Research Article

Twisting of the zebrafish heart tube during cardiac looping is a tbx5-dependent and tissue-intrinsic process

Hubrecht Institute-KNAW and University Medical Center Utrecht, Netherlands
Mathematical Institute, Leiden University, Netherlands
Origins Center, Leiden University, Netherlands
Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Biology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Netherlands
Institute of Biology, Leiden University, Netherlands
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Division of Pediatrics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Netherlands

Aug 10, 2021

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.61733

Version of Record

Accepted for publication after peer review and revision.

Download
Cite
Share
CommentOpen annotations (there are currently 0 annotations on this page).

Version of Record updated: September 15, 2021 (This version)
Version of Record published: August 10, 2021 (Go to version)
Accepted: June 24, 2021
Received: August 6, 2020

1. Of interest
Cohesin-independent STAG proteins interact with RNA and R-loops and promote complex loading

Hayley Porter, Yang Li ... Suzana Hadjur

Research Article Updated Jun 2, 2023
Further reading

Article
Figures and data
Abstract
Introduction
Results
Discussion
Materials and methods
Appendix 1
Data availability
References
Decision letter
Author response
Article and author information
Metrics

Abstract

Organ laterality refers to the left-right asymmetry in disposition and conformation of internal organs and is established during embryogenesis. The heart is the first organ to display visible left-right asymmetries through its left-sided positioning and rightward looping. Here, we present a new zebrafish loss-of-function allele for tbx5a, which displays defective rightward cardiac looping morphogenesis. By mapping individual cardiomyocyte behavior during cardiac looping, we establish that ventricular and atrial cardiomyocytes rearrange in distinct directions. As a consequence, the cardiac chambers twist around the atrioventricular canal resulting in torsion of the heart tube, which is compromised in tbx5a mutants. Pharmacological treatment and ex vivo culture establishes that the cardiac twisting depends on intrinsic mechanisms and is independent from cardiac growth. Furthermore, genetic experiments indicate that looping requires proper tissue patterning. We conclude that cardiac looping involves twisting of the chambers around the atrioventricular canal, which requires correct tissue patterning by Tbx5a.

Introduction

Bilateral animals such as vertebrates, while being symmetric on the outside when divided through the sagittal plane, have left-right (LR) asymmetrically arranged internal organs. LR asymmetry of organ disposition and form supports proper development and function of the organism throughout life.

The embryonic heart is the first organ to visibly break LR symmetry of the vertebrate embryo (Desgrange et al., 2018 and references therein). The heart starts out as a linear tube positioned at the midline, which subsequently bends toward the right, initiating an ensemble of developmentally regulated complex processes referred to as cardiac looping (Patten, 1922). The looped heart tube is either a flat S-shape in fish or a helix in amniotes (chick and mouse) (Desgrange et al., 2018). Correct looping is closely intertwined to proper patterning and alignment of the inflow and outflow tracts, cardiac chambers and atrioventricular canal, which are crucial to establish and maintain heart function. Indeed, cardiac looping defects in humans can result in severe congenital heart defects such as transposition of the great arteries (TGA), double outlet right ventricle (DORV), and Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) (Lin et al., 2014).

Correct cardiac looping depends on both tissue intrinsic and extrinsic mechanisms. Establishment of LR asymmetry involves an extrinsic mechanism that influences cardiac looping. In most vertebrates, this LR asymmetry is established during embryogenesis due to the activity of the LR organizer, called the node in mice and Kupffer’s vesicle in zebrafish. The LR organizer is a transient structure consisting of ciliated cells, located in the posterior part of the embryo (Essner et al., 2002). Rotation of the cilia results in a directed fluid flow (nodal flow), which breaks the symmetry by inducing left-sided-specific expression of Nodal and Pitx2 (Meno et al., 1998; Okada et al., 1999). Left-sided Nodal expression regulates the asymmetric position and dextral looping of the heart (Meno et al., 1998; Baker et al., 2008; Long et al., 2003; Noël et al., 2013; Levin et al., 1997). In zebrafish, LR symmetry is first broken when the linear heart tube arises from an initial flat disc between 20 and 24 hr post-fertilization (hpf; reviewed in Stainier, 2001). As its formation progresses, the inflow pole moves to the left side of the midline in a process referred to as cardiac jogging (Chen et al., 1997). This breaking of LR symmetry is dependent on left-sided Nodal expression (Long et al., 2003; Grimes et al., 2020; Montague et al., 2018). After this, the heart tube undergoes cardiac looping, which under normal conditions is dextral (rightward). If the function of the LR organizer is affected, a sinistral (leftward) loop can be observed (Noël et al., 2013; Noël et al., 2016). Based on mutant analysis, it was suggested that cardiac jogging can be separated from cardiac looping and that there are likely separate mechanisms that regulate these processes (reviewed by Bakkers et al., 2009). Corroborating such a model, we previously demonstrated that while left-sided Nodal expression directs cardiac jogging, a separate, tissue-intrinsic mechanism drives looping morphogenesis (Noël et al., 2013). Intrinsic LR asymmetry has been observed in various tissues and organs of invertebrates (reviewed in Inaki et al., 2016). In Drosophila, the hindgut and the genitalia show LR asymmetry (Sato et al., 2015; Taniguchi et al., 2011), for which myosin seems to be the major determinant (Hozumi et al., 2006; Lebreton et al., 2018). LR asymmetry is not only observed at the organ and tissue level, but also in single cells (reviewed in Pohl, 2015). For example, human leukemia cells preferentially polarize to the left of an imaginary axis between the nucleus and the centrosome (Xu et al., 2007). The actin cytoskeleton and actomyosin interactions are important for the observed intrinsic chirality of cells (reviewed in Satir, 2016) as chiral actin cytoskeletal organization was observed in cells on micropatterns (Tee et al., 2015; Wan et al., 2011). As cardiomyocytes display LR asymmetries during cardiac looping, and heart looping morphogenesis requires actomyosin activity, this presents the exciting hypothesis that vertebrate heart looping depends on tissue- and cell-intrinsic chirality (Noël et al., 2013; Merks et al., 2018; Ray et al., 2018).

To identify novel factors and mechanisms that drive cardiac looping, we have performed forward genetic screens in zebrafish (Noël et al., 2013; Smith et al., 2011a; Tessadori et al., 2015; Wienholds et al., 2003). In such a screen we identified the oudegracht (oug) mutant in which cardiac jogging was unaffected while cardiac looping was compromised. We found that a novel loss-of-function allele for tbx5a, one of the two zebrafish paralogues of Tbx5, was responsible for the cardiac looping defect in oug mutants. Tbx5 is a transcription factor which acts as a master regulator of cardiac development, with established roles in cardiomyocyte differentiation, conduction system development, and septation across vertebrates, including humans (Jensen et al., 2013; Mori and Bruneau, 2004); however, a link to intrinsic heart looping morphogenesis has not been established yet. To gain a better understanding of cardiac looping, we performed live two-photon confocal imaging in wild type and oug mutant embryos and mapped cardiomyocyte behavior at a single-cell level. Our study establishes that during looping, cardiomyocytes in the forming ventricle and atrium actually rearrange toward the outer curvatures of the chambers. Hence, the ventricle and the atrium undergo asymmetric rotational movements around the atrioventricular canal, effectively transmitting a twisting transformation to the heart tube, a process which we show to be defective in tbx5a^-/- zebrafish mutants. To address which processes exert a regulatory role in this major cellular rearrangement, we manipulated cardiac looping by chemical treatment or ex vivo culture and analyzed single-cell behavior during heart morphogenesis. Finally, rescue of the tbx5a^-/- cardiac phenotype in a tbx2b^-/- background establishes that the intrinsic looping morphogenesis relies on correct genetic patterning during cardiac development.

Results

Tbx5a is required for cardiac looping and patterning

We have performed several forward genetic screens to identify genes that regulate LR patterning and heart looping morphogenesis (Noël et al., 2013; Smith et al., 2011a; Tessadori et al., 2015; Wienholds et al., 2003). In short, embryos were screened around 28 hpf for correct formation and asymmetry of the cardiac tube, and at 50 hpf to assess cardiac looping. In one of these screens, the recessive and lethal oudegracht (oug) mutation was identified, named after the stretched S-shaped canal in the city centre of Utrecht (NL). The oug mutants displayed cardiac edema, defective cardiac looping at 50 hpf (Figure 1A–C) and reduced heartbeat rate (not shown). LR patterning was unaffected in oug embryos since the direction of cardiac jogging was predominantly leftward and the laterality of the visceral organs was not affected (Figure 1C). Morphologically, oug mutants grow normally, although importantly they lack development of the pectoral fin buds (Figure 1B). Using positional cloning and direct sequencing, we determined that oug mutants carry a point mutation resulting in a premature truncation of the Tbx5a transcription factor (Figure 1D–F; ENSDARG00000024894). The oug mutation is a recessive, fully phenotypically penetrant mutation as crossing of heterozygous oug carriers yielded approximately 25% progeny displaying a cardiac looping defect and absence of fin buds (Figure 1G), conforming to the corresponding Mendelian inheritance pattern. To confirm that oug affects the tbx5a locus (NM_130915), we carried out a complementation test with a previously identified tbx5a mutant allele, heartstrings (hst) which was also reported to display cardiac looping and fin bud formation defects (Garrity et al., 2002). Crossing of heterozygous oug and hst carriers yielded about 25% embryos in which both of these phenotypes were present, thereby confirming that the heart and fin phenotypes observed in oug embryos are caused by a mutation in tbx5a (Figure 1G).

Figure 1 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

The *oudegracht (oug*) mutant carries a *tbx5a* null allele and displays defective cardiac looping.

(A) Lateral view of wt and *oug* mutant embryos at 52 hpf. Note the cardiac edema in *oug*. (B) At 72 hpf dorsal observation of *oug* mutant embryos reveals absence of lateral fins. (C) Two dpf *oug* mutant embryos display defective cardiac looping but normal asymmetric positioning of the internal organs. L, liver; P, pancreas (D) Mapping and genomic position of the *oug* mutation (indicated by the asterix). (E) A single-nucleotide substitution in *tbx5a* (G to A) resulting in a tryptophan (Trp; TGG) to stop (TGA) mutation segregates with the *oug* phenotype. (F) Tbx5a is truncated at amino acid 147 in *oug,* in its T-Box domain. The *hst* allele (Q316X; Garrity et al., 2002) is included for comparison (G) Complementation test. Outcross of *oug*^+/- to *hst*^+/- fails to complement the *oug* cardiac and pectoral fin bud phenotype. (H) Gene patterning is affected in *oug* hearts at 2dpf. Expression of *nppa* is reduced in the cardiac chambers while expression of *bmp4* and *tbx2b* is expanded in the AV canal. Cardiac cushion markers *has2* and *versican* also show expanded expression domains. ISH for *hst* is shown for comparison: while *bmp4* and *has2* display expanded expression domains as in *oug*, *tbx2b* is barely detectable. Transcripts for *tbx5a* are detected in wt and *oug* mutants. (I) Transcripts for *tbx5a* can be detected evenly in transversal sections through the entire 2 dpf heart tube. (J) Luciferase assay establishes that *oug* retains virtually no activity. Mean values ± SEM are shown. Scale bars (**A,B,C,H**): 100 µm; (I): 50 µm.

Figure 1—source data 1 Source files for data presented in panels G and J.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/61733/elife-61733-fig1-data1-v2.xlsx
Download elife-61733-fig1-data1-v2.xlsx

Embryos homozygous for the oug/tbx5a allele display consistent reduced dextral looping (Figure 1—figure supplement 1), especially noticeable when compared to the relative variability in the looping defect of hst (Figure 1—figure supplement 1).

As tbx5a is expressed throughout the myocardium (Figure 1H,I), where it regulates patterning of the heart in chamber (working) and AV canal (non-working) myocardium we performed in situ hybridization (ISH) using markers for the AV canal and chamber myocardium. In agreement with such a role for Tbx5 we observed in oug/tbx5a mutants a strong reduction in chamber differentiation (nppa, Figure 1H) while the AV canal region was expanded as revealed by expanded domains of expression for bmp4 and tbx2b (Figure 1H). The latter contrasted with hst/tbx5a mutant AV canals in which tbx2b transcripts were just-detectable (Figure 1H) or reported to be absent (Garrity et al., 2002). In accordance with our observations on the AV canal myocardium, we also detected increased expression of the AV endocardial markers has2 and versican (Figure 1H).

The oug/tbx5a allele (hereafter, and throughout the manuscript referred to as oug) truncates Tbx5a at amino acid 147 (out of 492; Figure 1F), resulting in the loss of approximately 50% its DNA-binding T-box domain, which is crucial for its function (Wilson and Conlon, 2002). This is not the case for the hst/tbx5a allele, which does not affect the T-box domain (Figure 1F).

To address whether the difference in AV canal phenotype (i.e. expression of tbx2b) between oug and hst mutants could be due to differences in activity of the perspective Tbx5a mutations, we carried out an in vitro test for Tbx5a activity (Figure 1J). Tbx5 activity was measured using a regulatory region of the nppa gene that contains a T-box-binding site driving luciferase expression. Our results show that while Tbx5a with the oug mutation causes an almost complete loss of luciferase expression, Tbx5a with the hst mutation retained a significantly higher capacity to induce luciferase expression (Figure 1J). Hence, the defect in cardiac gene patterning and accompanying failure to complete cardiac looping in oug mutant embryos are the result of loss of Tbx5a function.

Time-lapse imaging reveals twisting of the chambers around the AV canal

Cardiac looping in zebrafish can be observed from 28 hpf and is considered to be completed, including chamber ballooning, at around 55 hpf. During this process, the heart tube not only changes position with respect to the overall geometry of the embryo (Figure 2—figure supplement 1) but also seemingly undergoes flat bending (or planar buckling) along its anterior-posterior axis (Figure 2—figure supplement 1). To get more insight into this transformation, we have defined a left-right and a superior-inferior axis of the heart tube at 28 hpf (Figure 2A) and we followed the movements of individual cardiomyocytes approximately from 28 hpf to 38 hpf (Figure 2A; Figure 2—figure supplement 2; Figure 2—video 1) in hearts in which cardiac contractions were suppressed (Sehnert et al., 2002). At this early stage, the embryonic zebrafish heart displays normal heart morphogenesis in the absence of heartbeat (Noël et al., 2013). Individual cardiomyocytes were tracked (Figure 2B) and the start and end point of each trace was used to obtain the individual track displacement, hence quantifying the displacement of each tracked cardiomyocyte and representing it as a vector (Figure 2C; Figure 2—figure supplement 2; Figure 2—video 2). Based on the starting location at the beginning of their corresponding track, cardiomyocytes were categorized in three regions: ventricle, atrium, and AV canal (Figure 2D). Visual inspection of these ‘displacement maps’ revealed coherent cellular movements within the heart chambers (Figure 2E–F). Comparison of the displacement tracks in the superior and inferior sides of the heart tube revealed large differences. Most strikingly, the vectors in the superior and inferior sides of the atrium pointed in different directions (Figure 2E–F). If planar buckling was the principal contributor to the transformation, the expected displacement vectors for the superior and inferior sides of each chamber would be similar. Instead, in the atrium these vectors pointing in near opposite directions suggested that the atrium rotates during cardiac looping. This impression was corroborated by the presence of cardiomyocyte tracks with major Z-displacement at the outer (Figure 2G; asterisks) and inner (Figure 2H; arrowheads) curvatures of the atrium, both compatible with a rotational transformation of the chamber. To more precisely quantify rotation of the cardiac chambers, we subjected all time-lapse movies to the following procedure: first, we stabilized residual drift of the heart tube by rooting the centroid (for definition see Appendix 1-Supplementary Methods) of the AV canal at the origin (0,0,0) of the coordinate system throughout all timepoints (Figure 2I). Second, we identified two axes: the first running from the AV canal centroid to the centroid of the ventricle, the other running from the AV canal to the centroid of the atrium. For each timepoint, we unfolded the axis by rotating the positions of the entire atrium and ventricle, with the AV canal acting as a ‘hinge’ rooted at the origin, to make the axes overlap with their respective position at the start of the timelapse (Figure 2I’). After this ‘computational unfolding’ only the rotation of the cardiomyocytes around either the atrium axis or the ventricle axis remained in the dataset. Third, to quantify this rotation, we measured the angle α subtended between the starting and ending cellular positions at consecutive time points (Figure 2I’’; Figure 2—video 3). The rotational velocity ω of the cells is given by this angle divided by the time ∆t between two timepoints (Supplementary Equation 17 in Supplementary Methods). By integrating the average of all cells’ rotational velocity to time (i.e. cumulative addition of the average rotation angles at consecutive timepoints to obtain the total angle traveled), we obtain the rotation of each chamber around each of the axes (Figure 2J; for detailed explanation see Appendix 1-Supplementary Methods). We observed that the absolute value of the average total rotation steadily increases for both the ventricle and the atrium in all hearts (n = 5), with clearly separating values for the ventricle (negative) and atrium (positive) (Figure 2J), indicating that the chambers rotate in opposite directions. Values for cells in the AV canal displayed a much more erratic behavior, with variability in positive and negative total rotation angle values between and within the tracks (Figure 2—figure supplement 2). During cardiac looping, the angular velocities of the ventricle (negative) and atrium (positive) differ consistently from one another (Figure 2K), while the AV canal hardly rotates (Figure 2—figure supplement 2). Altogether these observations show that rotation of the ventricle and the atrium in opposite directions around the AV canal twists the heart tube during development.

