1. Cancer Biology

Hyaluronic acid fuels pancreatic cancer cell growth

  1. Peter K Kim
  2. Christopher J Halbrook
  3. Samuel A Kerk
  4. Megan Radyk
  5. Stephanie Wisner
  6. Daniel M Kremer
  7. Peter Sajjakulnukit
  8. Anthony Andren
  9. Sean W Hou
  10. Ayush Trivedi
  11. Galloway Thurston
  12. Abhinav Anand
  13. Liang Yan
  14. Lucia Salamanca-Cardona
  15. Samuel D Welling
  16. Li Zhang
  17. Matthew R Pratt
  18. Kayvan R Keshari
  19. Haoqiang Ying
  20. Costas A Lyssiotis  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Michigan, United States
  2. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
  3. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
  4. University of Southern California, United States
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.62645
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Peter K Kim
  2. Christopher J Halbrook
  3. Samuel A Kerk
  4. Megan Radyk
  5. Stephanie Wisner
  6. Daniel M Kremer
  7. Peter Sajjakulnukit
  8. Anthony Andren
  9. Sean W Hou
  10. Ayush Trivedi
  11. Galloway Thurston
  12. Abhinav Anand
  13. Liang Yan
  14. Lucia Salamanca-Cardona
  15. Samuel D Welling
  16. Li Zhang
  17. Matthew R Pratt
  18. Kayvan R Keshari
  19. Haoqiang Ying
  20. Costas A Lyssiotis
(2021)
Hyaluronic acid fuels pancreatic cancer cell growth
eLife 10:e62645.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.62645
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

Abstract

Rewired metabolism is a hallmark of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDA). Previously, we demonstrated that PDA cells enhance glycosylation precursor biogenesis through the hexosamine biosynthetic pathway (HBP) via activation of the rate limiting enzyme, glutamine-fructose 6-phosphate amidotransferase 1 (GFAT1). Here, we genetically ablated GFAT1 in human PDA cell lines, which completely blocked proliferation in vitro and led to cell death. In contrast, GFAT1 knockout did not preclude the growth of human tumor xenografts in mice, suggesting that cancer cells can maintain fidelity of glycosylation precursor pools by scavenging nutrients from the tumor microenvironment. We found that hyaluronic acid (HA), an abundant carbohydrate polymer in pancreatic tumors composed of repeating N-acetyl-glucosamine (GlcNAc) and glucuronic acid sugars, can bypass GFAT1 to refuel the HBP via the GlcNAc salvage pathway. Together, these data show HA can serve as a nutrient fueling PDA metabolism beyond its previously appreciated structural and signaling roles.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting file; raw images have been provided for all western blots in the Source Data file.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Peter K Kim

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9382-7223

  2. Christopher J Halbrook

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  3. Samuel A Kerk

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  4. Megan Radyk

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  5. Stephanie Wisner

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  6. Daniel M Kremer

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  7. Peter Sajjakulnukit

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  8. Anthony Andren

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  9. Sean W Hou

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  10. Ayush Trivedi

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  11. Galloway Thurston

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  12. Abhinav Anand

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  13. Liang Yan

    Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  14. Lucia Salamanca-Cardona

    Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  15. Samuel D Welling

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  16. Li Zhang

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  17. Matthew R Pratt

    Department of Chemistry, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3205-5615

  18. Kayvan R Keshari

    Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  19. Haoqiang Ying

    Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  20. Costas A Lyssiotis

    Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
    For correspondence
    clyssiot@med.umich.edu
    Competing interests
    Costas A Lyssiotis, has received consulting fees from Astellas Pharmaceuticals and Odyssey Therapeutics and is an inventor on patents pertaining to Kras regulated metabolic pathways, redox control pathways in pancreatic cancer, and targeting the GOT1-pathway as a therapeutic approach (US Patent No: 2015126580-A1, 05/07/2015; US Patent No: 20190136238, 05/09/2019; International Patent No: WO2013177426-A2, 04/23/2015)..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9309-6141

Funding

National Cancer Institute (Cancer Biology Training Grant,T32AI007413)

  • Peter K Kim
  • Samuel A Kerk

Thompson Family Foundation (Research Grant)

  • Kayvan R Keshari

STARR Cancer Consortium (Research Grant)

  • Kayvan R Keshari

National Cancer Institute (Cancer Center Support Grant,P30CA008748)

  • Kayvan R Keshari

American Association for Cancer Research (Pathway to Leadership award,13-70-25-LYSS)

  • Costas A Lyssiotis

V Foundation for Cancer Research (Junior Scholar Award,V2016-009)

  • Costas A Lyssiotis

Sidney Kimmel Foundation (Kimmel Scholar Award,SKF-16-005)

  • Costas A Lyssiotis

American Association for Cancer Research (NextGen Grant for Transformative Cancer Research,17-20-01-LYSS)

  • Costas A Lyssiotis

National Cancer Institute (Cancer Center Support Grant,P30 CA046592)

  • Costas A Lyssiotis

National Cancer Institute (R37CA237421)

  • Costas A Lyssiotis

National Cancer Institute (R01CA248160)

  • Costas A Lyssiotis

National Cancer Institute (Predoctoral Fellowship,F31CA243344)

  • Peter K Kim

National Cancer Institute (R01CA244931)

  • Costas A Lyssiotis

National Institutes of Health (U24DK097153)

  • Costas A Lyssiotis

Charles Woodson Research Fund (Research Support)

  • Costas A Lyssiotis

UM Pediatric Brain Tumor Initiative (Research Support)

  • Costas A Lyssiotis

National Cancer Institute (F99/K00CA264414)

  • Samuel A Kerk

National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (T32HD007505)

