The Development of Nanosota-1 as anti-SARS-CoV-2 nanobody drug candidates

  1. Gang Ye
  2. Joseph Gallant
  3. Jian Zheng
  4. Christopher Massey
  5. Ke Shi
  6. Wanbo Tai
  7. Abby Odle
  8. Molly Vickers
  9. Jian Shang
  10. Yushun Wan
  11. Lanying Du Dr.
  12. Hideki Aihara
  13. Stanley Perlman
  14. Aaron LeBeau  Is a corresponding author
  15. Fang Li  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Minnesota, United States
  2. University of Iowa, United States
  3. University of Texas Medical Branch, United States
  4. Lindsley F Kimball Research Institute, United States
  5. Lindsley F Kimball Research Institute, New York Blood Center, United States

Abstract

Combating the COVID-19 pandemic requires potent and low-cost therapeutics. We identified a series of single-domain antibodies (i.e., nanobody), Nanosota-1, from a camelid nanobody phage display library. Structural data showed that Nanosota-1 bound to the oft-hidden receptor-binding domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, blocking viral receptor ACE2. The lead drug candidate possessing an Fc tag (Nanosota-1C-Fc) bound to SARS-CoV-2 RBD ~3000 times more tightly than ACE2 did and inhibited SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus ~160 times more efficiently than ACE2 did. Administered at a single dose, Nanosota-1C-Fc demonstrated preventive and therapeutic efficacy against live SARS-CoV-2 infection in both hamster and mouse models. Unlike conventional antibodies, Nanosota-1C-Fc was produced at high yields in bacteria and had exceptional thermostability. Pharmacokinetic analysis of Nanosota-1C-Fc documented an excellent in vivo stability and a high tissue bioavailability. As effective and inexpensive drug candidates, Nanosota-1 may contribute to the battle against COVID-19.

Data availability

Coordinates and structure factors have been deposited to the Protein Data Bank with accession number 7KM5.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Gang Ye

    Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, United States
    Competing interests
    Gang Ye, The University of Minnesota has filed a patent on Nanosota-1 drugs with F.L, G.Y., A.M.L., J.P.G., J.S., and Y.W. as inventors..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6034-2174
  2. Joseph Gallant

    Pharmacology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States
    Competing interests
    Joseph Gallant, The University of Minnesota has filed a patent on Nanosota-1 drugs with F.L, G.Y., A.M.L., J.P.G., J.S., and Y.W. as inventors..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4943-1744
  3. Jian Zheng

    Microbiology and Immunology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Christopher Massey

    Institutional Office of Regulated Nonclinical Studies, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston,, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Ke Shi

    Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Wanbo Tai

    New York Blood Center, Lindsley F Kimball Research Institute, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9864-8993
  7. Abby Odle

    Microbiology and Immunology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Molly Vickers

    Microbiology and Immunology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Jian Shang

    Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, United States
    Competing interests
    Jian Shang, The University of Minnesota has filed a patent on Nanosota-1 drugs with F.L, G.Y., A.M.L., J.P.G., J.S., and Y.W. as inventors..
  10. Yushun Wan

    Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, United States
    Competing interests
    Yushun Wan, The University of Minnesota has filed a patent on Nanosota-1 drugs with F.L, G.Y., A.M.L., J.P.G., J.S., and Y.W. as inventors..
  11. Lanying Du Dr.

    Viral Immunology Laboratory, Lindsley F Kimball Research Institute, New York Blood Center, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Hideki Aihara

    Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7508-6230
  13. Stanley Perlman

    Microbiology and Immunology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Aaron LeBeau

    Pharmacology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States
    For correspondence
    alebeau@umn.edu
    Competing interests
    Aaron LeBeau, The University of Minnesota has filed a patent on Nanosota-1 drugs with F.L, G.Y., A.M.L., J.P.G., J.S., and Y.W. as inventors..
  15. Fang Li

    Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, United States
    For correspondence
    lifang@umn.edu
    Competing interests
    Fang Li, The University of Minnesota has filed a patent on Nanosota-1 drugs with F.L, G.Y., A.M.L., J.P.G., J.S., and Y.W. as inventors..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1958-366X

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R01AI157975)

  • Lanying Du Dr.
  • Stanley Perlman
  • Aaron LeBeau
  • Fang Li

National Institutes of Health (R01AI089728)

  • Fang Li

National Institutes of Health (R35GM118047)

  • Hideki Aihara

University of Minnesota

  • Fang Li

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. John W Schoggins, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols of the University of Texas Medical Branch (protocol number 2007072), of the New York Blood Center (protocol number 194.22), of the University of Iowa (protocol number 9051795), and of the University of Minnesota (protocol number 2009-38426A).

