Real-time, low-latency closed-loop feedback using markerless posture tracking

  1. Gary A Kane
  2. Gonçalo Lopes
  3. Jonny L Sanders
  4. Alexander Mathis
  5. Mackenzie Mathis  Is a corresponding author
  1. Princeton University, United States
  2. NeuroGears, United Kingdom
  3. University of Oregon, United States
  4. EPFL, Switzerland

Abstract

The ability to control a behavioral task or stimulate neural activity based on animal behavior in real-time is an important tool for experimental neuroscientists. Ideally, such tools are noninvasive, low-latency, and provide interfaces to trigger external hardware based on posture. Recent advances in pose estimation with deep learning allows researchers to train deep neural networks to accurately quantify a wide variety of animal behaviors. Here we provide a new DeepLabCut-Live! package that achieves low-latency real-time pose estimation (within 15 ms, >100 FPS), with an additional forward-prediction module that achieves zero-latency feedback, and a dynamic-cropping mode that allows for higher inference speeds. We also provide three options for using this tool with ease: (1) a stand-alone GUI (called DLC-Live! GUI, and integration into (2) Bonsai and (3) AutoPilot. Lastly, we benchmarked performance on a wide range of systems so that experimentalists can easily decide what hardware is required for their needs.

Data availability

All models, data, test scripts and software is already released and made freely available: DLClive.deeplabcut.org

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Gary A Kane

    Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7703-5055
  2. Gonçalo Lopes

    NeuroGears, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0731-4945
  3. Jonny L Sanders

    Institute of Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Alexander Mathis

    Life Sciences, EPFL, Geneva, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3777-2202
  5. Mackenzie Mathis

    Brain Mind Institute, EPFL, Genève, Switzerland
    For correspondence
    mackenzie.mathis@epfl.ch
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7368-4456

Funding

Chan Zuckerberg Initiative (EOSS)

  • Alexander Mathis
  • Mackenzie Mathis

National Science Foundation (1309047)

  • Jonny L Sanders

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All mouse work was carried out under the permission of the IACUC at Harvard University (#17-07-309). Dog videos and feedback was exempt from IACUC approval (with conformation with IACUC).

Copyright

© 2020, Kane et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 13,745
    views
  • 1,462
    downloads
  • 107
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Gary A Kane
  2. Gonçalo Lopes
  3. Jonny L Sanders
  4. Alexander Mathis
  5. Mackenzie Mathis
(2020)
Real-time, low-latency closed-loop feedback using markerless posture tracking
eLife 9:e61909.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.61909

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.61909