Hyaluronic acid fuels pancreatic cancer cell growth

  1. Peter K Kim
  2. Christopher J Halbrook
  3. Samuel A Kerk
  4. Megan Radyk
  5. Stephanie Wisner
  6. Daniel M Kremer
  7. Peter Sajjakulnukit
  8. Anthony Andren
  9. Sean W Hou
  10. Ayush Trivedi
  11. Galloway Thurston
  12. Abhinav Anand
  13. Liang Yan
  14. Lucia Salamanca-Cardona
  15. Samuel D Welling
  16. Li Zhang
  17. Matthew R Pratt
  18. Kayvan R Keshari
  19. Haoqiang Ying
  20. Costas Lyssiotis  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Michigan, United States
  2. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
  3. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
  4. University of Southern California, United States

Abstract

Rewired metabolism is a hallmark of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDA). Previously, we demonstrated that PDA cells enhance glycosylation precursor biogenesis through the hexosamine biosynthetic pathway (HBP) via activation of the rate limiting enzyme, glutamine-fructose 6-phosphate amidotransferase 1 (GFAT1). Here, we genetically ablated GFAT1 in human PDA cell lines, which completely blocked proliferation in vitro and led to cell death. In contrast, GFAT1 knockout did not preclude the growth of human tumor xenografts in mice, suggesting that cancer cells can maintain fidelity of glycosylation precursor pools by scavenging nutrients from the tumor microenvironment. We found that hyaluronic acid (HA), an abundant carbohydrate polymer in pancreatic tumors composed of repeating N-acetyl-glucosamine (GlcNAc) and glucuronic acid sugars, can bypass GFAT1 to refuel the HBP via the GlcNAc salvage pathway. Together, these data show HA can serve as a nutrient fueling PDA metabolism beyond its previously appreciated structural and signaling roles.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting file; raw images have been provided for all western blots in the Source Data file.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Peter K Kim

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9382-7223
  2. Christopher J Halbrook

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Samuel A Kerk

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Megan Radyk

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Stephanie Wisner

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Daniel M Kremer

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Peter Sajjakulnukit

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Anthony Andren

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Sean W Hou

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Ayush Trivedi

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Galloway Thurston

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Abhinav Anand

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Liang Yan

    Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Lucia Salamanca-Cardona

    Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. Samuel D Welling

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  16. Li Zhang

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  17. Matthew R Pratt

    Department of Chemistry, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3205-5615
  18. Kayvan R Keshari

    Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  19. Haoqiang Ying

    Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  20. Costas Lyssiotis

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    For correspondence
    clyssiot@med.umich.edu
    Competing interests
    Costas Lyssiotis, has received consulting fees from Astellas Pharmaceuticals and Odyssey Therapeutics and is an inventor on patents pertaining to Kras regulated metabolic pathways, redox control pathways in pancreatic cancer, and targeting the GOT1-pathway as a therapeutic approach (US Patent No: 2015126580-A1, 05/07/2015; US Patent No: 20190136238, 05/09/2019; International Patent No: WO2013177426-A2, 04/23/2015)..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9309-6141

Funding

National Cancer Institute (Cancer Biology Training Grant,T32AI007413)

  • Peter K Kim
  • Samuel A Kerk

Thompson Family Foundation (Research Grant)

  • Kayvan R Keshari

STARR Cancer Consortium (Research Grant)

  • Kayvan R Keshari

National Cancer Institute (Cancer Center Support Grant,P30CA008748)

  • Kayvan R Keshari

American Association for Cancer Research (Pathway to Leadership award,13-70-25-LYSS)

  • Costas Lyssiotis

V Foundation for Cancer Research (Junior Scholar Award,V2016-009)

  • Costas Lyssiotis

Sidney Kimmel Foundation (Kimmel Scholar Award,SKF-16-005)

  • Costas Lyssiotis

American Association for Cancer Research (NextGen Grant for Transformative Cancer Research,17-20-01-LYSS)

  • Costas Lyssiotis

National Cancer Institute (Cancer Center Support Grant,P30 CA046592)

  • Costas Lyssiotis

National Cancer Institute (R37CA237421)

  • Costas Lyssiotis

National Cancer Institute (R01CA248160)

  • Costas Lyssiotis

National Cancer Institute (Predoctoral Fellowship,F31CA243344)

  • Peter K Kim

National Cancer Institute (R01CA244931)

  • Costas Lyssiotis

National Institutes of Health (U24DK097153)

  • Costas Lyssiotis

Charles Woodson Research Fund (Research Support)

