NAD+ enhances ribitol and ribose rescue of α-dystroglycan functional glycosylation in human FKRP-mutant myotubes

  1. Carolina Ortiz-Cordero
  2. Alessandro Magli
  3. Neha R Dhoke
  4. Taylor Kuebler
  5. Sridhar Selvaraj
  6. Nelio AJ Oliveira
  7. Haowen Zhou
  8. Yuk Y Sham
  9. Anne G Bang
  10. Rita CR Perlingeiro  Is a corresponding author
  1. Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of Minnesota, United States
  2. Lillehei Heart Institute, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, United States
  3. Stem Cell Institute, University of Minnesota, United States
  4. Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Program, University of Minnesota, United States
  5. Conrad Prebys Center for Chemical Genomics, Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, United States

Decision letter

  1. Christopher Cardozo
    Reviewing Editor
  2. Mone Zaidi
    Senior Editor; Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, United States
  3. Christopher Cardozo
    Reviewer

In the interests of transparency, eLife publishes the most substantive revision requests and the accompanying author responses.

Acceptance summary:

The paper examines several questions regarding a severe form of muscular dystrophy caused by mutations of an enzyme necessary for forming the proper inter-molecular associations that anchor muscle cells to the meshwork of fibers within which they reside. This work elucidates a simple treatment with nutritional supplements using cell culture models. It will be exciting to see how this knowledge translates in other experimental systems.

Decision letter after peer review:

Thank you for submitting your article "NAD+ enhances ribitol and ribose rescue of α-dystroglycan functional glycosylation in FKRP-mutant myotubes" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by two peer reviewers, including Christopher Cardozo as the Reviewing Editor and Reviewer #1, and the evaluation has been overseen by Mone Zaidi as the Senior Editor.

Summary:

In this manuscript, the authors used myotubes derived from iPS cells generated from fibroblasts from a patient with Walker-Warburg syndrome to test the therapeutic potential of pentose phosphate pathway metabolites alone or combined with NAD+ to mitigate the signature biochemical deficit of this disorder, incomplete glycosilation of α-dystroglycan resulting in impaired binding of this protein to laminin. The syndrome is caused by mutations of fukutin-related protein which result in reduced enzymatic activity. The paper biochemically validates this model through its reduced IIH6 99 and laminin binding, and rescue by FKRP transgene introduction. The authors investigate the effect of manipulations of the pentose phosphate shunt through ribose at varying concentrations, its product ribitol and NAD on rescuing the phenotype. The latter is reflected in glycosylation of α-dystroglycan and laminin binding. The rescue was associated with increased ribitol-5-P and CDP ribitol. The rescue, again assayed through reduced IIH6 99 and laminin binding was also enhanced by NAD+, which appeared to act through enhanced ribose, independent of ribitol-5-P and CDP-ribitol. It was compromised by FKRP knockout in FKRP-C318CY myotubes. The paper concludes with possible and reasonable translational suggestions and speculation strongly inviting clinical investigation.

Essential revisions:

The authors are encouraged to consider the following suggestions to improve clarity of the presentation of the data.

Figure 5C: Confirm in the figure or figure legend that experiments done with FKRP KO cells?

Figure 1—figure supplement 1. It seems appropriate to add a description of how karyotyping was done or provide a link to prior literature.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1A and D: it was difficult to discern what is shown in these images (phase contrast, MyHC-immunostaining, or others as appropriate).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65443.sa1

Author response

Essential revisions:

The authors are encouraged to consider the following suggestions to improve clarity of the presentation of the data.

Figure 5C: Confirm in the figure or figure legend that experiments done with FKRP KO cells?

We thank the reviewers for confirming this point. The experiments in Figure 5C were performed using the FKRP KO myotubes. We have revised this figure to make sure this information is clearly conveyed.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1. It seems appropriate to add a description of how karyotyping was done or provide a link to prior literature.

Cytogenetic analysis: Live iPS cells were submitted to the Cytogenomics Core at the University of Minnesota Masonic Cancer Center for G-band karyotype analysis. Cells were treated with colcemid for 3 hours to arrest cells and 20 different metaphases were analyzed at a resolution of 400–450 band level.”

Figure 2—figure supplement 1A and D: it was difficult to discern what is shown in these images (phase contrast, MyHC-immunostaining, or others as appropriate).

We thank the reviewers for bringing this up. We have revised the figure legend to clarify that images represent phase contrast, as shown below.

“Figure 2—figure supplement 1. Ribitol and ribose dose-response studies in iPS cell-derived myotubes.[…] (E) Western blot shows IIH6 immunoreactivity. β-DG was used as loading control. Scale bar, 200μm.”

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65443.sa2

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Carolina Ortiz-Cordero
  2. Alessandro Magli
  3. Neha R Dhoke
  4. Taylor Kuebler
  5. Sridhar Selvaraj
  6. Nelio AJ Oliveira
  7. Haowen Zhou
  8. Yuk Y Sham
  9. Anne G Bang
  10. Rita CR Perlingeiro
(2021)
NAD+ enhances ribitol and ribose rescue of α-dystroglycan functional glycosylation in human FKRP-mutant myotubes
eLife 10:e65443.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65443

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65443