Time resolved phosphoproteomics reveals scaffolding and catalysis-responsive patterns of SHP2-dependent signaling

  1. Vidyasiri Vemulapalli
  2. Lily A Chylek
  3. Alison Erickson
  4. Anamarija Pfeiffer
  5. Khal-Hentz Gabriel
  6. Jonathan LaRochelle
  7. Kartik Subramanian
  8. Ruili Cao
  9. Kimberley Stegmaier
  10. Morvarid Mohseni
  11. Matthew J LaMarche
  12. Michael G Acker
  13. Peter K Sorger
  14. Steven P Gygi
  15. Stephen C Blacklow  Is a corresponding author
  1. Harvard Medical School, United States
  2. Novo Nordisk Foundation and University of Copenhagen, Denmark
  3. Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, United States
  4. Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, United States

Abstract

SHP2 is a protein tyrosine phosphatase that normally potentiates intracellular signaling by growth factors, antigen receptors, and some cytokines, yet is frequently mutated in human cancer. Here, we examine the role of SHP2 in the responses of breast cancer cells to EGF by monitoring phosphoproteome dynamics when SHP2 is allosterically inhibited by SHP099. The dynamics of phosphotyrosine abundance at more than 400 tyrosine residues reveal six distinct response signatures following SHP099 treatment and washout. Remarkably, in addition to newly identified substrate sites on proteins such as occludin, ARHGAP35, and PLCγ2, another class of sites shows reduced phosphotyrosine abundance upon SHP2 inhibition. Sites of decreased phospho-abundance are enriched on proteins with two nearby phosphotyrosine residues, which can be directly protected from dephosphorylation by the paired SH2 domains of SHP2 itself. These findings highlight the distinct roles of the scaffolding and catalytic activities of SHP2 in effecting a transmembrane signaling response.

Data availability

Quantitative proteomics data have been deposited in the mass spectrometry interactive virtual environment (MassIVE) database with the accession code MSV000083702. All other data generated in this study are in the manuscript and supporting files.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Vidyasiri Vemulapalli

    Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Lily A Chylek

    Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Alison Erickson

    Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Anamarija Pfeiffer

    Center for Protein Research, Novo Nordisk Foundation and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Khal-Hentz Gabriel

    Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Jonathan LaRochelle

    Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Kartik Subramanian

    Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6900-8882
  8. Ruili Cao

    Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Kimberley Stegmaier

    Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Morvarid Mohseni

    Oncology, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    Morvarid Mohseni, Novartis employee while this work was performed..
  11. Matthew J LaMarche

    Global Discovery Chemistry, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    Matthew J LaMarche, Novartis employee while this work was performed..
  12. Michael G Acker

    Oncology, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    Michael G Acker, Novartis employee while this work was performed..
  13. Peter K Sorger

    HMS LINCS Center, Laboratory of Systems Pharmacology, Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3364-1838
  14. Steven P Gygi

    Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. Stephen C Blacklow

    Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    stephen_blacklow@hms.harvard.edu
    Competing interests
    Stephen C Blacklow, SCB receives research funding for this project from Novartis, is a member of the SAB of Erasca, Inc., is an advisor to MPM Capital, and is a consultant on unrelated projects for IFM, Scorpion Therapeutics, and Ayala Therapeutics..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6904-1981

Funding

Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research

  • Vidyasiri Vemulapalli
  • Khal-Hentz Gabriel
  • Jonathan LaRochelle
  • Kimberley Stegmaier
  • Stephen C Blacklow

National Cancer Institute (R35 CA220340)

  • Stephen C Blacklow

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U54-HL127365)

  • Lily A Chylek
  • Peter K Sorger

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Jonathan A Cooper, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Centre, United States

Version history

  1. Received: October 23, 2020
  2. Accepted: March 21, 2021
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: March 23, 2021 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: April 6, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2021, Vemulapalli et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,297
    views
  • 483
    downloads
  • 16
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Vidyasiri Vemulapalli
  2. Lily A Chylek
  3. Alison Erickson
  4. Anamarija Pfeiffer
  5. Khal-Hentz Gabriel
  6. Jonathan LaRochelle
  7. Kartik Subramanian
  8. Ruili Cao
  9. Kimberley Stegmaier
  10. Morvarid Mohseni
  11. Matthew J LaMarche
  12. Michael G Acker
  13. Peter K Sorger
  14. Steven P Gygi
  15. Stephen C Blacklow
(2021)
Time resolved phosphoproteomics reveals scaffolding and catalysis-responsive patterns of SHP2-dependent signaling
eLife 10:e64251.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64251

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64251

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Natalia Dolgova, Eva-Maria E Uhlemann ... Oleg Y Dmitriev
    Research Article

    Mediator of ERBB2-driven Cell Motility 1 (MEMO1) is an evolutionary conserved protein implicated in many biological processes; however, its primary molecular function remains unknown. Importantly, MEMO1 is overexpressed in many types of cancer and was shown to modulate breast cancer metastasis through altered cell motility. To better understand the function of MEMO1 in cancer cells, we analyzed genetic interactions of MEMO1 using gene essentiality data from 1028 cancer cell lines and found multiple iron-related genes exhibiting genetic relationships with MEMO1. We experimentally confirmed several interactions between MEMO1 and iron-related proteins in living cells, most notably, transferrin receptor 2 (TFR2), mitoferrin-2 (SLC25A28), and the global iron response regulator IRP1 (ACO1). These interactions indicate that cells with high MEMO1 expression levels are hypersensitive to the disruptions in iron distribution. Our data also indicate that MEMO1 is involved in ferroptosis and is linked to iron supply to mitochondria. We have found that purified MEMO1 binds iron with high affinity under redox conditions mimicking intracellular environment and solved MEMO1 structures in complex with iron and copper. Our work reveals that the iron coordination mode in MEMO1 is very similar to that of iron-containing extradiol dioxygenases, which also display a similar structural fold. We conclude that MEMO1 is an iron-binding protein that modulates iron homeostasis in cancer cells.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Isabelle Petit-Hartlein, Annelise Vermot ... Franck Fieschi
    Research Article

    NADPH oxidases (NOX) are transmembrane proteins, widely spread in eukaryotes and prokaryotes, that produce reactive oxygen species (ROS). Eukaryotes use the ROS products for innate immune defense and signaling in critical (patho)physiological processes. Despite the recent structures of human NOX isoforms, the activation of electron transfer remains incompletely understood. SpNOX, a homolog from Streptococcus pneumoniae, can serves as a robust model for exploring electron transfers in the NOX family thanks to its constitutive activity. Crystal structures of SpNOX full-length and dehydrogenase (DH) domain constructs are revealed here. The isolated DH domain acts as a flavin reductase, and both constructs use either NADPH or NADH as substrate. Our findings suggest that hydride transfer from NAD(P)H to FAD is the rate-limiting step in electron transfer. We identify significance of F397 in nicotinamide access to flavin isoalloxazine and confirm flavin binding contributions from both DH and Transmembrane (TM) domains. Comparison with related enzymes suggests that distal access to heme may influence the final electron acceptor, while the relative position of DH and TM does not necessarily correlate with activity, contrary to previous suggestions. It rather suggests requirement of an internal rearrangement, within the DH domain, to switch from a resting to an active state. Thus, SpNOX appears to be a good model of active NOX2, which allows us to propose an explanation for NOX2’s requirement for activation.