Version history

  1. Received: November 11, 2020
  2. Preprint posted: November 17, 2020 (view preprint)
  3. Accepted: July 28, 2021
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: August 2, 2021 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: August 10, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2021, Ye et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,847
    views
  • 397
    downloads
  • 40
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Gang Ye
  2. Joseph Gallant
  3. Jian Zheng
  4. Christopher Massey
  5. Ke Shi
  6. Wanbo Tai
  7. Abby Odle
  8. Molly Vickers
  9. Jian Shang
  10. Yushun Wan
  11. Lanying Du Dr.
  12. Hideki Aihara
  13. Stanley Perlman
  14. Aaron LeBeau
  15. Fang Li
(2021)
The Development of Nanosota-1 as anti-SARS-CoV-2 nanobody drug candidates
eLife 10:e64815.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64815

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64815

Further reading

    1. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Alexander D Cook, Mark Carrington, Matthew K Higgins
    Research Article

    African trypanosomes replicate within infected mammals where they are exposed to the complement system. This system centres around complement C3, which is present in a soluble form in serum but becomes covalently deposited onto the surfaces of pathogens after proteolytic cleavage to C3b. Membrane-associated C3b triggers different complement-mediated effectors which promote pathogen clearance. To counter complement-mediated clearance, African trypanosomes have a cell surface receptor, ISG65, which binds to C3b and which decreases the rate of trypanosome clearance in an infection model. However, the mechanism by which ISG65 reduces C3b function has not been determined. We reveal through cryogenic electron microscopy that ISG65 has two distinct binding sites for C3b, only one of which is available in C3 and C3d. We show that ISG65 does not block the formation of C3b or the function of the C3 convertase which catalyses the surface deposition of C3b. However, we show that ISG65 forms a specific conjugate with C3b, perhaps acting as a decoy. ISG65 also occludes the binding sites for complement receptors 2 and 3, which may disrupt recruitment of immune cells, including B cells, phagocytes, and granulocytes. This suggests that ISG65 protects trypanosomes by combining multiple approaches to dampen the complement cascade.

    1. Medicine
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Yi-Shin Chang, Kai Huang ... David L Perkins
    Research Article

    Background:

    End-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients experience immune compromise characterized by complex alterations of both innate and adaptive immunity, and results in higher susceptibility to infection and lower response to vaccination. This immune compromise, coupled with greater risk of exposure to infectious disease at hemodialysis (HD) centers, underscores the need for examination of the immune response to the COVID-19 mRNA-based vaccines.

    Methods:

    The immune response to the COVID-19 BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine was assessed in 20 HD patients and cohort-matched controls. RNA sequencing of peripheral blood mononuclear cells was performed longitudinally before and after each vaccination dose for a total of six time points per subject. Anti-spike antibody levels were quantified prior to the first vaccination dose (V1D0) and 7 d after the second dose (V2D7) using anti-spike IgG titers and antibody neutralization assays. Anti-spike IgG titers were additionally quantified 6 mo after initial vaccination. Clinical history and lab values in HD patients were obtained to identify predictors of vaccination response.

    Results:

    Transcriptomic analyses demonstrated differing time courses of immune responses, with prolonged myeloid cell activity in HD at 1 wk after the first vaccination dose. HD also demonstrated decreased metabolic activity and decreased antigen presentation compared to controls after the second vaccination dose. Anti-spike IgG titers and neutralizing function were substantially elevated in both controls and HD at V2D7, with a small but significant reduction in titers in HD groups (p<0.05). Anti-spike IgG remained elevated above baseline at 6 mo in both subject groups. Anti-spike IgG titers at V2D7 were highly predictive of 6-month titer levels. Transcriptomic biomarkers after the second vaccination dose and clinical biomarkers including ferritin levels were found to be predictive of antibody development.

    Conclusions:

    Overall, we demonstrate differing time courses of immune responses to the BTN162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in maintenance HD subjects comparable to healthy controls and identify transcriptomic and clinical predictors of anti-spike IgG titers in HD. Analyzing vaccination as an in vivo perturbation, our results warrant further characterization of the immune dysregulation of ESRD.

    Funding:

    F30HD102093, F30HL151182, T32HL144909, R01HL138628. This research has been funded by the University of Illinois at Chicago Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCTS) award UL1TR002003.