A low Smc flux avoids collisions and facilitates chromosome organization in B. subtilis

  1. Anna Anchimiuk
  2. Virginia S Lioy
  3. Florian Patrick Bock
  4. Anita Minnen
  5. Frederic Boccard
  6. Stephan Gruber  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Lausanne, Switzerland
  2. Université Paris-Saclay, France
  3. Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Germany

Abstract

SMC complexes are widely conserved ATP-powered DNA-loop-extrusion motors indispensable for organizing and faithfully segregating chromosomes. How SMC complexes translocate along DNA for loop extrusion and what happens when two complexes meet on the same DNA molecule is largely unknown. Revealing the origins and the consequences of SMC encounters is crucial for understanding the folding process not only of bacterial, but also of eukaryotic chromosomes. Here, we uncover several factors that influence bacterial chromosome organization by modulating the probability of such clashes. These factors include the number, the strength, and the distribution of Smc loading sites, the residency time on the chromosome, the translocation rate, and the cellular abundance of Smc complexes. By studying various mutants, we show that these parameters are fine-tuned to reduce the frequency of encounters between Smc complexes, presumably as a risk mitigation strategy. Mild perturbations hamper chromosome organization by causing Smc collisions, implying that the cellular capacity to resolve them is limited. Altogether, we identify mechanisms that help to avoid Smc collisions and their resolution by Smc traversal or other potentially risky molecular transactions.

Data availability

All deep sequencing data has been deposited to the NCBI GEO database and will be available at GEO Accession number: GSE163573All other raw data will be made available via Mendeley Data DOI:10.17632/kvjd6nj2bh.2

The following data sets were generated
    1. Anchimiuk A
    2. Gruber S
    (2021) Smc_collisions
    Mendeley Data, V2, doi: 10.17632/kvjd6nj2bh.2.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Anna Anchimiuk

    Department of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Virginia S Lioy

    Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Florian Patrick Bock

    Department of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Anita Minnen

    Chromosome Organisation and Dynamics, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Frederic Boccard

    Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Stephan Gruber

    Department of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
    For correspondence
    stephan.gruber@unil.ch
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0150-0395

Funding

European Reserach Council Horizon 2020 (724482)

  • Stephan Gruber

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-CE12-0013-01)

  • Frederic Boccard

Assocation pour la Recherche contre le Cancer

  • Frederic Boccard

Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems Magdeburg

  • Anita Minnen

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Michael T Laub, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, United States

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: December 4, 2020 (view preprint)
  2. Received: December 4, 2020
  3. Accepted: July 28, 2021
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: August 4, 2021 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: August 11, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2021, Anchimiuk et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 923
    Page views
  • 147
    Downloads
  • 13
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Anna Anchimiuk
  2. Virginia S Lioy
  3. Florian Patrick Bock
  4. Anita Minnen
  5. Frederic Boccard
  6. Stephan Gruber
(2021)
A low Smc flux avoids collisions and facilitates chromosome organization in B. subtilis
eLife 10:e65467.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65467

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65467

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Erandi Velazquez-Miranda, Ming He
    Insight

    Endothelial cell subpopulations are characterized by unique gene expression profiles, epigenetic landscapes and functional properties.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Monica Salinas-Pena, Elena Rebollo, Albert Jordan
    Research Article

    Histone H1 participates in chromatin condensation and regulates nuclear processes. Human somatic cells may contain up to seven histone H1 variants, although their functional heterogeneity is not fully understood. Here, we have profiled the differential nuclear distribution of the somatic H1 repertoire in human cells through imaging techniques including super-resolution microscopy. H1 variants exhibit characteristic distribution patterns in both interphase and mitosis. H1.2, H1.3, and H1.5 are universally enriched at the nuclear periphery in all cell lines analyzed and co-localize with compacted DNA. H1.0 shows a less pronounced peripheral localization, with apparent variability among different cell lines. On the other hand, H1.4 and H1X are distributed throughout the nucleus, being H1X universally enriched in high-GC regions and abundant in the nucleoli. Interestingly, H1.4 and H1.0 show a more peripheral distribution in cell lines lacking H1.3 and H1.5. The differential distribution patterns of H1 suggest specific functionalities in organizing lamina-associated domains or nucleolar activity, which is further supported by a distinct response of H1X or phosphorylated H1.4 to the inhibition of ribosomal DNA transcription. Moreover, H1 variants depletion affects chromatin structure in a variant-specific manner. Concretely, H1.2 knock-down, either alone or combined, triggers a global chromatin decompaction. Overall, imaging has allowed us to distinguish H1 variants distribution beyond the segregation in two groups denoted by previous ChIP-Seq determinations. Our results support H1 variants heterogeneity and suggest that variant-specific functionality can be shared between different cell types.