Unique integrated stress response sensors regulate cancer cell susceptibility when Hsp70 activity is compromised
Abstract
AMPK, AMP-activated protein Kinase; AKT, AK strain Transforming serine/threonine kinase; ASNS, asparagine synthetase; ATF4, activating transcription factor 4; ATF6, activating transcription factor 6; BiP, Immunoglobulin Binding Protein; CHOP, C/EBP homologous protein; CQ, chloroquine; DTT, 1,4-Dithiothreitol; EBSS, Earle's balanced salt solution; eIF2α, eukaryotic initiation factor 2 alpha; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; ERAD, endoplasmic reticulum associated degradation; FBS, fetal bovine serum; GCN2, general control non-derepressible 2 factor; GFP, green fluorescent protein; HER2, epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HIF1α, Hypoxia Inducible Factor 1 Subunit Alpha; HRI, heme-regulated inhibitor kinase; Hsp70, heat shock protein 70; IRE1, inositol-required enzyme 1; ISR, integrated stress response; MAL3-101, phenylmethyl 4-[1,1'-biphenyl]-4-yl-1-[6-[[2-(butylamino)-1-[3-(methoxycarbonyl)-4-(2-methoxy-2-oxoethoxy)phenyl]-2-oxoethyl]hexylamino]-6-oxohexyl]-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-6-methyl-2-oxo-5-pyrimidinecarboxylate; mTOR, mechanistic Target Of Rapamycin; PBS, phosphate buffered saline; PERK, PKR-like endoplasmic reticulum resident kinase; PI, propidium iodide; PKR, Protein Kinase RNA-activated; RFP, red fluorescent protein; RPPA, Reverse Phase Protein Array; S6K, 70‐kDa ribosomal protein S6 kinase; TNBC, triple negative breast cancer; UPR, unfolded protein response; XbpI, X-box binding protein 1.
Data availability
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and source files.
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
European Molecular Biology Laboratory (post-doctoral fellowship (ALTF 823-2016))
- Sara Sannino
National Institutes of Health (F30CA250167)
- Megan E Yates
National Institutes of Health (GM131732)
- Jeffrey L Brodsky
National Institutes of Health (DK79307)
- Jeffrey L Brodsky
National Institutes of Health (P30CA047904)
- Jeffrey L Brodsky
Howard Hughes Medical Institute (Howard Hughes Medical Institute Collaborative Innovation award)
- Jeffrey L Brodsky
University of Pittsburgh (Translational and Precision Pharmacology programs (pilot grant))
- Jeffrey L Brodsky
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Copyright
© 2021, Sannino et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 2,531
- views
-
- 393
- downloads
-
- 17
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Cancer Biology
- Cell Biology
Understanding the cell cycle at the single-cell level is crucial for cellular biology and cancer research. While current methods using fluorescent markers have improved the study of adherent cells, non-adherent cells remain challenging. In this study, we addressed this gap by combining a specialized surface to enhance cell attachment, the FUCCI(CA)2 sensor, an automated image analysis pipeline, and a custom machine learning algorithm. This approach enabled precise measurement of cell cycle phase durations in non-adherent cells. This method was validated in acute myeloid leukemia cell lines NB4 and Kasumi-1, which have unique cell cycle characteristics, and we tested the impact of cell cycle-modulating drugs on NB4 cells. Our cell cycle analysis system, which is also compatible with adherent cells, is fully automated and freely available, providing detailed insights from hundreds of cells under various conditions. This report presents a valuable tool for advancing cancer research and drug development by enabling comprehensive, automated cell cycle analysis in both adherent and non-adherent cells.
-
- Cell Biology
Multiple gut antimicrobial mechanisms are coordinated in space and time to efficiently fight foodborne pathogens. In Drosophila melanogaster, production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) together with intestinal cell renewal play a key role in eliminating gut microbes. A complementary mechanism would be to isolate and treat pathogenic bacteria while allowing colonization by commensals. Using real-time imaging to follow the fate of ingested bacteria, we demonstrate that while commensal Lactiplantibacillus plantarum freely circulate within the intestinal lumen, pathogenic strains such as Erwinia carotovora or Bacillus thuringiensis, are blocked in the anterior midgut where they are rapidly eliminated by antimicrobial peptides. This sequestration of pathogenic bacteria in the anterior midgut requires the Duox enzyme in enterocytes, and both TrpA1 and Dh31 in enteroendocrine cells. Supplementing larval food with hCGRP, the human homolog of Dh31, is sufficient to block the bacteria, suggesting the existence of a conserved mechanism. While the immune deficiency (IMD) pathway is essential for eliminating the trapped bacteria, it is dispensable for the blockage. Genetic manipulations impairing bacterial compartmentalization result in abnormal colonization of posterior midgut regions by pathogenic bacteria. Despite a functional IMD pathway, this ectopic colonization leads to bacterial proliferation and larval death, demonstrating the critical role of bacteria anterior sequestration in larval defense. Our study reveals a temporal orchestration during which pathogenic bacteria, but not innocuous, are confined in the anterior part of the midgut in which they are eliminated in an IMD-pathway-dependent manner.