Modeling hepatitis C virus kinetics during liver transplantation reveals the role of the liver in virus clearance

  1. Louis Shekhtman
  2. Miquel Navasa
  3. Natasha Sansone
  4. Gonzalo Crespo
  5. Gitanjali Subramanya
  6. Tje Lin Chung
  7. E Fabian Cardozo-Ojeda
  8. Sofia Pérez-del-Pulgar
  9. Alan S Perelson
  10. Scott J Cotler
  11. Xavier Forns
  12. Susan L Uprichard  Is a corresponding author
  13. Harel Dahari  Is a corresponding author
  1. Loyola University Medical Center, Stritch School of Medicine, United States
  2. University of Barcelona, Spain
  3. University of Illinois, Chicago, United States
  4. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, United States
  5. Los Alamos National Laboratory, United States

Abstract

While the liver, specifically hepatocytes, are widely accepted as the main source of hepatitis C virus (HCV) production, the role of the liver/hepatocytes in clearance of circulating HCV remains unknown. Frequent HCV kinetic data were recorded and mathematically modeled from 5 liver-transplant patients throughout the anhepatic (absence of liver) phase and for 4 hours post-reperfusion. During the anhepatic phase, HCV remained at pre-anhepatic levels (n=3) or declined (n=2) with t1/2~1h. Immediately post-reperfusion, virus declined in a biphasic manner in 4 patients consisting of a rapid decline (t1/2=5min) followed by a slower decline (t1/2=67min). Consistent with the majority of patients in the anhepatic phase, when we monitored HCV clearance at 37°C from culture medium in the absence/presence of chronically infected hepatoma cells that were inhibited from secreting HCV, the HCV t1/2 in cell culture was longer in the absence of chronically HCV-infected cells. The results suggest that the liver plays a major role in the clearance of circulating HCV and that hepatocytes may be involved.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Louis Shekhtman

    Division of Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Loyola University Medical Center, Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5273-8363
  2. Miquel Navasa

    Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS and CIBEREHD, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Natasha Sansone

    Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Illinois, Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Gonzalo Crespo

    Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS and CIBEREHD, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Gitanjali Subramanya

    Division of Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Loyola University Medical Center, Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Tje Lin Chung

    Division of Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Loyola University Medical Center, Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. E Fabian Cardozo-Ojeda

    Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8690-9896
  8. Sofia Pérez-del-Pulgar

    Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS and CIBEREHD, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Alan S Perelson

    Theoretical Biology and Biophysics, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Scott J Cotler

    Division of Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Loyola University Medical Center, Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Xavier Forns

    3Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS and CIBEREHD, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    Xavier Forns, XF acted as advisor for Gilead and AbbVie.
  12. Susan L Uprichard

    Division of Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Loyola University Medical Center, Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, United States
    For correspondence
    suprichard@luc.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5691-1557
  13. Harel Dahari

    Division of Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Loyola University Medical Center, Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, United States
    For correspondence
    hdahari@luc.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

Funding

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01-AI078881)

  • Susan L Uprichard

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01-AI116868)

  • Alan S Perelson

Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI15/00151 and PI13/00155)

  • Xavier Forns

Secretaria d'Universitats i Recerca del Departament d'Economia i Coneixement (grant 2017_SGR_1753)

  • Xavier Forns

CERCA Programme/Generalitat de Catalunya

  • Xavier Forns

Germany Academic Exchange Service

  • Tje Lin Chung

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: The study was approved by the Ethics Committee at Hospital Clinic Barcelona (Record 2010/5810) and all patients provided a written informed consent.