Figure 2 with 17 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

Cardiac looping is accompanied by opposite rotation of the cardiac chambers.

(A) Time-lapse imaging is carried out on *tg(myl7:Gal4FF; UAS:H2A-GFP)* embryos. In the 28 hpf panel, the dashed line indicates the position of the transversal section shown in the bottom left corner, in which the superior (S), inferior (I), right (R) and left (L) sides of the heart tube are defined. One representative heart is shown. A: anterior; P: posterior. (B) Total tracks (Ventral View). Each track is color-coded and is assigned an ID number. (C) Track displacement vectors for each single trace. (D) Track displacement vectors to be analyzed are selected, categorized by visual inspection and color-labeled accordingly. (E) Cardiac displacement vectors on the superior side of the ventricle and atrium and (F) on the inferior side of the cardiac chambers. (G) Displacement of cardiomyocytes at the outer curvature (asterisks) and (H) at the inner curvature (arrowheads) of the atrium are compatible with rotation of the chamber. (**I–I’’'**) Computational unfolding and angular velocity measurement. (**I-I''**) Steps 1 and 2 (**I, I'**) taken to computationally unfold the heart tube, resulting in the vector map shown in I''. The angular velocity of the cardiomyocytes is then calculated in the plane perpendicular to the axis (**I'''**). A detailed description of the methodology is available in the SI (J) Cumulative rotation angle for the ventricle (shades of red) and atrium (shades of blue) in wild-type hearts. Note the opposite direction of rotation of the two chambers. Positive values represent anti-clockwise rotation and negative values represent clockwise rotation with respect to the outflow of the heart. (K) Comparison of the average angular velocity for each replicate per 1.5 hr time window displayed by the chambers analyzed in (J). Horizontal bars: mean values. Scale bars: 100 µm.

Figure 2—source data 1 Source files for data presented in panels J and K.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/61733/elife-61733-fig2-data1-v2.xlsx
Download elife-61733-fig2-data1-v2.xlsx

Genetic tracing of left and right cardiac fields reveals twisting of the cardiac tube

During linear heart tube formation the cardiac disc rotates in a clockwise direction (from a dorsal view), while at the same time invagination of the right- and posterior sides results in a three-dimensional cone (Baker et al., 2008; Rohr et al., 2008; Smith et al., 2008; de Campos-Baptista et al., 2008). As a consequence of this rotation and folding, the cardiomyocytes originating from the left cardiac field form the superior side of the tube, while cells originating from the right cardiac field form the inferior side at approximately 24 hpf (Bakkers et al., 2009). A model has been proposed in which this clockwise rotation is followed by a counterclockwise rotation just before or during looping, which would restore the original left-right orientation of the cardiac cells (Baker et al., 2008). This two-rotation model would not be compatible with our observations from the cell tracking of ventricular cardiomyocytes. In an attempt to resolve this, we generated a new transgenic line that would allow an accurate tracing of cells derived from the left and right cardiac fields. The transgenic line, referred to as tg(0.2Intr1spaw:GFP) (Figure 3—figure supplement 1) was made by using a highly conserved 0.2 kb sequence in the first intron of the Nodal-related gene spaw, which acts as an asymmetric enhancer (ASE; Fan et al., 2007; Norris and Robertson, 1999). This ASE sequence drives GFP expression in the left lateral plate mesoderm (LPM) during somatogenesis. While spaw mRNA is no longer detectable in the left heart field beyond 30 hpf, the stability of the fluorescent protein allows us to follow left-derived GFP-positive cells up to 2 dpf. This line could therefore be used in combination with a myl7 fluorescent reporter to trace cells originating from the left and right cardiac fields during cardiac looping stages and address how these cells behave during cardiac looping morphogenesis.

We first wanted to test whether we could confirm the clockwise rotation during linear heart tube formation, which results in left-derived cells occupying the superior side and right-originating cells occupying the inferior side of the tube (Rohr et al., 2008; Smith et al., 2008). Indeed, this clockwise rotation is also observed in vivo, in tg(myl7:Gal4FF; UAS:RFP; 0.2Intr1spaw:GFP) zebrafish embryos as localization of 0.2Intr1spaw:GFP expressing cells is confined to the superior side of the tube (Figure 3A,A’). We then proceeded to use these transgenic lines to analyze the localization of the left- and right-originating cells in the looped heart. Interestingly, at this stage, left-originating cells localizing to the superior side of the heart tube are now located ventrally with respect to the inferior side of the heart tube, which is due to an extension of the embryo and a 180 degrees flip of the heart tube (Figure 3B and Figure 2—figure supplement 1). In addition, in cross-sections we observed left-originating cells at the outer curvatures of both chambers, reaching, especially visible in the ventricle, the inferior side of the heart (Figure 3B, arrowheads). Concomitantly, the region at the inner curvature of the atrium is only RFP-positive, indicating the right origin of these cardiomyocytes (Figure 3B). To confirm these observations, we used an additional reporter line in which the regulatory sequences of the lefty2 gene drive expression of Gal4FF (Asakawa et al., 2008), referred to as tg(lft2BAC:Gal4FF)(Derrick et al., 2021). This line, when combined with a UAS fluorescent reporter line, recapitulated endogenous lefty2 expression in the cardiac disc (Figure 3—figure supplement 2). Analysis of the localization of the left- and right-originating cells in the looped heart in tg(lft2BAC:Gal4FF) by fluorescence immunolabeling (Figure 3—figure supplement 2) corroborated our results obtained with tg(0.2Intr1spaw:GFP). Together, these observations are consistent with those from our time-lapse imaging and cell tracing. Furthermore, they confirm our conclusion that cardiac chambers twist around the AV canal in opposing directions resulting in torsion of the heart tube.

Figure 3 with 2 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

Origin and final positioning of left- and right-originating cardiomyocytes during cardiac looping.

(A) At 28 hpf, as cardiac jogging towards the anterior left side of the embryo is completed, (A’) the *tg(0.2Intr1spaw:GFP)* labels cardiomyocytes localizing to the superior side of the cardiac tube (section). (B) By 48 hpf cardiac looping morphogenesis is accompanied by displacement in opposite directions of left-originating cardiomyocytes toward the outer curvatures of the ventricle and the atrium (arrowheads in the section and surface view panels). (C) At 48 hpf, the *oug* mutant heart tube fails to display any constriction at the AV canal and left-originating cardiomyocytes are not visible in the region around the outer curvatures of the cardiac chambers (asterisk; ventricle). Legends: R: Right; L: Left; S: Superior side; I: Inferior side. Scale bars: 50 µm.

Tbx5a is required for the twisting of the cardiac chambers

To address the role of Tbx5a in the observed twisting of the cardiac chambers, we first crossed the oug mutation into the tg(myl7:Gal4FF; UAS:RFP; 0.2Intr1spaw:GFP). Contrary to observations in wild-type hearts, we observed that the outer curvature of both the ventricle and atrium in oug mutant hearts are largely devoid of left-originating GFP+ cells (Figure 3C). In transversal sections of the ventricle, left-originating cells remain largely localized to the superior side of the heart tube (Figure 3C). The domain occupied by left-originating cells remained virtually unchanged when compared to the situation at the end of cardiac jogging, suggesting a lack of twisting and the absence of torsion in hearts lacking Tbx5a.

Next, we time-lapsed and analyzed cardiomyocyte displacements in five oug mutant embryos in the same manner as we did for siblings using the tg(myl7:Gal4FF; UAS:H2A-GFP) line (Figure 4A–E; Figure 4—figure supplement 1; Figure 4—videos 1–3). Cardiomyocyte tracks on the superior and inferior sides of the cardiac chambers did not display the visible difference in rotation direction (Figure 4D–E) that was observed in the wild-type situation. Moreover, we did not observe major retreating or advancing Z-displacements at the outer and inner curvature, respectively (Figure 4F–G). This suggests that, while some bending of the cardiac tube happens during cardiac looping in oug/tbx5a, rotation of the chambers is strongly reduced if present at all. Plotting the average total rotation angle for the mutant ventricles and atria (Figure 4H), did not result in a clear separation of the tracks for each chamber type, as was the case for the wild type (compare with Figure 2J). Many of the tracks successively display positive and negative rotation angle values, which would indicate that during the time-lapse acquisition time, there is little concerted movement of the cardiomyocytes in the chambers. Furthermore, the absence of separation of the ventricular and atrial tracks indicates that the twisting of the heart tube (i.e. the opposite rotation of atrium and ventricle) is largely absent in oug. Comparison of the mean ventricular and atrial angular velocity values yielded no significant difference (Figure 4I), with values for both chambers distributed in the positive and negative halves of the plot. These observations confirm that the strong reduction in reverse rotation of the chambers in oug embryos underlies the reduced cardiac looping. In fact, the values obtained for the chamber cardiomyocytes in oug are similar to those of the AV canal (compare Figure 4—figure supplement 1 and Figure 4H,I), further supporting the lack of heart tube twisting in absence of tbx5a.

Figure 4 with 16 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

Cardiac looping is defective in *oug* mutants due to absence of asymmetric rotation of the cardiac chambers.

(A) Total tracks (Ventral View) obtained from a time-lapse movie of cardiac looping in an *oug* mutant. Each track is colour-coded and is assigned an ID number. (B) Track displacement vectors for each trace drawn in (A). (C) Track displacement vectors to be analyzed are selected, categorized by visual inspection and colour-labeled accordingly. (D) Detail of the track displacement vectors on the superior cardiac side and (E) on the inferior cardiac side. (F), (G) Lateral views of the selected tracks reveal no major displacement along the Z-axis. (H) Cumulative rotation angle for the ventricle (shades of red) and atrium (shades of blue) in *oug* hearts. Compare with Figure 2F; the chambers do not show separation. With the outflow of the heart as viewpoint, positive values represent anti-clockwise rotation and negative values represent clockwise rotation. (I) Comparison of the average angular velocity for each replicate per 1.5 hr time window displayed by the chambers analyzed in (H). Horizontal bars: mean values. (**J–L**) Twisting of the heart tube during cardiac looping. (J) Plot of the twisting angle (as defined in the main text and in Appendix 1- Supplementary Methods) in time. The looping defect in *oug* is due to a reduced twisting of the heart tube. Solid lines: Mean; shaded area: standard deviation. (K) Average twisting angle for the sample hearts 9 hr after the start of the timelapse (37 hpf). Horizontal bars: mean values. (L) The twisting velocity in 1.5 hr windows in the wt samples is significantly higher than in *oug*. Horizontal bars: mean values. Scale bars: (**A–C**): 100 µm.

Figure 4—source data 1 Source files for data presented in panels H, I, J, K, and L.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/61733/elife-61733-fig4-data1-v2.xlsx
Download elife-61733-fig4-data1-v2.xlsx

To assess the extent of the transformation in wild type and oug hearts, we calculated the twisting angle as the difference between rotation angles of the ventricle and the atrium from 28 to 38 hpf (Figure 4J, Supplementary Equation 20). Both the average twisting angle after 37 hpf (Figure 4K) and twisting velocity throughout the time-lapse (Figure 4L) are significantly higher in wild type compared to oug hearts. From these results, we conclude that twisting of the chambers around the AV canal is a tbx5a-dependent process.

A tissue intrinsic mechanism, and not cell addition to the embryonic cardiac poles, is required for torsion of the heart tube

Next, we asked which mechanisms could be driving the observed opposite twisting of the chamber around the AV canal during heart looping. During mouse heart morphogenesis, asymmetric contributions at the poles drive a helical rotation of the tube (Le Garrec et al., 2017). Although the zebrafish heart does not form a helix, we considered that the opposite chamber rotation could be driven by a similar mechanism. Previous work has demonstrated that also in zebrafish cells from the second heart field (SHF) are added to the poles of the heart tube concomitantly with cardiac looping (de Pater et al., 2009; Lazic and Scott, 2011; Zhou et al., 2011). To test whether cardiomyocyte addition from the SHF is required for the correct progression of cardiac looping, we abolished it in two independent manners prior to the onset of cardiac looping: (1) by treating embryos with the FGF inhibitor SU5402 (de Pater et al., 2009) and (2) by explanting linear heart tubes and culturing them ex vivo for 24 hr, as previously described (Noël et al., 2013). Treatment with SU5402 was efficient, as we counted reduced numbers of ventricular cardiomyocytes, confirming previous reports (de Pater et al., 2009; Figure 5—figure supplement 1). Cardiac looping was however not strongly affected, as SU5402-treated hearts displayed a clear S shape at 48 hpf, and left-originating cardiomyocytes could be observed at the outer curvature of the ventricle (Figure 5A). Moreover, quantification of the looping angle did not reveal any significant difference with the control condition (Figure 5B). In explanted cultured tg(lft2BAC:Gal4FF; UAS:RFP; myl7:GFP) hearts (Figure 5C,D), we also observed convincing cardiac looping (Figure 5D, upper panels). The use of the lft2 reporter allowed us to orient the explanted heart tubes and observe that left-originating cardiomyocytes locate to the outer curvatures of the ventricle and atrium. We also exposed explanted heart tubes to SU5402 during culture and still observed satisfactory looping morphogenesis (Figure 5D, lower panels). From these observations, we concluded that heart tubes ex vivo not only retain their capacity to loop dextrally (Noël et al., 2013), but also that the cardiac torsion is still occurring.

Figure 5 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

Chemical and physical suppression of cell addition to the heart tube do not affect proper completion of cardiac looping.

Representative SU5402-treated and DMSO Control (explanted) hearts are shown. (A) 48 hpf *tg(myl7:Gal4FF; UAS:RFP; 0.2Intr1spaw-GFP)* hearts. In SU5402-treated hearts, dextral looping is completed and left-originating cardiomyocytes (green) can be observed at the ventricle outer curvature, similar to the control condition (arrowheads). (B) Quantification and comparison of AV canal angles in SU5402-treated and DMSO Control embryos. AV canal angle measurement is exemplified in the upper left panel. (C) Heart explant procedure: as cardiac jogging is completed (26 hpf) heart tubes are explanted and put into culture for approximately 24 hpf during which chemical treatments can be carried out. At 48 hpf, the hearts are imaged. (D) Heart tubes explanted at 26 hpf and subsequently cultured in liquid medium for 24 hr display normal formation of a ventricle, atrium and atrioventricular canal. The *lft2* reporter allows visualization of left-originating cells at the outer curvature of both ventricle and atrium, in control (DMSO) and treatment (SU5402) conditions. For (B) mean values ± SEM are shown. Legends: R: Right; L: Left; S: Superior side; I: Inferior side. Scale bars: 100 µm.

Figure 5—source data 1 Source files for data presented in panel B.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/61733/elife-61733-fig5-data1-v2.xlsx
Download elife-61733-fig5-data1-v2.xlsx

Consistent with our observation that addition of SHF cells to the poles of the heart tube is dispensable for opposite chamber rotation and cardiac looping, we observed no changes in cardiomyocyte numbers in the ventricle (or atrium) of oug mutants (Figure 6A,B). To reject the possibility that the looping phenotype displayed by oug mutants is secondary to fluid pressure caused by the cardiac edema appearing by 2 dpf, we explanted oug tg(myl7:Gal4FF; UAS:RFP; 0.2Intr1spaw:GFP) heart tubes at 28 hpf. Indeed, after 24 hr in vitro culturing, oug mutant hearts failed to loop, indicating that the morphogenesis defect was not related to changes in physical properties of oug mutant embryos (Figure 6C). From the above results, we conclude that cardiomyocyte addition from the SHF is dispensable for cardiac looping.