  • Megan Radyk

National Cancer Institute (Pathway to Independence Award,K99CA241357)

  • Christopher J Halbrook

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (Postdoctoral Support,P30DK034933)

  • Christopher J Halbrook

National Cancer Institute (F31CA24745701)

  • Samuel A Kerk

National Cancer Institute (R01CA237466)

  • Kayvan R Keshari

National Cancer Institute (R01CA252037)

  • Kayvan R Keshari

National Cancer Institute (R21CA212958)

  • Kayvan R Keshari

Stand Up To Cancer (Research Grant)

  • Kayvan R Keshari

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Lydia W S Finley, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees of the University of Michigan. Protocol#: PRO00008877

Version history

  1. Received: September 1, 2020
  2. Accepted: December 21, 2021
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: December 24, 2021 (version 1)
  4. Accepted Manuscript updated: December 29, 2021 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record published: January 5, 2022 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2021, Kim et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 8,933
    views
  • 901
    downloads
  • 50
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Peter K Kim
  2. Christopher J Halbrook
  3. Samuel A Kerk
  4. Megan Radyk
  5. Stephanie Wisner
  6. Daniel M Kremer
  7. Peter Sajjakulnukit
  8. Anthony Andren
  9. Sean W Hou
  10. Ayush Trivedi
  11. Galloway Thurston
  12. Abhinav Anand
  13. Liang Yan
  14. Lucia Salamanca-Cardona
  15. Samuel D Welling
  16. Li Zhang
  17. Matthew R Pratt
  18. Kayvan R Keshari
  19. Haoqiang Ying
  20. Costas A Lyssiotis
(2021)
Hyaluronic acid fuels pancreatic cancer cell growth
eLife 10:e62645.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.62645

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.62645

Categories and tags

Research organisms

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology

    Glutamine deprivation triggers NAGK-dependent hexosamine salvage

    Sydney Campbell, Clementina Mesaros ... Kathryn E Wellen
    Research Article

    Tumors frequently exhibit aberrant glycosylation, which can impact cancer progression and therapeutic responses. The hexosamine biosynthesis pathway (HBP) produces uridine diphosphate N-acetylglucosamine (UDP-GlcNAc), a major substrate for glycosylation in the cell. Prior studies have identified the HBP as a promising therapeutic target in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA). The HBP requires both glucose and glutamine for its initiation. The PDA tumor microenvironment is nutrient poor, however, prompting us to investigate how nutrient limitation impacts hexosamine synthesis. Here, we identify that glutamine limitation in PDA cells suppresses de novo hexosamine synthesis but results in increased free GlcNAc abundance. GlcNAc salvage via N-acetylglucosamine kinase (NAGK) is engaged to feed UDP-GlcNAc pools. NAGK expression is elevated in human PDA, and NAGK deletion from PDA cells impairs tumor growth in mice. Together, these data identify an important role for NAGK-dependent hexosamine salvage in supporting PDA tumor growth.

    1. Cancer Biology

    FAK loss reduces BRAFV600E-induced ERK phosphorylation to promote intestinal stemness and cecal tumor formation

    Chenxi Gao, Huaibin Ge ... Jing Hu
    Research Article

    BRAFV600E mutation is a driver mutation in the serrated pathway to colorectal cancers. BRAFV600E drives tumorigenesis through constitutive downstream extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) activation, but high-intensity ERK activation can also trigger tumor suppression. Whether and how oncogenic ERK signaling can be intrinsically adjusted to a ‘just-right’ level optimal for tumorigenesis remains undetermined. In this study, we found that FAK (Focal adhesion kinase) expression was reduced in BRAFV600E-mutant adenomas/polyps in mice and patients. In Vil1-Cre;BRAFLSL-V600E/+;Ptk2fl/fl mice, Fak deletion maximized BRAFV600E’s oncogenic activity and increased cecal tumor incidence to 100%. Mechanistically, our results showed that Fak loss, without jeopardizing BRAFV600E-induced ERK pathway transcriptional output, reduced EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor)-dependent ERK phosphorylation. Reduction in ERK phosphorylation increased the level of Lgr4, promoting intestinal stemness and cecal tumor formation. Our findings show that a ‘just-right’ ERK signaling optimal for BRAFV600E-induced cecal tumor formation can be achieved via Fak loss-mediated downregulation of ERK phosphorylation.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Computational and Systems Biology

    Optimal transport for automatic alignment of untargeted metabolomic data

    Marie Breeur, George Stepaniants ... Vivian Viallon
    Research Article

    Untargeted metabolomic profiling through liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) measures a vast array of metabolites within biospecimens, advancing drug development, disease diagnosis, and risk prediction. However, the low throughput of LC-MS poses a major challenge for biomarker discovery, annotation, and experimental comparison, necessitating the merging of multiple datasets. Current data pooling methods encounter practical limitations due to their vulnerability to data variations and hyperparameter dependence. Here, we introduce GromovMatcher, a flexible and user-friendly algorithm that automatically combines LC-MS datasets using optimal transport. By capitalizing on feature intensity correlation structures, GromovMatcher delivers superior alignment accuracy and robustness compared to existing approaches. This algorithm scales to thousands of features requiring minimal hyperparameter tuning. Manually curated datasets for validating alignment algorithms are limited in the field of untargeted metabolomics, and hence we develop a dataset split procedure to generate pairs of validation datasets to test the alignments produced by GromovMatcher and other methods. Applying our method to experimental patient studies of liver and pancreatic cancer, we discover shared metabolic features related to patient alcohol intake, demonstrating how GromovMatcher facilitates the search for biomarkers associated with lifestyle risk factors linked to several cancer types.