The connectome of the adult Drosophila mushroom body provides insights into function

  1. Feng Li  Is a corresponding author
  2. Jack W Lindsey
  3. Elizabeth C Marin
  4. Nils Otto
  5. Marisa Dreher
  6. Georgia Dempsey
  7. Ildiko Stark
  8. Alexander S Bates
  9. Markus William Pleijzier
  10. Philipp Schlegel
  11. Aljoscha Nern
  12. Shin-ya Takemura
  13. Nils Eckstein
  14. Tansy Yang
  15. Audrey Francis
  16. Amalia Braun
  17. Ruchi Parekh
  18. Marta Costa
  19. Louis K Scheffer
  20. Yoshinori Aso
  21. Gregory SXE Jefferis
  22. Larry F Abbott
  23. Ashok Litwin-Kumar
  24. Scott Waddell
  25. Gerald M Rubin  Is a corresponding author
  1. Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, United States
  2. Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University, Zuckerman Institute, United States
  3. Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
  4. Centre for Neural Circuits & Behaviour, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
  5. Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, United Kingdom

Decision letter

  1. Leslie C Griffith
    Reviewing Editor; Brandeis University, United States
  2. Eve Marder
    Senior Editor; Brandeis University, United States
  3. Leslie C Griffith
    Reviewer; Brandeis University, United States
  4. Jason Pipkin
    Reviewer; Brandeis University, United States
  5. Chris Q Doe
    Reviewer; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Oregon, United States

In the interests of transparency, eLife publishes the most substantive revision requests and the accompanying author responses.

Acceptance summary:

The Drosophila hemibrain connectome is a resource that will be important for pushing forward our understanding of circuits in general. This paper is a data-rich contribution which shows how thoughtful questions can be put to this type of complicated data set. The results, which include detailed analyses of known cell types and identification of previously unknown cell types, are quite exciting and will generate a lot of new ideas/hypotheses in the community.

Decision letter after peer review:

Thank you for submitting your article "The connectome of the adult Drosophila mushroom body: implications for function" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by three peer reviewers, including Leslie C Griffith as the Reviewing Editor and Reviewer #1, and the evaluation has been overseen by Eve Marder as the Senior Editor. The following individuals involved in review of your submission have agreed to reveal their identity: Jason Pipkin (Reviewer #2); Chris Q Doe (Reviewer #3).

The reviewers have discussed the reviews with one another and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this decision to help you prepare a revised submission.

We would like to draw your attention to changes in our revision policy that we have made in response to COVID-19 (https://elifesciences.org/articles/57162). Specifically, we are asking editors to accept without delay manuscripts, like yours, that they judge can stand as eLife papers without additional data, even if they feel that they would make the manuscript stronger. Thus the revisions requested below only address clarity and presentation.

Summary:

The Drosophila hemi brain EM reconstruction is an important resource for the fly community. This paper demonstrates how thoughtful, but broad, questions can be put to such a data set. Some of the analyses presented put details onto general concepts that were already out there in the field, but there is also a wealth of real discovery here that is going to catalyze new ways of looking at mushroom body function in the context of the rest of the brain. This is the most comprehensive mushroom body paper ever written and fully realizes the utility of connectomics.

Essential revisions:

The only concern the reviewers had was around the use of synapse number thresholds. It would be useful for the reader to have a bit more insight into why particular thresholds were chosen and what the impact of better resolution (i.e. more synapses) will have on conclusions since the Janelia team notes that the true count of synapses they've identified is likely to be an underestimate.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.62576.sa1

Author response

Essential revisions:

The only concern the reviewers had was around the use of synapse number thresholds. It would be useful for the reader to have a bit more insight into why particular thresholds were chosen and what the impact of better resolution (i.e. more synapses) will have on conclusions since the Janelia team notes that the true count of synapses they've identified is likely to be an underestimate.

Thresholds were chosen to make the graphs and figures show the strongest connections.

We added text to provide additional information about thresholds in two places in the manuscript:

1) In the first place we mention threshold (Introduction) we describe what a threshold is and why we use them.

2) In the Discussion we added a paragraph to describe the utility and limitations of thresholds and the assumptions we make when using them.

We also added a new figure supplement (Figure 6—figure supplement 3) that illustrates the effect of choosing different thresholds on the fraction of synapses retained for MBON outputs and DAN inputs.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.62576.sa2

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Feng Li
  2. Jack W Lindsey
  3. Elizabeth C Marin
  4. Nils Otto
  5. Marisa Dreher
  6. Georgia Dempsey
  7. Ildiko Stark
  8. Alexander S Bates
  9. Markus William Pleijzier
  10. Philipp Schlegel
  11. Aljoscha Nern
  12. Shin-ya Takemura
  13. Nils Eckstein
  14. Tansy Yang
  15. Audrey Francis
  16. Amalia Braun
  17. Ruchi Parekh
  18. Marta Costa
  19. Louis K Scheffer
  20. Yoshinori Aso
  21. Gregory SXE Jefferis
  22. Larry F Abbott
  23. Ashok Litwin-Kumar
  24. Scott Waddell
  25. Gerald M Rubin
(2020)
The connectome of the adult Drosophila mushroom body provides insights into function
eLife 9:e62576.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.62576

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.62576