Figure 6

Download asset Open asset

Defective looping in *oug mutants* is not due to reduced cardiomyocyte number or embryonic environment.

(A) Immunofluorescence with atrium-specific S46 antibody allows distinction of the cardiac chambers. (B) Quantification of ventricular and atrial cardiomyocytes in wt and *oug* mutant embryos at 2dpf. (C) Explanting *oug* mutant hearts and culturing them in vitro, ex-embryo does not rescue defective looping. (B): Horizontal bars: mean value ± SEM. Legends: R: Right; L: Left; S: Superior side; I: Inferior side . Scale bars: 100 µm.

Figure 6—source data 1 Source files for data presented in panel B.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/61733/elife-61733-fig6-data1-v2.xlsx
Download elife-61733-fig6-data1-v2.xlsx

Reduced anisotropic growth in oug cardiomyocytes

Epithelial remodeling is an important driver for asymmetric rotation of the Drosophila gut tube or looping of the chick midgut and heart tube (Taniguchi et al., 2011; Ray et al., 2018; Davis et al., 2008). In the zebrafish heart tube changes in cardiomyocyte shape and cell boundaries occur during looping morphogenesis as well (Merks et al., 2018; Auman et al., 2007; Lombardo et al., 2019). Hence, we next proceeded by assessing the shape of GFP+ ventricular cardiomyocytes between 30 hpf and 42 hpf (Figure 7A; for wt: Figure 7—videos 1–4; for oug: Figure 7—videos 5–7). Indeed, we could determine that the progression of the left-originating cardiomyocytes is concomitant to anisotropic growth of these cardiomyocytes, which results in a reduced roundness (Figure 7B). Analysis of the positioning of cardiomyocytes at the border between left- (green) and right- (magenta) originating cardiac regions confirmed this change in cell shape (Figure 7C–D; for wt: Figure 7—videos 8–11; for oug: Figure 7—videos 12–15), possibly suggesting involvement of cell intercalation. In oug mutant embryos, we observed that ventricular cells retain their higher cell roundness throughout the analysis window and display a much straighter left/right boundary in the ventricle. We therefore conclude that our results are consistent with the proposed model in which tissue-intrinsic properties drive opposite chamber rotation and cardiac looping (Noël et al., 2013; Merks et al., 2018) and indicate that Tbx5a activity is required for this to occur.

Figure 7 with 15 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

Anisotropic cell shape changes accompany cardiac looping.

(A) Outline of ventricular cardiomyocytes assessed for assessed for cell roundness. Representative images of the data quantified in (B) are shown for wt (upper row) and *oug* (lower row). (B) Quantification of cell roundness as observed in (A) and comparison between values for wt and *oug* mutants. (C) Upper panels: surface rendering of *tg(myl7:Gal4FF; UAS:RFP; 0.2Intr1spaw-GFP)* in 48 hpf hearts allows clear definition of a boundary between Left-originating cardiomyocytes (LCMs, green) and right-originating cardiomyocytes (RCMs, magenta). This allows calculation of the straightness index of the left/right boundary (white) of the ventricle (lower panels, respective viewpoint indicated in upper panels). The straightness index is calculated as the ratio between distance between start and end point of left/right boundary at (straight dotted line) and length of left/right boundary measured on the ventricular surface. (D) Quantification of the straightness index is indicative of the level of anisotropic growth in wt and *oug* mutant hearts. (B) and (D): Horizontal bars: mean value ± SEM. Legends: R: Right; L: Left; S; Superior side; I: Inferior side. Scale bars: (A) 20 µm; (C) 100 µm.

Figure 7—source data 1 Source files for data presented in panels B and D.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/61733/elife-61733-fig7-data1-v2.xlsx
Download elife-61733-fig7-data1-v2.xlsx

Cardiac looping is reestablished in Tbx5a-defective hearts by suppression of Tbx2b activity

AV canal versus chamber specification is tightly regulated by a balance in gene activation and repression by Tbx5 and Tbx2, respectively (Chi et al., 2008; Christoffels et al., 2004a, reviewed in Greulich et al., 2011). As we observed an expansion of tbx2b expression in oug mutant hearts (Figure 1D), we first tested whether the myocardial patterning defect in oug mutants could be rescued by reducing Tbx2b activity. To do so, we used the tbx2b mutant from beyond (fby) (Snelson et al., 2008). Analysis of cardiac markers by ISH and transgenic reporters revealed that fby/tbx2b^-/- embryos display robust cardiac looping and a properly patterned heart (Figure 8 and Figure 8—figure supplement 1). In tbx5a^-/-;tbx2b^-/- (oug/fby) double mutant background, ISH indicated rescue of the constriction at the AV canal (Figure 8A), reestablishment of nppa expression in the cardiac chambers, while bmp4 expression remained similar to that of tbx5a-/- hearts (Figure 8—figure supplement 1). Analysis of tg(nppaBAC:mCitrine) in vivo confirmed the rescue of nppa expression in the atrium of tbx5a^-/-;tbx2b^-/- double mutants, which was absent in oug embryos (Figure 8B). Next, we investigated how the rescue in cardiac patterning affects heart looping morphogenesis. Along with the reestablishment of myocardial patterning, we also observed a significant rescue of the looping phenotype by measuring the looping angle (Figure 8C). Consistently with these observations, analysis of tg(myl7:Gal4FF; UAS:RFP; 0.2Intr1spaw-GFP) in tbx5a^-/-;tbx2b^-/- embryonic hearts revealed the presence of GFP+ left-originating cardiomyocytes on the inferior side of the ventricle (Figure 8D–D’’’), indicating substantial rescue of the twisting of the heart tube. Additionally, we observed that while pectoral fin development was not rescued in tbx5a^-/-;tbx2b^-/- double mutants, these fish hardly developed a cardiac edema, as compared to oug mutants (Figure 8—figure supplement 2). Altogether, these results indicate that heart looping morphogenesis is the result of proper tissue patterning and requires a finely balanced Tbx5a and Tbx2b activity.

Figure 8 with 2 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

Defective cardiac looping in *oug* mutants is alleviated by simultaneous loss of *tbx2b.*

(A) ISH for *myl7* at 50 hpf in wild type siblings, *oug* mutants and *tbx5a;tbx2b* double mutants. (B) Confocal maximum projections of 2dpf *tg(nppa:mCitrine)* hearts. In the *tbx5a;tbx2b* double mutants, atrial expression of *nppa*, which was lost in *oug* mutants, is re-instated. (C) Quantification and comparison of AV canal angles in wild-type siblings, *tbx5a* mutants and *tbx5a;tbx2b* double mutants. Quantification of AV canal angle is carried out as reported in Figure 5D. (**D–D’’’**) 48 hpf *tg(myl7:Gal4FF; UAS:RFP; 0.2Intr1spaw-GFP)* hearts. Wt (D) and *tbx5^-/-* (D’) are shown for comparison. *tbx2b^-/-* hearts (**D’’**) display robust dextral looping and left-originating cardiomyocytes (green) at the ventricle outer curvature, similar to wt (arrowheads in D; Figure 3B). In double homozygous mutants *tbx5a^-/-; tbx2b^-/-* (**D’’’**) rescue of cardiac looping is observed, accompanied by presence of left-originating cardiomyocytes at the ventricle OC (Compare with D, **D’’**). (C): Horizontal bars: mean value ± SEM. Legends: R: Right; L: Left; S: Superior side; I: Inferior side. Scale bars: 100 µm.

Figure 8—source data 1 Source files for data presented in panel C.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/61733/elife-61733-fig8-data1-v2.xlsx
Download elife-61733-fig8-data1-v2.xlsx

Discussion

In this study, we have analyzed the early phase of cardiac looping, from its onset at the end of cardiac jogging (28 hpf) until approximately 40 hpf, as the heart tube acquires a distinct S-shape. As knowledge about the cardiomyocyte behavior during these initial stages of heart looping was limited, we carried out a detailed and quantitative four-dimensional analysis of cellular trajectories in the different heart segments, in order to better understand how these underlie the looping transformation at the organ level. By calculating the angular velocity of ventricular and atrial cardiomyocytes, we establish that the two chambers rotate in opposing directions with respect to their longitudinal axes (Figure 2), essentially twisting around the AV canal region. When this twisting of the heart tube is defective, as in oug/tbx5a (Figure 4), cardiac looping is reduced or absent. Combination of these results with the genetic tracing of left-originating cardiomyocytes allowed us to formulate a model for cardiac looping in the zebrafish (Figure 9). Finally, we conclude that twisting of the heart tube is a tissue intrinsic process that requires proper patterning into chamber and AV canal myocardium, which is regulated by T-box containing transcription factors.

Figure 9

Download asset Open asset

Model for cardiac looping morphogenesis.

Viewpoint for describing direction of rotation is always the outflow tract (OFT). Left- and right- originating regions of the embryonic myocardium are reported in green and magenta, respectively. Transversal sections are shown next to the corresponding cartoon. In wild-type hearts, at the end of cardiac jogging, twisting of the heart tube results in disposition of left-originating cardiomyocytes toward the outer curvatures of both the ventricle and atrium. The resulting twisting of the heart tube is driven by the clockwise rotation of the ventricle and counterclockwise rotation of the atrium, around a fixed hinge, the AV canal. In *oug* hearts, cardiac jogging is completed properly, but progression of cardiac looping is defective. Reduced twisting of the heart tube and chamber expansion are observed. Defective looping is accompanied by an expansion of the expression domain of *tbx2b* (spotted pattern), especially noticeable at the AV canal (see also Figure 1H). Legends: R: Right; L: Left.

In this study, we identified a novel tbx5a allele, oug, which we demonstrated to be a tbx5a null allele (Figure 1J). Indeed, in oug approximately 75% of the gene product is lost, including a large portion of the DNA-binding T-box domain. In oug mutants, we observed an expansion of genes that mark the AV canal (Figure 1H). Work in various vertebrate models has established that Tbx5 has a crucial role in cardiomyocyte differentiation and establishment of the working chamber (Steimle and Moskowitz, 2017 and references therein). In mouse, this role is balanced by other T-box factors, such as Tbx2/3 (Habets et al., 2002; Hoogaars et al., 2007a; Hoogaars et al., 2007b), which compete for the same T-box sequences as Tbx5 and are restricted to non-chamber myocardium (i.e. AV canal) (Shirai et al., 2009). In the zebrafish oug mutant, the absence of Tbx5a results in the expansion of the AV canal as illustrated by expanded domains of expression of tbx2b, bmp4, and has2, as is also observed in other zebrafish looping mutants (Hurlstone et al., 2003; Smith et al., 2011b). In hst mutants, however, the picture seems less clear (Figure 1H). Based on the hst results, a model was proposed in which Tbx5a stimulates the expression of tbx2 in the AV canal (Garrity et al., 2002; Camarata et al., 2010), which needs to be reconsidered based on the oug results presented here. These different outcomes in patterning of the AV canal and chamber myocardium might be explained by the different locations of the oug and hst mutations in tbx5a (Figure 1F). While in oug/tbx5a the T-box is truncated, it is still present in hst/tbx5a (Garrity et al., 2002), which is only missing regions proposed to affect its subcellular localization (Camarata et al., 2010).

There is a striking resemblance between the rotation in the ventricle during looping as described here and the clockwise rotation that occurs earlier when the cardiac disc transforms into a linear heart tube, which has been described in several studies (Baker et al., 2008; Smith et al., 2008; de Campos-Baptista et al., 2008). As a consequence of this first rotation event, the original left-right orientation of the cardiac cells is transformed to a superior-inferior orientation. In a previously published study, the authors suggested that after the linear heart tube is formed this superior-inferior orientation is transformed back to the original left-right orientation due to a second counterclockwise rotation around its longitudinal axis (Baker et al., 2008). Although we detected atrial cardiomyocyte movement compatible with this observation (Figure 2), we did not observe this second rotation when tracing the ventricular cardiomyocytes originating from the left and right lateral plate mesoderm. This difference between the observations might be partially explained by how the left and right cardiac cells were labeled in the two studies. In our study, we used stable transgenic lines in which lefty2 or spaw regulatory elements drive left-sided expression of GFP. In the original study by Baker et al., 2008, a myl7:Dendra plasmid was injected at the one- or two-cell stage and embryos were screened before 18 hpf for either left- or right sided expression and analysed at 48 hpf. As we know now, at 18 hpf, the myl7 promoter is only activated in the first heart field (FHF). Cardiomyocytes from the second heart field (SHF) initiate myl7 expression at a later stage, up to 38 hpf, when these are added to the cardiac poles (de Pater et al., 2009; Lazic and Scott, 2011). As a consequence, embryos scored with unilateral myl7:Dendra expression at 18 hpf may display expression of Dendra in cardiomyocytes from the originally (18 hpf) non-expressing side when scored at 48 hpf. The gradual activation of myl7 due to the continuous process of cardiomyocyte differentiation during heart tube morphogenesis limits its use as a cell tracing technique.

The clockwise rotation we observed in the ventricle is in the same direction as the rotation that was observed during linear heart tube formation (Smith et al., 2008). Recently, a clockwise rotation was also described in the OFT of the zebrafish heart at later cardiac looping stages (40–54 hpf) (Lombardo et al., 2019). Together, these observations suggest that a clockwise rotation of the cardiac tissue is initiated during linear heart tube formation (20–26 hpf) and that this clockwise rotation continues in the ventricle (28–42 hpf) during looping initiation and continues in the OFT (40–54 hpf) during the late looping stage. In the atrium, however, we describe here a counterclockwise rotation during the early looping phase (28–42 hpf), resulting in a torsion of the heart tube.

During cardiac looping, there is extensive growth of the myocardium. Due to the addition of cells at the poles from the SHF, the number of cardiomyocytes is doubled between 24 and 48 hpf (de Pater et al., 2009). Reduced cell addition from the SHF by inhibiting FGF signaling still allowed looping and twisting of the zebrafish heart tube (Figure 5). This is different in the mouse heart, where reduced growth due to compromised addition of cells from the SHF results in looping defects (Cai et al., 2003; Cohen et al., 2012; Tsuchihashi et al., 2011). This may be due to more extensive growth of the murine heart, which extends its length over fourfold during looping, resulting in a distinct helical shape (Le Garrec et al., 2017).

Our data builds upon previous work exploring the intrinsic capacity of the heart to loop (Noël et al., 2013; Ray et al., 2018; Honda et al., 2020). Corroborating such a model, we observed that the twisting and looping of the heart tube still occurs in explanted hearts, or if SHF contribution is chemically inhibited. We therefore conclude that the early phase of heart looping in zebrafish occurs independently of cell addition. Other examples of tubes that undergo looping morphogenesis due to intrinsic LR asymmetry are the Drosophila genitalia and hindgut (Sato et al., 2015; Taniguchi et al., 2011). For these tubes, it is proposed that intrinsic chirality of the cells drive looping morphogenesis. In the zebrafish, the outer layer of the heart tube, the myocardium, is organized with distinct apical-basal polarity (Bakkers et al., 2009). During heart looping and chamber ballooning, the myocardium undergoes remodeling, which coincides with regional cell shape changes (Merks et al., 2018; Auman et al., 2007; Lombardo et al., 2019). Interestingly, defective chamber expansion is accompanied in oug embryos by failure of the cardiomyocytes of the ventricle to remodel anisotropically, a process that is regulated by non-canonical Wnt-and PCP-signaling (Merks et al., 2018). Although regulation by Tbx5 of canonical Wnt ligands is established in limb (Takeuchi et al., 2003; Ng et al., 2002) and lung (Steimle et al., 2018) development, a potential role in controlling cardiac non-canonical Wnt signaling still needs to be explored.

In oug mutants, nppa expression was reduced while tbx2b expression was expanded in the AV canal. This was restored in in tbx5a^-/-;tbx2b^-/- (oug/fby) double mutants, which is consistent with the proposed roles of Tbx5 and Tbx2 in patterning the heart in chamber myocardium and primary (e.g. AV canal) myocardium (Christoffels et al., 2004b). In this respect, it is surprising that no cardiac phenotype was observed in fby/tbx2b mutants (Figure 8; Figure 8—figure supplement 1). This could be ascribed to the presence in zebrafish of a second tbx2 paralogue, tbx2a, which is also expressed in the embryonic heart (Ribeiro et al., 2007). The observed looping defects in oug in combination with the observed rescue of cardiac looping in oug/fby double mutant supports a model in which cardiac patterning in chamber and AV canal myocardium is an important driver for the intrinsic heart looping morphogenesis.

