Transcription-associated topoisomerase 2α activity is a major effector of cytotoxicity induced by G-quadruplex ligands

  1. Madeleine Bossaert
  2. Angélique Pipier
  3. Jean-Francois Riou
  4. Céline Noirot
  5. Linh-Trang Nguyễn
  6. Remy-Felix Serre
  7. Olivier Bouchez
  8. Eric Defrancq
  9. Patrick Calsou
  10. Sébastien Britton
  11. Dennis Gomez  Is a corresponding author
  1. Institut de Pharmacologie et Biologie Structurale, IPBS, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse, France, France
  2. Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, CNRS, INSERM, France
  3. INRAE, UR 875, Genotoul Bioinfo, Castanet-Tolosan, France, France
  4. INRAE, US 1426, Castanet-Tolosan, France, France
  5. UMR CNRS 5250, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble 38058, France, France

Abstract

G-quadruplexes (G4) are non-canonical DNA structures found in the genome of most species including human. Small molecules stabilizing these structures, called G4 ligands, have been identified and, for some of them, shown to induce cytotoxic DNA double-strand breaks. Through the use of an unbiased genetic approach, we identify here topoisomerase 2-alpha (TOP2A) as a major effector of cytotoxicity induced by two clastogenic G4 ligands, pyridostatin and CX-5461, the latter molecule currently undergoing phase I/II clinical trials in oncology. We show that both TOP2 activity and transcription account for DNA break production following G4 ligand treatments. In contrast, clastogenic activity of these G4 ligands is countered by topoisomerase 1 (TOP1), which limits co-transcriptional G4 formation, and by factors promoting transcriptional elongation. Altogether our results support that clastogenic G4 ligands act as DNA structure-driven TOP2-poisons at transcribed regions bearing G4 structures.

Data availability

RNA-seq data from wild-type HAP1 and CXR clones have been deposited on SRA with the project ID PRJNA637883

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Madeleine Bossaert

    Cancer, Institut de Pharmacologie et Biologie Structurale, IPBS, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse, France, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Angélique Pipier

    Cancer, Institut de Pharmacologie et Biologie Structurale, IPBS, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse, France, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8481-2860
  3. Jean-Francois Riou

    Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, CNRS, INSERM, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0055-6506
  4. Céline Noirot

    Unité de Mathématique et Informatique Appliquées, INRAE, UR 875, Genotoul Bioinfo, Castanet-Tolosan, France, Castanet-Tolosan, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Linh-Trang Nguyễn

    Cancer, Institut de Pharmacologie et Biologie Structurale, IPBS, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse, France, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Remy-Felix Serre

    GeT-PlaGe, Genotoul, INRAE, US 1426, Castanet-Tolosan, France, Castanet-Tolosan, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Olivier Bouchez

    GeT-PlaGe, Genotoul,, INRAE, US 1426, Castanet-Tolosan, France, Castanet-Tolosan, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Eric Defrancq

    Département de Chimie Moléculaire, UMR CNRS 5250, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble 38058, France, Grenoble, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Patrick Calsou

    Cancer, Institut de Pharmacologie et Biologie Structurale, IPBS, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse, France, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Sébastien Britton

    Cancer, Institut de Pharmacologie et Biologie Structurale, IPBS, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse, France, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7008-5316
  11. Dennis Gomez

    Cancer, Institut de Pharmacologie et Biologie Structurale, IPBS, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse, France, Toulouse, France
    For correspondence
    dennis.gomez@ipbs.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9942-1451

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-17-CE18-0002-01)

  • Madeleine Bossaert
  • Angélique Pipier
  • Linh-Trang Nguyễn
  • Patrick Calsou
  • Sébastien Britton
  • Dennis Gomez

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-16-CE11-0006-01)

  • Angélique Pipier
  • Jean-Francois Riou
  • Eric Defrancq
  • Patrick Calsou
  • Sébastien Britton
  • Dennis Gomez

CANCEROPOLE GSO (Emergence funding CX-Break"")

  • Madeleine Bossaert
  • Angélique Pipier
  • Linh-Trang Nguyễn
  • Patrick Calsou
  • Sébastien Britton
  • Dennis Gomez

Ligue Contre le Cancer (Equipe Labellisée 2018)

  • Madeleine Bossaert
  • Angélique Pipier
  • Linh-Trang Nguyễn
  • Patrick Calsou
  • Sébastien Britton
  • Dennis Gomez

