Hyaluronic acid fuels pancreatic cancer cell growth

  1. Peter K Kim
  2. Christopher J Halbrook
  3. Samuel A Kerk
  4. Megan Radyk
  5. Stephanie Wisner
  6. Daniel M Kremer
  7. Peter Sajjakulnukit
  8. Anthony Andren
  9. Sean W Hou
  10. Ayush Trivedi
  11. Galloway Thurston
  12. Abhinav Anand
  13. Liang Yan
  14. Lucia Salamanca-Cardona
  15. Samuel D Welling
  16. Li Zhang
  17. Matthew R Pratt
  18. Kayvan R Keshari
  19. Haoqiang Ying
  20. Costas Lyssiotis  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Michigan, United States
  2. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
  3. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
  4. University of Southern California, United States

Abstract

Rewired metabolism is a hallmark of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDA). Previously, we demonstrated that PDA cells enhance glycosylation precursor biogenesis through the hexosamine biosynthetic pathway (HBP) via activation of the rate limiting enzyme, glutamine-fructose 6-phosphate amidotransferase 1 (GFAT1). Here, we genetically ablated GFAT1 in human PDA cell lines, which completely blocked proliferation in vitro and led to cell death. In contrast, GFAT1 knockout did not preclude the growth of human tumor xenografts in mice, suggesting that cancer cells can maintain fidelity of glycosylation precursor pools by scavenging nutrients from the tumor microenvironment. We found that hyaluronic acid (HA), an abundant carbohydrate polymer in pancreatic tumors composed of repeating N-acetyl-glucosamine (GlcNAc) and glucuronic acid sugars, can bypass GFAT1 to refuel the HBP via the GlcNAc salvage pathway. Together, these data show HA can serve as a nutrient fueling PDA metabolism beyond its previously appreciated structural and signaling roles.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting file; raw images have been provided for all western blots in the Source Data file.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Peter K Kim

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9382-7223
  2. Christopher J Halbrook

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Samuel A Kerk

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Megan Radyk

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Stephanie Wisner

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Daniel M Kremer

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Peter Sajjakulnukit

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Anthony Andren

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Sean W Hou

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Ayush Trivedi

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Galloway Thurston

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Abhinav Anand

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Liang Yan

    Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Lucia Salamanca-Cardona

    Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. Samuel D Welling

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  16. Li Zhang

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  17. Matthew R Pratt

    Department of Chemistry, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3205-5615
  18. Kayvan R Keshari

    Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  19. Haoqiang Ying

    Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  20. Costas Lyssiotis

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    For correspondence
    clyssiot@med.umich.edu
    Competing interests
    Costas Lyssiotis, has received consulting fees from Astellas Pharmaceuticals and Odyssey Therapeutics and is an inventor on patents pertaining to Kras regulated metabolic pathways, redox control pathways in pancreatic cancer, and targeting the GOT1-pathway as a therapeutic approach (US Patent No: 2015126580-A1, 05/07/2015; US Patent No: 20190136238, 05/09/2019; International Patent No: WO2013177426-A2, 04/23/2015)..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9309-6141

Funding

National Cancer Institute (Cancer Biology Training Grant,T32AI007413)

  • Peter K Kim
  • Samuel A Kerk

Thompson Family Foundation (Research Grant)

  • Kayvan R Keshari

STARR Cancer Consortium (Research Grant)

  • Kayvan R Keshari

National Cancer Institute (Cancer Center Support Grant,P30CA008748)

  • Kayvan R Keshari

American Association for Cancer Research (Pathway to Leadership award,13-70-25-LYSS)

  • Costas Lyssiotis

V Foundation for Cancer Research (Junior Scholar Award,V2016-009)

  • Costas Lyssiotis

Sidney Kimmel Foundation (Kimmel Scholar Award,SKF-16-005)

  • Costas Lyssiotis

American Association for Cancer Research (NextGen Grant for Transformative Cancer Research,17-20-01-LYSS)

  • Costas Lyssiotis

National Cancer Institute (Cancer Center Support Grant,P30 CA046592)

  • Costas Lyssiotis

National Cancer Institute (R37CA237421)

  • Costas Lyssiotis

National Cancer Institute (R01CA248160)

  • Costas Lyssiotis

National Cancer Institute (Predoctoral Fellowship,F31CA243344)

  • Peter K Kim

National Cancer Institute (R01CA244931)

  • Costas Lyssiotis

National Institutes of Health (U24DK097153)

  • Costas Lyssiotis

Charles Woodson Research Fund (Research Support)

  • Costas Lyssiotis

UM Pediatric Brain Tumor Initiative (Research Support)

  • Costas Lyssiotis

National Cancer Institute (F99/K00CA264414)

  • Samuel A Kerk

National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (T32HD007505)

  • Megan Radyk

National Cancer Institute (Pathway to Independence Award,K99CA241357)

  • Christopher J Halbrook

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (Postdoctoral Support,P30DK034933)

