Evolutionary stasis of the pseudoautosomal boundary in strepsirrhine primates

  1. Rylan Shearn
  2. Alison E Wright
  3. Sylvain Mousset
  4. Corinne Régis
  5. Simon Penel
  6. Jean-François Lemaitre
  7. Guillaume Douay
  8. Brigitte Crouau-Roy
  9. Emilie Lecompte
  10. Gabriel AB Marais  Is a corresponding author
  1. CNRS / Univ. Lyon 1, France
  2. University of Sheffield, United Kingdom
  3. University of Vienna, Austria
  4. Zoo de Lyon, France
  5. CNRS / Univ. Toulouse, France

Abstract

Sex chromosomes are typically comprised of a non-recombining region and a recombining pseudoautosomal region. Accurately quantifying the relative size of these regions is critical for sex-chromosome biology both from a functional and evolutionary perspective. The evolution of the pseudoautosomal boundary (PAB) is well documented in haplorrhines (apes and monkeys) but not in strepsirrhines (lemurs and lorises). Here we studied the PAB of seven species representing the main strepsirrhine lineages by sequencing a male and a female genome in each species and using sex differences in coverage to identify the PAB. We found that during primate evolution, the PAB has remained unchanged in strepsirrhines whereas several recombination suppression events moved the PAB and shortened the pseudoautosomal region in haplorrhines. Strepsirrhines are well known to have much lower sexual dimorphism than haplorrhines. We suggest that mutations with antagonistic effects between males and females have driven recombination suppression and PAB evolution in haplorrhines.

Data availability

All the data generated in this study is available at NCBI (project # PRJNA482296)

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Rylan Shearn

    LBBE, CNRS / Univ. Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Alison E Wright

    Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Sylvain Mousset

    Faculty of Mathematics, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Corinne Régis

    LBBE, CNRS / Univ. Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Simon Penel

    LBBE, CNRS / Univ. Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Jean-François Lemaitre

    LBBE, CNRS / Univ. Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Guillaume Douay

    Zoo de Lyon, Lyon, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Brigitte Crouau-Roy

    Laboratoire Evolution et Diversité Biologique, CNRS / Univ. Toulouse, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Emilie Lecompte

    Laboratoire Evolution et Diversité Biologique, CNRS / Univ. Toulouse, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5711-7395
  10. Gabriel AB Marais

    LBBE, CNRS / Univ. Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France
    For correspondence
    gabriel.marais@univ-lyon1.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2134-5967

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-­‐12-­‐ BSV7-­‐0002-­‐04)

  • Gabriel AB Marais

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2020, Shearn et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,500
    views
  • 145
    downloads
  • 9
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Rylan Shearn
  2. Alison E Wright
  3. Sylvain Mousset
  4. Corinne Régis
  5. Simon Penel
  6. Jean-François Lemaitre
  7. Guillaume Douay
  8. Brigitte Crouau-Roy
  9. Emilie Lecompte
  10. Gabriel AB Marais
(2020)
Evolutionary stasis of the pseudoautosomal boundary in strepsirrhine primates
eLife 9:e63650.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.63650

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.63650

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Arman Angaji, Michel Owusu ... Johannes Berg
    Research Article

    In growing cell populations such as tumours, mutations can serve as markers that allow tracking the past evolution from current samples. The genomic analyses of bulk samples and samples from multiple regions have shed light on the evolutionary forces acting on tumours. However, little is known empirically on the spatio-temporal dynamics of tumour evolution. Here, we leverage published data from resected hepatocellular carcinomas, each with several hundred samples taken in two and three dimensions. Using spatial metrics of evolution, we find that tumour cells grow predominantly uniformly within the tumour volume instead of at the surface. We determine how mutations and cells are dispersed throughout the tumour and how cell death contributes to the overall tumour growth. Our methods shed light on the early evolution of tumours in vivo and can be applied to high-resolution data in the emerging field of spatial biology.

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    Matthew Osmond, Graham Coop
    Research Article

    Spatial patterns in genetic diversity are shaped by individuals dispersing from their parents and larger-scale population movements. It has long been appreciated that these patterns of movement shape the underlying genealogies along the genome leading to geographic patterns of isolation by distance in contemporary population genetic data. However, extracting the enormous amount of information contained in genealogies along recombining sequences has, until recently, not been computationally feasible. Here we capitalize on important recent advances in genome-wide gene-genealogy reconstruction and develop methods to use thousands of trees to estimate per-generation dispersal rates and to locate the genetic ancestors of a sample back through time. We take a likelihood approach in continuous space using a simple approximate model (branching Brownian motion) as our prior distribution of spatial genealogies. After testing our method with simulations we apply it to Arabidopsis thaliana. We estimate a dispersal rate of roughly 60km2 per generation, slightly higher across latitude than across longitude, potentially reflecting a northward post-glacial expansion. Locating ancestors allows us to visualize major geographic movements, alternative geographic histories, and admixture. Our method highlights the huge amount of information about past dispersal events and population movements contained in genome-wide genealogies.