Materials and methods

Key resources table

Reagent type (species) or resource	Designation	Source or reference	Identifiers	Additional information
Gene (Danio rerio)	tbx5a	NA	ZDB-GENE-991124–7
Strain, strain background (Danio rerio)	Tübingen Long Fin (TL)	ZIRC	ZDB-GENO-990623–2
Genetic reagent (Danio rerio)	oug/tbx5a	This paper		More info on generation of this line can be found in the Materials and Methods section.
Genetic reagent (Danio rerio)	hst/tbx5a	ZIRC	ZDB-ALT-030627–2
Genetic reagent (Danio rerio)	fby/tbx2b	ZIRC	ZDB-ALT-070117–1
Genetic reagent (Danio rerio)	tg(myl7:Gal4FF)	DOI: 10.1242/dev.113894	ZDB-ALT-151008–1
Genetic reagent (Danio rerio)	tg(lft2BAC:Gal4FF)	DOI: 10.1093/cvr/cvab004	Not available
Genetic reagent (Danio rerio)	tg(UAS:RFP)	DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0704963105	ZDB-ALT-080528–2
Genetic reagent (Danio rerio)	tg(UAS:H2A-GFP)	DOI: 10.1242/dev.113894	ZDB-ALT-151008–2
Genetic reagent (Danio rerio)	tg(myl7:dsRed)^s879Tg	DOI: 10.1101/gad.1629408	ZDB-FISH-150901–3078
Genetic reagent (Danio rerio)	tg(mCitrine:nppa)	DOI: 10.7554/eLife.50163	ZDB-ALT-201116–10
Cell line (Chlorocebus aethiops)	kidney fibroblast-like cell line (SV 40 transformed, Adult)	ATCC	Cat# CRL-1651; RRID:CVCL_0224
Transfected construct (Chlorocebus aethiops)	pGL3-Basic (plasmid)	Promega	Cat# E1751; Genbank: U47295
Transfected construct (Chlorocebus aethiops)	phRG-TK Renilla (plasmid)	Promega	Cat# E6291; Genbank: AF362551
Antibody	Living Colors anti-DsRed (Rabbit polyclonal)	Takara Bio	Cat# 101004; RRID:AB_10013483	1:200
Antibody	Myosin heavy chain, slow developmental (Mouse monoclonal)	DSHB	Cat# s46, RRID:AB_528376	1:200
Antibody	Anti-GFP (Chicken polyclonal)	Aves Labs	Cat# GFP-1010, RRID:AB_2307313	1:500
Antibody	Anti-Digoxigenin-AP, Fab fragments (Sheep polyclonal)	Roche	Cat# 11093274910, RRID:AB_2734716	1:5000
Antibody	Anti-Fluorescein-AP, Fab fragments (Sheep polyclonal)	Roche	Cat# 11426338910, RRID:AB_2734723	1:5000
Recombinant DNA reagent	E1b-GFP-Tol2-Gateway	DOI: 10.1101/gr.133546.111 Obtained from Addgene	RRID:Addgene_37846
Sequence-based reagent	Start site morpholino: tnnt2a	DOI: 10.1038/ng875	ZDB-MRPHLNO-060317–4	5' - CATGTTTGCTCTGATCTGACACGCA - 3' 2 ng / embryo
Commercial assay or kit	NBT/BCIP Stock solution	Sigma-Aldrich	Cat# 11681451001
Commercial assay or kit	INT/BCIP Stock solution	Sigma-Aldrich	Cat# 11681460001
Chemical compound, drug	SU5402	Sigma-Aldrich	Cat# 572630; CAS 215543-92-3	10 µM
Chemical compound, drug	phenylthourea	Sigma-Aldrich	Cat# P7629; CAS103-85-5	0,003%(v/v)
Software, algorithm	Fiji	https://fiji.sc/	RRID:SCR_002285
Software, algorithm	Volocity 3D Image Analysis Software	Perkin Elmer	RRID:SCR_002668
Software, algorithm	Graphpad Prism 9.0	Graphpad	RRID:SCR_002798	V9.0
Software, algorithm	Imaris data visualization software	Bitplane	RRID:SCR_007370	V9.3.1
Software, algorithm	heartbending.py	Source or reference: custom software, available in public repository: https://github.com/rmerks/heartbending (copy archived at swh:1:rev:149f05441e06f875faa3f9ab21101619bce25e93; Tsingos, 2021)	commit 149f054	Code for transforming cell track data and for statistical analysis of cell rotation around the heart segment axes.

Zebrafish lines

Request a detailed protocol

All animal experiments were conducted under the guidelines of the animal welfare committee of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW). Adult zebrafish (Danio rerio) were maintained and embryos raised and staged as previously described (Aleström et al., 2020; Westerfield, 1993).

The zebrafish lines used in this study are Tübingen longfin (wild type), hst/tbx5a (Garrity et al., 2002), fby/tbx2b (Snelson et al., 2008), tg(myl7:Gal4FF) (Strate et al., 2015); tg(lft2BAC:Gal4FF) (Derrick et al., 2021); tg(UAS:RFP) (Asakawa et al., 2008); tg(UAS:H2A-GFP) (Strate et al., 2015); tg(myl7:DsRed) (Mably et al., 2003); tg(mCitrine:nppa) (Honkoop et al., 2019).

Positional cloning of oudegracht/tbx5a

Request a detailed protocol

The oudegracht/tbx5a^hu⁶⁴⁹⁹ allele was identified in a ENU mutagenesis screen performed as described in Wienholds et al., 2003. The oudegracht/tbx5a^hu6499 was mapped using standard simple sequence length polymorphisms (SSLPs)-based meiotic mapping with SSLP primer sequences as pictured in Figure 4. The oudegracht/tbx5a^hu6499 mutation introduces a G to A substitution in Exon 4 of tbx5a (ENSDARG00000024894) resulting in the introduction of a premature stop codon. The mutation is identified by PCR amplification from genomic DNA using primers FKK106: 5’-GCGCATCAGGTCTGTGAC-3’ and FKK108: 5’-CCAAATACAAGTCCTCAAAGTG-3’ followed by BtscI restriction of the PCR product. The oudegracht/tbx5a^hu6499 mutation removes a BtscI restriction site.

Generation of the tg(0.2Intr1spaw:GFP) transgenic line

Request a detailed protocol

A 228 bp conserved sequence located in intron 1 of spaw (ENSDARG00000014309) was amplified by PCR using primers FT294 5’-AGTCAAGCATCTCGGGAAGA-3’ and FT295 5’-AGGTCCTGTCAGAGCAGATG-3’. The resulting PCR product was subsequently cloned in the E1b-GFP-Tol2-Gateway construct (Addgene #37846; Birnbaum et al., 2012) by Gateway cloning. The resulting construct was co-injected with 25 ng/μl Tol2 RNA in 1 cell zebrafish TL embryos. Founder fish (F0) were identified by outcrossing and the progeny (F1) was grown to establish the transgenic line.

Microinjection of antisense morpholino

Request a detailed protocol

The tnnt2a morpholino oligonucleotide targeting the translation start site (5' - CATGTTTGCTCTGATCTGACACGCA - 3') was used to block heart beat (Sehnert et al., 2002). We injected approximately 2 ng of the oligo morpholino in one-cell stage embryos.

Chemical treatments

SU5402 treatment

Request a detailed protocol

Embryos were dechorionated and treated with SU5402 (Sigma-Aldrich) at a concentration of 10 μM in E3 embryo medium from 24 hpf until 48 hpf at 28.5°C. Control embryos were treated with the corresponding DMSO concentration.

Phenylthiourea

Request a detailed protocol

Addition of phenylthiourea (PTU) at a concentration of 0.003% (v/v) to the E3 embryonic medium after shield stage (8 hpf) blocked pigmentation for improved confocal analysis.

Heart explants

Request a detailed protocol

Zebrafish heart tubes were manually dissected from 26 hpf embryos using forceps and placed into supplemented L15 culture medium (Gibco-BRL; 15% fetal bovine serum, 0.8 mM CaCl₂, 50 μg/ml penicillin, 0.05 mg/ml streptomycin, 0.05 mg/ml gentomycin) essentially as described in Noël et al., 2013. Explants were incubated at 28.5°C for 24 hr and fixed in 4% PFA overnight. Chemical treatment of the explants was carried out in an identical way as for the embryos. Explanted hearts were mounted in Vectashield (Vector Laboratories) before imaging.

Immunofluorescent labeling

Request a detailed protocol

Zebrafish embryos at the appropriate developmental stage were fixed overnight in 2% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS at 4°C. After washing with 1 × PBS–Triton X-100 (0.1%; PBS-T) and blocking in 10% goat serum in 1 × PBST (blocking buffer;BB), embryos were incubated overnight at 4°C with rabbit anti-DsRed (1:500 in BB; Takara Bio 632496), mouse anti-Myh6 antibody (1:200 in BB, DSHB, S46), or chicken anti-GFP (1:500 in BB, Aves Labs, GFP-1010). After washing in PBST, the embryos were incubated overnight at 4°C in Cy3-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibody (1:500 in BB; Jackson Immunoresearch, 111-165-144), Alexa488-conjugated goat anti-mouse (1:500 in BB, Invitrogen, A21133) or Alexa488-conjugated goat-anti-chicken (1:500 in BB; Invitrogen, A11039). Embryos were washed in PBST before imaging.

Whole mount mRNA in situ hybridization (ISH)

Request a detailed protocol

Fixation of the embryos was carried overnight in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA). Embryos were subsequently stored in methanol (MeOH) at −20°C. Rehydration was carried out in PBST (PBS plus 0.1% Tween-20) and, depending on the stage, embryos were treated with 1 µg ml-1 Proteinase K (Promega) between 1 and 20 min. Embryos were then rinsed in PBST, post-fixed in 4% PFA for 20 min, washed repeatedly in PBST and pre-hybridized for at least 1 hr in Hyb-buffer. Digoxigenin-labeled and fluorescein-labeled RNA probes were diluted in Hyb-buffer supplemented with transfer RNA (Sigma-Aldrich) and heparin (Sigma-Aldrich), and incubated with the embryos overnight at 70°C. After removal of the probe, embryos were washed stepwise from Hyb- to 2xSSCT, and subsequently from 0.2xSSCT to PBST. Embryos were blocked for at least 1 hr at room temperature (RT) in PBST supplemented with sheep serum and BSA before being incubated overnight at 4°C with an anti-digoxygenin-AP antibody (1:5000; Cat: 11093274910; Roche). After removal of the antibody, embryos were washed in PBST before being transferred to TBST. The embryos were subsequently incubated in the dark on a slow rocker in dilutions of Nitro-blue tetrazolium/5-bromo-4-chloro-3-inodyl phosphate (NBT/BCIP; Cat: 11093274910; Roche) in TBST. After development of the staining, embryos were washed extensively in PBST and fixed overnight in 4% PFA at 4°C. Before imaging, embryos were cleared in MeOH and mounted in benzylbenzoate:benzylalcohol (2:1). For two-colour detection, after development of the NBT/BCIP staining embryos were briefly washed in PBST and 0.1 M Glycin-HCl pH = 2.2 and incubated overnight at 4°C with an anti-fluorescein antibody-AP (1:5000; Cat: 11426338910; Sigma-Aldrich). After PBST and TBST washing, ISH signal was detected with Iodonitrotetrazolium INT/BCIP (1:5000; Cat:11681460001; Sigma-Aldrich). Imaging was carried out after mounting in 100% glycerol. Cryosectioning was carried out on tbx5a ISH embryos previously frozen in OCT (Leica Microsystems) on dry ice at a thickness of 10 µm before slide mounting and imaging.

Accession numbers of the genes assayed by ISH: myl7 (NM_131329), amhc (NM_198823), foxa3 (NM_131299), nppa (NM_198800), tbx2b (NM_131051), bmp4 (NM_131342), has2 (NM_153650), versican (NM_001326557), and tbx5a (NM_130915).

In vitro tbx5a activity assay

Request a detailed protocol

COS7 cells, grown in 12-well plates in DMEM supplemented with 10% FCS (Gibco-BRL) and glutamine, were transfected using polyethylenimine 25 kDa (PEI, Brunschwick) at a 1:3 ratio (DNA:PEI). Standard transfections were performed using 1.4 μg pGL3-Basic reporter vector (Promega) containing −638/+70 bp rNppa promoter (reporter construct), which was co-transfected with 3 ng phRG-TK Renilla vector (Promega) as normalization control. Zebrafish tbx5a wild type (wt) and mutant (hst and oug) open-reading frames were cloned into a pCS2+ vector and 300 ng of each construct was transfected along with the reporter constructs and normalization control. Experiments were performed in triplo, each with hextuplicate biological replicates. Isolation of cell extracts and subsequent luciferase assays were performed 48 hr after transfection using Luciferase Assay System according to the protocol of the manufacturer (Promega). Luciferase measurements were performed using a Promega Turner Biosystems Modulus Multimode Reader luminometer. Mean luciferase activity and standard deviation were plotted as fold activation compared to the promoter-reporter plasmid. All data was statistically validated using a one-way ANOVA for all combinations.

Imaging

Request a detailed protocol

In vivo phenotypic assessment and imaging was carried out on a Leica M165FC stereomicroscope or a Zeiss StemiSV6 stereomicroscope (Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany). Embryos were sedated if necessary with 16 mg/ml tricaine (MS222; Sigma-Aldrich) in E3 medium. ISH imaging was performed using a Zeiss Axioplan microscope (Carl Zeiss AG). Images were captured with a DFC420 digital microscope camera (Leica Microsystems). Confocal imaging was carried out on a Leica SPE or SP8 confocal microscope (Leica Microsystems). Multiphoton imaging was carried out on a Leica SP5 or SP8 confocal microscope (Leica Microsystems). Time-lapse imaging was carried out on sedated, PTU-treated, tnnt2a morpholino oligo-injected and dechorionated embryos mounted in 0.25% agarose in E3 medium. Images were acquired using a Leica SP5 or SP8 multiphoton microscope and stacks were acquired approximately every 10 min for about 16 hr.

Acquisition resolution of the images (x; y; z) in µm per pixel: Confocal timelapses: 0.889; 0.889; 2.000; Confocal live imaging (still): 0.604; 0.604; 1.000; Confocal fluorescent immunolabeling: 0.284; 0.284; 1.000.

Outer and inner curvature definition

Request a detailed protocol

Throughout the study, we defined the inner- and outer curvatures of the chambers as the long and short contours respectively visible in the ventral view of the 48 hpf heart. In the ventricle, the outer curvature is on the left of the chamber and the inner curvature on the right, and vice-versa for the atrium. The boundary in-between the inner and outer curvatures was not defined as additional markers were not available to us.

Image analysis

Request a detailed protocol

Time-lapse: Imaris software (Oxford Imaging) was used to generate time-lapse movies and automated cell tracking in 3D, followed by manual inspection of individual tracks.

Time lapse movies spanned approximately 28 hpf-38 hpf, with a frame (full stack) acquisition period of approximately 13 min. For each movie analyzed, tracks were selected if they were contained a minimum of 15 acquisition points. Drift correction was applied in Imaris prior to track analysis to correct for displacement of the whole heart during image acquisition. All data presented in the manuscript on time-lapse movies were generated in Imaris and subsequently processed in Excel (Microsoft) if required.

Cell roundness: cell roundness assessment was carried out in Fiji freeware (https://fiji.sc/). Roundness of a cell is defined as:

Cell counting: cell counting was carried out in Volocity (Perkin Elmer) or Imaris (Oxford Imaging) on confocal-acquired 3D stacks.

Straightness Index: The straightness index is defined as the ratio between the length of a straight line from the start to the end of the left/right border at the edge on the right side of the ventricle (ventral view) and the length of the actual border as measured on the surface of the heart.

Details of the cell trajectory analyses are given in Appendix 1-Supplementary Methods.

Statistics

Statistical assays were carried out in Graphpad Prism 9.0 (GraphPad Software). Statistical analysis for average total rotation angle, angular velocities, and twisting angle were performed with the Python packages scipy (Virtanen et al., 2020) and statsmodels (Seabold and Perktold, 2010).

