Learning to stand with unexpected sensorimotor delays

  1. Brandon G Rasman
  2. Patrick A Forbes
  3. Ryan M Peters
  4. Oscar Ortiz
  5. Ian Franks
  6. J Timothy Inglis
  7. Romeo Chua
  8. Jean-Sebastien Blouin  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Otago, New Zealand
  2. Erasmus University Medical Centre, Netherlands
  3. University of Calgary, Canada
  4. University of New Brunswick, Canada
  5. University of British Columbia, Canada

Abstract

Human standing balance relies on self-motion estimates that are used by the nervous system to detect unexpected movements and enable corrective responses and adaptations in control. These estimates must accommodate for inherent delays in sensory and motor pathways. Here, we used a robotic system to simulate human standing in the anteroposterior direction about the ankles and impose sensorimotor delays into the control of balance. Imposed delays destabilized standing, but through training, participants adapted and re-learned to balance with the delays. Before training, imposed delays attenuated vestibular contributions to balance and triggered perceptions of unexpected standing motion, suggesting increased uncertainty in the internal self-motion estimates. After training, vestibular contributions partially returned to baseline levels and larger delays were needed to evoke perceptions of unexpected standing motion. Through learning, the nervous system accommodates balance sensorimotor delays by causally linking whole-body sensory feedback (initially interpreted as imposed motion) to self-generated balance motor commands.

Data availability

We have created a Dataverse link for the source files needed to generate the group result figures. This can be found at https://doi.org/10.5683/SP2/IKX9ML. Source files will be published and publicly available upon acceptance for publication.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Brandon G Rasman

    School of Physical Education, Sport, and Exercise Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8031-8320
  2. Patrick A Forbes

    Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0230-9971
  3. Ryan M Peters

    Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Oscar Ortiz

    Faculty of Kinesiology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Ian Franks

    School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. J Timothy Inglis

    School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Romeo Chua

    School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Jean-Sebastien Blouin

    School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
    For correspondence
    jsblouin@mail.ubc.ca
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0046-4051

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Graduate Student Scholarship)

  • Brandon G Rasman

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO #016. Veni. 188.049)

  • Patrick A Forbes

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN-2020-05438)

  • Jean-Sebastien Blouin

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Noah J Cowan, Johns Hopkins University, United States

Ethics

Human subjects: The experimental protocol was verbally explained before the experiment and written informed consent was obtained. The experiments were approved by the University of British Columbia Human Research Ethics Committee and conformed to the Declaration of Helsinki, with the exception of registration to a database.

Version history

  1. Received: November 22, 2020
  2. Accepted: August 4, 2021
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: August 10, 2021 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: September 29, 2021 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record updated: October 5, 2021 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2021, Rasman et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,308
    views
  • 222
    downloads
  • 13
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Brandon G Rasman
  2. Patrick A Forbes
  3. Ryan M Peters
  4. Oscar Ortiz
  5. Ian Franks
  6. J Timothy Inglis
  7. Romeo Chua
  8. Jean-Sebastien Blouin
(2021)
Learning to stand with unexpected sensorimotor delays
eLife 10:e65085.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65085

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65085

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Elissavet Chartampila, Karim S Elayouby ... Helen E Scharfman
    Research Article

    Maternal choline supplementation (MCS) improves cognition in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) models. However, the effects of MCS on neuronal hyperexcitability in AD are unknown. We investigated the effects of MCS in a well-established mouse model of AD with hyperexcitability, the Tg2576 mouse. The most common type of hyperexcitability in Tg2576 mice are generalized EEG spikes (interictal spikes [IIS]). IIS also are common in other mouse models and occur in AD patients. In mouse models, hyperexcitability is also reflected by elevated expression of the transcription factor ∆FosB in the granule cells (GCs) of the dentate gyrus (DG), which are the principal cell type. Therefore, we studied ΔFosB expression in GCs. We also studied the neuronal marker NeuN within hilar neurons of the DG because reduced NeuN protein expression is a sign of oxidative stress or other pathology. This is potentially important because hilar neurons regulate GC excitability. Tg2576 breeding pairs received a diet with a relatively low, intermediate, or high concentration of choline. After weaning, all mice received the intermediate diet. In offspring of mice fed the high choline diet, IIS frequency declined, GC ∆FosB expression was reduced, and hilar NeuN expression was restored. Using the novel object location task, spatial memory improved. In contrast, offspring exposed to the relatively low choline diet had several adverse effects, such as increased mortality. They had the weakest hilar NeuN immunoreactivity and greatest GC ΔFosB protein expression. However, their IIS frequency was low, which was surprising. The results provide new evidence that a diet high in choline in early life can improve outcomes in a mouse model of AD, and relatively low choline can have mixed effects. This is the first study showing that dietary choline can regulate hyperexcitability, hilar neurons, ΔFosB, and spatial memory in an animal model of AD.

    1. Neuroscience
    Guozheng Feng, Yiwen Wang ... Ni Shu
    Research Article

    Brain structural circuitry shapes a richly patterned functional synchronization, supporting for complex cognitive and behavioural abilities. However, how coupling of structural connectome (SC) and functional connectome (FC) develops and its relationships with cognitive functions and transcriptomic architecture remain unclear. We used multimodal magnetic resonance imaging data from 439 participants aged 5.7–21.9 years to predict functional connectivity by incorporating intracortical and extracortical structural connectivity, characterizing SC–FC coupling. Our findings revealed that SC–FC coupling was strongest in the visual and somatomotor networks, consistent with evolutionary expansion, myelin content, and functional principal gradient. As development progressed, SC–FC coupling exhibited heterogeneous alterations dominated by an increase in cortical regions, broadly distributed across the somatomotor, frontoparietal, dorsal attention, and default mode networks. Moreover, we discovered that SC–FC coupling significantly predicted individual variability in general intelligence, mainly influencing frontoparietal and default mode networks. Finally, our results demonstrated that the heterogeneous development of SC–FC coupling is positively associated with genes in oligodendrocyte-related pathways and negatively associated with astrocyte-related genes. This study offers insight into the maturational principles of SC–FC coupling in typical development.