Competition between parallel sensorimotor learning systems

  1. Scott T Albert  Is a corresponding author
  2. Jihoon Jang
  3. Shanaathanan Modchalingam
  4. Marius 't Hart
  5. Denise Henriques
  6. Gonzalo Lerner
  7. Valeria Della-Maggiore
  8. Adrian M Haith
  9. John W Krakauer
  10. Reza Shadmehr
  1. Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, United States
  2. York University, Canada
  3. University of Buenos Aires, Argentina
  4. Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, United States

Abstract

Sensorimotor learning is supported by at least two parallel systems: a strategic process that benefits from explicit knowledge, and an implicit process that adapts subconsciously. How do these systems interact? Does one system's contributions suppress the other, or do they operate independently? Here we illustrate that during reaching, implicit and explicit systems both learn from visual target errors. This shared error leads to competition such that an increase in the explicit system's response siphons away resources that are needed for implicit adaptation, thus reducing its learning. As a result, steady-state implicit learning can vary across experimental conditions, due to changes in strategy. Furthermore, strategies can mask changes in implicit learning properties, such as its error sensitivity. These ideas, however, become more complex in conditions where subjects adapt using multiple visual landmarks, a situation which introduces learning from sensory prediction errors in addition to target errors. These two types of implicit errors can oppose each other, leading to another type of competition. Thus, during sensorimotor adaptation, implicit and explicit learning systems compete for a common resource: error.

Data availability

Source data files generated or analyzed during this study, as well as the associated analysis code, are included as supplements to Figures 1-10, as well as their associated Figure Supplements, and have also been deposited in OSF under accession code MZS6A

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Scott T Albert

    Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States
    For correspondence
    scottalbert1@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9140-1077
  2. Jihoon Jang

    Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Shanaathanan Modchalingam

    Department of Kinesiology and Health Science, York University, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Marius 't Hart

    Department of Kinesiology and Health Science, York University, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Denise Henriques

    Department of Kinesiology and Health Science, York University, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Gonzalo Lerner

    Deparamento de Fisiología y Biofísia, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7791-9408
  7. Valeria Della-Maggiore

    Deparamento de Fisiología y Biofísia, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Adrian M Haith

    Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5658-8654
  9. John W Krakauer

    Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4316-1846
  10. Reza Shadmehr

    Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7686-2569

Funding

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (F32NS095706)

  • Scott T Albert

National Science Foundation (CNS-1714623)

  • Reza Shadmehr

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS078311)

  • Reza Shadmehr

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: Informed consent was obtained from all study participants. All human subjects work was approved by the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Institutional Review Board (protocol number NA_00037510) or the York Human Participants Review Sub-committee.

Copyright

© 2022, Albert et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,877
    views
  • 523
    downloads
  • 66
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Scott T Albert
  2. Jihoon Jang
  3. Shanaathanan Modchalingam
  4. Marius 't Hart
  5. Denise Henriques
  6. Gonzalo Lerner
  7. Valeria Della-Maggiore
  8. Adrian M Haith
  9. John W Krakauer
  10. Reza Shadmehr
(2022)
Competition between parallel sensorimotor learning systems
eLife 11:e65361.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65361

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65361

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Célian Bimbard, Flóra Takács ... Philip Coen
    Tools and Resources

    Electrophysiology has proven invaluable to record neural activity, and the development of Neuropixels probes dramatically increased the number of recorded neurons. These probes are often implanted acutely, but acute recordings cannot be performed in freely moving animals and the recorded neurons cannot be tracked across days. To study key behaviors such as navigation, learning, and memory formation, the probes must be implanted chronically. An ideal chronic implant should (1) allow stable recordings of neurons for weeks; (2) allow reuse of the probes after explantation; (3) be light enough for use in mice. Here, we present the ‘Apollo Implant’, an open-source and editable device that meets these criteria and accommodates up to two Neuropixels 1.0 or 2.0 probes. The implant comprises a ‘payload’ module which is attached to the probe and is recoverable, and a ‘docking’ module which is cemented to the skull. The design is adjustable, making it easy to change the distance between probes, the angle of insertion, and the depth of insertion. We tested the implant across eight labs in head-fixed mice, freely moving mice, and freely moving rats. The number of neurons recorded across days was stable, even after repeated implantations of the same probe. The Apollo implant provides an inexpensive, lightweight, and flexible solution for reusable chronic Neuropixels recordings.

    1. Neuroscience
    Ana Fló, Lucas Benjamin ... Ghislaine Dehaene-Lambertz
    Research Article

    Interest in statistical learning in developmental studies stems from the observation that 8-month-olds were able to extract words from a monotone speech stream solely using the transition probabilities (TP) between syllables (Saffran et al., 1996). A simple mechanism was thus part of the human infant’s toolbox for discovering regularities in language. Since this seminal study, observations on statistical learning capabilities have multiplied across domains and species, challenging the hypothesis of a dedicated mechanism for language acquisition. Here, we leverage the two dimensions conveyed by speech –speaker identity and phonemes– to examine (1) whether neonates can compute TPs on one dimension despite irrelevant variation on the other and (2) whether the linguistic dimension enjoys an advantage over the voice dimension. In two experiments, we exposed neonates to artificial speech streams constructed by concatenating syllables while recording EEG. The sequence had a statistical structure based either on the phonetic content, while the voices varied randomly (Experiment 1) or on voices with random phonetic content (Experiment 2). After familiarisation, neonates heard isolated duplets adhering, or not, to the structure they were familiarised with. In both experiments, we observed neural entrainment at the frequency of the regularity and distinct Event-Related Potentials (ERP) to correct and incorrect duplets, highlighting the universality of statistical learning mechanisms and suggesting it operates on virtually any dimension the input is factorised. However, only linguistic duplets elicited a specific ERP component, potentially an N400 precursor, suggesting a lexical stage triggered by phonetic regularities already at birth. These results show that, from birth, multiple input regularities can be processed in parallel and feed different higher-order networks.