  • Costas Lyssiotis

UM Pediatric Brain Tumor Initiative (Research Support)

  • Costas Lyssiotis

National Cancer Institute (F99/K00CA264414)

  • Samuel A Kerk

National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (T32HD007505)

  • Megan Radyk

National Cancer Institute (Pathway to Independence Award,K99CA241357)

  • Christopher J Halbrook

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (Postdoctoral Support,P30DK034933)

  • Christopher J Halbrook

National Cancer Institute (F31CA24745701)

  • Samuel A Kerk

National Cancer Institute (R01CA237466)

  • Kayvan R Keshari

National Cancer Institute (R01CA252037)

  • Kayvan R Keshari

National Cancer Institute (R21CA212958)

  • Kayvan R Keshari

Stand Up To Cancer (Research Grant)

  • Kayvan R Keshari

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Lydia W S Finley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees of the University of Michigan. Protocol#: PRO00008877

Version history

  1. Received: September 1, 2020
  2. Accepted: December 21, 2021
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: December 24, 2021 (version 1)
  4. Accepted Manuscript updated: December 29, 2021 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record published: January 5, 2022 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2021, Kim et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 8,654
    views
  • 867
    downloads
  • 44
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Peter K Kim
  2. Christopher J Halbrook
  3. Samuel A Kerk
  4. Megan Radyk
  5. Stephanie Wisner
  6. Daniel M Kremer
  7. Peter Sajjakulnukit
  8. Anthony Andren
  9. Sean W Hou
  10. Ayush Trivedi
  11. Galloway Thurston
  12. Abhinav Anand
  13. Liang Yan
  14. Lucia Salamanca-Cardona
  15. Samuel D Welling
  16. Li Zhang
  17. Matthew R Pratt
  18. Kayvan R Keshari
  19. Haoqiang Ying
  20. Costas Lyssiotis
(2021)
Hyaluronic acid fuels pancreatic cancer cell growth
eLife 10:e62645.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.62645

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.62645

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    Célia Guérin, David Tulasne
    Review Article

    Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) directed against MET have been recently approved to treat advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harbouring activating MET mutations. This success is the consequence of a long characterization of MET mutations in cancers, which we propose to outline in this review. MET, a receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK), displays in a broad panel of cancers many deregulations liable to promote tumour progression. The first MET mutation was discovered in 1997, in hereditary papillary renal cancer (HPRC), providing the first direct link between MET mutations and cancer development. As in other RTKs, these mutations are located in the kinase domain, leading in most cases to ligand-independent MET activation. In 2014, novel MET mutations were identified in several advanced cancers, including lung cancers. These mutations alter splice sites of exon 14, causing in-frame exon 14 skipping and deletion of a regulatory domain. Because these mutations are not located in the kinase domain, they are original and their mode of action has yet to be fully elucidated. Less than five years after the discovery of such mutations, the efficacy of a MET TKI was evidenced in NSCLC patients displaying MET exon 14 skipping. Yet its use led to a resistance mechanism involving acquisition of novel and already characterized MET mutations. Furthermore, novel somatic MET mutations are constantly being discovered. The challenge is no longer to identify them but to characterize them in order to predict their transforming activity and their sensitivity or resistance to MET TKIs, in order to adapt treatment.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Kevin Nuno, Armon Azizi ... Ravindra Majeti
    Research Article

    Relapse of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is highly aggressive and often treatment refractory. We analyzed previously published AML relapse cohorts and found that 40% of relapses occur without changes in driver mutations, suggesting that non-genetic mechanisms drive relapse in a large proportion of cases. We therefore characterized epigenetic patterns of AML relapse using 26 matched diagnosis-relapse samples with ATAC-seq. This analysis identified a relapse-specific chromatin accessibility signature for mutationally stable AML, suggesting that AML undergoes epigenetic evolution at relapse independent of mutational changes. Analysis of leukemia stem cell (LSC) chromatin changes at relapse indicated that this leukemic compartment underwent significantly less epigenetic evolution than non-LSCs, while epigenetic changes in non-LSCs reflected overall evolution of the bulk leukemia. Finally, we used single-cell ATAC-seq paired with mitochondrial sequencing (mtscATAC) to map clones from diagnosis into relapse along with their epigenetic features. We found that distinct mitochondrially-defined clones exhibit more similar chromatin accessibility at relapse relative to diagnosis, demonstrating convergent epigenetic evolution in relapsed AML. These results demonstrate that epigenetic evolution is a feature of relapsed AML and that convergent epigenetic evolution can occur following treatment with induction chemotherapy.