Membrane binding controls ordered self-assembly of animal septins

  1. Agata Szuba
  2. Fouzia Bano
  3. Gerard Castro Linares
  4. Francois Iv
  5. Manos Mavrakis  Is a corresponding author
  6. Ralf P Richter  Is a corresponding author
  7. Aurélie Bertin  Is a corresponding author
  8. Gijsje H Koenderink  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Leeds, United Kingdom
  2. Umeå Universitet, Sweden
  3. Delft University of Technology, Netherlands
  4. Aix-Marseille Univ, France
  5. Institut Curie, France

Abstract

Septins are conserved cytoskeletal proteins that regulate cell cortex mechanics. The mechanisms of their interactions with the plasma membrane remain poorly understood. Here we show by cell-free reconstitution that binding to flat lipid membranes requires electrostatic interactions of septins with anionic lipids and promotes the ordered self-assembly of fly septins into filamentous meshworks. Transmission electron microscopy reveals that both fly and mammalian septin hexamers form arrays of single and paired filaments. Atomic force microscopy and quartz crystal microbalance demonstrate that the fly filaments form mechanically rigid, 12 to 18 nm thick, double layers of septins. By contrast, C-terminally truncated septin mutants form 4 nm thin monolayers, indicating that stacking requires the C-terminal coiled coils on DSep2 and Pnut subunits. Our work shows that membrane binding is required for fly septins to form ordered arrays of single and paired filaments and provides new insights into the mechanisms by which septins may regulate cell surface mechanics.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Agata Szuba

    Pollard Institute, School of Electronic & Electrical Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Fouzia Bano

    Department of Clinical Microbiology, Umeå Universitet, Umeå, Sweden
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0634-7091
  3. Gerard Castro Linares

    Bionanoscience Department, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Francois Iv

    Institut Fresnel, CNRS, Aix-Marseille Univ, Marseille, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Manos Mavrakis

    Institut Fresnel, CNRS, Aix-Marseille Univ, Marseille, France
    For correspondence
    manos.mavrakis@univ-amu.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Ralf P Richter

    School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Biological Sciences, School of Physics and Astronomy, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Astbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology, and Bra, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    R.Richter@leeds.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Aurélie Bertin

    Laboratoire Physico Chimie Curie, Institut Curie, Paris, France
    For correspondence
    aurelie.bertin@curie.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3400-6887
  8. Gijsje H Koenderink

    Bionanoscience Department, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
    For correspondence
    g.h.koenderink@tudelft.nl
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7823-8807

Funding

H2020 European Research Council (ERC StG 335672,MINICELL)

  • Gijsje H Koenderink

H2020 European Research Council (ERC StG 306435; JELLY)

  • Ralf P Richter

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (Equipment grant BB/R000174/1)

  • Ralf P Richter

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-13-JSV8-0002-01)

  • Manos Mavrakis
  • Aurélie Bertin

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-17-CE13-0014)

  • Manos Mavrakis
  • Aurélie Bertin

Fondation ARC pour la Recherche sur le Cancer (PJA 20151203182)

  • Manos Mavrakis
  • Aurélie Bertin

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (024.003.019)

  • Gijsje H Koenderink

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2021, Szuba et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,992
    views
  • 488
    downloads
  • 48
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Agata Szuba
  2. Fouzia Bano
  3. Gerard Castro Linares
  4. Francois Iv
  5. Manos Mavrakis
  6. Ralf P Richter
  7. Aurélie Bertin
  8. Gijsje H Koenderink
(2021)
Membrane binding controls ordered self-assembly of animal septins
eLife 10:e63349.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.63349

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.63349

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Jingjing Li, Xinyue Wang ... Vincent Archambault
    Research Article

    In animals, mitosis involves the breakdown of the nucleus. The reassembly of a nucleus after mitosis requires the reformation of the nuclear envelope around a single mass of chromosomes. This process requires Ankle2 (also known as LEM4 in humans) which interacts with PP2A and promotes the function of the Barrier-to-Autointegration Factor (BAF). Upon dephosphorylation, BAF dimers cross-bridge chromosomes and bind lamins and transmembrane proteins of the reassembling nuclear envelope. How Ankle2 functions in mitosis is incompletely understood. Using a combination of approaches in Drosophila, along with structural modeling, we provide several lines of evidence that suggest that Ankle2 is a regulatory subunit of PP2A, explaining how it promotes BAF dephosphorylation. In addition, we discovered that Ankle2 interacts with the endoplasmic reticulum protein Vap33, which is required for Ankle2 localization at the reassembling nuclear envelope during telophase. We identified the interaction sites of PP2A and Vap33 on Ankle2. Through genetic rescue experiments, we show that the Ankle2/PP2A interaction is essential for the function of Ankle2 in nuclear reassembly and that the Ankle2/Vap33 interaction also promotes this process. Our study sheds light on the molecular mechanisms of post-mitotic nuclear reassembly and suggests that the endoplasmic reticulum is not merely a source of membranes in the process, but also provides localized enzymatic activity.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Bhumil Patel, Maryke Grobler ... Needhi Bhalla
    Research Article

    Meiotic crossover recombination is essential for both accurate chromosome segregation and the generation of new haplotypes for natural selection to act upon. This requirement is known as crossover assurance and is one example of crossover control. While the conserved role of the ATPase, PCH-2, during meiotic prophase has been enigmatic, a universal phenotype when pch-2 or its orthologs are mutated is a change in the number and distribution of meiotic crossovers. Here, we show that PCH-2 controls the number and distribution of crossovers by antagonizing their formation. This antagonism produces different effects at different stages of meiotic prophase: early in meiotic prophase, PCH-2 prevents double-strand breaks from becoming crossover-eligible intermediates, limiting crossover formation at sites of initial double-strand break formation and homolog interactions. Later in meiotic prophase, PCH-2 winnows the number of crossover-eligible intermediates, contributing to the designation of crossovers and ultimately, crossover assurance. We also demonstrate that PCH-2 accomplishes this regulation through the meiotic HORMAD, HIM-3. Our data strongly support a model in which PCH-2’s conserved role is to remodel meiotic HORMADs throughout meiotic prophase to destabilize crossover-eligible precursors and coordinate meiotic recombination with synapsis, ensuring the progressive implementation of meiotic recombination and explaining its function in the pachytene checkpoint and crossover control.