sally Prouty
  14. Saul Ocampo Landa
  15. Liping Yu
  16. Junyu Xiao
  17. Jack E Dixon
  18. Francesco Muntoni
  19. Kevin P Campbell  Is a corresponding author
  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Iowa Roy J and Lucille A Carver College of Medicine, United States
  2. Dubowitz Neuromuscular Centre, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health & Great Ormond Street Hospital, United Kingdom
  3. University of Iowa, United States
  4. Peking University, China
  5. University of California, San Diego, United States
  6. UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, United Kingdom
  7. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Iowa Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, United States

Abstract

Matriglycan [-GlcA-β1,3-Xyl-α1,3-]n serves as a scaffold in many tissues for extracellular matrix proteins containing laminin-G domains including laminin, agrin, and perlecan. Like-acetylglucosaminyltransferase-1 (LARGE1) synthesizes and extends matriglycan on α-dystroglycan (α-DG) during skeletal muscle differentiation and regeneration; however, the mechanisms which regulate matriglycan elongation are unknown. Here, we show that Protein O-Mannose Kinase (POMK), which phosphorylates mannose of core M3 (GalNac-β1,3-GlcNac-β1,4-Man) preceding matriglycan synthesis, is required for LARGE1-mediated generation of full-length matriglycan on α-DG (~150 kDa). In the absence of Pomk gene expression in mouse skeletal muscle, LARGE1 synthesizes a very short matriglycan resulting in a ~90 kDa α-DG which binds laminin but cannot prevent eccentric contraction-induced force loss or muscle pathology. Solution NMR spectroscopy studies demonstrate that LARGE1 directly interacts with core M3 and binds preferentially to the phosphorylated form. Collectively, our study demonstrates that phosphorylation of core M3 by POMK enables LARGE1 to elongate matriglycan on α-DG, thereby preventing muscular dystrophy.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ameya S Walimbe

    Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Iowa Roy J and Lucille A Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Hidehiko Okuma

    Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Iowa Roy J and Lucille A Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Soumya Joseph

    Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Iowa Roy J and Lucille A Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Tiandi Yang

    Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Iowa Roy J and Lucille A Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Takahiro Yonekawa

    Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Iowa Roy J and Lucille A Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Jeffrey M Hord

    Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Iowa Roy J and Lucille A Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. David Venzke

    Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Iowa Roy J and Lucille A Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8180-9562
  8. Mary E Anderson

    Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Iowa Roy J and Lucille A Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Silvia Torelli

    Neurology, Dubowitz Neuromuscular Centre, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health & Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Adnan Manzur

    Neurology, Dubowitz Neuromuscular Centre, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health & Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Megan Devereaux

    Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Iowa Roy J and Lucille A Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Marco Cuellar

    Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Iowa Roy J and Lucille A Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Sally Prouty

    Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Iowa Roy J and Lucille A Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Saul Ocampo Landa

    Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Iowa Roy J and Lucille A Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Liping Yu

    University of Iowa Roy J and Lucille A Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Junyu Xiao

    School of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1822-1701
  17. Jack E Dixon

    Department of Pharmacology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8266-5449
  18. Francesco Muntoni

    UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. Kevin P Campbell

    Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Iowa Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, United States
    For correspondence
    kevin-campbell@uiowa.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2066-5889

Funding

Paul D. Wellstone Muscular Dystrophy Specialized Research Center grant (1U54NS053672)

  • Kevin P Campbell

Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust and University College

  • Silvia Torelli
  • Francesco Muntoni

Medical Scientist Training Program Grant by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (5 T32 GM007337)

  • Ameya S Walimbe

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

  • Kevin P Campbell

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) protocols of the University of Iowa (#0081122).

Human subjects: All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of NHS Health Research Authority (REC ref: 06/Q0406/33). We acknowledge and thank the BRC/MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases Biobank for providing patients' serum and biopsy samples. We confirm that informed consent was provided to the patient and family regarding the nature of the genetic studies to be performed upon collection of samples and is available for our patient.

Copyright

© 2020, Walimbe et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,060
    views
  • 291
    downloads
  • 23
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ameya S Walimbe
  2. Hidehiko Okuma
  3. Soumya Joseph
  4. Tiandi Yang
  5. Takahiro Yonekawa
  6. Jeffrey M Hord
  7. David Venzke
  8. Mary E Anderson
  9. Silvia Torelli
  10. Adnan Manzur
  11. Megan Devereaux
  12. Marco Cuellar
  13. Sally Prouty
  14. Saul Ocampo Landa
  15. Liping Yu
  16. Junyu Xiao
  17. Jack E Dixon
  18. Francesco Muntoni
  19. Kevin P Campbell
(2020)
POMK regulates dystroglycan function via LARGE1-mediated elongation of matriglycan
eLife 9:e61388.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.61388

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.61388

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Federico A Vignale, Andrea Hernandez Garcia ... Adrian G Turjanski
    Research Article

    Yerba mate (YM, Ilex paraguariensis) is an economically important crop marketed for the elaboration of mate, the third-most widely consumed caffeine-containing infusion worldwide. Here, we report the first genome assembly of this species, which has a total length of 1.06 Gb and contains 53,390 protein-coding genes. Comparative analyses revealed that the large YM genome size is partly due to a whole-genome duplication (Ip-α) during the early evolutionary history of Ilex, in addition to the hexaploidization event (γ) shared by core eudicots. Characterization of the genome allowed us to clone the genes encoding methyltransferase enzymes that catalyse multiple reactions required for caffeine production. To our surprise, this species has converged upon a different biochemical pathway compared to that of coffee and tea. In order to gain insight into the structural basis for the convergent enzyme activities, we obtained a crystal structure for the terminal enzyme in the pathway that forms caffeine. The structure reveals that convergent solutions have evolved for substrate positioning because different amino acid residues facilitate a different substrate orientation such that efficient methylation occurs in the independently evolved enzymes in YM and coffee. While our results show phylogenomic constraint limits the genes coopted for convergence of caffeine biosynthesis, the X-ray diffraction data suggest structural constraints are minimal for the convergent evolution of individual reactions.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Angel D'Oliviera, Xuhang Dai ... Jeffrey S Mugridge
    Research Article

    The SARS-CoV-2 main protease (Mpro or Nsp5) is critical for production of viral proteins during infection and, like many viral proteases, also targets host proteins to subvert their cellular functions. Here, we show that the human tRNA methyltransferase TRMT1 is recognized and cleaved by SARS-CoV-2 Mpro. TRMT1 installs the N2,N2-dimethylguanosine (m2,2G) modification on mammalian tRNAs, which promotes cellular protein synthesis and redox homeostasis. We find that Mpro can cleave endogenous TRMT1 in human cell lysate, resulting in removal of the TRMT1 zinc finger domain. Evolutionary analysis shows the TRMT1 cleavage site is highly conserved in mammals, except in Muroidea, where TRMT1 is likely resistant to cleavage. TRMT1 proteolysis results in reduced tRNA binding and elimination of tRNA methyltransferase activity. We also determined the structure of an Mpro-TRMT1 peptide complex that shows how TRMT1 engages the Mpro active site in an uncommon substrate binding conformation. Finally, enzymology and molecular dynamics simulations indicate that kinetic discrimination occurs during a later step of Mpro-mediated proteolysis following substrate binding. Together, these data provide new insights into substrate recognition by SARS-CoV-2 Mpro that could help guide future antiviral therapeutic development and show how proteolysis of TRMT1 during SARS-CoV-2 infection impairs both TRMT1 tRNA binding and tRNA modification activity to disrupt host translation and potentially impact COVID-19 pathogenesis or phenotypes.