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-10-INBS-09)

  • Céline Noirot
  • Remy-Felix Serre
  • Olivier Bouchez

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2021, Bossaert et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,617
    views
  • 627
    downloads
  • 57
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Madeleine Bossaert
  2. Angélique Pipier
  3. Jean-Francois Riou
  4. Céline Noirot
  5. Linh-Trang Nguyễn
  6. Remy-Felix Serre
  7. Olivier Bouchez
  8. Eric Defrancq
  9. Patrick Calsou
  10. Sébastien Britton
  11. Dennis Gomez
(2021)
Transcription-associated topoisomerase 2α activity is a major effector of cytotoxicity induced by G-quadruplex ligands
eLife 10:e65184.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65184

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65184

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    Ismail M Meraz, Mourad Majidi ... Jack A Roth
    Research Article

    Expression of NPRL2/TUSC4, a tumor-suppressor gene, is reduced in many cancers including NSCLC. Restoration of NPRL2 induces DNA damage, apoptosis, and cell-cycle arrest. We investigated NPRL2 antitumor immune responses in aPD1R/KRAS/STK11mt NSCLC in humanized-mice. Humanized-mice were generated by transplanting fresh human cord blood-derived CD34 stem cells into sub-lethally irradiated NSG mice. Lung-metastases were developed from KRAS/STK11mt/aPD1R A549 cells and treated with NPRL2 w/wo pembrolizumab. NPRL2-treatment reduced lung metastases significantly, whereas pembrolizumab was ineffective. Antitumor effect was greater in humanized than non-humanized-mice. NPRL2 + pembrolizumab was not synergistic in KRAS/STK11mt/aPD1R tumors but was synergistic in KRASwt/aPD1S H1299. NPRL2 also showed a significant antitumor effect on KRASmt/aPD1R LLC2 syngeneic-tumors. The antitumor effect was correlated with increased infiltration of human cytotoxic-T, HLA-DR+DC, CD11c+DC, and downregulation of myeloid and regulatory-T cells in TME. Antitumor effect was abolished upon in-vivo depletion of CD8-T, macrophages, and CD4-T cells whereas remained unaffected upon NK-cell depletion. A distinctive protein-expression profile was found after NPRL2 treatment. IFNγ, CD8b, and TBX21 associated with T-cell functions were significantly increased, whereas FOXP3, TGFB1/B2, and IL-10RA were strongly inhibited by NPRL2. A list of T-cell co-inhibitory molecules was also downregulated. Restoration of NPRL2 exhibited significantly slower tumor growth in humanized-mice, which was associated with increased presence of human cytotoxic-T, and DC and decreased percentage of Treg, MDSC, and TAM in TME. NPRL2-stable cells showed a substantial increase in colony-formation inhibition and heightened sensitivity to carboplatin. Stable-expression of NPRL2 resulted in the downregulation of MAPK and AKT-mTOR signaling. Taken-together, NPRL2 gene-therapy induces antitumor activity on KRAS/STK11mt/aPD1R tumors through DC-mediated antigen-presentation and cytotoxic immune-cell activation.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Cancer Biology
    Flavie Coquel, Sing-Zong Ho ... Philippe Pasero
    Research Article

    Cancer cells display high levels of oncogene-induced replication stress (RS) and rely on DNA damage checkpoint for viability. This feature is exploited by cancer therapies to either increase RS to unbearable levels or inhibit checkpoint kinases involved in the DNA damage response. Thus far, treatments that combine these two strategies have shown promise but also have severe adverse effects. To identify novel, better-tolerated anticancer combinations, we screened a collection of plant extracts and found two natural compounds from the plant, Psoralea corylifolia, that synergistically inhibit cancer cell proliferation. Bakuchiol inhibited DNA replication and activated the checkpoint kinase CHK1 by targeting DNA polymerases. Isobavachalcone interfered with DNA double-strand break repair by inhibiting the checkpoint kinase CHK2 and DNA end resection. The combination of bakuchiol and isobavachalcone synergistically inhibited cancer cell proliferation in vitro. Importantly, it also prevented tumor development in xenografted NOD/SCID mice. The synergistic effect of inhibiting DNA replication and CHK2 signaling identifies a vulnerability of cancer cells that might be exploited by using clinically approved inhibitors in novel combination therapies.