  • Christopher J Halbrook

National Cancer Institute (F31CA24745701)

  • Samuel A Kerk

National Cancer Institute (R01CA237466)

  • Kayvan R Keshari

National Cancer Institute (R01CA252037)

  • Kayvan R Keshari

National Cancer Institute (R21CA212958)

  • Kayvan R Keshari

Stand Up To Cancer (Research Grant)

  • Kayvan R Keshari

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees of the University of Michigan. Protocol#: PRO00008877

Copyright

© 2021, Kim et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 9,663
    views
  • 955
    downloads
  • 67
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Peter K Kim
  2. Christopher J Halbrook
  3. Samuel A Kerk
  4. Megan Radyk
  5. Stephanie Wisner
  6. Daniel M Kremer
  7. Peter Sajjakulnukit
  8. Anthony Andren
  9. Sean W Hou
  10. Ayush Trivedi
  11. Galloway Thurston
  12. Abhinav Anand
  13. Liang Yan
  14. Lucia Salamanca-Cardona
  15. Samuel D Welling
  16. Li Zhang
  17. Matthew R Pratt
  18. Kayvan R Keshari
  19. Haoqiang Ying
  20. Costas Lyssiotis
(2021)
Hyaluronic acid fuels pancreatic cancer cell growth
eLife 10:e62645.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.62645

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.62645

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Immunology and Inflammation
    Sofia V Krasik, Ekaterina A Bryushkova ... Ekaterina O Serebrovskaya
    Research Article

    The current understanding of humoral immune response in cancer patients suggests that tumors may be infiltrated with diffuse B cells of extra-tumoral origin or may develop organized lymphoid structures, where somatic hypermutation and antigen-driven selection occur locally. These processes are believed to be significantly influenced by the tumor microenvironment through secretory factors and biased cell-cell interactions. To explore the manifestation of this influence, we used deep unbiased immunoglobulin profiling and systematically characterized the relationships between B cells in circulation, draining lymph nodes (draining LNs), and tumors in 14 patients with three human cancers. We demonstrated that draining LNs are differentially involved in the interaction with the tumor site, and that significant heterogeneity exists even between different parts of a single lymph node (LN). Next, we confirmed and elaborated upon previous observations regarding intratumoral immunoglobulin heterogeneity. We identified B cell receptor (BCR) clonotypes that were expanded in tumors relative to draining LNs and blood and observed that these tumor-expanded clonotypes were less hypermutated than non-expanded (ubiquitous) clonotypes. Furthermore, we observed a shift in the properties of complementarity-determining region 3 of the BCR heavy chain (CDR-H3) towards less mature and less specific BCR repertoire in tumor-infiltrating B-cells compared to circulating B-cells, which may indicate less stringent control for antibody-producing B cell development in tumor microenvironment (TME). In addition, we found repertoire-level evidence that B-cells may be selected according to their CDR-H3 physicochemical properties before they activate somatic hypermutation (SHM). Altogether, our work outlines a broad picture of the differences in the tumor BCR repertoire relative to non-tumor tissues and points to the unexpected features of the SHM process.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Computational and Systems Biology
    Rosalyn W Sayaman, Masaru Miyano ... Mark A LaBarge
    Research Article Updated

    Effects from aging in single cells are heterogenous, whereas at the organ- and tissue-levels aging phenotypes tend to appear as stereotypical changes. The mammary epithelium is a bilayer of two major phenotypically and functionally distinct cell lineages: luminal epithelial and myoepithelial cells. Mammary luminal epithelia exhibit substantial stereotypical changes with age that merit attention because these cells are the putative cells-of-origin for breast cancers. We hypothesize that effects from aging that impinge upon maintenance of lineage fidelity increase susceptibility to cancer initiation. We generated and analyzed transcriptomes from primary luminal epithelial and myoepithelial cells from younger <30 (y)ears old and older >55 y women. In addition to age-dependent directional changes in gene expression, we observed increased transcriptional variance with age that contributed to genome-wide loss of lineage fidelity. Age-dependent variant responses were common to both lineages, whereas directional changes were almost exclusively detected in luminal epithelia and involved altered regulation of chromatin and genome organizers such as SATB1. Epithelial expression variance of gap junction protein GJB6 increased with age, and modulation of GJB6 expression in heterochronous co-cultures revealed that it provided a communication conduit from myoepithelial cells that drove directional change in luminal cells. Age-dependent luminal transcriptomes comprised a prominent signal that could be detected in bulk tissue during aging and transition into cancers. A machine learning classifier based on luminal-specific aging distinguished normal from cancer tissue and was highly predictive of breast cancer subtype. We speculate that luminal epithelia are the ultimate site of integration of the variant responses to aging in their surrounding tissue, and that their emergent phenotype both endows cells with the ability to become cancer-cells-of-origin and represents a biosensor that presages cancer susceptibility.