Figure 1J: One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test; for all pairwise comparisons ****; p<0.0001 except empty vs oug ns; p=0.5950.

Figure 2K: One-way ANOVA comparing all possible combinations among ventricle, atrium, and AV canal of wild type and oug hearts, followed by Mann-Whitney/Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Bonferroni-correction for multiple comparison, p values and significance levels are reported in the figure panel.

Figure 4I: One-way ANOVA comparing all possible combinations among ventricle, atrium, and AV canal of wild type and oug hearts, followed by Mann-Whitney/Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Bonferroni-correction for multiple comparison, p values and significance levels are reported in the figure panel.

Figure 4K: Two-tailed, non-paired Student’s t-test; p values and significance levels are reported in the figure panel.

Figure 4L: Two-tailed, non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test, p values and significance levels are reported in the figure panel.

Figure 5B: One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test; p values and significance levels are reported in the figure panel.

Figure 6B: One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test; p values and significance levels are reported in the figure panel.

Figure 7D: Two-tailed, non-paired Student’s t-test; p values and significance levels are reported in the figure panel.

Figure 8C: One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test; p values and significance levels are reported in the figure panel.

Data collection

Request a detailed protocol

Figure 1 (C) and (H): representative pictures of a minimum of three independent experiments. Numbers of samples are reported in the figure.

(G): Number of embryos analyzed (per cross): wt x wt: n = 94; oug^-/- x oug^-/-: n = 134; hst^-/- x hst^-/-: n = 125; oug^+/- ± hst^+/-: n = 298.

(J): six technical and biological repeats.

Figure 2 (A–K): representative pictures and data collected on five technical and biological repeats.

Figure 3 (A’): representative pictures of two technical and biological repeats.

(B–B’): representative pictures of six technical and biological repeats.

(C–C’): representative pictures of six technical and biological repeats.

Figure 4 (A–I): representative pictures and data collected on five technical and biological repeats.

(J–L): data collected on five technical and biological repeats per genotype.

Figure 5 (A): number of samples is reported in the figure panels.

(B): DMSO: nine samples; SU5402:13 samples.

(D): number of samples is reported in the figure panels.

Figure 6 (A,B): number of samples is reported in B.

(C): number of samples is reported in the figure panels.

Figure 7 (A): representative pictures of three biological and technical replicates per genotype.

(B): Data points: for all points 5 < n < 9 unless *: n = 2.

(C–D): representative pictures and data collected on four biological and technical replicates.

Figure 8 (A–C): representative pictures of a minimum of six biological and technical replicates, as reported in panel C.

(B): representative pictures of a minimum of five biological and technical replicates.

(D–D’’’): number of biological and technical replicates are reported in the figure panels.

Appendix 1

Computational unfolding of the heart axis onto a straight reference axis

Here we detail the algorithm we use to quantify the rotation of each cell during heart development. We assume that the displacement of the cells can be disentangled into three types of movement: (i) translation of the whole heart tube (Appendix 1—figure 1 a-b), (ii) folding of the tube over the atrio-ventricular canal (AVC) (Appendix 1—figure 1 c), and, finally the (iii) rotation along the AVC-atrium axis viz. the AVC-ventricle axis, which we aim to extract from the data (Appendix 1—figure 1 d). During translation, all cells displace by the same distance and into the same direction. During folding the whole heart tube folds over the AVC that acts a ‘hinge’. We aim to remove the displacement and folding components from the cell tracking data, so that we can quantify the cells’ rotation over the AVC-atrium or the AVC-ventricle axis.

Appendix 1—figure 1

Download asset Open asset

Scheme of the types of motion described in the text.

(a) Scheme of the heart tube with a few cells manually marked for each category, the respective category centroid calculated from the marked cells’ average position, and the axes linking these centroids. The cells are drawn in different sizes to highlight their position at the front or back of the heart tube. The centroid is larger than the cells. (b) Example of translation. (c) Example of heart tube folding over the hinge-like AVC. (d) Example of cell rotation around the axis of the respective category.

In short, we extract the cell positions at successive time points from the microscopy data. For each time point we translate the cell positions so that the AVC remains centered at the origin (step 1; see also Figure 2I in the main text). We then unfold atrium and ventricle by rotating the cells so that both the atrium-AVC axis and the ventricle-AVC axis lie onto their respective reference axes (step 2; see also Figure 2I’,I’’ in the main text). Finally, we calculate the rotation of the cells by measuring the angle subtended by their displacement per time step, projected on the plane perpendicular to their axis (step 3; see also Figure 2I’’’ in the main text). In the following we explain each step in more detail.

Step 1. Translate AVC to origin

We subdivide the cell tracks into categories belonging to atrium (A), ventricle (V), and AVC by manual annotation of the data in Imaris. In the subsequent analysis, we exclude all timepoints where any of these categories has less than 5 cells. We define the centroid $C_{h} (t)$ of a category $h$ as the average coordinate of the point cloud consisting of all cells in the respective category at time $t$ .

In order to let the centroids of the AVC coincide throughout the time-lapse and remove translation due to drift (Appendix 1—figure 1b), we first translate the whole dataset such that the centroid of the AVC at each time point is located at the origin of the coordinate system. The centroid of the AVC is defined for each timepoint $t$ as the sum of each AVC cell $i$ 's position $P_{i, A V C} (t)$ at that timepoint divided by the total number of AVC cells at that timepoint $N_{A V C} (t)$

C_{A V C} (t) = \frac{1}{N_{A V C} (t)} \sum_{i = 0}^{i = N_{A V C} (t)} P_{i, A V C} (t) .

We pick the AVC centroid at the earliest timepoint as a reference point

C_{A V C, r} = C_{A V C} (t_{m i n})

and subtract this reference from each cell $i$ 's position $P_{i} (t)$ at every timepoint $t$ to obtain a cell position vector for each cell in all the categories

{\vec{p}}_{i}^{*} (t) = P_{i} (t) - C_{A V C, r} .

Then, we calculate the AVC centroids $C_{A V C}^{*} (t)$ using the translated coordinates ${\vec{p}}_{i}^{*} (t)$ analogously to Equation 19. The displacement of $C_{A V C}^{*} (t)$ in time quantifies the drift of the heart. We subtract each $C_{A V C}^{*} (t)$ from all cell coordinates at the corresponding time point ( ${\vec{p}}_{i}^{*} (t)$ ) to obtain

{\vec{p}}_{i}^{* *} (t) = {\vec{p}}_{i}^{*} (t) - C_{A V C}^{*} (t),

which are the coordinates of all cells at all timepoints, translated such that the AVC centroid remains located at the origin.

Similar to the AVC centroid, we define the centroid of atrium $C_{A} (t)$ and ventricle $C_{V} (t)$ as the average position of atrial and ventricular cells, analogously to Equation 19. We calculate these centroids from the translated coordinates ${\vec{p}}_{i}^{* *} (t)$ , and denote them as $C_{A}^{* *} (t)$ and $C_{V}^{* *} (t)$ . For each timepoint, we can now define two axes, one for atrium ${\vec{a}}_{A} (t)$ and one for ventricle ${\vec{a}}_{V} (t)$ , as the vector from the AVC centroid to the chamber centroid:

{\vec{a}}_{A} (t) = C_{A V C}^{* *} (t) - C_{A}^{* *} (t) a n d {\vec{a}}_{V} (t) = C_{V}^{* *} (t) - C_{A V C}^{* *} (t) .

Step 2: Unfolding of heart axis

In order to detect twisting of the heart, we removed the folding caused by the angular movement of the axes (Appendix 1—figure 1c). For each of the chambers, a reference axis is defined as,

{\vec{a}}_{h, r} = {\vec{a}}_{h} (t_{m i n}),

where $h$ denotes either atrium or ventricle. That is, these are the two axes at the first timepoint of the dataset.

The datasets for all subsequent data points are then rotated such that the axes of the rotated dataset overlap with the reference axes (Appendix 1—figure 2a-b). To this end, we define a rotation matrix $R_{h} (t)$ that is calculated from the unit vectors of the reference axis and the axis at timepoint $t$ , respectively ${\hat{a}}_{h, r}$ and ${\hat{a}}_{h} (t)$ (we denote normalised vectors with the symbol ^{^}).

Appendix 1—figure 2

Download asset Open asset

Scheme of the calculations.

(**a–b**) Scheme of step 2 in the text. The folding angle $θ$ is the angle subtended by the axis $a_{h} (t)$ and the reference axis $a_{h, r}$ . (c) Rotating the cells by the angle defined in (**a–b**). (d) Scheme of the plane perpendicular to the reference axis used to calculate cell rotation around the axis. (e) Calculation of the angle of rotation of the cells around the reference axis with symbols as used in the text. Note that this is not the same angle as in (**a–c**).

The rotation matrix is derived from Rodrigues' rotation formula, where the axis of rotation is the normalised cross product between ${\hat{a}}_{h} (t)$ and ${\hat{a}}_{h, r}$ (Appendix 1—figure 2a).

R_{h} (t) = I + {[a]}_{\times} + {[a]}_{\times}^{2} \frac{1}{1 + {\hat{a}}_{h, r} \cdot {\hat{a}}_{h} (t)}

where $I$ is the 3 × 3 identity matrix, and the term in square brackets represents the skew-symmetric cross product matrix

{[a]}_{\times} = {[{\hat{a}}_{h} (t) \times {\hat{a}}_{h, r}]}_{\times} = {[- ({\hat{a}}_{h, r} \times {\hat{a}}_{h} (t))]}_{\times} = [\begin{array}{ccc} 0 & + k_{z} & - k_{y} \\ - k_{z} & 0 & + k_{x} \\ + k_{y} & - k_{x} & 0 \end{array}],

with

[\begin{matrix} k_{x} \\ k_{y} \\ k_{z} \end{matrix}] = {\hat{a}}_{h} (t) \times {\hat{a}}_{h, r} .

The rotation matrix is then multiplied to the coordinate of each cell $i$ at every timepoint $t$ of the corresponding chamber $h$ (atrium or ventricle) (Appendix 1—figure 2c).

{\vec{p}}_{i}^{* * *} (t) = R_{h} (t) \cdot {\vec{p}}_{i}^{* *} (t) .

After this operation, the axes of the respective chambers ${\vec{a}}_{h}$ coincide at every timepoint with the reference axis, allowing us to perform all further calculations with respect to the reference unit vector axis ${\hat{a}}_{h, r}$ . To correct the folding on AVC cells, we used the angle obtained from the above calculation using the ventricle axis as reference.

Step 3: Calculation of cell rotation around the axis

By unfolding the heart in step 2 (i.e. rotating the axes at all timepoints onto a reference at $t_{m i n}$ ), we have disentangled translation and folding from the rotation of a cell around its axis (Appendix 1—figure 1 d). We can now calculate this rotation. Appendix 1—figure 2 d-e illustrate the steps of the calculation. Briefly, for each cell we define a plane on which the rotation is measured (Appendix 1—figure 2 d). This plane is perpendicular to the axis and passes by the cell at timepoint $t - 1$ . We project the cell’s position at time $t$ on this plane to obtain ${\vec{p}}_{i}^{* * *} (t)'$ . Then, we define two vectors on this plane: The first vector, ${\vec{v}}_{(t - 1) ⊥}$ , spans from the plane-axis intersection $A_{i}$ to the position of the cell ${\vec{p}}_{i}^{* * *} (t - 1)$ , and the second vector, ${\vec{v}}_{t ⊥}$ , spans from the plane-axis intersection $A_{i}$ to the projected position ${\vec{p}}_{i}^{* * *} (t)'$ . The angle $α_{i} (t)$ between these vectors is defined as the rotation angle of the cell over that time step $∆ t$ . We neglect off-plane displacement, thus considering only the projection of the displacement on the plane itself for the rotation. The rotation angle divided by $∆ t$ yields the rotational velocity $ω_{i} (t)$ .

Mathematically, for each cell $i$ , we define vectors $v_{i} (t)$ that give the displacement of the cells between subsequent time steps

\vec{v_{i}} (t) = {\vec{p}}_{i}^{* * *} (t) - {\vec{p}}_{i}^{* * *} (t - 1) .

We seek to find the point $A_{i}$ on the axis. This point intersects the plane perpendicular to the axis that passes by ${\vec{p}}_{i}^{* * *} (t - 1)$ . It is calculated as:

A_{i} = C_{A V C}^{* * *} + {\hat{a}}_{h, r} \frac{({\vec{p}}_{i}^{* * *} (t - 1) - C_{A V C}^{* * *}) \cdot {\hat{a}}_{h, r}}{{\hat{a}}_{h, r} \cdot {\hat{a}}_{h, r}}

Intuitively, the point $A_{i}$ is the projection on the axis of the vector spanning from ${\vec{p}}_{i}^{* * *} (t - 1)$ to $C_{A V C}^{* * *}$ , which can be calculated as the dot product between the axis and this vector. Then, we calculate the component of the displacement vector ${\vec{v}}_{i} (t)$ parallel to the plane perpendicular to the axis and passing by $A_{i}$ (for clarity, we drop the subscript $i$ and time dependence when we denote the vectors ${\vec{v}}_{i} (t)$ and simply write $\vec{v}$ ). To this end, we decompose the displacement vectors $\vec{v}$ into components parallel to (||) to and perpendicular to (⊥) the corresponding category's unit vector axis

{\vec{v}}_{∥} = (\vec{v} \cdot {\hat{a}}_{h, r}) \cdot {\hat{a}}_{h, r} a n d {\vec{v}}_{⊥} = \vec{v} - {\vec{v}}_{∥}

We then project the cell's position in the current step ${\vec{p}}_{i}^{* * *} (t)$ onto the plane

{\vec{p}}_{i}^{* * *} {(t)}^{'} = {\vec{p}}_{i}^{* * *} + {\vec{v}}_{∥} .

Now we obtain the vectors in the plane

{\vec{v}}_{(t - 1) ⊥} = {\vec{p}}_{i}^{* * *} (t - 1) - A_{i} a n d {\vec{v}}_{t ⊥} = {\vec{p}}_{i}^{* * *} {(t)}^{'} - A_{i},

which we use to calculate the angle of rotation of the cell around the axis

α_{i} (t) = \tan^{- 1} \frac{{\hat{a}}_{h, r} ({\vec{v}}_{(t - 1) ⊥} \times {\vec{v}}_{(t) ⊥})}{{\vec{v}}_{(t - 1) ⊥} \cdot {\vec{v}}_{(t) ⊥}},

from which follows the angular velocity over the time step $∆ t$

ω_{i} (t) = \frac{α_{i} (t)}{Δ t} .

Calculation of total rotation angle

The angles obtained in Equation 17 are the basis for the statistical analysis presented in this article. To obtain the total rotation (or cumulative rotation) we proceed as follows: First, we average the angular velocities for each cell $i$ per category $h$ at every timepoint $t$ to obtain the mean angular velocity ${\bar{ω}}_{h} (t)$

{\bar{ω}}_{h} (t) = \frac{1}{N_{h} (t)} \sum_{i = 0}^{i = N_{h} (t)} ω_{i, h} (t),

where $N_{h} (t)$ is the total number of cells for category $h$ at timepoint $t$ . Then, we integrate the mean angular velocity over time by taking the cumulative sum, and obtain the total rotation in each of the heart tube categories

{\bar{α}}_{h, t o t} (t) = \sum_{τ = t_{m i n}}^{τ = t} {\bar{ω}}_{h} (τ) .

Calculation of heart twisting angle

We define the twisting angle $ξ (t)$ by the absolute difference between the total rotation obtained in Equation 19 for the atrium and the ventricle, respectively ${\bar{α}}_{A, t o t} (t)$ and ${\bar{α}}_{h, t o t} (t_{Δ 1.5})$

ξ (t) = | {\bar{α}}_{V, t o t} (t) - {\bar{α}}_{A, t o t} (t) | .

Calculation of time-averaged angular and twisting velocities

To calculate statistics on the data, we obtained time-averaged angular velocities in 1.5-hour intervals both for the total rotation angle (Figure 2K, Figure 4I in the main text) and for the twisting angle (Figure 4L in the main text). To this end, we split the data into $t_{Δ 1.5}$ = 1.5 hr intervals and performed a linear fit of the form $y = m t + b$ , where the slope m and the intercept b are fitting parameters. The slope m of the function y fitted on the total rotation angle ${\bar{α}}_{h, t o t} (t_{Δ 1.5})$ or the twisting angle $ξ (t_{Δ 1.5})$ is then equivalent to the derivative, i.e., respectively the average angular velocity in that interval $⟨ {\bar{ω}}_{h} (t_{Δ 1.5}) ⟩$ or the average twisting velocity in that interval $⟨ ψ (t_{Δ 1.5}) ⟩$ .

