Investigation of Drosophila fruitless neurons that express Dpr/DIP cell adhesion molecules

  1. Savannah G Brovero
  2. Julia C Fortier
  3. Hongru Hu
  4. Pamela C Lovejoy
  5. Nicole R Newell
  6. Colleen M Palmateer
  7. Ruei-Ying Tzeng
  8. Pei-Tseng Lee
  9. Kai Zinn
  10. Michelle N Arbeitman  Is a corresponding author
  1. Florida State University, United States
  2. Baylor College of Medicine, United States
  3. California Institute of Technology, United States

Abstract

Drosophila reproductive behaviors are directed by fruitless neurons. A reanalysis of genomic studies shows that genes encoding dpr and DIP Immunoglobulin superfamily (IgSF) members are expressed in fru P1 neurons. We find that each fru P1 and dpr/DIP (fru P1dpr/DIP) overlapping expression pattern is similar in both sexes, but there are dimorphisms in neuronal morphology and cell number. Behavioral studies of fru P1dpr/DIP perturbation genotypes indicates that the mushroom body functions together with the lateral protocerebral complex to direct courtship behavior. A single-cell RNA-seq analysis of fru P1 neurons shows that many DIPs have high expression in a small set of neurons, whereas the dprs are often expressed in a larger set of neurons at intermediate levels, with a myriad of dpr/DIP expression combinations. Functionally, we find that perturbations of sex hierarchy genes and of DIP-ε change the sex-specific morphologies of fru P1DIP-α neurons.

Data availability

All raw data are provided in the supplementary materials. The sequencing data has been deposited in GEO under accession number GSE162098

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Savannah G Brovero

    Biomedical Sciences, Florida State University, Tallahassee, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Julia C Fortier

    Biomedical Sciences, Florida State University, Tallahassee, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Hongru Hu

    Biomedical Sciences, Florida State University, Tallahassee, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Pamela C Lovejoy

    Biomedical Sciences, Florida State University, Tallahassee, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Nicole R Newell

    Biomedical Sciences, Florida State University, Tallahassee, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Colleen M Palmateer

    Biomedical Sciences, Florida State University, Tallahassee, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Ruei-Ying Tzeng

    Biomedical Sciences, Florida State University, Tallahassee, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Pei-Tseng Lee

    Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Kai Zinn

    Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6706-5605
  10. Michelle N Arbeitman

    Biomedical Sciences, Florida State University, Tallahassee, United States
    For correspondence
    michelle.arbeitman@med.fsu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2437-4352

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R01 grant number R01GM073039)

  • Savannah G Brovero
  • Julia C Fortier
  • Hongru Hu
  • Pamela C Lovejoy
  • Nicole R Newell
  • Colleen M Palmateer
  • Ruei-Ying Tzeng
  • Michelle N Arbeitman

National Institutes of Health (R03 grant number R03NS090184)

  • Ruei-Ying Tzeng

National Institutes of Health (R01 grant number R01GM073039)

  • Michelle N Arbeitman

Florida State University (R01 grant number Biomedical Sciences)

  • Hongru Hu
  • Pamela C Lovejoy
  • Nicole R Newell
  • Colleen M Palmateer

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2021, Brovero et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,708
    views
  • 297
    downloads
  • 20
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Savannah G Brovero
  2. Julia C Fortier
  3. Hongru Hu
  4. Pamela C Lovejoy
  5. Nicole R Newell
  6. Colleen M Palmateer
  7. Ruei-Ying Tzeng
  8. Pei-Tseng Lee
  9. Kai Zinn
  10. Michelle N Arbeitman
(2021)
Investigation of Drosophila fruitless neurons that express Dpr/DIP cell adhesion molecules
eLife 10:e63101.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.63101

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.63101

Further reading

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Dániel Molnár, Éva Viola Surányi ... Judit Toth
    Research Article

    The sustained success of Mycobacterium tuberculosis as a pathogen arises from its ability to persist within macrophages for extended periods and its limited responsiveness to antibiotics. Furthermore, the high incidence of resistance to the few available antituberculosis drugs is a significant concern, especially since the driving forces of the emergence of drug resistance are not clear. Drug-resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis can emerge through de novo mutations, however, mycobacterial mutation rates are low. To unravel the effects of antibiotic pressure on genome stability, we determined the genetic variability, phenotypic tolerance, DNA repair system activation, and dNTP pool upon treatment with current antibiotics using Mycobacterium smegmatis. Whole-genome sequencing revealed no significant increase in mutation rates after prolonged exposure to first-line antibiotics. However, the phenotypic fluctuation assay indicated rapid adaptation to antibiotics mediated by non-genetic factors. The upregulation of DNA repair genes, measured using qPCR, suggests that genomic integrity may be maintained through the activation of specific DNA repair pathways. Our results, indicating that antibiotic exposure does not result in de novo adaptive mutagenesis under laboratory conditions, do not lend support to the model suggesting antibiotic resistance development through drug pressure-induced microevolution.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Sanjarbek Hudaiberdiev, Ivan Ovcharenko
    Research Article

    Enhancers and promoters are classically considered to be bound by a small set of transcription factors (TFs) in a sequence-specific manner. This assumption has come under increasing skepticism as the datasets of ChIP-seq assays of TFs have expanded. In particular, high-occupancy target (HOT) loci attract hundreds of TFs with often no detectable correlation between ChIP-seq peaks and DNA-binding motif presence. Here, we used a set of 1003 TF ChIP-seq datasets (HepG2, K562, H1) to analyze the patterns of ChIP-seq peak co-occurrence in combination with functional genomics datasets. We identified 43,891 HOT loci forming at the promoter (53%) and enhancer (47%) regions. HOT promoters regulate housekeeping genes, whereas HOT enhancers are involved in tissue-specific process regulation. HOT loci form the foundation of human super-enhancers and evolve under strong negative selection, with some of these loci being located in ultraconserved regions. Sequence-based classification analysis of HOT loci suggested that their formation is driven by the sequence features, and the density of mapped ChIP-seq peaks across TF-bound loci correlates with sequence features and the expression level of flanking genes. Based on the affinities to bind to promoters and enhancers we detected five distinct clusters of TFs that form the core of the HOT loci. We report an abundance of HOT loci in the human genome and a commitment of 51% of all TF ChIP-seq binding events to HOT locus formation thus challenging the classical model of enhancer activity and propose a model of HOT locus formation based on the existence of large transcriptional condensates.