HP1α is a chromatin crosslinker that controls nuclear and mitotic chromosome mechanics

  1. Amy R Strom
  2. Ronald J Biggs
  3. Edward J Banigan
  4. Xiaotao Wang
  5. Katherine Chiu
  6. Cameron Herman
  7. Jimena Collado
  8. Feng Yue
  9. Joan C Ritland Politz
  10. Leah J Tait
  11. David Scalzo
  12. Agnes Telling
  13. Mark Groudine
  14. Clifford P Brangwynne
  15. John F Marko
  16. Andrew D Stephens  Is a corresponding author
  1. Princeton University, United States
  2. Northwestern University, United States
  3. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, United States
  4. Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, United States
  5. University of Massachusetts Amherst, United States
  6. The Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, United States

Abstract

Chromatin, which consists of DNA and associated proteins, contains genetic information and is a mechanical component of the nucleus. Heterochromatic histone methylation controls nucleus and chromosome stiffness, but the contribution of heterochromatin protein HP1α (CBX5) is unknown. We used a novel HP1α auxin-inducible degron human cell line to rapidly degrade HP1α. Degradation did not alter transcription, local chromatin compaction, or histone methylation, but did decrease chromatin stiffness. Single-nucleus micromanipulation reveals that HP1α is essential to chromatin-based mechanics and maintains nuclear morphology, separate from histone methylation. Further experiments with dimerization-deficient HP1αI165E indicate that chromatin crosslinking via HP1α dimerization is critical, while polymer simulations demonstrate the importance of chromatin-chromatin crosslinkers in mechanics. In mitotic chromosomes, HP1α similarly bolsters stiffness while aiding in mitotic alignment and faithful segregation. HP1α is therefore a critical chromatin-crosslinking protein that provides mechanical strength to chromosomes and the nucleus throughout the cell cycle and supports cellular functions.

Data availability

We have provided the RNAseq data sets in the supplemental material as excel files

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Amy R Strom

    Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Ronald J Biggs

    Department of Molecular Biosciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Edward J Banigan

    Institute for Medical Engineering and Science and Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5478-7425
  4. Xiaotao Wang

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3531-2157
  5. Katherine Chiu

    Biology Department, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Cameron Herman

    Department of Molecular Biosciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Jimena Collado

    Department of Molecular Biosciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Feng Yue

    Northwestern University, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Joan C Ritland Politz

    Basic Sciences Division, The Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Leah J Tait

    Basic Sciences Division, The Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. David Scalzo

    Basic Sciences Division, The Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Agnes Telling

    Basic Sciences Division, The Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Mark Groudine

    Basic Sciences Division, The Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Clifford P Brangwynne

    Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1350-9960
  15. John F Marko

    Department of Molecular Biosciences, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Northwestern University, Evanston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Andrew D Stephens

    Biology Department, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, United States
    For correspondence
    Andrew.stephens@umass.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5474-7845

Funding

National Institutes of Health (U54DK107980)

  • John F Marko

National Institutes of Health (U01DA040583)

  • Mark Groudine

National Institutes of Health (1UM1HG011536)

  • John F Marko
  • Andrew D Stephens

National Institutes of Health (R00GM123195)

  • Andrew D Stephens

National Institutes of Health (U54CA193419)

  • John F Marko

National Institutes of Health (U01 DA040601)

  • Clifford P Brangwynne

Mark Foundation For Cancer Research (Life science research foundation Postdoctoral Fellowship,AWD1006303)

  • Amy R Strom

National Institutes of Health (GM114190)

  • Edward J Banigan

National Institutes of Health (R24DK106766)

  • Feng Yue

National Institutes of Health (1R35GM124820)

  • Feng Yue

National Institutes of Health (R01HG009906)

  • Feng Yue

National Institutes of Health (U01CA200060)

  • Feng Yue

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2021, Strom et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 7,649
    views
  • 996
    downloads
  • 86
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Amy R Strom
  2. Ronald J Biggs
  3. Edward J Banigan
  4. Xiaotao Wang
  5. Katherine Chiu
  6. Cameron Herman
  7. Jimena Collado
  8. Feng Yue
  9. Joan C Ritland Politz
  10. Leah J Tait
  11. David Scalzo
  12. Agnes Telling
  13. Mark Groudine
  14. Clifford P Brangwynne
  15. John F Marko
  16. Andrew D Stephens
(2021)
HP1α is a chromatin crosslinker that controls nuclear and mitotic chromosome mechanics
eLife 10:e63972.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.63972

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.63972

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Fabian Link, Sisco Jung ... Brooke Morriswood
    Research Article

    The actin cytoskeleton is a ubiquitous feature of eukaryotic cells, yet its complexity varies across different taxa. In the parasitic protist Trypanosoma brucei, a rudimentary actomyosin system consisting of one actin gene and two myosin genes has been retained despite significant investment in the microtubule cytoskeleton. The functions of this highly simplified actomyosin system remain unclear, but appear to centre on the endomembrane system. Here, advanced light and electron microscopy imaging techniques, together with biochemical and biophysical assays, were used to explore the relationship between the actomyosin and endomembrane systems. The class I myosin (TbMyo1) had a large cytosolic pool and its ability to translocate actin filaments in vitro was shown here for the first time. TbMyo1 exhibited strong association with the endosomal system and was additionally found on glycosomes. At the endosomal membranes, TbMyo1 colocalised with markers for early and late endosomes (TbRab5A and TbRab7, respectively), but not with the marker associated with recycling endosomes (TbRab11). Actin and myosin were simultaneously visualised for the first time in trypanosomes using an anti-actin chromobody. Disruption of the actomyosin system using the actin-depolymerising drug latrunculin A resulted in a delocalisation of both the actin chromobody signal and an endosomal marker, and was accompanied by a specific loss of endosomal structure. This suggests that the actomyosin system is required for maintaining endosomal integrity in T. brucei.

    1. Cell Biology
    Georgia Maria Sagia, Xenia Georgiou ... Sofia Dimou
    Research Article Updated

    Membrane proteins are sorted to the plasma membrane via Golgi-dependent trafficking. However, our recent studies challenged the essentiality of Golgi in the biogenesis of specific transporters. Here, we investigate the trafficking mechanisms of membrane proteins by following the localization of the polarized R-SNARE SynA versus the non-polarized transporter UapA, synchronously co-expressed in wild-type or isogenic genetic backgrounds repressible for conventional cargo secretion. In wild-type, the two cargoes dynamically label distinct secretory compartments, highlighted by the finding that, unlike SynA, UapA does not colocalize with the late-Golgi. In line with early partitioning into distinct secretory carriers, the two cargoes collapse in distinct ER-Exit Sites (ERES) in a sec31ts background. Trafficking via distinct cargo-specific carriers is further supported by showing that repression of proteins essential for conventional cargo secretion does not affect UapA trafficking, while blocking SynA secretion. Overall, this work establishes the existence of distinct, cargo-dependent, trafficking mechanisms, initiating at ERES and being differentially dependent on Golgi and SNARE interactions.