Data availability

Data generated during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting information.

References

(2020) Zebrafish: Housing and husbandry recommendations
Laboratory Animals 54:213–224.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677219869037
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Asakawa K
2. Suster ML
3. Mizusawa K
4. Nagayoshi S
5. Kotani T
6. Urasaki A
7. Kishimoto Y
8. Hibi M
9. Kawakami K
(2008) Genetic dissection of neural circuits by Tol2 transposon-mediated Gal4 gene and enhancer trapping in zebrafish
PNAS 105:1255–1260.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0704963105
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Auman HJ
2. Coleman H
3. Riley HE
4. Olale F
5. Tsai HJ
6. Yelon D
(2007) Functional modulation of cardiac form through regionally confined cell shape changes
PLOS Biology 5:e53.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050053
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2008) Direct and indirect roles for Nodal signaling in two axis conversions during asymmetric morphogenesis of the zebrafish heart
PNAS 105:13924–13929.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0802159105
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2009) Shaping the zebrafish heart: from left-right axis specification to epithelial tissue morphogenesis
Developmental Biology 330:213–220.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.04.011
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Birnbaum RY
2. Clowney EJ
3. Agamy O
4. Kim MJ
5. Zhao J
6. Yamanaka T
7. Pappalardo Z
8. Clarke SL
9. Wenger AM
10. Nguyen L
11. Gurrieri F
12. Everman DB
13. Schwartz CE
14. Birk OS
15. Bejerano G
16. Lomvardas S
17. Ahituv N
(2012) Coding exons function as tissue-specific enhancers of nearby genes
Genome Research 22:1059–1068.
https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.133546.111
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Cai CL
2. Liang X
3. Shi Y
4. Chu PH
5. Pfaff SL
6. Chen J
7. Evans S
(2003) Isl1 identifies a cardiac progenitor population that proliferates prior to differentiation and contributes a majority of cells to the heart
Developmental Cell 5:877–889.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00363-0
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Camarata T
2. Krcmery J
3. Snyder D
4. Park S
5. Topczewski J
6. Simon HG
(2010) Pdlim7 (LMP4) regulation of Tbx5 specifies zebrafish heart atrio-ventricular boundary and valve formation
Developmental Biology 337:233–245.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.10.039
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(1997) Left-right pattern of cardiac BMP4 may drive asymmetry of the heart in zebrafish
Development 124:4373–4382.
https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.124.21.4373
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Chi NC
2. Shaw RM
3. De Val S
4. Kang G
5. Jan LY
6. Black BL
7. Stainier DY
(2008) Foxn4 directly regulates tbx2b expression and atrioventricular canal formation
Genes & Development 22:734–739.
https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1629408
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2004a) T-box transcription factor Tbx2 represses differentiation and formation of the cardiac chambers
Developmental Dynamics 229:763–770.
https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.10487
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2004b) Architectural plan for the heart: early patterning and delineation of the chambers and the nodes
Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine 14:301–307.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcm.2004.09.002
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Cohen ED
2. Miller MF
3. Wang Z
4. Moon RT
5. Morrisey EE
(2012) Wnt5a and Wnt11 are essential for second heart field progenitor development
Development 139:1931–1940.
https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.069377
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Davis NM
2. Kurpios NA
3. Sun X
4. Gros J
5. Martin JF
6. Tabin CJ
(2008) The chirality of gut rotation derives from left-right asymmetric changes in the architecture of the dorsal mesentery
Developmental Cell 15:134–145.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2008.05.001
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2008) Nodal signaling promotes the speed and directional movement of cardiomyocytes in zebrafish
Developmental Dynamics 237:3624–3633.
https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.21777
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2009) Distinct phases of cardiomyocyte differentiation regulate growth of the zebrafish heart
Development 136:1633–1641.
https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.030924
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2021) Asymmetric Hapln1a drives regionalised cardiac ECM expansion and promotes heart morphogenesis in zebrafish development
Cardiovascular Research cvab004.
https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvab004
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2018) Left-right asymmetry in heart development and disease: forming the right loop
Development 145:dev162776.
https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.162776
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Essner JJ
2. Vogan KJ
3. Wagner MK
4. Tabin CJ
5. Yost HJ
6. Brueckner M
(2002) Conserved function for embryonic nodal cilia
Nature 418:37–38.
https://doi.org/10.1038/418037a
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2007) The evolutionary origin of nodal-related genes in teleosts
Development genes and evolution 217:807–813.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00427-007-0191-y
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2002) The heartstrings mutation in zebrafish causes heart/fin Tbx5 deficiency syndrome
Development 129:4635–4645.
https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.129.19.4635
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2011) Mechanisms of T-box gene function in the developing heart
Cardiovascular Research 91:212–222.
https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvr112
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2020) Left-right asymmetric heart jogging increases the robustness of dextral heart looping in zebrafish
Developmental Biology 459:79–86.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2019.11.012
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2002) Cooperative action of Tbx2 and Nkx2.5 inhibits ANF expression in the atrioventricular canal: implications for cardiac chamber formation
Genes & Development 16:1234–1246.
https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.222902
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Honda H
2. Abe T
3. Fujimori T
(2020) The Chiral Looping of the Embryonic Heart Is Formed by the Combination of Three Axial Asymmetries
Biophysical Journal 118:742–752.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2019.11.3397
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Honkoop H
2. de Bakker DE
3. Aharonov A
4. Kruse F
5. Shakked A
6. Nguyen PD
7. de Heus C
8. Garric L
9. Muraro MJ
10. Shoffner A
11. Tessadori F
12. Peterson JC
13. Noort W
14. Bertozzi A
15. Weidinger G
16. Posthuma G
17. Grün D
18. van der Laarse WJ
19. Klumperman J
20. Jaspers RT
21. Poss KD
22. van Oudenaarden A
23. Tzahor E
24. Bakkers J
(2019) Single-cell analysis uncovers that metabolic reprogramming by ErbB2 signaling is essential for cardiomyocyte proliferation in the regenerating heart
eLife 8:e50163.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.50163
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2007a) T-box factors determine cardiac design
Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS 64:646–660.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-007-6518-z
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Hoogaars WM
2. Engel A
3. Brons JF
4. Verkerk AO
5. de Lange FJ
6. Wong LY
7. Bakker ML
8. Clout DE
9. Wakker V
10. Barnett P
11. Ravesloot JH
12. Moorman AF
13. Verheijck EE
14. Christoffels VM
(2007b) Tbx3 controls the sinoatrial node gene program and imposes pacemaker function on the atria
Genes & Development 21:1098–1112.
https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.416007
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Hozumi S
2. Maeda R
3. Taniguchi K
4. Kanai M
5. Shirakabe S
6. Sasamura T
7. Spéder P
8. Noselli S
9. Aigaki T
10. Murakami R
11. Matsuno K
(2006) An unconventional myosin in Drosophila reverses the default handedness in visceral organs
Nature 440:798–802.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04625
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Hurlstone AF
2. Haramis AP
3. Wienholds E
4. Begthel H
5. Korving J
6. Van Eeden F
7. Cuppen E
8. Zivkovic D
9. Plasterk RH
10. Clevers H
(2003) The Wnt/beta-catenin pathway regulates cardiac valve formation
Nature 425:633–637.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02028
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Inaki M
2. Liu J
3. Matsuno K
(2016) Cell chirality: its origin and roles in left-right asymmetric development
Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences 371:371.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0403
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2013) Evolution and development of the building plan of the vertebrate heart
Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research 1833:783–794.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2012.10.004
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Lazic S
2. Scott IC
(2011) Mef2cb regulates late myocardial cell addition from a second heart field-like population of progenitors in zebrafish
Developmental Biology 354:123–133.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.03.028
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Le Garrec JF
2. Domínguez JN
3. Desgrange A
4. Ivanovitch KD
5. Raphaël E
6. Bangham JA
7. Torres M
8. Coen E
9. Mohun TJ
10. Meilhac SM
(2017) A predictive model of asymmetric morphogenesis from 3D reconstructions of mouse heart looping dynamics
eLife 6:e28951.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.28951
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Lebreton G
2. Géminard C
3. Lapraz F
4. Pyrpassopoulos S
5. Cerezo D
6. Spéder P
7. Ostap EM
8. Noselli S
(2018) Molecular to organismal chirality is induced by the conserved myosin 1D
Science 362:949–952.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat8642
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Levin M
2. Pagan S
3. Roberts DJ
4. Cooke J
5. Kuehn MR
6. Tabin CJ
(1997) Left/right patterning signals and the independent regulation of different aspects of situs in the chick embryo
Developmental Biology 189:57–67.
https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.1997.8662
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2014) Laterality defects in the national birth defects prevention study (1998-2007): birth prevalence and descriptive epidemiology
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A 164A:2581–2591.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.36695
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2019) Morphogenetic control of zebrafish cardiac looping by Bmp signaling
Development 146:dev180091.
https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.180091
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2003) The zebrafish nodal-related gene southpaw is required for visceral and diencephalic left-right asymmetry
Development 130:2303–2316.
https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.00436
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2003) heart of glass regulates the concentric growth of the heart in zebrafish
Current Biology 13:2138–2147.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2003.11.055
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Meno C
2. Shimono A
3. Saijoh Y
4. Yashiro K
5. Mochida K
6. Ohishi S
7. Noji S
8. Kondoh H
9. Hamada H
(1998) lefty-1 is required for left-right determination as a regulator of lefty-2 and nodal
Cell 94:287–297.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81472-5
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Merks AM
2. Swinarski M
3. Meyer AM
4. Müller NV
5. Özcan I
6. Donat S
7. Burger A
8. Gilbert S
9. Mosimann C
10. Abdelilah-Seyfried S
11. Panáková D
(2018) Planar cell polarity signalling coordinates heart tube remodelling through tissue-scale polarisation of actomyosin activity
Nature Communications 9:2161.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04566-1
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2018) Conserved regulation of Nodal-mediated left-right patterning in zebrafish and mouse
Development 145:dev171090.
https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.171090
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Mori AD
2. Bruneau BG
(2004) TBX5 mutations and congenital heart disease: Holt-Oram syndrome revealed
Current Opinion in Cardiology 19:211–215.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00001573-200405000-00004
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2002) The limb identity gene Tbx5 promotes limb initiation by interacting with Wnt2b and Fgf10
Development 129:5161–5170.
https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.129.22.5161
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2013) A Nodal-independent and tissue-intrinsic mechanism controls heart-looping chirality
Nature Communications 4:2754.
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3754
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Noël ES
2. Momenah TS
3. Al-Dagriri K
4. Al-Suwaid A
5. Al-Shahrani S
6. Jiang H
7. Willekers S
8. Oostveen YY
9. Chocron S
10. Postma AV
11. Bhuiyan ZA
12. Bakkers J
(2016) A Zebrafish Loss-of-Function Model for Human CFAP53 Mutations Reveals Its Specific Role in Laterality Organ Function
Human Mutation 37:194–200.
https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.22928
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Norris DP
2. Robertson EJ
(1999) Asymmetric and node-specific nodal expression patterns are controlled by two distinct cis-acting regulatory elements
Genes & Development 13:1575–1588.
https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.13.12.1575
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Okada Y
2. Nonaka S
3. Tanaka Y
4. Saijoh Y
5. Hamada H
6. Hirokawa N
(1999) Abnormal nodal flow precedes situs inversus in iv and inv mice
Molecular Cell 4:459–468.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80197-5
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Patten BM
(1922) The formation of the cardiac loop in the chick
American Journal of Anatomy 30:373–397.
https://doi.org/10.1002/aja.1000300304
- Google Scholar
1. Pohl C
(2015) Cytoskeletal Symmetry Breaking and Chirality: From Reconstituted Systems to Animal Development
Symmetry 7:2062–2107.
https://doi.org/10.3390/sym7042062
- Google Scholar
1. Ray P
2. Chin AS
3. Worley KE
4. Fan J
5. Kaur G
6. Wu M
7. Wan LQ
(2018) Intrinsic cellular chirality regulates left-right symmetry breaking during cardiac looping
PNAS 115:E11568–E11577.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1808052115
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2007) Tbx2 and Tbx3 regulate the dynamics of cell proliferation during heart remodeling
PLOS ONE 2:e398.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000398
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2008) Asymmetric involution of the myocardial field drives heart tube formation in zebrafish
Circulation Research 102:12–19.
https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.165241
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Satir P
(2016) Chirality of the cytoskeleton in the origins of cellular asymmetry
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 371:20150408.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0408
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Sato K
2. Hiraiwa T
3. Maekawa E
4. Isomura A
5. Shibata T
6. Kuranaga E
(2015) Left-right asymmetric cell intercalation drives directional collective cell movement in epithelial morphogenesis
Nature Communications 6:10074.
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10074
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
Conference
1. Seabold S
2. Perktold J
(2010)
Statsmodels: econometric and statistical modeling with Python

Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference. pp. 92–96.
- Google Scholar
1. Sehnert AJ
2. Huq A
3. Weinstein BM
4. Walker C
5. Fishman M
6. Stainier DY
(2002) Cardiac troponin T is essential in sarcomere assembly and cardiac contractility
Nature Genetics 31:106–110.
https://doi.org/10.1038/ng875
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2009) T-box 2, a mediator of Bmp-Smad signaling, induced hyaluronan synthase 2 and Tgfbeta2 expression and endocardial cushion formation
PNAS 106:18604–18609.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0900635106
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2008) Rotation and asymmetric development of the zebrafish heart requires directed migration of cardiac progenitor cells
Developmental Cell 14:287–297.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2007.11.015
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Smith KA
2. Noël E
3. Thurlings I
4. Rehmann H
5. Chocron S
6. Bakkers J
(2011a) Bmp and nodal independently regulate lefty1 expression to maintain unilateral nodal activity during left-right axis specification in zebrafish
PLOS Genetics 7:e1002289.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002289
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Smith KA
2. Lagendijk AK
3. Courtney AD
4. Chen H
5. Paterson S
6. Hogan BM
7. Wicking C
8. Bakkers J
(2011b) Transmembrane protein 2 (Tmem2) is required to regionally restrict atrioventricular canal boundary and endocardial cushion development
Development 138:4193–4198.
https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.065375
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2008) Tbx2b is required for the development of the parapineal organ
Development 135:1693–1702.
https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.016576
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Stainier DY
(2001) Zebrafish genetics and vertebrate heart formation
Nature Reviews Genetics 2:39–48.
https://doi.org/10.1038/35047564
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Steimle JD
2. Rankin SA
3. Slagle CE
4. Bekeny J
5. Rydeen AB
6. Chan SS
7. Kweon J
8. Yang XH
9. Ikegami K
10. Nadadur RD
11. Rowton M
12. Hoffmann AD
13. Lazarevic S
14. Thomas W
15. Boyle Anderson EAT
16. Horb ME
17. Luna-Zurita L
18. Ho RK
19. Kyba M
20. Jensen B
21. Zorn AM
22. Conlon FL
23. Moskowitz IP
(2018) Evolutionarily conserved Tbx5-Wnt2/2b pathway orchestrates cardiopulmonary development
PNAS 115:E10615–E10624.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1811624115
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Steimle JD
2. Moskowitz IP
(2017) TBX5: A Key Regulator of Heart Development
Current topics in developmental biology 122:195–221.
https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.ctdb.2016.08.008
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2015) Glypican4 promotes cardiac specification and differentiation by attenuating canonical Wnt and Bmp signaling
Development 142:1767–1776.
https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.113894
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2003) Tbx5 and Tbx4 trigger limb initiation through activation of the Wnt/Fgf signaling cascade
Development 130:2729–2739.
https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.00474
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Taniguchi K
2. Maeda R
3. Ando T
4. Okumura T
5. Nakazawa N
6. Hatori R
7. Nakamura M
8. Hozumi S
9. Fujiwara H
10. Matsuno K
(2011) Chirality in planar cell shape contributes to left-right asymmetric epithelial morphogenesis
Science 333:339–341.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1200940
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Tee YH
2. Shemesh T
3. Thiagarajan V
4. Hariadi RF
5. Anderson KL
6. Page C
7. Volkmann N
8. Hanein D
9. Sivaramakrishnan S
10. Kozlov MM
11. Bershadsky AD
(2015) Cellular chirality arising from the self-organization of the actin cytoskeleton
Nature Cell Biology 17:445–457.
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb3137
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2015) Nodal signaling range is regulated by proprotein convertase-mediated maturation
Developmental Cell 32:631–639.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2014.12.014
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
Software
1. Tsingos E
(2021)
Quantification of heart cell tracks in 3D, version swh:1:rev:149f05441e06f875faa3f9ab21101619bce25e93 https://archive.softwareheritage.org/swh:1:rev:149f05441e06f875faa3f9ab21101619bce25e93

