Nucleo-cytoplasmic shuttling of splicing factor SRSF1 is required for development and cilia function

  1. Fiona Haward
  2. Magdalena M Maslon
  3. Patricia L Yeyati
  4. Nicolas Bellora
  5. Jan Niklas Hansen
  6. Stuart Aitken
  7. Jennifer Lawson
  8. Alex von Kriegsheim
  9. Dagmar Wachten
  10. Pleasantine Mill  Is a corresponding author
  11. Ian R Adams
  12. Javier F Caceres  Is a corresponding author
  1. Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  2. National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Argentina
  3. Institute of Innate Immunity, Biophysical Imaging, Medical Faculty, Germany
  4. Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, United Kingdom

Abstract

Shuttling RNA-binding proteins coordinate nuclear and cytoplasmic steps of gene expression. The SR family proteins regulate RNA splicing in the nucleus and a subset of them, including SRSF1, shuttles between the nucleus and cytoplasm affecting post-splicing processes. However, the physiological significance of this remains unclear. Here, we used genome editing to knock-in a nuclear retention signal (NRS) in Srsf1 to create a mouse model harboring an SRSF1 protein that is retained exclusively in the nucleus. Srsf1NRS/NRS mutants displayed small body size, hydrocephalus and immotile sperm, all traits associated with ciliary defects. We observed reduced translation of a subset of mRNAs and decreased abundance of proteins involved in multiciliogenesis, with disruption of ciliary ultrastructure and motility in cells and tissues derived from this mouse model. These results demonstrate that SRSF1 shuttling is used to reprogram gene expression networks in the context of high cellular demands, as observed here, during motile ciliogenesis.

Data availability

Total RNA-seq data related to splicing analysis have been deposited in GEO under accession code GSE157269G. Polysomal, monosomal and cytoplasmic RNA-sequencing data have been deposited in GEO under accession code GSE161828. The mass spectrometry proteomics data is presented as LFQ values in the form of Excel tables in Figure 4-source data 1 and in Figure 4-figure supplement 1-source data 1. The complete raw datasests can be downloaded from ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD019859. Cilia motility data analyzed in Fiji using the custom-written ImageJ plugin "Cilility_JNH" was deposited in zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5138072).

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Fiona Haward

    MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9048-5600
  2. Magdalena M Maslon

    MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1050-1306
  3. Patricia L Yeyati

    MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Nicolas Bellora

    Institute of Nuclear Technologies for Health (Intecnus), National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), 8400 Bariloche, Argentina
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6637-3465
  5. Jan Niklas Hansen

    Institute of Innate Immunity, Biophysical Imaging, Medical Faculty, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0489-7535
  6. Stuart Aitken

    MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Jennifer Lawson

    MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Alex von Kriegsheim

    Edinburgh Cancer Research UK Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Dagmar Wachten

    Institute of Innate Immunity, Biophysical Imaging, Medical Faculty, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4800-6332
  10. Pleasantine Mill

    MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    Plesantine.Mill@ed.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Ian R Adams

    MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8838-1271
  12. Javier F Caceres

    MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    Javier.Caceres@ed.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8025-6169

Funding

Medical Research Council (MRC Core funding)

  • Javier F Caceres

H2020 European Research Council (Consolidator grant 866355)

  • Pleasantine Mill

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Germany's Excellence Strategy)

  • Dagmar Wachten

Wellcome Trust (Multiuser Equipment 208402/Z/17)

  • Alex von Kriegsheim

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Douglas L Black, University of California, Los Angeles, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This is stated in the Materials and Methods Section, 'Animal experiments'We followed international, national and institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals. Animal experiments were carried out under UK Home Office Project Licenses PPL 60/4424, PB0DC8431 and P18921CDE in facilities at the University of Edinburgh (PEL 60/2605) and were approved by the University of Edinburgh animal welfare and ethical review body.