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 551
    views
  • 91
    downloads
  • 4
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Louis Shekhtman
  2. Miquel Navasa
  3. Natasha Sansone
  4. Gonzalo Crespo
  5. Gitanjali Subramanya
  6. Tje Lin Chung
  7. E Fabian Cardozo-Ojeda
  8. Sofia Pérez-del-Pulgar
  9. Alan S Perelson
  10. Scott J Cotler
  11. Xavier Forns
  12. Susan L Uprichard
  13. Harel Dahari
(2021)
Modeling hepatitis C virus kinetics during liver transplantation reveals the role of the liver in virus clearance
eLife 10:e65297.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65297

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65297

Further reading

    1. Immunology and Inflammation
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Benita Martin-Castaño, Patricia Diez-Echave ... Julio Galvez
    Research Article

    Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a respiratory illness caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) that displays great variability in clinical phenotype. Many factors have been described to be correlated with its severity, and microbiota could play a key role in the infection, progression, and outcome of the disease. SARS-CoV-2 infection has been associated with nasopharyngeal and gut dysbiosis and higher abundance of opportunistic pathogens. To identify new prognostic markers for the disease, a multicentre prospective observational cohort study was carried out in COVID-19 patients divided into three cohorts based on symptomatology: mild (n = 24), moderate (n = 51), and severe/critical (n = 31). Faecal and nasopharyngeal samples were taken, and the microbiota was analysed. Linear discriminant analysis identified Mycoplasma salivarium, Prevotella dentalis, and Haemophilus parainfluenzae as biomarkers of severe COVID-19 in nasopharyngeal microbiota, while Prevotella bivia and Prevotella timonensis were defined in faecal microbiota. Additionally, a connection between faecal and nasopharyngeal microbiota was identified, with a significant ratio between P. timonensis (faeces) and P. dentalis and M. salivarium (nasopharyngeal) abundances found in critically ill patients. This ratio could serve as a novel prognostic tool for identifying severe COVID-19 cases.

    1. Epidemiology and Global Health
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Bo Zheng, Bronner P Gonçalves ... Caoyi Xue
    Research Article

    Background:

    In many settings, a large fraction of the population has both been vaccinated against and infected by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Hence, quantifying the protection provided by post-infection vaccination has become critical for policy. We aimed to estimate the protective effect against SARS-CoV-2 reinfection of an additional vaccine dose after an initial Omicron variant infection.

    Methods:

    We report a retrospective, population-based cohort study performed in Shanghai, China, using electronic databases with information on SARS-CoV-2 infections and vaccination history. We compared reinfection incidence by post-infection vaccination status in individuals initially infected during the April–May 2022 Omicron variant surge in Shanghai and who had been vaccinated before that period. Cox models were fit to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs).

    Results:

    275,896 individuals were diagnosed with real-time polymerase chain reaction-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in April–May 2022; 199,312/275,896 were included in analyses on the effect of a post-infection vaccine dose. Post-infection vaccination provided protection against reinfection (aHR 0.82; 95% confidence interval 0.79–0.85). For patients who had received one, two, or three vaccine doses before their first infection, hazard ratios for the post-infection vaccination effect were 0.84 (0.76–0.93), 0.87 (0.83–0.90), and 0.96 (0.74–1.23), respectively. Post-infection vaccination within 30 and 90 days before the second Omicron wave provided different degrees of protection (in aHR): 0.51 (0.44–0.58) and 0.67 (0.61–0.74), respectively. Moreover, for all vaccine types, but to different extents, a post-infection dose given to individuals who were fully vaccinated before first infection was protective.

    Conclusions:

    In previously vaccinated and infected individuals, an additional vaccine dose provided protection against Omicron variant reinfection. These observations will inform future policy decisions on COVID-19 vaccination in China and other countries.

    Funding:

    This study was funded the Key Discipline Program of Pudong New Area Health System (PWZxk2022-25), the Development and Application of Intelligent Epidemic Surveillance and AI Analysis System (21002411400), the Shanghai Public Health System Construction (GWVI-11.2-XD08), the Shanghai Health Commission Key Disciplines (GWVI-11.1-02), the Shanghai Health Commission Clinical Research Program (20214Y0020), the Shanghai Natural Science Foundation (22ZR1414600), and the Shanghai Young Health Talents Program (2022YQ076).