Software Heritage.
1. Tsuchihashi T
2. Maeda J
3. Shin CH
4. Ivey KN
5. Black BL
6. Olson EN
7. Yamagishi H
8. Srivastava D
(2011) Hand2 function in second heart field progenitors is essential for cardiogenesis
Developmental Biology 351:62–69.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.12.023
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Virtanen P
2. Gommers R
3. Oliphant TE
4. Haberland M
5. Reddy T
6. Cournapeau D
7. Burovski E
8. Peterson P
9. Weckesser W
10. Bright J
11. van der Walt SJ
12. Brett M
13. Wilson J
14. Millman KJ
15. Mayorov N
16. Nelson ARJ
17. Jones E
18. Kern R
19. Larson E
20. Carey CJ
21. Polat İ
22. Feng Y
23. Moore EW
24. VanderPlas J
25. Laxalde D
26. Perktold J
27. Cimrman R
28. Henriksen I
29. Quintero EA
30. Harris CR
31. Archibald AM
32. Ribeiro AH
33. Pedregosa F
34. van Mulbregt P
35. Oliphant, M Haberland TE
36. SciPy C
37. SciPy 1.0 Contributors
(2020) SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python
Nature Methods 17:261–272.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Wan LQ
2. Ronaldson K
3. Park M
4. Taylor G
5. Zhang Y
6. Gimble JM
7. Vunjak-Novakovic G
(2011) Micropatterned mammalian cells exhibit phenotype-specific left-right asymmetry
PNAS 108:12295–12300.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1103834108
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
Book
1. Westerfield M
(1993)
A Guide for the Laboratory Use of Zebrafish Danio (Brachydanio) rerio

Eugene: M Westerfield.
- Google Scholar
(2003) Efficient target-selected mutagenesis in zebrafish
Genome Research 13:2700–2707.
https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.1725103
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Wilson V
2. Conlon FL
(2002) The T-box family
Genome Biology 3:reviews3008.1.
https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2002-3-6-reviews3008
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Xu J
2. Van Keymeulen A
3. Wakida NM
4. Carlton P
5. Berns MW
6. Bourne HR
(2007) Polarity reveals intrinsic cell chirality
PNAS 104:9296–9300.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0703153104
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Zhou Y
2. Cashman TJ
3. Nevis KR
4. Obregon P
5. Carney SA
6. Liu Y
7. Gu A
8. Mosimann C
9. Sondalle S
10. Peterson RE
11. Heideman W
12. Burns CE
13. Burns CG
(2011) Latent TGF-β binding protein 3 identifies a second heart field in zebrafish
Nature 474:645–648.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10094
- PubMed
- Google Scholar

Decision letter

Didier YR Stainier

Senior Editor; Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Germany
Sigolène M Meilhac

Reviewing Editor; Imagine-Institut Pasteur, France
Maximilian Furthauer

Reviewer

In the interests of transparency, eLife publishes the most substantive revision requests and the accompanying author responses.

Acceptance summary:

With an elegant combination of cell tracking and genetic tracing, this paper reveals twisting movements in cardiac chambers during heart looping in the fish. Mutant analyses show that these movements depend on the transcription factors Tbx5a and Tbx2b, which pattern chambers and their boundary at the atrio-ventricular canal. This work thus characterises intrinsic mechanisms shaping the fish heart independently of the left determinant Nodal, a process that was previously only suspected. It provides novel insight into how the heart acquires its shape to sustain efficient blood circulation.

Decision letter after peer review:

Thank you for submitting your article "Twisting of the heart tube during cardiac looping is a tbx5-dependent and tissue-intrinsic process" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by 3 peer reviewers, including Sigolène M Meilhac as the Reviewing Editor and Reviewer #1, and the evaluation has been overseen by Didier Stainier as the Senior Editor. The following individual involved in review of your submission has agreed to reveal their identity: (Maximilian Furthauer [Reviewer #2]).

The reviewers have discussed the reviews with one another and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this decision to help you prepare a revised submission.

As the editors have judged that your manuscript is of interest, but as described below that additional experiments are required before it is published, we would like to draw your attention to changes in our revision policy that we have made in response to COVID-19 (https://elifesciences.org/articles/57162). First, because many researchers have temporarily lost access to the labs, we will give authors as much time as they need to submit revised manuscripts. We are also offering, if you choose, to post the manuscript to bioRxiv (if it is not already there) along with this decision letter and a formal designation that the manuscript is "in revision at eLife". Please let us know if you would like to pursue this option. (If your work is more suitable for medRxiv, you will need to post the preprint yourself, as the mechanisms for us to do so are still in development.)

While cardiac looping is essential for cardiac function, the complex morphogenetic events that govern this asymmetric process remain poorly understood. Asymmetric morphogenesis has been mainly analysed in terms of direction and downstream of left Nodal signaling. The work of Tessadori et al. now addresses the contribution of other factors to shape the heart loop. This manuscript builds upon a previous study from the same group, showing that cardiac looping is independent of the initial leftward jog of the heart that is driven by left-sided Nodal activity. A recent study from another group (Lombardo et al., 2019) suggested that rotational events occur at the level of the cardiac outflow tract. The present work substantially extends these findings by providing more evidence of intrinsic mechanisms driving looping. The authors use a number of elegant approaches to provide a 3-dimensional description of this process. The presented experimental work is generally of high quality. The combination of cell tracking and genetic tracing of left markers, including with a new 0.2Intr1spaw transgene, suggests differential movements in the ventricle and atrium. A novel allele (oug), encoding a truncated version of the transcription factor tbx5a, is analysed, showing normal gut looping, indicative of normal LR asymmetry establishment. This allele is molecularly more severe than the well-known heartstrings allele ; unlike hst mutants, in oug mutant hearts AV canal specification is expanded. Oug mutants display defective heart looping, associated with defective chamber movements. This can be rescued to some extent by further loss of tbx2b, supporting a model where Tbx5a and Tbx2b act to establish chamber and AVC boundaries to promote torsional rotation of the heart tube and shape the loop. Explant experiments and pharmacological treatments, to interfere with the tube attachment and progenitor cell ingression, do not prevent heart looping. Altogether, the present work provides important new insights into the morphogenetic events that contribute to the shaping of the zebrafish heart. However, there are important issues that should be addressed.

Essential revisions:

1. The chamber movements are interesting new observations. Yet, their analysis is currently insufficient. Although images and cell tracking have been performed in 3D, it is unclear why the quantification is flattened in 2D. Angles are treated as linear values, whereas they should be treated as circular values (see statistical comments below). The avc is proposed to act as a "fixed hinge": how are cell traces/displacement vectors in this region? In Figure 2, it seems that the movement in the ventricle is towards the posterior (or venous pole), rather than the left, and so why are the movements qualified as opposite, rather than perpendicular? In addition, vectors in the dorsal/left ventricle are not opposite, so the rationale of a rotation of the ventricle is unclear. To support the claim that authors "map cardiomyocyte behavior during cardiac looping at a single-cell level", the movement of the overall chamber should be subtracted to the cell traces. Z cell displacement in Figure 2K, 4J should be analysed in a more quantitative way (e.g. mean displacement index at the atrial/ventricular inner/outer curvature). This would allow to see whether the changes observed in oug mutants are significant.

2. As the authors themselves mention in the discussion when comparing their results to Baker et al. 2008 (which used myl7:GFP), it is essential to establish which cells are actually labelled by a transgene. Given that previous studies (e.g. Figure 1D of de Campos-Baptista et al., 2008) have shown spaw to be expressed to the left of the cardiac primordium, rather than within the cmlc2-positive cardiac disc itself, a dorsal view of the 23 somite stage cardiac disc (e.g. spaw:GFP/myl7-RFP or GFP/cmlc2 two colour in situ) should be provided to clarify whether spaw:GFP and lft2:Gal4 transgenes are indeed specifically expressed in the left heart primordium. The staining of left transgenic markers is described as dorsal at 28hpf (text and Figure 3A), and ventral at 48hpf (text and Figure 3B): please explain whether this implies a 180 degree rotation or just a general flip of the heart relative to the embryo. It is unclear why spaw-GFP cells are located in the ventral part of oug mutant ventricles (Figure 4K, 8D): in wild-type animals left-originating cells give initially rise to the dorsal part of the ventricle. Through clockwise rotation of the outflow tract, these dorsal cells are then relocated to the outer curvature of the ventricle, as shown in Figure 3B. So if no rotation occurs in tbx5a/oug, why are spaw:GFP cells found in the ventral ventricle, rather than remaining in their initial dorsal position? What is the pattern of lft2BAC in oug mutants? The legend of Figure 9 reports "expansion of the space occupied by left-originating cardiomyocytes": what is the percentage of the VV, VD, AV, AD regions labelled at different stages and in different experimental conditions? What is the degree of rotation of the pattern and does it correspond to that measured by cell tracking? Are markers of the inner/outer curvature (ex nppa) also rotating?

3. In their characterization of tbx5a/oug mutants, the authors state that cardiac looping is “defective”, but a precise description of the actual type of defect is lacking. From the picture in Figure 1C it looks as if looping occurs still in the right direction, but with reduced amplitude. Is this the only type of defect observed, or are there others (e.g. absent or inverted looping)? Numbers should be included to substantiate these claims. Jogging in oug mutants, which is stated as normal, should be shown. It is also very difficult to compare the impact of experimental conditions impairing extrinsic cues (Figure 5-6), without a quantitative analysis of cardiac looping and of the patterns of left-transgenic markers. The authors should be careful when concluding that FGF-inhibition in vivo does not inhibit heart looping. They state that they “observed robust cardiac looping in the majority of hearts”, but actually the percentage of correct looping drops from 85% (17/20, Figure 5A) to 60% (12/20). No observation of the twist is provided in this condition. A caveat of explant experiments, is that the tissue may shrink and the orientation of the sample is lost. What are the parameters of the explanted tubes (pole distance, size), and which references are used to assess patterns? Thus, it is difficult to rule out extrinsic cues of heart looping.

4. The authors suggest discrepancies between oug and previously published hst mutants (Garrity et al. 2002, Camarata et al., 2010) with respect to AVC development. It is however not clear to what extent the perceived differences may just be due to differences in the use / interpretation of different markers. For example Tessadori et al. talk about “Increased expression for the AV endocardial markers”, which appears similar to Camarata et al. talking about “loss of AV boundary restriction” of AV marker genes. The authors should provide side-by-side comparisons of the appropriate in situs (has2, bmp4, tbx2b) in oug and hst backgrounds. This would be especially critical for tbx2b, given the genetic rescue experiments, and would facilitate follow-up studies that may use either mutant to further characterize the events reported here. How does the looping phenotype compare between the two mutants?

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.61733.sa1

Author response

Essential revisions:

1. The chamber movements are interesting new observations. Yet, their analysis is currently insufficient. Although images and cell tracking have been performed in 3D, it is unclear why the quantification is flattened in 2D. Angles are treated as linear values, whereas they should be treated as circular values (see statistical comments below).

In the revised version of the manuscript, we have extensively updated our analysis of the cardiomyocyte displacement. Following the reviewers’ comments, we have removed the original analysis done in 2D and present now 3D analysis and quantification of cardiomyocyte behavior.

The 3D analysis required an entirely different approach for which a detailed description can be found in the Supplementary Materials and methods. In short, we start by stabilizing the cell-tracking data in successive timepoints by removing movements due to sample drift and folding of the heart tube, then we calculate the rotation of each cell around computationally-defined axes in the ventricle and atrium.

To stabilize the data: first, we translate the positions of all cells by a vector equal to the positional difference of the AV canal’s centroid (average position of all AV canal cells) at successive time points, thus keeping the AV canal’s centroid at a fixed location over time. Second, we get two axes for each timepoint by connecting the centroid of each chamber to the centroid of the AV canal. Third, to remove displacement due to folding of these axes, we get the angle formed by the axes at a given time point to the axis at the initial reference timepoint. Finally, we use this angle to rotate each cell’s coordinates effectively “unbuckling” the heart tube computationally.

Third, after stabilization the remaining motion is either parallel to the respective heart chamber axis or perpendicular to it (the rotation we aim to quantify). Thus, we calculate the rotation of each cell as the angle subtended by the displacement perpendicular to the axis of the respective heart chamber. For the AV canal cells, we have used the axis of the ventricle. Finally, we calculate the angular velocity of a cell at one time point as the ratio between this angle and the time between successive measurements.

The advantage of calculating angular velocities is that their analysis does not require circular statistics (because angular velocities can take any value). We updated the supplementary section with a detailed description of this method (Supplementary Methods: Computational unfolding of the heart axis onto a straight reference axis), and included several explanatory figures where appropriate (e.g. Figure 2 panel I-I’’ in the main manuscript).

The results for these new calculations on the wild type embryos are described on page 7 of the revised manuscript and shown in Figure 2I-K. They further support the conclusion of the original manuscript that the atrium and ventricle rotate in opposite directions around the AV canal, which we refer to as twisting of the heart tube.

The results for these new calculations on the oug mutant embryos are described on pages 9-10 of the revised manuscript and shown in Figure 4H-I. From these calculations we conclude that there is a lack of twisting in the oug heart tube.

We now also calculated the twisting angle as the absolute difference between total rotation angles of the ventricle and the atrium from 28 to 38 hpf for hearts of wild type and oug embryos, which are plotted in Figure 4 panels J-L. This shows that while wild type hearts have an average twisting angle of 76.0° after 9 hours of time-lapse, this is significantly reduced to 34.1° in oug mutant hearts.

The avc is proposed to act as a "fixed hinge": how are cell traces/displacement vectors in this region?

In the revised version of the manuscript, we have added analysis of the angular velocity of all cardiomyocytes (see above). We analyzed the AV canal cells’ rotation, by calculating their motion with respect to the ventricle axis. In some replicates AV canal cells behave more similar to the ventricle while in others more similar to the atrium (Figure 2—figure supplement 2 and Figure 4—figure supplement 1). This behaviour is expected in light of their position between the atrium and ventricle segments. On average, AV canal cells do not show a rotational preference, as expected of a hinge-like region. For the calculation of the angle of displacement of cardiomyocytes in the ventricle and the atrium, we have used the center of mass of the ventricle or the atrium together with the center of mass of the AV canal to effectively draw a reference axis for each chamber that is articulate at the AV canal. Details of the calculations and results are now presented in the supplementary methods as also described in the response to essential revision 1.

In Figure 2, it seems that the movement in the ventricle is towards the posterior (or venous pole), rather than the left, and so why are the movements qualified as opposite, rather than perpendicular? In addition, vectors in the dorsal/left ventricle are not opposite, so the rationale of a rotation of the ventricle is unclear.

In this revised manuscript we have removed the description of the vector direction in the ventricle as we now have included the calculation of rotation around the central axis for both chambers. These calculations clearly demonstrate that taking as viewpoint the outflow of the heart tube ventricular cardiomyocytes display a clockwise (negative) rotation around the central axis, while atrial cardiomyocytes display a anti-clockwise (positive) rotation (shown in Figure 2J,K).

To support the claim that authors "map cardiomyocyte behavior during cardiac looping at a single-cell level", the movement of the overall chamber should be subtracted to the cell traces.

The current analysis pipeline for the angular velocity of the cardiomyocytes removes residual drift by subtracting the movement of the AV canal from all cell traces and stabilizes the heart axis – separately for atrium and ventricle – by subtracting the rotation of each chamber around the AV canal from all cell traces.

Z cell displacement in Figure 2K, 4J should be analysed in a more quantitative way (e.g. mean displacement index at the atrial/ventricular inner/outer curvature). This would allow to see whether the changes observed in oug mutants are significant.