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: September 4, 2020 (view preprint)
  2. Received: November 23, 2020
  3. Accepted: July 30, 2021
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: August 2, 2021 (version 1)
  5. Accepted Manuscript updated: August 4, 2021 (version 2)
  6. Accepted Manuscript updated: August 5, 2021 (version 3)
  7. Version of Record published: August 9, 2021 (version 4)

Copyright

© 2021, Haward et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,831
    Page views
  • 356
    Downloads
  • 25
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Fiona Haward
  2. Magdalena M Maslon
  3. Patricia L Yeyati
  4. Nicolas Bellora
  5. Jan Niklas Hansen
  6. Stuart Aitken
  7. Jennifer Lawson
  8. Alex von Kriegsheim
  9. Dagmar Wachten
  10. Pleasantine Mill
  11. Ian R Adams
  12. Javier F Caceres
(2021)
Nucleo-cytoplasmic shuttling of splicing factor SRSF1 is required for development and cilia function
eLife 10:e65104.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65104

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65104

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Medicine
    Giulia Leanza, Francesca Cannata ... Nicola Napoli
    Research Article

    Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is associated with higher fracture risk, despite normal or high bone mineral density. We reported that bone formation genes (SOST and RUNX2) and advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) were impaired in T2D. We investigated Wnt signaling regulation and its association with AGEs accumulation and bone strength in T2D from bone tissue of 15 T2D and 21 non-diabetic postmenopausal women undergoing hip arthroplasty. Bone histomorphometry revealed a trend of low mineralized volume in T2D (T2D 0.249% [0.156–0.366]) vs non-diabetic subjects 0.352% [0.269–0.454]; p=0.053, as well as reduced bone strength (T2D 21.60 MPa [13.46–30.10] vs non-diabetic subjects 76.24 MPa [26.81–132.9]; p=0.002). We also showed that gene expression of Wnt agonists LEF-1 (p=0.0136) and WNT10B (p=0.0302) were lower in T2D. Conversely, gene expression of WNT5A (p=0.0232), SOST (p<0.0001), and GSK3B (p=0.0456) were higher, while collagen (COL1A1) was lower in T2D (p=0.0482). AGEs content was associated with SOST and WNT5A (r=0.9231, p<0.0001; r=0.6751, p=0.0322), but inversely correlated with LEF-1 and COL1A1 (r=–0.7500, p=0.0255; r=–0.9762, p=0.0004). SOST was associated with glycemic control and disease duration (r=0.4846, p=0.0043; r=0.7107, p=0.00174), whereas WNT5A and GSK3B were only correlated with glycemic control (r=0.5589, p=0.0037; r=0.4901, p=0.0051). Finally, Young’s modulus was negatively correlated with SOST (r=−0.5675, p=0.0011), AXIN2 (r=−0.5523, p=0.0042), and SFRP5 (r=−0.4442, p=0.0437), while positively correlated with LEF-1 (r=0.4116, p=0.0295) and WNT10B (r=0.6697, p=0.0001). These findings suggest that Wnt signaling and AGEs could be the main determinants of bone fragility in T2D.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Valentin Bohl, Nele Merret Hollmann ... Axel Mogk
    Research Article

    Heat stress can cause cell death by triggering the aggregation of essential proteins. In bacteria, aggregated proteins are rescued by the canonical Hsp70/AAA+ (ClpB) bi-chaperone disaggregase. Man-made, severe stress conditions applied during, e.g., food processing represent a novel threat for bacteria by exceeding the capacity of the Hsp70/ClpB system. Here, we report on the potent autonomous AAA+ disaggregase ClpL from Listeria monocytogenes that provides enhanced heat resistance to the food-borne pathogen enabling persistence in adverse environments. ClpL shows increased thermal stability and enhanced disaggregation power compared to Hsp70/ClpB, enabling it to withstand severe heat stress and to solubilize tight aggregates. ClpL binds to protein aggregates via aromatic residues present in its N-terminal domain (NTD) that adopts a partially folded and dynamic conformation. Target specificity is achieved by simultaneous interactions of multiple NTDs with the aggregate surface. ClpL shows remarkable structural plasticity by forming diverse higher assembly states through interacting ClpL rings. NTDs become largely sequestered upon ClpL ring interactions. Stabilizing ring assemblies by engineered disulfide bonds strongly reduces disaggregation activity, suggesting that they represent storage states.