A low Smc flux avoids collisions and facilitates chromosome organization in B. subtilis
Abstract
SMC complexes are widely conserved ATP-powered DNA-loop-extrusion motors indispensable for organizing and faithfully segregating chromosomes. How SMC complexes translocate along DNA for loop extrusion and what happens when two complexes meet on the same DNA molecule is largely unknown. Revealing the origins and the consequences of SMC encounters is crucial for understanding the folding process not only of bacterial, but also of eukaryotic chromosomes. Here, we uncover several factors that influence bacterial chromosome organization by modulating the probability of such clashes. These factors include the number, the strength, and the distribution of Smc loading sites, the residency time on the chromosome, the translocation rate, and the cellular abundance of Smc complexes. By studying various mutants, we show that these parameters are fine-tuned to reduce the frequency of encounters between Smc complexes, presumably as a risk mitigation strategy. Mild perturbations hamper chromosome organization by causing Smc collisions, implying that the cellular capacity to resolve them is limited. Altogether, we identify mechanisms that help to avoid Smc collisions and their resolution by Smc traversal or other potentially risky molecular transactions.
Data availability
All deep sequencing data has been deposited to the NCBI GEO database and will be available at GEO Accession number: GSE163573All other raw data will be made available via Mendeley Data DOI:10.17632/kvjd6nj2bh.2
-
GEO_Smc_collisionsNCBI GEO, GSE163573.
-
Smc_collisionsMendeley Data, V2, doi: 10.17632/kvjd6nj2bh.2.
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
European Reserach Council Horizon 2020 (724482)
- Stephan Gruber
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-CE12-0013-01)
- Frederic Boccard
Assocation pour la Recherche contre le Cancer
- Frederic Boccard
Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems Magdeburg
- Anita Minnen
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Reviewing Editor
- Michael T Laub, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, United States
Version history
- Preprint posted: December 4, 2020 (view preprint)
- Received: December 4, 2020
- Accepted: July 28, 2021
- Accepted Manuscript published: August 4, 2021 (version 1)
- Version of Record published: August 11, 2021 (version 2)
Copyright
© 2021, Anchimiuk et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 923
- Page views
-
- 147
- Downloads
-
- 13
- Citations
Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Chromosomes and Gene Expression
- Genetics and Genomics
Endothelial cell subpopulations are characterized by unique gene expression profiles, epigenetic landscapes and functional properties.
-
- Cell Biology
- Chromosomes and Gene Expression
Histone H1 participates in chromatin condensation and regulates nuclear processes. Human somatic cells may contain up to seven histone H1 variants, although their functional heterogeneity is not fully understood. Here, we have profiled the differential nuclear distribution of the somatic H1 repertoire in human cells through imaging techniques including super-resolution microscopy. H1 variants exhibit characteristic distribution patterns in both interphase and mitosis. H1.2, H1.3, and H1.5 are universally enriched at the nuclear periphery in all cell lines analyzed and co-localize with compacted DNA. H1.0 shows a less pronounced peripheral localization, with apparent variability among different cell lines. On the other hand, H1.4 and H1X are distributed throughout the nucleus, being H1X universally enriched in high-GC regions and abundant in the nucleoli. Interestingly, H1.4 and H1.0 show a more peripheral distribution in cell lines lacking H1.3 and H1.5. The differential distribution patterns of H1 suggest specific functionalities in organizing lamina-associated domains or nucleolar activity, which is further supported by a distinct response of H1X or phosphorylated H1.4 to the inhibition of ribosomal DNA transcription. Moreover, H1 variants depletion affects chromatin structure in a variant-specific manner. Concretely, H1.2 knock-down, either alone or combined, triggers a global chromatin decompaction. Overall, imaging has allowed us to distinguish H1 variants distribution beyond the segregation in two groups denoted by previous ChIP-Seq determinations. Our results support H1 variants heterogeneity and suggest that variant-specific functionality can be shared between different cell types.