The revised manuscript now presents analysis in 3D, so Z displacement is quantitatively analysed in all regions of the heart in the same manner as displacement in X and Y. As correctly pointed out by the reviewers, this was a shortcoming in the original version of the paper which we are confident is now addressed. These new analysis in 3D allowed the calculation of rotation of cardiomyocytes in the chambers around the central heart axis and subsequent twisting angle, which is significantly different in wild type and oug mutant hearts (Figure 2; Figure 4).

2. As the authors themselves mention in the discussion when comparing their results to Baker et al. 2008 (which used myl7:GFP), it is essential to establish which cells are actually labelled by a transgene. Given that previous studies (e.g. Figure 1D of de Campos-Baptista et al., 2008) have shown spaw to be expressed to the left of the cardiac primordium, rather than within the cmlc2-positive cardiac disc itself, a dorsal view of the 23 somite stage cardiac disc (e.g. spaw:GFP/myl7-RFP or GFP/cmlc2 two colour in situ) should be provided to clarify whether spaw:GFP and lft2:Gal4 transgenes are indeed specifically expressed in the left heart primordium.

Indeed, spaw is expressed in the left LPM and not in the cardiac disc. Spaw is a secreted protein and as such activates gene expression in neighboring tissues. For example, Spaw induces the expression of lefty2 in the left cardiac disc (e.g. Figure 1B of de Campos-Baptista et al., 2008 and Figure 2K and O of Noël et al. 2013 pmid:24212328). In the revised version of the manuscript, we have addressed the expression of the transgenes in the cardiac disc as follows:

– For the tg(0.2Intr1spaw:GFP) line: we have performed confocal imaging of the cardiac disc at 23 somite stages in Tg(myl7:GalFF:UAS:RFP; 0.2Intr1spaw:GFP) embryos. While all cardiac progenitors in the cardiac disc display RFP expression, only those located in the left side of the cardiac disc additionally express the GFP reporter. A representative picture of our observations has been added to the revised version of the manuscript as panel D in Figure 3—figure supplement 1.

– For the tg(lft2BAC:Gal4FF) line: due to the timing of expression of lft2 in the cardiac disc (expression starts at approximately 22 somites, just before the rapid start of the jogging process) and slow maturation time of the fluorescent protein, it is not possible to image the actual fluorescent protein reporter at the cardiac disc stage. Hence, we have carried out whole mount double-colour RNA ISH for myl7 and GFP on 23 somite tg(lft2BAC:Gal4FF; UAS:GFP) embryos. We have added a representative picture of the result of the ISH to the revised version of the manuscript as panels A and B in Figure 3—figure supplement 2. In the cardiac disc, GFP transcripts could only be detected on the left side, conforming to the lft2 expression pattern. Additional extracardiac GFP transcripts could also be detected at the midline, and are caused by residual Gal4FF-mediated activation of the UAS:GFP in this anatomical structure.

The staining of left transgenic markers is described as dorsal at 28hpf (text and Figure 3A), and ventral at 48hpf (text and Figure 3B): please explain whether this implies a 180 degree rotation or just a general flip of the heart relative to the embryo. It is unclear why spaw-GFP cells are located in the ventral part of oug mutant ventricles (Figure 4K, 8D): in wild-type animals left-originating cells give initially rise to the dorsal part of the ventricle. Through clockwise rotation of the outflow tract, these dorsal cells are then relocated to the outer curvature of the ventricle, as shown in Figure 3B. So if no rotation occurs in tbx5a/oug, why are spaw:GFP cells found in the ventral ventricle, rather than remaining in their initial dorsal position?

The description of the dorsal (at 28 hpf) and ventral (at 48 hpf) expression of the transgenes is due to a general flip of the heart with respect to the overall 3D geometry of the embryo and does not refer to any rotation of the heart tube. To better explain this flip we have added explanatory cartoons in Figure 2—figure supplement 1. When the heart tube is formed (between 22-28 hpf) the transgenes are expressed in the left side of the cardiac disc and form the dorsal side of the heart tube at 28 hpf due to invagination of the right side of the cardiac disc. Between 28 and 48 hpf the heart flips (venous pole moves from an anterior position to a more posterior position) and because of this flip the dorsal side of the heart tube at 28 hpf will become the ventral side at 48 hpf. Therefore, without any other rotation the tg(0.2Intr1spaw:GFP) cells are found in the ventral side of the heart tube in the oug/tbx5 mutant. In wild type embryos the rotation of the ventricle relocates the tg(0.2Intr1spaw:GFP) cells to the outer curvature.

What is the pattern of lft2BAC in oug mutants?

In the revised version of the manuscript, we have added representative imaging of tg(lft2BAC:Gal4FF); UAS:RFP; myl7:GFP in a oug mutant at 48 hpf as panel F in Figure 3—figure supplement 2. As can be appreciated, the left-originating cardiomyocytes are located in the ventral side of the almost linear heart tube and no such RFP+ cardiomyocyte can be observed at the outer curvature of the ventricle. This result is consistent with the observation of the tg(0.2Intr1spaw:GFP) in oug mutants (shown in Figure 3C).

The legend of Figure 9 reports "expansion of the space occupied by left-originating cardiomyocytes": what is the percentage of the VV, VD, AV, AD regions labelled at different stages and in different experimental conditions? What is the degree of rotation of the pattern and does it correspond to that measured by cell tracking?

We have amended the legend of Figure 9 and replaced "expansion of the space occupied by left-originating cardiomyocytes" by “disposition” as our observations do not allow us to reach the conclusion that there is expansion (ie increase of the occupied space) of the left-originating myocardium.

To answer the second part of the reviewers’ question, we calculated the twisting angle on the dataset originally used in Figure 7C,D and present these results in Author response image 1. Here we took transversal sections at the level of the AVC including both the ventricle and atrium (dashed line in A and B), of double-labeled WT (A) and oug (B) hearts. On these sections we measured values L₁ and L₂, which correspond respectively to the perimeter of the heart (L₁, myl7 transgenic) and the length occupied by left-originating cardiomyocytes (L₂, 0.2IntrSpaw transgenic). The quotient L₂/L₁ gives the relative fraction of left-originating cardiomyocytes and this is then converted in fraction of a complete quadrant (360°), to which the heart section is assimilated. Since at the start of heart looping, left-originating cells occupy exactly half of such a quadrant (see Figure 2A’); i.e. 180°, this value is subtracted. The resulting angular value represents the rotation of the pattern in both the ventricle and the atrium, which we refer to as twisting angle (C). Quantification of the twisting angle for wild type (n=4) and oug mutants (n=4) is presented in D and shows a significantly higher value for WT (approx. 47°) than for oug (approx. 9°). These results are in good agreement with the new calculations based on the cell tracking.

Author response image 1

Download asset Open asset

Measurement of the twisting angle.

Transversal sections of WT (A) and *oug* (B) are used to calculate the twisting angle θ as explained in (C). For clarity, transversal sections of the heart are assimilated to a perfect ellipsoid. Quantification and statistical comparison of the measured twisting angles for the two genotypes is presented in (D). Horizontal bars: Mean +/- SEM. Statistical test: Student’s t test; **: p=0.0068.

Are markers of the inner/outer curvature (ex nppa) also rotating?

We were not able to answer this question as we lack reliable markers for these regions. We analyzed nppa expression by ISH and with a BAC transgenic line generated in our laboratory (Honkoop et al.; PMID: 31868166). In our results (Figure 1H, Figure 8B and Figure S8), we mostly observe expression of nppa in the entire ventricle. In the atrium, nppa expression appears more restricted to the outer curvature but its expression is too weak to reliably use it as an outer curvature marker.

3. In their characterization of tbx5a/oug mutants, the authors state that cardiac looping is “defective”, but a precise description of the actual type of defect is lacking. From the picture in Figure 1C it looks as if looping occurs still in the right direction, but with reduced amplitude. Is this the only type of defect observed, or are there others (e.g. absent or inverted looping)? Numbers should be included to substantiate these claims. Jogging in oug mutants, which is stated as normal, should be shown.

Following the reviewers’ comments, we have expanded and improved our characterization of the cardiac phenotype of tbx5a/oug mutants. As can be seen in Figure S1 in tbx5a/oug mutants cardiac looping can be described as in the “correct” direction but with reduced amplitude. No inversion or absence of cardiac looping was observed in oug/tbx5 mutants. As suggested we have also added numbers to the panels in Figure 1C.

We have also added panels (including numbers) illustrating our analysis of cardiac jogging in tbx5a/oug mutants, which is not affected (Figure 1C in revised version). This is in line with the observation of normal left-right patterning in oug/tbx5a mutants.

It is also very difficult to compare the impact of experimental conditions impairing extrinsic cues (Figure 5-6), without a quantitative analysis of cardiac looping and of the patterns of left-transgenic markers. The authors should be careful when concluding that FGF-inhibition in vivo does not inhibit heart looping. They state that they “observed robust cardiac looping in the majority of hearts”, but actually the percentage of correct looping drops from 85% (17/20, Figure 5A) to 60% (12/20). No observation of the twist is provided in this condition.

To address the reviewers’ comments, we have carried out several additional experiments, the results of which are described below and reported in the revised Figure 5 and Figure 5—figure supplement 1.

– Cardiomyocyte counting at 48 hpf was carried out to confirm the effectiveness of SU5402 treatment. The results are presented in Figure S7.

– To address twisting of the heart tube, Imaging of Tg(myl7:GalFF:UAS:RFP; 0.2Intr1spaw:GFP) hearts after treatment with DMSO or SU5402 was carried out. Basing ourselves on the results (Figure 5A), we conclude that twisting still occurs after SU5402 treatment.

– To provide a better quantification of looping we measured the looping angle in SU5402-treated embryos as originally done in Figure 8. Results are shown in (Figure 5B) and statistical testing revealed no significant differences in looping angle between DMSO and SU5402 treated hearts. We removed the more qualitative descriptions of “correct” heart looping in DMSO and SU5402 treated embryos from the manuscript.

The results of the above-mentioned new experiments expand and confirm our initial conclusion that FGF inhibition does not significantly impact the intrinsic ability of the heart tube to loop.

A caveat of explant experiments, is that the tissue may shrink and the orientation of the sample is lost. What are the parameters of the explanted tubes (pole distance, size), and which references are used to assess patterns? Thus, it is difficult to rule out extrinsic cues of heart looping.

We understand the concerns of the reviewers, and we do not rule out all extrinsic cues of heart looping. Our analysis and conclusion are restricted to the cell addition from the SHF, for which we find no evidence that this contributes to heart looping in zebrafish embryos. We are confident that the experiments allow us to reach the current conclusions, for a number of reasons:

– Once explanted, the heart tubes are placed in liquid culture medium without any shaking or gradient of any kind (as described in Noël et al., 2013 PMID: 24212328).

– Tissue shrinking is minimal, if present, as indicated by the scale bars added in the revised version of the manuscript (compare with “normal” 48 hpf hearts).

– The explanted hearts are derived from tg(lft2BAC:Gal4FF; UAS:RFP; myl7:GFP) embryos that completed left cardiac jogging. Hence the transgenes are used to relate the hearts to their original orientation in the embryo.

Based on these results and on the SU5402 treatments we conclude that addition of cells from the second heart field is not essential for heart looping morphogenesis of the zebrafish heart. The revised manuscript has been modified accordingly.

4. The authors suggest discrepancies between oug and previously published hst mutants (Garrity et al. 2002, Camarata et al., 2010) with respect to AVC development. It is however not clear to what extent the perceived differences may just be due to differences in the use / interpretation of different markers. For example Tessadori et al. talk about “Increased expression for the AV endocardial markers”, which appears similar to Camarata et al. talking about “loss of AV boundary restriction” of AV marker genes. The authors should provide side-by-side comparisons of the appropriate in situs (has2, bmp4, tbx2b) in oug and hst backgrounds. This would be especially critical for tbx2b, given the genetic rescue experiments, and would facilitate follow-up studies that may use either mutant to further characterize the events reported here.

The main difference we describe between the hst/tbx5a allele and the oug/tbx5a allele is related to the reported lack of tbx2b expression in the AVC of hst/tbx5a mutants and the expansion of tbx2b expression in the oug/tbx5a mutants. We agree with the reviewers that it is hard to make conclusions without a side-by-side comparison of the two different mutant alleles for tbx5a. Therefore, we have now performed RNA ISH in hst embryos for has2, bmp4 and tbx2b and show the results side-by-side to the results on oug/tbx5a (Figure 1H). In contrast to the reported lack of tbx2b expression by Camarata et al., we observed some expression of tbx2b in the AVC of hst/tbx5a mutant embryos, however this expression was strongly reduced compared to wild type and oug/tbx5a mutant hearts. Based on these results we conclude that hst and oug have different effects on tbx2b expression in the AVC. We have adjusted the text in the Results section which now reads:

“As tbx5a is expressed throughout the myocardium (Figure 1H,I), where it regulates patterning of the heart in chamber (working) and AV canal (non-working) myocardium we performed in situ hybridization (ISH) using markers for the AV canal and chamber myocardium. […] In accordance with our observations on the AV canal myocardium, we also detected increased expression of the AV endocardial markers has2 and versican (Figure 1H). ”

How does the looping phenotype compare between the two mutants?

We find that the looping phenotype is more homogeneous in oug than it is in hst. To substantiate this observation, we have provided in Figure 1—figure supplement 1 side-by-side comparison of a number of representative myl7 ISH pictures for 2dpf hearts in oug and hst. While for oug we consistently observe very reduced dextral looping, for hst the spectrum of observed phenotype is much broader, ranging from almost wt-like robust dextral looping to moderate sinistral looping. This result is consistent with our conclusion that hst and oug have different effects on Tbx5 activity.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.61733.sa2

Article and author information

Author details

Federico Tessadori

Hubrecht Institute-KNAW and University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands

Contribution
Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Supervision, Validation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing - original draft

For correspondence
f.tessadori@hubrecht.eu

Competing interests
No competing interests declared

"This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9975-0546
Erika Tsingos

Mathematical Institute, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands

Contribution
Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing - review and editing

Competing interests
No competing interests declared

"This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7267-160X
Enrico Sandro Colizzi
1. Mathematical Institute, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
2. Origins Center, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
Contribution
Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing - review and editing

Competing interests
No competing interests declared

"This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1709-4499
Fabian Kruse

Hubrecht Institute-KNAW and University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands

Contribution
Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation

Competing interests
No competing interests declared
Susanne C van den Brink

Hubrecht Institute-KNAW and University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands

Contribution
Formal analysis, Investigation

Competing interests
No competing interests declared

"This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3683-7737
Malou van den Boogaard

Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Biology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Contribution
Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing - original draft

Competing interests
No competing interests declared
Vincent M Christoffels

Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Biology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Contribution
Supervision, Funding acquisition

Competing interests
No competing interests declared

"This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4131-2636
Roeland MH Merks
1. Mathematical Institute, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
2. Origins Center, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
3. Institute of Biology, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
Contribution
Conceptualization, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Writing - review and editing

Competing interests
No competing interests declared
Jeroen Bakkers
1. Hubrecht Institute-KNAW and University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
2. Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Division of Pediatrics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
Contribution
Conceptualization, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Writing - original draft

For correspondence
j.bakkers@hubrecht.eu

Competing interests
No competing interests declared

"This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9418-0422

Funding

Hartstichting (CVON2014-18CONCOR-GENES)

Vincent M Christoffels
Jeroen Bakkers

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO/ENW-VICI 865.17.004)

Roeland MH Merks

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Nederlandse Wetenschapsagenda Startimpuls)

Enrico Sandro Colizzi

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Anko de Graaff (Hubrecht Imaging Center) for assistance with microscopic imaging, Phong Nguyen (Hubrecht Institute) for carrying out the ISH cryosections and critically reading the manuscript and Hessel Honkoop (Hubrecht Institute) for critically reading the manuscript. Funding: The authors wish to acknowledge the support from the Dutch Heart Foundation grant CVON2014-18CONCOR-GENES to JB and VMC, support from the Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Nederlandse Wetenschapsagenda Startimpuls) to ESC and Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek grant NWO/ENW-VICI 865.17.004 to RMHM.

Senior Editor

Didier YR Stainier, Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Germany

Reviewing Editor

Sigolène M Meilhac, Imagine-Institut Pasteur, France

Reviewer

Maximilian Furthauer

Publication history

Received: August 6, 2020
Accepted: June 24, 2021
Version of Record published: August 10, 2021 (version 1)
Version of Record updated: September 15, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.