ARL3 activation requires the co-GEF BART and effector-mediated turnover

  1. Yasmin ElMaghloob
  2. Begoña Sot
  3. Michael J McIlwraith
  4. Esther Garcia
  5. Tamas Yelland
  6. Shehab Ismail  Is a corresponding author
  1. Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, United Kingdom
  2. IMDEA Nanoscience, Spain

Abstract

The ADP-ribosylation factor-like 3 (ARL3) is a ciliopathy G-protein which regulates the ciliary trafficking of several lipid-modified proteins. ARL3 is activated by its guanine exchange factor (GEF) ARL13B via an unresolved mechanism. BART is described as an ARL3 effector which has also been implicated in ciliopathies, although the role of its ARL3 interaction is unknown. Here we show that, at physiological GTP:GDP levels, human ARL3GDP is weakly activated by ARL13B. However, BART interacts with nucleotide-free ARL3 and, in concert with ARL13B, efficiently activates ARL3. In addition, BART binds ARL3GTP and inhibits GTP dissociation, thereby stabilising the active G-protein; the binding of ARL3 effectors then releases BART. Finally, using live cell imaging, we show that BART accesses the primary cilium and colocalises with ARL13B. We propose a model wherein BART functions as a bona fide co-GEF for ARL3 and maintains the active ARL3GTP, until it is recycled by ARL3 effectors.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for: Figures 1A and 1B, Figures 2B, 2C, 2D, 2E, and 2F, Figures 3A,3B, 3C, 3D, 3F, Figures 4A, 4B, and 4C and Figure 5B, 5C

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Yasmin ElMaghloob

    Structural biology, Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Begoña Sot

    Nanobiosystems, IMDEA Nanoscience, Madrid, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Michael J McIlwraith

    Structural biology, Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Esther Garcia

    Structural biology, Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Tamas Yelland

    Structural biology, Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Shehab Ismail

    Structural biology, Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    shehab.ismail@glasgow.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4150-1077

Funding

Cancer Research UK (A17196)

  • Shehab Ismail

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Suzanne R Pfeffer, Stanford University School of Medicine, United States

Version history

  1. Received: November 4, 2020
  2. Accepted: January 12, 2021
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: January 13, 2021 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: January 20, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2021, ElMaghloob et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,165
    views
  • 187
    downloads
  • 16
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Yasmin ElMaghloob
  2. Begoña Sot
  3. Michael J McIlwraith
  4. Esther Garcia
  5. Tamas Yelland
  6. Shehab Ismail
(2021)
ARL3 activation requires the co-GEF BART and effector-mediated turnover
eLife 10:e64624.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64624

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64624

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Natalia E Ketaren, Fred D Mast ... John D Aitchison
    Research Advance

    To date, all major modes of monoclonal antibody therapy targeting SARS-CoV-2 have lost significant efficacy against the latest circulating variants. As SARS-CoV-2 omicron sublineages account for over 90% of COVID-19 infections, evasion of immune responses generated by vaccination or exposure to previous variants poses a significant challenge. A compelling new therapeutic strategy against SARS-CoV-2 is that of single-domain antibodies, termed nanobodies, which address certain limitations of monoclonal antibodies. Here, we demonstrate that our high-affinity nanobody repertoire, generated against wild-type SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (Mast et al., 2021), remains effective against variants of concern, including omicron BA.4/BA.5; a subset is predicted to counter resistance in emerging XBB and BQ.1.1 sublineages. Furthermore, we reveal the synergistic potential of nanobody cocktails in neutralizing emerging variants. Our study highlights the power of nanobody technology as a versatile therapeutic and diagnostic tool to combat rapidly evolving infectious diseases such as SARS-CoV-2.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Benjamin R Duewell, Naomi E Wilson ... Scott D Hansen
    Research Article

    Phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) beta (PI3Kβ) is functionally unique in the ability to integrate signals derived from receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), G-protein coupled receptors, and Rho-family GTPases. The mechanism by which PI3Kβ prioritizes interactions with various membrane-tethered signaling inputs, however, remains unclear. Previous experiments did not determine whether interactions with membrane-tethered proteins primarily control PI3Kβ localization versus directly modulate lipid kinase activity. To address this gap in our knowledge, we established an assay to directly visualize how three distinct protein interactions regulate PI3Kβ when presented to the kinase in a biologically relevant configuration on supported lipid bilayers. Using single molecule Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence (TIRF) Microscopy, we determined the mechanism controlling PI3Kβ membrane localization, prioritization of signaling inputs, and lipid kinase activation. We find that auto-inhibited PI3Kβ prioritizes interactions with RTK-derived tyrosine phosphorylated (pY) peptides before engaging either GβGγ or Rac1(GTP). Although pY peptides strongly localize PI3Kβ to membranes, stimulation of lipid kinase activity is modest. In the presence of either pY/GβGγ or pY/Rac1(GTP), PI3Kβ activity is dramatically enhanced beyond what can be explained by simply increasing membrane localization. Instead, PI3Kβ is synergistically activated by pY/GβGγ and pY/Rac1 (GTP) through a mechanism consistent with allosteric regulation.